User talk:Dsergeant

Though I was born in Seville, Spain, I have spent most of adult life in Lincolnshire (first in Lincoln, now in Hibaldstow). I love the place (once you get over the fact you need a car for everything, as public transport is almost non-existent). Regarding the photos, I need confirmation on the name of the White Horse shelter. I have checked everywhere but I cannot find what its proper name is. Hopefully someone will come around and correct it, if wrong. I am constantly uploading images (see User:Asterion/Image Gallery), some of which do not have a corresponding article, if you want to help out with the red links. Best regards, E Asterion ^{u talking to me?} 12:01, 12 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The answer to your White Horse shelter lies within the conservation document you linked from the Redbourne page which says on page 13:

"Another prominent building facing the Green is the Old Smithy at the northeast corner. This unusual temple type structure has an open timber columned portico surmounted by a pediment. The rearing horse on the roof and the brick paving on the floor are clues to its more humble purpose. The interior still houses the hearths, flues and troughs used in the shoeing process and a seating area have been added."

So your answer is "The Old Smithy".

Must say I have seen it countless times when passing through the village but never thought to ask what it was!

Dsergeant 13:10, 12 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Great! Thank you very much. I will try to get some decent pictures at some stage (for the Red Lion too), those I uploaded were taken with my mobile phone camera and the quality is not very good. I will amend the description. E Asterion ^{u talking to me?} 13:23, 12 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re. Methodist Church: Is it the one on the way out of the village towards Middle Street/North Cliff Road (B1398)? If that is so, it has been converted into residential property. A work colleague of mine used to live in one of the flats. E Asterion ^{u talking to me?} 21:49, 15 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure, I rarely passed through Willoughton. But there is a photo of it at http://www.lincolnshire.gov.uk/section.asp?catId=7969 My great grandfather lived there for many years and were active members of the Primitive Methodist. I have their family bible with loads of newspaper cuttings of it until the 1930's but couldn't find when it closed. I see there was a Weslyan chapel there as well.Dsergeant 10:58, 16 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, that's the same one. I drive past it almost everyday on my way to work, so I had the chance to take a picture today. You've done a great job with the stub. I just added the photo to the article. Thanks a lot. E Asterion ^{u talking to me?} 22:58, 16 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to the article brings up a good point. It needs to reflect activity in the non-USA as well. I know the Japanese and others collect Collins and other USA boatanchors so, is it safe to say ALL boatanchors are US-made? Are there any UK companies that made boatanchors which are collected? Is there substantial glowbug, AM, or boatanchor activity in EU? How can we represent this aspect? If you have any ideas on this, please feel free to contribute. LuckyLouie 18:49, 30 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I think the term 'boatanchor' is a mainly US one and not used over here... But there are a number of organisations interested in preserving and using vintage stuff. Have a look at http://www.vmars.org.uk/ for starters. I am not actually involved in it myself (just came across your article by accident while sorting out some other amateur and radio articles) so guess I can't add that much myself. But it would be good to make it more international, we certainly don't use those frequencies on 80m over here! 73 Dave G3YMC Dsergeant 20:55, 30 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the link. Can you tell me if there is a "ham slang" term for boatanchors (big, heavy old radio gear) that is used in the UK or EU? LuckyLouie 22:28, 30 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If there is I am not aware of one! Glowbug is another of those words which seems not to be used outside your shores. There again we have valves and not tubes...Dsergeant 15:17, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! I am not at all familiar with UK and EU amateur radio clubs, contests, communities, etc. Any material you can add is appreciated. 73. -- LuckyLouie 06:09, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, that edit was done very quickly. As an avid entrant in QRP contests from this side of the pond I will try and improve it (as well as the rest of this article). 73 Dave G3YMC Dsergeant 07:27, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have removed the speedy deletion templates from the article, because it is not written like an ad at all. Cheers! Evilclown93 15:49, 13 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks! Will see if the chap who added it comes back... Dsergeant 17:03, 13 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, just noticed your message to me just now. I added a bit more to the article but I'm not sure whether it will help towards meeting WP notability criteria. Seems you may have more experience with the WP guidelines. Please advise what sort of info would help. --Ikester 05:17, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. since I don't track changes here very often, it might be quicker to get me at the CC MWP forum and/or my CC wiki talk page. --Ikester 05:17, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A {{prod}} template has been added to the article Notepad+, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. hbdragon88 01:15, 8 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have had great fun this week expanding on the RAF Hemswell stub you initiated. Any comments or additions? 21stCenturyGreenstuff (talk) 17:32, 10 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Very impressive! I can't add anything as you obviously know far more about it than I ever did, well done. Dsergeant (talk) 07:46, 11 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

