User talk:Chemicalinterest

This user may have left Wikipedia. Chemicalinterest has not edited Wikipedia since only 2 edits after 2011. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

Talk page archives: 1, 2, 3, 4

Hello Chemicalinterest, what do you mean with this: "How do you get element pictures?" --Alchemist-hp (talk) 22:25, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Oops! Sorry. I was trying to remove the crystal structure, not your picture of the material, which I think is helpful. You can see that I looked into the Co2O3 and it apparently never been crystallized. Oxides are complicated things, but I digress...--Smokefoot (talk) 00:54, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:Rock_Brook.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Chris G Bot (talk) 03:38, 15 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please email me if you have any further problems. --Chemicalinterest (talk) 20:51, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding the image File:MB Branch along South Middlebush Road.JPG; Did you deliberatly post this image sideways? Because if you'd like I can replace it with an upright version before it gets sent off to the commons. ----DanTD (talk) 20:54, 22 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for the late response. I was away for a long time. No. It was taken in my more amateur days of photography. You can flip it if you like. --Chemicalinterest (talk) 20:51, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

 Done. ----DanTD (talk) 15:47, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, this is just to let you know that I have granted you the "autopatrolled" permission. This won't affect your editing, it just automatically marks any page you create as patrolled, benefiting new page patrollers. Please remember:

• This permission does not give you any special status or authority
• Submission of inappropriate material may lead to its removal
• You may wish to display the {{Autopatrolled}} top icon and/or the {{User wikipedia/autopatrolled}} userbox on your user page
• If, for any reason, you decide you do not want the permission, let me know and I can remove it

If you have any questions about the permission, don't hesitate to ask. Otherwise, happy editing! Acalamari 11:22, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I actually don't need this as my editing is practically at a standstill. Goodbye. --Chemicalinterest (talk) 23:01, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Chemicalinterest, I've put the article up for peer review, would you care to take a look at it? Thanks, Lanthanum-138 (talk) 11:08, 16 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for getting back so late. I am on a wikibreak and probably will not review the article any time soon. I can only respond occasionally to queries. --Chemicalinterest (talk) 21:13, 23 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Never mind, User:R8R Gtrs has started. Thanks anyway! Lanthanum-138 (talk) 06:31, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have been unable to locate the photos you uploaded to the neodymium article in the website. However, I have reason to believe that they are labeled incorrectly. The "daylight" and "fluorescent light" photos should be somewhat similar, due to fluorescent emissions from UV, which should be missing in the "incandescent" shot. But that is not what we see! So I don't believe it. Any photo in which incandescent "fluorescence" looks more like daylight than "fluoroscent light" fluorescense does, has got to be wrong. SBHarris 01:03, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Here's the source. Chemicalinterest aka --98.221.179.18 (talk) 10:57, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

These are mislabeled. Although the "tungsten" color is discussed, it is not actually shown! What IS shown is "cold-TL light," which I take it is some type of LED light (google it). The fluorescent light is an energy-saver tube which I take it has the UV and some other components removed, so it's hard to say what's happening. In any case the photos are daylight, energy saver fluorescent, and some kind of white LED. At least put that in. SBHarris 04:14, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I mistakenly thought TL was an abbreviation for tungsten light. --98.221.179.18 (talk) 10:55, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Refer to your talk page at Commons, I have a serious concern with your uploads. — raekyt 01:24, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, do you have any interest in psychoactive chemicals, by any chance? Particularly, hallucinogens? 62.255.129.19 (talk) 21:02, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Umm, no. Although I am an amateur chemist, I am not a meth cook. Psychoactives make a lot of trouble for experimenters, so no thanks to the offer. --Chemicalinterest (talk) 21:08, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I removed the hatnote you put on NuvoSonic pointing to Phosphorus sesquisulfide. I'd guess it was due to P2S3 redirecting to that page, but I can't find any Phosphorus sulfide with that formula. But, then, my knowledge of inorganic compounds is poor. So, please re-add the hatnote if I've erred. (If you do re-add the hatnote, please use Template:Redirect. I found the hatnote looking for WP:CLICKHERE violations. Template:Redirect it will consistently format things, and encapsulate the hatnote in the important selfref tag.) Cheers—Ketil Trout (^<><!) 03:32, 29 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Rhenium fluoride requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Ryan Vesey Review me! 21:23, 2 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I am looking for help on the Perchloric Acid article. Please see the talk page for details. I can't find an explanation for the varying pKa values given by most sources. I was hoping that since you're in college, you will have some good sources at your disposal and would be able to resolve the issue. Thanks, Explodo-nerd (talk) 17:21, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I am currently on break but I'll try to find an answer when I get back. --98.221.90.11 (talk) 18:56, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This means you. --Tagishsimon (talk) 12:19, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Chemicalinterest.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 18:09, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:24, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Sodium tellurate, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:31, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Chemicalinterest. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Sodium tellurate".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Puffin ^{Let's talk!} 10:43, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:Original chromate.JPG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:Lead solder.JPG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

orphaned image, low quality

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:CuCl in situ.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. ✗plicit 10:28, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]