User talk:Aleksandr Grigoryev

From Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

Welcome![edit]

Hello Aleksandr Grigoryev! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Urania3 22:37, 11 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines

The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

Random Wiki Smile![edit]

-WarthogDemon 06:00, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

United territorial communities[edit]

Oh, Aleksandr! It seems there with the recent addition of the "united territorial communities" (OTT) to the Administrative divisions of Ukraine by Yulia Romero, it throws the page back into chaos. I was discussing with her about this new form of government, and she linked me to an article (https://www.radiosvoboda.org/a/28757609.html), and the article - if my translation was correct - seems to imply that these are in fact not voluntary. It also appears the new law creating them totally redid the administrative divisions of the country. It says the law splits the country into only three divisions, now: Regions, Counties (though, maybe this is still Raion?), and the "Communities." At the same time, it seems that a district would have to meet a certian population threshold to become a "united territorial community". So, in districts that didn't meet the requirement, they'd still be divided into the existing counciles (i.e. cities of district significant, settlement councils, and rural councils). It's also not entirely clear even in those districts that meet the threshold if EVERY community merges into one another, or if each community has a choice to join the OTT. And in that case, what would be the "county" level which oversees the cities left out of the OTT?

I'm probably reading this wrong. If you could read this and let me know what the new law did and didn't do, that would be great. In fact, it'd be nice to see a copy of the law, itself, as that would answer all of these questions. --Criticalthinker (talk) 00:53, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yea, it has been ongoing since 2015 as part of the administrative-territorial reform. It is pretty confusing. But it is not just about the numbers. There is a process that take place behind a scene. One has to follow closely on updates for that certain community that goes through the administrative-territorial reform. I do not really follow on that subject. I might be too sceptical, but it looks to me like as the process with the police reform that was supposed to make impact, but instead turn out to be a change of label and more funds deficiency out of the state budget. About those communities, Ukrainian Wikipedia has pretty good articles with tables and stuff. Aleksandr Grigoryev (talk) 02:55, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Criticalthinker, that is a great article. It is written by former parliamentary and deputy minister Doctor Technical Sciences Mykhailo Pozhyvanov. He points out to the fact that the law goes against to what it is stated in the Constitution of Ukraine. It is pretty clearly proscribed. He also points to what I find awkward that those communities are being created within a district (raion) with the old system of administration. Also those districts could have both and those communities as well as the old councils. According to Dr. Pozhyvanov those new communities are not like community organizations, but rather as organized crime groups that are being united under a bigger landowner who is in the parliament. It sounds simply like a political speculation of someone who is bitter about a loss of something, but there could be some grain of truth. (here is a wikilink to the Ukrainian Wikipedia article about the new and greatest united communities uk:Список об'єднаних територіальних громад України). Aleksandr Grigoryev (talk) 03:20, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Criticalthinker, the whole administrative territorial reform was supposed to take place with the adaptation of the Constitution of Ukraine back in 1996, but was constantly postponed (just like the Ukrainian census that was taken only once in 2001). Aleksandr Grigoryev (talk) 03:25, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Criticalthinker, here is the copy of the law. Aleksandr Grigoryev (talk) 04:46, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Honestly, what I'm interested in is whether the administrative subdivisions page (in English) needs to be updated further to reflect any changes to the existing units at this level (i.e. cities of district significance, settlement councils, and rural councils). What I'm still unsure of is kind of what I talked about above including:
1. Does this level of government merge the existing lower-level councils in the districts that become OTTs, or do they retain their local governance?
2. How exactly is it decided (at which level) which districts become OTTs? Must each constituent council vote affirmatively, or is it decided by a vote of the entire population of the district in a majority vote?
According to Yulia's update of the page, 252 districts have already chosen to become OTTs and have thus already voted in a new council. Elections for another 226 are coming this year and next year. What I'm concerned about is whether the cities, settlements and rural councils in these OTTs cease to exist or not, because they would require a lot of work in updating numbers and such. I want to ask DDima about this, but he doesn't appear to be active at the moment from what I can gather. --Criticalthinker (talk) 05:55, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
So, I have translated down to Article 8 of the law you linked me to. Unfortunately, online translators really stink at English to Ukrainian translations. But what I got is that initially while the existing councils within a district continue to exist, that after a certain amount of time, the OTT can begin to abolish the city, settlement and rural councils within the new territory. As to the question about who and at which level it is decided for a district to become an OTT, this is something less clear to me as the translation is power. It both sounds like that an OTT doesn't have to include every local council in an existing district, and that it can actually include local councils in adjacent districts. So it sounds like the districts aren't necessarily the building buildings of an OTT, rather the local councils themselves. What confuses me is that say every local council but a single on in a district decides to be an OTT; what happens to the district goverment after the other communities become an OTT if there is only one local council left in that former district? Are there any cases of all of the councils of a district wanting to be excluded from an OTT, who becomes the district council over them? Yes, I guess what would be easiest to pick a particular example of an OTT, and see how it was formed and from which local councils it was formed. This would explain a lot. --Criticalthinker (talk) 06:25, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Criticalthinker, you are correct. It is not fully and explicitly proscribed. At this time it is decided to allow local councils to reform into those united communities, and after that we will think about. The main point is that either local councils nor united communities are proscribed in the Constitution of Ukraine, therefore there is no conflict. Supposedly the next step is that those communities will be organized into counties (povits) to replace districts (raions). However, those districts are mentioned in the Constitution as part of the administrative-territorial system in the country. So, in order to start to form those counties, a constitutional reform should take place. Waging a semi-concealed armed conflict with Russia that invaded territories of eastern and south Ukraine, the government of Ukraine avoids to start the constitutional reform. Aleksandr Grigoryev (talk) 15:28, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Criticalthinker, it is not districts that are being reformed into united communities, but rather local councils that are part of districts. The local councils are being encouraged to merge with others becoming united communities. The word «united» is not a random word, it also carries a certain meaning. There is a demographic problem in the country and many local communities are becoming less populated which causes certain issues in regards to public services such as hospitalization, fire services, and other. Aleksandr Grigoryev (talk) 15:35, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Are there any examples of current OTTs and how they relate to the districts of which they are/we a part of? For example, when a city (of district significance) unites with most of its surrounding settlement and rural councils, does the district's government cease to operate? Or does that district's government continue to exist along with the OTT? It sounds like at least initially, the newly formed OTT council is still an administrative level below a district/raion council, but that after the other lower-level councils within the OTT are abolished that it rises to district level? Again, an example of an OTT to see what it's current status is would be very helpful in this discussion. --Criticalthinker (talk) 11:09, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Criticalthinker, I already provided you with an article from the Ukrainian Wikipedia higher. Here it is again: uk:Список об'єднаних територіальних громад України (List of united territorial communities of Ukraine). It looks like someone does follow on the subject and updates the list pretty consistently. Aleksandr Grigoryev (talk) 14:54, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 6[edit]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Podilsko-Voskresensky Bridge (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Focal point

