User talk:Aryabhatta

Welcome!

Hello, Aryabhatta, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! RJFJR (talk) 17:25, 8 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Helix Nebula Science Cloud.
• To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via live help, or on the reviewer's talk page

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Puffin ^{Let's talk!} 18:01, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Aryabhatta, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! heather walls (talk) 05:06, 8 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Helix Nebula Science Cloud.
• To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via live help, or on the reviewer's talk page

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! FeralOink (talk) 18:35, 8 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your question in Wikipedia Teahouse related to Helix Nebula Science Cloud has been answered (or replied). You can see here: Wikipedia:Teahouse/Questions#a_sense_of_proportion. Best, --Tito Dutta ^Message 21:43, 22 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, Sarah moved it here as it was not a question. Please don't give up yet! The hosts of the Teahouse are happy to help you get the article ready, they have lots of experience with the seemingly-mysterious requirements. heather walls (talk) 21:51, 22 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I know Sanskrit, and actually have been finding the answer for last few months now.. I was interested to learn the exact pronunciation of t in Aryabhata, is it ट or त? If it is त then the meaning of the name becomes, a person who is representative of Aryan culture.
Another answer I have been searching is the way Aryabhata calculated Pi. Aryabhata used this string: (see details in this section of Aryabhata article)

Add four to 100, multiply by eight, and then add 62,000. By this rule the circumference of a circle with a diameter of 20,000 can be approached ((4 + 100) × 8 + 62000)/20000 = 62832/20000 = 3.1416"

But the thing I have not understood in that Wikipedia article (I am not a contributor there, just a reader), from where Aryabhata got the numbers 4, 100, 8, 62000, 20000? When we say Pi=22/7, we can understand if circumference is 22 unit then diameter will be 7 unit, but, what are these 4, 100, 8, 62000, 20000? Any idea? --Tito Dutta ^Message 23:23, 22 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I am inclined to think that the sum is not mathematical. Clearly the 20,000 diameter is a 10,000 radius, so imagining we don't have decimal points, the natural way to express a truth about the circle relating to 2π is to look at bigger circles

• Radius 1 circumference 6
• Radius 10 circumference 63
• Radius 100 circumference 628
• Radius 1000 circumference 6283
• Radius 10000 circumference 62832

The two questions left are why 62832 is constructed that way - could it be a mnemonic? Or possibly an obscuring device? and how did he calculate the figure? At this point I am overwhelmed by my ignorance, but I think the 20,000 at least is explained. Rich Farmbrough, 02:30, 3 May 2012 (UTC).[reply]

Hi, Aryabhatta, how are you? You have got a reply from one of the reviewers of the article FeralOink, you can see the reply here. If you have any question or comment, you can write/discuss in that section of the talk page. Click on "edit" link at upper right side of the section, and write your comment at the bottom of the section like this: (Yes, I know, you know these very well, but actually I sometimes get confused.. my bad.. :) ). I feel they will be happy to help you. --Tito Dutta ^Message 23:13, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedian, the hardworking hosts and staff at WP:Teahouse would like your feedback! We have created a brief survey meant to help us better understand the experience of new editors on Wikipedia. You are being selected to participate in our survey because you edited the Teahouse Questions or Guests pages sometime in the last few months.

Click here to be taken to the survey site.

The survey should take less than 10 minutes to complete. We really appreciate your feedback, and we look forward to your next vist to the Teahouse!

Happy editing,

J-Mo, Teahouse host

This message was sent via Global message delivery on 00:26, 22 May 2012 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Helix Nebula Science Cloud, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 02:00, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Aryabhatta. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Helix Nebula Science Cloud".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Helix Nebula Science Cloud}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 04:00, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your upload of File:CDwivedi Waterman Brentford 2009.jpg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 14:10, 16 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]