User talk:109.79.68.151
From Wikipedia the free encyclopedia
December 2023
[edit]Hello, I'm TechnoSquirrel69. I noticed that in this edit to Brewster's Millions (1985 film), you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 06:50, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
- I did explain in my edit summary. Mixed to negative is not a good description. The summary was trying to have it both ways. There have been many discussion about this topic at WP:FILM including recently -- 109.79.68.151 (talk) 06:53, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
- Echoing the IP above, @TechnoSquirrel69:, their edit does in fact appear to have an edit summary explaining the reason for the removal. EggRoll97 (talk) 06:58, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
- I'd disagree that their original edit summary was an adequate explanation for their changes, but the second summary was more helpful. Since it's clear they're not vandalizing, I'll let editors more experienced in this area take it from here. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 07:02, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
- Mixed to negative is not good writing, I'm disappointed that you think it needed any more explanation than what I provided (in good faith and to follow the WP:SIMPLE rules to provide an edit summary). I hope you will read the recent discussion I pointed to. -- 109.79.68.151 (talk) 07:05, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
- I did read through the discussion you linked, and I appreciate you for elaborating on your reasoning. As you can see, I have not reverted you again as I don't really have an opinion on the subject, just a desire to fight vandalism. Since it's now clear you're not vandalizing, all good! —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 07:08, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
- Do vandals often provide edit summaries? I thought I was already following the WP:SIMPLE rules and showing plenty of good faith. -- 109.79.68.151 (talk) 07:18, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
- I did read through the discussion you linked, and I appreciate you for elaborating on your reasoning. As you can see, I have not reverted you again as I don't really have an opinion on the subject, just a desire to fight vandalism. Since it's now clear you're not vandalizing, all good! —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 07:08, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
- Mixed to negative is not good writing, I'm disappointed that you think it needed any more explanation than what I provided (in good faith and to follow the WP:SIMPLE rules to provide an edit summary). I hope you will read the recent discussion I pointed to. -- 109.79.68.151 (talk) 07:05, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
- I'd disagree that their original edit summary was an adequate explanation for their changes, but the second summary was more helpful. Since it's clear they're not vandalizing, I'll let editors more experienced in this area take it from here. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 07:02, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
- Echoing the IP above, @TechnoSquirrel69:, their edit does in fact appear to have an edit summary explaining the reason for the removal. EggRoll97 (talk) 06:58, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address. |