User talk:Egy writer

	The Writer's Barnstar
	You are hereby awarded the Writer’s Barnstar for bringing the excellence in factuality inherent in the spirit of journalism to our reference encyclopedia Wikipedia. WikiEditorial101 (talk) 06:02, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@WikiEditorial101: Thank you ❤. Egy writer (talk) 13:01, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

	The Editor's Barnstar
	You are hereby awarded the Editor’s Barnstar for displaying particularly fine decisions in general editing. WikiEditorial101 (talk) 06:03, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@WikiEditorial101: Thank you very very much 😍. Egy writer (talk) 13:01, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please see this change I just made to your comment at the portals RFC. I added the bold word "Oppose" for consistency with the other !votes in that discussion. If you'd like to keep that label, I invite you to remove my HTML comment ("<!-- This word added by User:Dcljr, for consistency with other !votes -->"). If not, please change "Oppose" to whatever label you prefer (e.g., "Strong oppose" or "Weak oppose", etc.). - dcljr (talk) 19:02, 25 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You are invited to join the effort to revitalize and improve the Portal system...

The Portals WikiProject was rebooted 9 days ago, and is going strong. Fifty-two editors have joined so far, with more joining daily.

We're having a blast, and excitement is high...

Our goal is to update, upgrade, and maintain portals.

In addition to working directly on portals, we are developing tools to make building and maintaining portals easier. We've finished one so far, with more to come.

Discussions are underway about how to upgrade portals, and what the portals of the future will be.

There are plenty of tasks (including WikiGnome tasks too) on the WikiProject page.

With more to come.

We may even surprise ourselves and exceed all expectations. Who knows what we will be able to accomplish in what may become the biggest Wikicollaboration in years.

See ya at the WikiProject!

Sincerely,    — The Transhumanist   03:11, 27 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The RfC discussion to eliminate portals was closed May 12, with the statement "There exists a strong consensus against deleting or even deprecating portals at this time." This was made possible because you and others came to the rescue. Thank you for speaking up.

By the way, the current issue of the Signpost features an article with interviews about the RfC and the Portals WikiProject.

I'd also like to let you know that the Portals WikiProject is working hard to make sure your support of portals was not in vain. Toward that end, we have been working diligently to innovate portals, while building, updating, upgrading, and maintaining them. The project has grown to 80 members so far, and has become a beehive of activity.

Our two main goals at this time are to automate portals (in terms of refreshing, rotating, and selecting content), and to develop a one-page model in order to make obsolete and eliminate most of the 150,000 subpages from the portal namespace by migrating their functions to the portal base pages, using technologies such as selective transclusion. Please feel free to join in on any of the many threads of development at the WikiProject's talk page, or just stop by to see how we are doing. If you have any questions about portals or portal development, that is the best place to ask them.

If you would like to keep abreast of developments on portals, keep in mind that the project's members receive updates on their talk pages. The updates are also posted here, for your convenience.

Again, we can't thank you enough for your support of portals, and we hope to make you proud of your decision. Sincerely,    — The Transhumanist   23:23, 25 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

P.S.: if you reply to this message, please {{ping}} me. Thank you. -TT

Thank you for this beautiful message, I can not describe my happiness to stay portals system, If he had enough time, he would join the portals development workshop. Egy writer (talk) 01:34, 27 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2017 Minya attack, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Minya (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:31, 27 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Parmouti 30 (Coptic Orthodox liturgics) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Seraphim System ^(talk) 16:41, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. Fitzcarmalan (talk) 11:17, 26 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Again, will you please stop marking your edits as minor? Fitzcarmalan (talk) 21:28, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

OK, i will take care next time. Egy writer (talk) 06:37, 6 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there - thanks for creating the page, unfortunately it features writing that isn't good enough. The article has several serious mistakes and is not really up to Wiki standards, so please take notice of that. Skycycle (talk) 17:27, 2 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This is probably one of the strangest comments I've ever seen. Why is it not good enough? --the eloquent peasant (talk) 17:41, 2 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry I had looked at the first Minya bus article - the one in 2017 and wondered why you had made the comment. That was my mistake. --the eloquent peasant (talk) 21:33, 2 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hey,
I assume you are a Coptic Egptian. You probably heard of Nubia and how it used to be Christian for approximately 1000 years. I wanted to ask if you are interested in helping me out with something, doing some translation work. Please let me know if you are. LeGabrie (talk) 19:26, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

hello there, Let me know if I need help, and I will do my best. Egy writer (talk) 23:25, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, here's the deal: there's an Arabic work on the kingdom of Alodia, the most southerly and most powerful of the Nubian kingdoms. Link I am mostly interested in what the author has to say in chapter 1, 2 and 5 (I already know what it says on p. 52 and 53 by the way) and if he says anything that's not been said yet in the Wiki article (I would recommend reading "Sources", "Geography" and "Christianization and Peak" beforehand). This is quite a lot to ask for, I know, but it might help to improve the Wiki article with new, interesting information / speculation. LeGabrie (talk) 12:19, 9 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Egy writer. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Ramy Malek. Since you had some involvement with the Ramy Malek redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Esprit15d • talk • contribs 03:39, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:16, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Egyptian has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 02:39, 26 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Nader Abbassi. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Paul Vaurie (talk) 23:54, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Egy writer. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Nader Abbassi, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:05, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]