User talk:Brest

My sandbox for images.

mk:Разговор со корисник:Brest
This page is a soft redirect.

I think you misunderstand. It is illegal to use copyrighted text, which this clearly is. I know that isn't always enforced on the internet, but Wikipedia takes intellectual property theft very seriously, and any copies or close paraphrases of websites that are not clearly and explicitly marked as public domain must be removed. To avoid copyright infringement, it would need to be rewritten from scratch, changing the odd sentence won't solve the problem.

Furthermore, the deleted copyright text is not neutral and encyclopaedic. It is promotional in tone and doesn't give any independent sources, Jimfbleak - talk to me? 06:59, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The copied page is clearly marked as © National and University Library "St. Kliment Ohridski" 2001.. I doesn't matter even if pages are not marked as copyright, like the macedonian one you linked, the assumption is that the creator owns the copyright unless it's clearly and explicitly marked as public domain. The very first thing your friend needs to know is that you have to write Wikipedia article in your own words, not just lift them from anywhere you fancy. It's not biting to enforce a legal requirement Jimfbleak - talk to me? 07:27, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It occurs to me that Macedonian law may be different, although I'd be surprised if there is no copyright protection there. However, the Wikipedia servers are in the US, so it's their law that applies Jimfbleak - talk to me? 07:30, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited National and University Library "St. Kliment of Ohrid", you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page IFLA (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:30, 7 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You may be interested in the deletion proposal related to Category: Professionals. Regards, XOttawahitech (talk) 03:20, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:20, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Софија and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 February 25#Софија until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. QuickQuokka ^[talk] 21:46, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]