User talk:Antigng

Hi, Antigng. Welcome to Wikipedia! I noticed you've just joined, and wanted to give you a few tips to get you started.

You don't need to read anything - anybody can edit; just go to an article and edit it. Be Bold, but please don't put silly stuff in - it will be removed very quickly, and will annoy people. Ask for help. Edit this page, put {{helpme}} and describe what help you need. Someone will reply very quickly - usually within a few minutes. Edit existing articles, before you make your own. Look at some subjects that you know about, and see if you can make them a bit better. For example, Wikipedia:Cleanup#2009. When you're ready, read about Your first article. It should be about something well-known, and it will need references. Good luck with editing; please drop me a line some time on my own talk page. There's lots of information below. Once again, welcome to the fantastic world of Wikipedia! - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 03:21, 5 February 2015 (UTC)[reply] Getting started A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: edit a page • upload and use images Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Policies and guidelines Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Grade sources • Cite sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The community Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists • Best articles Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Writing articles Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Manual of style Pages needing attention • Peer review The missing manual

Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to Super16 (film school), did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page.

It's great that you have created an account, but your tagging with {{primary sources}} in Super16 (film school) does not apply since all sources used as references are secondary. Considering that you tagged within 2 minutes 18 seconds from your last edit I don't suppose you have actually loaded and read the bulk part of the sources if any. Which level is your understanding of Danish at? Article already had a {{film-org-stub}} in it, so your application of {{stub}} is redundant. And since the article is a six sentence stub, but is sourced with nine references, {{refimprove}} does not apply either. Should you however after having properly read the sources believe that something in the text is not in the citations given, I'd be happy to hear about it. -- Sam ^Sing! 11:06, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Please don't patrol new pages. There is first a lot to be learned at WP:NPP, WP:DELETION, and WP:CSD that you don't know about. Patrolling new pages needs high amount of experience which unfortunately you don't have (yet). You have joined Wikipedia just 22 days ago and has made only ~70 edits which is not enough. Instead, when you have made at least 200 edits to mainspace you can consider enrolling at the WP:CVUA and learning how you can help us fight vandalism. But now, please don't patrol new pages. In this edit for example, you tagged an article with G3 but G3 doesn't applies. So, I ask you to stop patrolling pages. Thank you for understanding. Feel free to contact me or Kudpung (an experienced new page patroller) if you have any question related to new page patrolling. Happy editing! Jim Carter 06:56, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Antigng. Thank you for your work on patrolling new pages and tagging for speedy deletion. I'm just letting you know that I declined your deletion request for Kalaroad, a page that you tagged for speedy deletion, because the criterion you used or the reason you gave does not cover this kind of page. Please take a moment to look at the suggested tasks for patrollers, criteria for speedy deletion, and particularly, the section covering non-criteria. Such pages are best tagged with proposed deletion or proposed deletion for biographies of living persons, or sent to the appropriate deletion discussion. Thanks! Jim Carter 07:07, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Roebling (River Line station). Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. This is an automated message from a bot about this edit, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it.—^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 03:47, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, person from Shanghai, please help me lock all the IP addresses that I used, then I would be not able to visit Wikipedia.org. If you could manage to lock all my IP addresses for ever, then I would say thank you in advance. 175.19.66.5 (talk) 03:35, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. Thank you. MikeM2011 (talk) 02:11, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 03:20, 5 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry if I put your name in the spotlight as I hadn't seen the nominator of a deletion discussion relist something twice. If you do nominate things for deletion that's okay but it is best if someone uninvolved relist the discussion (even if you relisted it once) when no comments come forward. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 14:18, 5 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, I am sorry, I don't name for the theorem is Dao's theorem on six circumcenrs, the theorem name by Nikolaos Dergiades and Telv Cohl, and Paul Yiu(the Editor in Chief of the Journal). The first time, Dao Thanh Oai found and he named the theorem is Another Seven Circle theorem at here Another Seven Circles Theorem,(I mean I publish the first time at there). But Nikolaos Dergiades, and Telv Cohl give the proof and publish, they call theorem is Dao six circumcenter theorem. Why I call theorem is Another seven circle theorem? Because it is like as: Seven circles theorem. Thank to You very much --Hophap124 (talk) 16:46, 6 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Antigng,

I want let you known that the theorem is not Non-notable maginalia with some reseon as follows:

First reason: This theorem is a generalization of Kosnita theorem. When A2,A1 are the same point and A4,A3 are the same point, and A5,A6 are the same point. This theorem become Kosnita theorem. Could you see reson 1 at: Kosnita theorem and Dao's theorem on six circumcenters and Đào Thanh Oai-Francisco Javier Garcia Capitan, AdvancedPlaneGeometry, message 1717, message 1718.

Second reason: If we write only result of the point of cuncurrence (given by the coordinates in A4 page) > 24 pages to wrote result

Third reason I think the theorem is nice as Seven circles theorem and difficulte to proof as Seven circles theorem

Could you help me wrote soem reason above by China language in wiki China?

--Hophap124 (talk) 06:45, 7 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'm happy with your closure of this AfD as a merge, but I'm unclear as to who will do it. As I said in the discussion, I don't feel up to the task because the article is such a mess - in fact I'm not sure if there's anything much there worth merging apart from the general idea that this topic ought to be in the main article. Any ideas? Andyjsmith (talk) 09:10, 20 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I came across the article Loudrage you PRODed. Good call for the PROD btw. However, when the creator is very new, please make sure to leave a more detailed (acronym-free, if possible) reason. Otherwise they panic. An appropriate welcome template, like Template:First article is also a good idea. It gives them the tools to do better next time. Keep up the good work! Happy Squirrel (talk) 15:07, 2 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

a na ta ha cyuugokujin de su ka? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 175.19.66.78 (talk) 15:07, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, annoyance from Shanghai, why can not I visit zh.Wikipedia.org? Are you a Chinese or a Shinajin? This is really a question confused me too a lot, you do really bring me too much trouble! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 221.9.25.58 (talk) 23:34, 6 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your help I could visit zh.Wikipedia.org again! Thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 119.53.117.72 (talk) 05:25, 10 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

OK, guy, to me you are just the fly in the air! But I wanted let you know the next time you (whoever) report me, never mention the city, the province/state, the country what this IP reflects, because I have no responsibility to pay others' bill. You are also less than a penny to me, so never ever set in my way! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 119.53.104.152 (talk) 13:52, 27 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

这位来自北京或上海的效力于什么组织的支那，你能不能给我滚！ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 119.51.187.0 (talk) 07:45, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Henryhx (talk • contribs) 19:37, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Someone has marked Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/Antigng-bot as needing your input. Please visit that page to reply to the requests. Thanks! AnomieBOT⚡ 20:05, 25 June 2016 (UTC) To opt out of these notifications, place {{bots|optout=operatorassistanceneeded}} anywhere on this page.[reply]

Hello, Antigng. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have never committed any vandalism in Chinese Wikipedia. But I was blocked indefinitely by you. And what's more, I didn't abused my talk page before you deprived me of editing completely. Could you tell me what policies or guidelines in the world I have violated? ^[Kidding] --10.68.23.58 (talk) 10:00, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Antigng. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Antigng. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Antigng. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

https://tools.wmflabs.org/trusty-tools/u/antigng lists tools you maintain which need to be manually migrated from the legacy Ubuntu Trusty job grid to the new Debian Stretch job grid. Emails notifying you of this have been bouncing, so updating the email address associated with your Developer account would also be appreciated. --BDavis (WMF) (talk) 02:30, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:18, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is An urgent report about a user:折毛's hoaxes. Thank you. PAVLOV (talk) 15:28, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]