User talk:DaxServer

This user is aware of the designation of the following topics as contentious topics: articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan COVID-19, broadly construed discussions about infoboxes and to edits adding, deleting, collapsing, or removing verifiable information from infoboxes complementary and alternative medicine gender-related disputes or controversies or people associated with them He should not be given alerts for those areas.

Archives

Index Archive 1 Archive 2 Archive 3

This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present.

Hello, DaxServer. You have new messages at Woodensuperman's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary, as you did at Muhammad zubair. We are writing to inform you that your recent edits on Wikipedia have been flagged for engaging in an edit war and disrupting the editing process. Your repeated attempts to add information without proper consensus and edit warring are in violation of Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

We understand that you may have strong opinions or beliefs regarding the content you are adding, but it is essential to follow Wikipedia's collaborative editing process. Edit warring disrupts the ability of editors to work together and compromises the quality and neutrality of Wikipedia articles.

We urge you to refrain from further edit warring and disruptive editing practices. Instead, we encourage you to engage in constructive discussion on the article's talk page to reach a consensus with other editors. Consensus-building is a fundamental principle of Wikipedia, and it ensures that articles reflect a neutral and balanced point of view.

Failure to comply with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines may result in administrative action, including the possibility of being blocked from editing. We hope that you will take this warning seriously and contribute positively to the Wikipedia community by respecting the collaborative editing process. Sak7340 (talk) 14:28, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DaxServer, I apologize for the recent edit warring and curt communication with you and other editors at A. C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupada and thank you for your edit aimed at improving the article in question. Will be more mindful about Wiki's guidelines and cooperative spirit. Regards, Cinosaur (talk) 14:56, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Cinosaur I'm delighted to hear from you. At times, we all make mistakes. It is the heading to the feedback that sets up apart! — DaxServer (t · m · e · c) 11:23, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, DaxServer. In the meantime, I tried to address some of your and other editors' feedback in the draft, reported my revisions of the draft on the talk page and, per consensus there, am rolling the draft out into mainspace, one section at a time. Will be grateful for your further comments and revisions. Happy editing. Regards, Cinosaur (talk) 11:36, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

FYI - you're at three reverts and I've gotta be fair and warn everyone on that article. I'd hate to see you get caught up by the 3RR report, when it's really likely they'll get a block for the edit-warring and hopefully disruptive editing in genera. If they keep pushing it, just let it stay until the EW report is handled. Fun stuff, I know. Ravensfire (talk) 17:16, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Ravensfire Thanks for the note. It is WP:NOT3RR#7 for the reverts you and I made. — DaxServer (t · m · e · c) 17:29, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I was wondering if I should ask for ECP protection or just wait a tad bit longer for an admin to be available to act on the 3RR report — DaxServer (t · m · e · c) 17:30, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Probably falls under that, but you want to mention that in your edit summary so a reviewing admin knows what you're doing. I think ECP isn't needed right now - it's one disruptive editor, so block them and it's resolved. If they try the IP route, then semi-protection. Hopefully they are getting the point - I know, not likely given their talk page comments where they steadfastly ignore the main points being made. Ravensfire (talk) 17:34, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That makes sense. I'll try to put them in the edit summaries. Thanks for the tip ;) — DaxServer (t · m · e · c) 17:40, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yet again, was reverted 😅 — DaxServer (t · m · e · c) 18:08, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:DaxServer reported by User:Sak7340 (Result: ). Thank you. Sak7340 (talk) 18:15, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Sak7340. Thank you.

The retaliatory and utterly bogus EWN reports have pushed this well passed disruptive on their part, so reported them to ANI and mentioned you as the other target. Hopefully this gets a quick block. Ravensfire (talk) 18:32, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

And the smacketh was layeth downeth. Ravensfire (talk) 18:46, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks @Ravensfire. It seems like everyone is on the Easter holiday! — DaxServer (t · m · e · c) 18:49, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, @ToBeFree is here! — DaxServer (t · m · e · c) 18:51, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Heh. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 18:51, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Egg-cellent! And I'll just show myself out... Ravensfire (talk) 18:54, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

<throws easter eggs at Ravensfire> ~ ToBeFree (talk) 18:58, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

— DaxServer (t · m · e · c) 19:00, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oooh, that's a cool icon! ~ ToBeFree (talk) 19:38, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi one editor is deliberately moving this film article Family Star (film) to draft space repeatedly and creating confusion among reviewers only to make it declined. The film is going to release on April 5 2024. Request you to review the article and fix the issue once and for all.Zolgensma (talk) 07:43, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

test — DaxServer (t · m · e · c) 04:10, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

{{Unblock-auto|45.129.34.0/24|Colocation web host block but I have both local IPBE and global IPBE. I'm not sure why they're not working tho.|Blablubbs‬}} {{Unblock-auto|45.129.34.0/23|Same as above but adding this as well as I have the notice from the two IP ranges separately.|ST47}}

Oh shoot, never mind. The local IPBE expired. Could a watching admin add IPBE to this account? or, perhaps I'll email CU later. cc @GeneralNotability: who added IPBE in 2022. Thanks! — DaxServer (t · m · e · c) 04:26, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I took care of it. I set your IPBE to permanent. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 04:39, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks @Jpgordon ;) — DaxServer (t · m · e · c) 04:41, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 April 8 § Category:Recipients of Indian civil awards and decorations on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. PepperBeast (talk) 21:03, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Can you add italics to Sivakumar filmography? DareshMohan (talk) 04:36, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]