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:12, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Ua-pop-est2011[edit]

Template:Ua-pop-est2011 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 16:30, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 13[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Loktionov, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Roman Loktionov (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:10, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 20[edit]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Ovruch (air base) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Horodok Raion
Shevchenkivskyi District, Kiev (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Lukyanivka

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:26, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 27[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ukraine national football team, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Leonid Tkachenko (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:22, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 3[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 1992 FC Dynamo Kyiv season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Andriy Khomyn (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:49, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Yevhen Zhovtyak for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Yevhen Zhovtyak is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yevhen Zhovtyak until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  M A A Z   T A L K  08:08, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 10[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Avanhard Stadium (Rivne), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lubomirski Palace (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:34, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 19[edit]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Russification of Ukraine (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Novomoskovsk, Kotovsk, Dzerzhynsk and Artemivsk

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:18, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Ukrainian Cossack officers has been nominated for discussion[edit]

Category:Ukrainian Cossack officers, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 23:23, 10 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Ukrainian people of the Thirty Years' War has been nominated for discussion[edit]

Category:Ukrainian people of the Thirty Years' War, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 12:31, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Category:People of Cuman descent has been nominated for discussion[edit]

Category:People of Cuman descent, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 11:10, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Category:People from Wall, Pennsylvania has been nominated for discussion[edit]

Category:People from Wall, Pennsylvania, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 10:05, 1 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Crimean Tatar communities and territories has been nominated for discussion[edit]

Category:Crimean Tatar communities and territories, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 04:56, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 5[edit]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Josyf Slipyj (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Vatican
Myroslav Ivan Lubachivsky (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Vatican

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:04, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard#internetua.com . 2A00:C98:2060:A008:7:0:0:1 (talk) 17:46, 10 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 12[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ukrainian Greek Catholic Church, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Salesian Sisters and Sisters of the Holy Family (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:49, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

WOSO Task Force News: April 2018[edit]

Women's Football / Soccer Task Force News: April 2018


Eniola Aluko of England (in white) and Jovana Mrkić (in red) of Montenegro, 2014
Eniola Aluko of England (in white) and Jovana Mrkić (in red) of Montenegro, 2014

Hello WOSO editors! A few initiatives have been started with an emphasis on making more WOSO links blue (similar to the work that WikiProject Women in Red does) and filling in the gaps within various league, team, and player, etc. articles.

