User talk:Cobaltbluetony

This user may have left Wikipedia. Cobaltbluetony has not edited Wikipedia since July 2015. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

Cobaltbluetony is taking a short wikibreak and will be back on Wikipedia soon.

I saw that you previously deleted this article before. I was thinking of re-instating it since this person has been on TV a few times and has significant media appearances. What are your thoughts? A bit of research has shown him appear on the BBC, Newsweek, Guardian, Independent, Wall Street Journal .etc Also his name appears in a couple of articles if you search it here on Wikipedia. - Vermillion trade — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vermillion trade (talk • contribs) 16:54, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed you raised a NPOV dispute a while back and wondered if you would like to close it out? MarsInSVG (talk) 08:39, 3 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This message is being sent to inform you of a Wikipedia picnic that is being held in your area this Saturday, June 25. From 1 to 5 PM or any time in between, join your fellow volunteers for a get together in the Azalea Garden, just behind the Philadelphia Museum of Art 39°58′05″N 75°10′59″W / 39.96801°N 75.183156°W / 39.96801; -75.183156

Take along your friends (newbies permitted), your family and other free culture enthusiasts! You may also want to pack a blanket, some water or perhaps even a frisbee.

If you can, share what you're bringing at the discussion page.

Also, please remember that this is the picnic that anyone can edit so bring enough food to share!

Smallbones (talk) 17:31, 22 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Wafah Dufour is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wafah Dufour until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.

I see that you're on a break, but you have been a significant contributor to the article, so I thought you should know. --GentlemanGhost (talk) 16:16, 2 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for weighing in on the discussion. --GentlemanGhost (talk) 19:28, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Wikipedist editor, I want to submit to your attention an our common problem: disruptive contributions and edit warring operated by user Derek farn (talk). This latter shows systematically a provoking behaviour and lacking of respect for other people’s work, typical of vandalism. I’ve sent this communication to many people having the same problem in order to organize a collective protest/action request directed to e.g. the Arbitration Committee or Requests for comment/User conduct (this latter procedure requires the participation of at least two users) or to the Wikipedia Community. If you agree with this initiative please contact me at this dedicated email address: clipeaster-1971 AT yahoo DOT com. In order to avoid creating of a forum section dedicated to Derek farn I suggest you to delete this communication once you’ve read it and, then, be in contact via email. Any suggestion are welcomed. I look forward to hearing from you. Best regards, Structuralgeol (talk) 18:17, 15 July 2011 (UTC).[reply]

As another user pointed out to me that suggesting to be in contact outside wikipedia is not a correct way, for transparency reasons, so I conclude that we need to correspond via talk page. Best regards, Structuralgeol (talk) 02:35, 16 July 2011 (UTC).[reply]

You are correct. Also, I find nothing waranting any extreme measures. Perhaps you should give more time to the arbitration process, or accept that not everyone holds the same views as you and work toward a compromise. Cheers! - CobaltBlueTony™ _talk 18:05, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Cobaltbluetony. Hope you're enjoying your wikibreak!

A page with this title has previously been deleted.
If you are creating a new page with different content, please continue. If you are recreating a page similar to the previously deleted page, or are unsure, please first contact the deleting administrator using the information provided below.

• 13:32, 13 August 2009 Cobaltbluetony (talk | contribs) deleted "Talk:DWRC-TV" ‎ (G8: Page dependent on a deleted or nonexistent page)

I guess I'm recreating a page that was pretty much identical to the one you deleted. --Shirt58 (talk) 09:14, 11 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Philly.com. Since you had some involvement with the Philly.com redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). – hysteria18 (talk) 03:10, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I noticed that in 2008 you deleted a redirect entitled "Game Informer Issue 181: Gears of War 2". From the sound it in this discussion, I believe that the information from this former article would be perfect for the WP:VG Reference Library - a non-mainspace project that is ongoing here. Is there any way to undelete the page so that I can transfer the information here? Alternately if you can still see the information from that former page, you may be able to make a snap determination as to whether the information would be of any help at the Reference Library. Thanks. -Thibbs (talk) 15:49, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wishing Cobaltbluetony a very happy adminship anniversary on behalf of the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Armbrust, B.Ed. ^{Let's talk}_{about my edits?} 00:15, 31 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The article Keshav Dev Temple has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

