User talk:EliotWL

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Ashley Purdy. Thanks! CNMall41 (talk) 19:38, 23 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi EliotWL! You created a thread called Citing a source where the original video is missing but is backed up on youtube at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread. Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by David Gerard was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Doesn't meet WP:NMUSIC, which is probably why it's been deleted six times previously

David Gerard (talk) 22:04, 30 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, EliotWL! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! David Gerard (talk) 22:04, 30 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi EliotWL! You created a thread called How long do rejected article drafts stay on the website? at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread. Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Ashley Purdy, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:28, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, EliotWL. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Ashley Purdy".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Jalen Folf (talk) 04:14, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from TV Parental Guidelines into Television content rating system. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 14:43, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

The page I edited already attributed to the page I copied from. The page I copied from had just been edited since the last time someone had updated the page I edited. I was only bringing it back up to date, which I did say in the edit summary.

Unless you mean to say that I needed to double-attribute it? EliotWL (talk) 14:56, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not seeing any edit summary at Television content rating system that indicates content was copied from TV Parental Guidelines. — Diannaa (talk) 16:16, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ah looks like I misread a previous edit from 2011. Someone had removed the section for being too similar to the main article and linked to it, and almost immediately the text got re-added. When I made my edit, I thought it was already attributed and it had been so similar that I didn't double check, and just said I was updating to keep it in line with the main article instead of re-linking to it EliotWL (talk) 22:07, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]