User talk:Conversion script
From Wikipedia the free encyclopedia
| Note: This user appeared to create many articles, when it in fact just transferred them (see user page). Therefore, the mostly automated messages appearing below are mostly irrelevant. |
|
Archives: Index, 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 12 months  |
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gallifrey until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Has one ever considered Magneton? Pokelego999 (talk) 22:09, 14 November 2024 (UTC)
Actinide has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 23:51, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for Bouldering
[edit]Bouldering has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 22:07, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
Nomination of Just another Perl hacker for deletion
[edit]The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Just another Perl hacker (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) (talk) 23:59, 14 February 2025 (UTC)
Nomination of Closed (poker) for deletion
[edit]The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Closed (poker) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Mrfoogles (talk) 00:04, 7 March 2025 (UTC)
Iblis has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Launchballer 16:59, 4 June 2025 (UTC)