There has been a {{notability}} tag on this article for the past three years, and the issue has yet to be resolved.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. @ 06:13, 7 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Polyarchy, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Kratos and Poly (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:54, 4 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The article PennPraxis has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

no apparent independent notability

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DGG ( talk ) 16:02, 3 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

	Philadelphia's Great American Wiknic at Penn Park
	You are invited to the Philadelphia edition of the Great American Wiknic taking place in Penn Park, on Saturday, June 22, 2013! We would love to see you there!--User:Ocaasi (talk)|}}

World Digital Library Wikipedia Partnership - We need you!

Hi Cobaltbluetony! I'm the Wikipedian In Residence at the World Digital Library, a project of the Library of Congress and UNESCO. I'm recruiting Wikipedians who are passionate about history & culture to participate in improving Wikipedia using the WDL's vast free online resources. Participants can earn our awesome WDL barnstar and help to disseminate free knowledge from over 100 libraries in 7 different languages. Multilingual editing encouraged!!! But being multilingual is not a necessity to make this project a success. Please sign up to participate here. Thanks for editing Wikipedia and I look forward to working with you! SarahStierch (talk) 14:49, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedians are invited to the GLAM Café at the Chemical Heritage Foundation to meet, talk, and edit. We provide the space, the coffee, and the snacks: you provide ideas and enthusiasm! On the second Tuesday of each month, starting November 12, 2013.

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Ur mom. Since you had some involvement with the Ur mom redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Nedgreiner (talk) 18:09, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed you haven't been here awhile but were a prolific contributor during your time here. I've added you to the page above, so if you return, please remove your name. Alternatively, you may remove yourself with an edit summary stating you do not wish to be put on that list; that way it'll be there whenever other editors see you're missing and go looking through your Special:Contributions to see if you fit the bill. God bless, LazyBastardGuy 17:20, 23 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Rabaska. Since you had some involvement with the Rabaska redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. --BDD (talk) 13:32, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Edward Gudonis. Since you had some involvement with the Edward Gudonis redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. De728631 (talk) 15:43, 2 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Cobaltbluetony! As a Steward I'm involved in the upcoming unification of all accounts organized by the Wikimedia Foundation (see m:Single User Login finalisation announcement). By looking at your account, I realized that you don't have a global account yet. In order to secure your name, I recommend you to create such account on your own by submitting your password on Special:MergeAccount and unifying your local accounts. If you have any problems with doing that or further questions, please don't hesitate to ping me with {{ping|DerHexer}}. Cheers, —DerHexer (Talk) 23:26, 30 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@DerHexer: Thanks, got it! - CobaltBlueTony™ _talk 16:22, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Looks good! :-) Cheers, —DerHexer (Talk) 16:25, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Timeline of Philadelphia has a discussion about selection and inclusion criteria. Two editors are discussing it, but we have divergent views. More opinions would be helpful. - SummerPhD^v2.0 13:07, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Timeline of Philadelphia has a discussion about selection and inclusion criteria. Two editors are discussing it, but we have divergent views. More opinions would be helpful. - SummerPhD^v2.0 13:07, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, Tefkasp, I've been inordinately busy and just now saw this. I will try and comment when I have a chance. Cheers! - CobaltBlueTony™ _talk 21:16, 17 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Where is the discussion? I tried to find it quickly, but couldn't... - CobaltBlueTony™ _talk 21:17, 17 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I believe that we should re-review the deletion of an article on a very notable scientist in the field of computer science and natural language processing.

He is the author of seminal books on entire fields, like Introduction to Information Retrieval (a book mentioned in English Wikipedia 23 times [1]).

His peers are generally listed in Wikipedia, and not briefly, see Prabhakar Raghavan, Andrew Ng etc.

He is mentioned in articles like International Conference on Intelligent Text Processing and Computational Linguistics, Studies in Natural Language Processing and Mary Dalrymple and cited in others, for example Information retrieval

He leads the Stanford NLP Group and is behind the Stanford CoreNLP software suite which is used widely in industry for NLP problems like machine translation. His work has been cited 44K+ times, mostly in the last 5 years. [2] People frequently search for his name on the web. [3]

Also, currently Chris manning redirects to a court case where a much less notable barrister with that name was involved.