If you're interested in collaborating with others to make more links blue, take a look at the initiatives listed in the box below. Sign up at the bottom of an initiative page and help grow the lists, add potential references, resources, and create the articles ... or create your own initiative.

Did you know ...

WP:GNG takes precedence over WP:NFOOTY (which only includes the players in 1 active women's league)? Often times there is enough media coverage that meets WP:GNG or other notability guidelines. For more information, see WP:WOSO#Notability and be sure to tag the new article talk page with: {{WP Women's sport|footy=yes}}

Current and upcoming seasons for top-division leagues
Current season articles needing creation


Have some new articles in mind or see some that need improvement? Add them to the Open Tasks.

Has an article you worked on been nominated for deletion? See:

Want some tips, assistance, or resources from other WOSO editors?
Leave a message on the task force talk page.

Thank you for your continued contributions to articles related to women's football / soccer (WOSO)!

Women's Football / Soccer Task Force
#wikiwomeninred

Subscribe or Unsubscribe here. Sent by: Hmlarson (talk) 17:53, 18 April 2018 (UTC) [reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 22[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Volodymyr Shcherbytsky, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Plenum (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:49, 22 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on FC Luzhany, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Sir Sputnik (talk) 19:32, 22 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 23[edit]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Kiev Voivodeship (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Czerkasy

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:31, 23 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 30[edit]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Zalishchyky (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Galicia

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:12, 30 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Largest cities of Chernivtsi Oblast[edit]

Template:Largest cities of Chernivtsi Oblast has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. --woodensuperman 15:19, 19 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Largest cities of Donetsk Oblast[edit]

Template:Largest cities of Donetsk Oblast has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. --woodensuperman 15:19, 19 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Largest cities of Luhansk Oblast[edit]

Template:Largest cities of Luhansk Oblast has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. --woodensuperman 15:19, 19 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Largest cities of Mykolaiv Oblast[edit]

Template:Largest cities of Mykolaiv Oblast has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. --woodensuperman 15:19, 19 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Largest cities of Sumy Oblast[edit]

Template:Largest cities of Sumy Oblast has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. --woodensuperman 15:19, 19 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Largest cities of Zakarpattia Oblast[edit]

Template:Largest cities of Zakarpattia Oblast has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. --woodensuperman 15:19, 19 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 25[edit]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Kuban Oblast (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to South Russia
Pavlo Meshyk (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to VMN
Pervomaysk (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Pervomaisc

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:09, 25 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 2[edit]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Florida State Road 527 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Osceola County
Kuban Oblast (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to South Russia
Meadow Woods, Florida (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to CVX

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:19, 2 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia[edit]

Please read WP:COPYWITHIN before copying large chunks from one article to another; better yet, consider how much is really needed at the destination, and summarise. Pinkbeast (talk) 14:22, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Pinkbeast, involvement of Russian so-called "volunteers" (or little and very polite green men) in Bosnian conflict is known very well throughout the post-Soviet states. There is a very well established euphemism of those state-sponsored "volunteers". Yet the article completely lacks that fact. How is that possible? Instead of being added to the main article, information about Russian "volunteers" is only mentioned in some side article. Aleksandr Grigoryev (talk) 16:14, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This has nothing to do with what I said. Please read WP:COPYWITHIN.
As regards the rest, even the giant block of text you added did not in any way suggest the Russians were not volunteers. I'm not saying they were! I am only too well aware that meddling in the rest of Europe did not begin with Vladimir Putin. But if the infobox is going to say it, the article must say it, and if the article is going to say it we must have cites to support it. Pinkbeast (talk) 21:45, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 16[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ukraine, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Andriy Melnyk (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 16 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Donetsian Coal Basin listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Donetsian Coal Basin. Since you had some involvement with the Donetsian Coal Basin redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Toddy1 (talk) 06:12, 29 August 2018 (UTC)