User talk:Faridshahi79

Welcome!

Hello, Faridshahi79, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  NickelShoe (Talk) 19:20, 5 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Farid! Thanks first of all for your interesting contributions on esoteric subjects, in all senses of the word. May I ask you, however, the source of (apparently yours) information, according to which others people than Ortiz, Chericcoti and Bertani were condemned after the Trial of the thirty? Indeed, your creation of the article prompted me to read again this chapter from Jean Maitron, so I've included a bit of info. Cheers! Tazmaniacs (talk) 03:16, 26 April 2008 (UTC) According to Tom McCarthy's literary account, it does seems like preventive detention. Tazmaniacs (talk) 03:28, 26 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again! No, no pictures of the trial, you should have a look on the Internet (google in French procès des trente) and, if you find one, use the Template:Historic fur. Tazmaniacs (talk) 14:40, 26 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I noticed you removed my note that there wasn't information on whether Ivan Aguéli was Maliki, and simply stated he was. Are you sure? I couldn't find any information on this. As far as I know, it's perfectly possible Aguéli didn't follow an specific Maddhab, but rather mixed practices from more than one. Could you please provide a source, or mention which one of the already provided references explicit this detail?

In the meantime, I've added a {{fact}} to that infobox line. -- alexgieg (talk) 01:41, 28 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for replying. The information you provide is indeed indicative that he was a Maliki, there's little doubt about it. I think it's just a matter of adding the information as a footnote. In fact, what you wrote is surely much more informative for such a purpose than my original footnote was, so I'll replace the {{fact}} link with it.

By the way: if Aguéli's master's father was such an important person, I think an article on him would be a very good thing! I searched for "Ilaysh" and the only mention to this name is Aguéli's article itself. Would you have enough information to create such an article, even if it's more a stub than a proper article? If you do, please do so. The more info, the better, and it would be good to link back from the new footnote. -- alexgieg (talk) 01:47, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:50, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]