Hi Cobaltbluetony, hope you're well. Just realized I never thanked you back in 2008 when you welcomed me to Wikipedia - so thanks! samtar ^{t} 13:22, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:13, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

	Seasons Greetings
	Christmas! Christmas, everywhere, on every talk page, I do dispair Seasons being greeted and Wikibreaks told, but still time for a little more editing, for being WP:BOLD! So go on, go forth and enjoy beyond concern Your Wiki will be waiting for when you return.

Again, thank you for the welcome It looks like you might not be back for a while, so I hope it's all going well and you have a great Christmas! -- samtar ^whisper 22:19, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User:JustinGzzzzz/Magnaflux, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:JustinGzzzzz/Magnaflux and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:JustinGzzzzz/Magnaflux during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 07:00, 27 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The article Duane Davis has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

IMDB is the only reference for this article.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TheDomain (talk) 21:13, 18 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in more than one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next month. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three-year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three-year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at WP:RFA. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. MadmanBot (talk) 00:30, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in more than one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next several days. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three-year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three-year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at WP:RFA. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. MadmanBot (talk) 00:30, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Join us this Saturday (July 30) at the Philadelphia Wiknic, the "picnic anyone can edit". This is an opportunity to meet other local Wikipedians, have fun, and discuss potential projects.

The event is this Saturday, between 1pm-5pm at the Picnic Grove in Penn Park.

(To unsubscribe from future messages, remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiProject Philadelphia/Philadelphia meet-up invite list.)

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:21, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in more than one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions have been removed pending your return. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three-year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three-year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at WP:RFA. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. Acalamari 12:54, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings Recent Changes Patrollers!

This is a one-time-only message to inform you about technical proposals related to Recent Changes Patrol in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey that I think you may be interested in reviewing and perhaps even voting for:

1. Adjust number of entries and days at Last unpatrolled
2. Editor-focused central editing dashboard
3. "Hide trusted users" checkbox option on watchlists and related/recent changes (RC) pages
4. Real-Time Recent Changes App for Android
5. Shortcut for patrollers to last changes list

Further, there are more than 20 proposals related to Watchlists in general that you may be interested in reviewing. (and over 260 proposals in all, across many aspects of wikis)

Thank you for your consideration. Please note that voting for proposals continues through December 12, 2016.

Note: You received this message because you have transcluded {{User wikipedia/RC Patrol}} (user box) on your user page. Since this message is "one-time-only" there is no opt out for future mailings.

Best regards, Stevietheman — Delivered: 01:09, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The article Katie Kazoo has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Noah Kastin (talk) (🖋) 06:23, 26 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Sonic the Hedgehog (Sonic Underground charachter). Since you had some involvement with the Sonic the Hedgehog (Sonic Underground charachter) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. _{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 10:36, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Core worlds is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Core worlds (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. _{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 22:35, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Joe(magazine). Since you had some involvement with the Joe(magazine) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 20:18, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Almost 11 years ago you deleted an article for James Purvis. Could you please restore that to my sandbox so I can see what was there. Trackinfo (talk) 05:53, 23 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Duane Davis is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Duane Davis until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ‡ Єl Cid of ᐺalencia ^ᐐT₳LKᐬ 17:04, 4 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article Threshold (2003 film) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Nothing found to help it pass WP:NFILM. Tagged since August 2018.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Donaldd23 (talk) 15:56, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Alex Evans (Video Game Developer). The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 December 31#Alex Evans (Video Game Developer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. IceWelder [✉] 02:25, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Acronym Institute for Disarmament Diplomacy is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Acronym Institute for Disarmament Diplomacy until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

SWinxy (talk) 21:52, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect The Reason (Disambiguation) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 August 24#The Reason (Disambiguation) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Steel1943 (talk) 16:51, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article Brixton Karnes has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet WP:NACTOR, with only one significant role. There are no reliable sources currently in the article, and there do not appear to be any online. No significant coverage on Newspapers.com either.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 21:09, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]