By way of introduction, I'm a real person that works for Phorm. I created an individual account that I hope will allow us to have a productive dialogue and fix some of the many problems in tone and fact with this article. I understand the Conflict of Interest policy and hope we can work within it and with Wikipedia editors like yourself to add or correct facts where appropriate in good faith.

On behalf of Phorm, I'd once again like to apologize for our editing of the Phorm page without warning a few months back. Though the edits we made were intended to correct some factual errors and not intended to make the article self-promotional, we understand it wasn’t appropriate. We waited a few months so everyone could be sure we got the message and that we understand how to interact with Wikipedia productively. At this point, if possible, we’d like to start to help improve the factual basis of the page and bring it in line with Wikipedia’s neutral point of view policies.

Is this something you can help with? If so, what’s the best way to move forward? IworkforPhorm (talk) 16:56, 25 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to the WikiProject Lincolnshire, glad to have you on board. --BSTemple (talk) 07:13, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your notes re Mac Fisheries and Bracknell. Am I surprised that a reference is sometimes wrong - hey, even (on this occasion) the local historians I found get it wrong! Happy with your local knowledge that you amend as appropriate. Rgds, - Trident13 (talk) 10:16, 2 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi I see you and Acabashi have been busy on the Atterby page. I managed to find an online citation for the windmill (already added) at Lincs To The Past site which is run by Lincolnshire Archives. Very useful to those of us working on Lincs articles. Best wishes Panderoona (talk) 19:00, 26 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I replied to your comment on my talk page, but I don't know if you're watching it. (There seems to be different standards on this among users.) -Sparkgap (talk) 07:01, 30 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You are invited to the third Reading Wiki Meetup which will take place at The Hope Tap, 99-105 Friar Street, Reading RG1 1EP on Sunday 20 January 2013 from 1.00 pm. If you have never been to one, this is an opportunity to meet other Wikipedians in an informal atmosphere for Wiki and non-Wiki related chat and for beer or food if you like. Experienced and new contributors are all welcome. This event is definitely not restricted just to discussion of Berkshire related topics. Bring your laptop if you like and use the free Wifi or just bring yourself. Even better, bring a friend! Click the link for full details. Looking forward to seeing you. Philafrenzy (talk) 02:52, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

For info, this company has its European headquarters in Arlington Squre, Bracknell. Pterre (talk) 22:58, 12 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, thanks, that did not come up on a web search. It is good to have somebody in Arlington Square, it has largely remained unoccupied after it was opened in a blaze of glory ten years ago... Dsergeant (talk) 07:17, 13 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I'm running a survey to identify the best way to notify Wikimedians about upcoming UK wikimeets (informal, in-person social meetings of Wikimedians), and to see if we can improve UK wikimeets to make them accessible and attractive to more editors and readers. All questions are optional, and it will take about 10 minutes to complete. Please fill it in at:

https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/JJMNVVD

Thanks! Mike Peel (talk) 19:30, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:05, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Europe/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like Germany, Italy, the Benelux countries, Iberian Peninsula, Romania, Slovenia etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. If you would like to see masses of articles being improved for Europe and your specialist country like Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon, sign up today and once the challenge starts a contest can be organized. This is a way we can target every country of Europe, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant and also sign under any country sub challenge on the page that you might contribute to! Thank you. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 05:53, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Dsergeant. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Dsergeant. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Dsergeant. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Dsergeant. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:08, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. You seem to have been left off an original ping list for this one. Your involvement in place articles could suggest you might interested in this topic. Thanks. See:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_England/Parishes_RfC Acabashi (talk) 14:30, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]