User talk:Dhiren7291

Hi I am a software developer

Please Discuss any concerns here or you can mail me at dhirendrapratapsingh398@gmail.com

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. Mean as custard (talk) 12:17, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

to Mean as custard Why are you revering whole edit ? Please tell me the Paragraph, Sentences you find promotional not in NPOV. I will remove them. but the Merger information, pictures, awards, Headquarters image, number of employees are general information  ? Aren't they ? For example see CISCO wiki page Does't this page has such information ?

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, as you did at Telestream, you may be blocked from editing. – NJD-DE (talk) 10:17, 4 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

What is your problem NJD-DE (talk)  ? Which paragraph did you find disruptive ? Did you even spend 10 minutes Dumbo researching about the content whether its true before removing it ?? That is looking simly neutral and informative to me. There are Thousands of wiki pages with similar information ? If you have problem the mark that paragraph or sentence and tell the editor rather than completely removing it. – Dhiren — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dhiren7291 (talk • contribs) 10:32, 4 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I suggest you read WP:NPA first. Then we can talk about content. – NJD-DE (talk) 10:52, 4 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Dhiren7291. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Dhiren7291. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Dhiren7291|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. – NJD-DE (talk) 11:08, 4 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]