User talk:296cherry

From Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

[edit]
Welcome!

Hello, 296cherry, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! Severestorm28 (talk) 01:41, 2 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

296cherry, you are invited to the Teahouse!

[edit]
Teahouse logo

Hi 296cherry! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Nick Moyes (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:01, 3 December 2021 (UTC)

flags

[edit]

See [1] [2]. There is a coat of arms but there are no flags of the viceroyalties. The burgundy cross has no reference. I have replaced it with the first Spanish national flag, which is the last Spanish flag of Peru. If you are going to reverse please add the bibliography. Thanks--Vicentemovil (talk) 17:55, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

That’s fair, thanks for notifying me. 296cherry (talk) 18:10, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Sultanate of Maldives has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Sultanate of Maldives. Thanks! BuySomeApples (talk) 09:25, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sultanate of Maldives has been accepted

[edit]
Sultanate of Maldives, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

BuySomeApples (talk) 10:33, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hooray! Thank you for reviewing my article! 296cherry (talk) 16:04, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

[edit]

You have recently edited a page related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic designated as contentious. This standard message is designed as an introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

  • adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
  • comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
  • follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
  • comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
  • refrain from gaming the system.

Additionally you must be logged-in, have 500 edits and an account age of 30 days and are not allowed to make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on a page within this topic.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

EvergreenFir (talk) 16:07, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]