User talk:GalaxyFighter55

If I have left you a message: please answer on your talk page, linking to me ({{Ping|GalaxyFighter55}}), so that I will be notified. If you leave me a message: I will answer on my talk page, linking to your username, so that you will be notified. Please click here to leave me a new message.

I noticed a recent block was placed on an account and they tended to have some spite for you appearently? I wanted to let you know that you are doing great, and to try not to let people like them bring you down. You're doing good lad :) cheers. PerryPerryD Talk To Me 18:04, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Shield Hero Season One BD.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:31, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. An abortion is an induced miscarriage, so by definition you can't have an abortion after birth. So the words "before birth" aren't needed, and imply that post-birth abortions are illegal in those states. We could word it "no gestational limit" if you think that's better. — kwami (talk) 06:16, 7 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Doesn't make any sense but whatever, keep as is before my edit.--GalaxyFighter55 (talk) 06:18, 7 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Centcom08. I noticed that you recently removed content from A Certain Scientific Railgun T without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Centcom08 (talk) 04:57, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Centcom08: Are you going to breathe down my neck the entire time I'm refining these articles? I understand your reasons but I'd like it if you kindly wouldn't do automatic reverts so my bell wouldn't be notified. Thank you! I'm not looking for an edit war of any sort, but if you can do manual reverts whenever possible I'd appreciate it.--GalaxyFighter55 (talk) 05:07, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@GalaxyFighter55 I do understand. It seems that you're editing the articles per section (not as a whole, I don't know if it is to increase your number of edits). I'll give you an hour before I begin reviewing your changes because the majority of your edits on the articles in question do not have edit summaries. Centcom08 (talk) 05:21, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Centcom08: Why would I explain every single edit I make on Wikipedia? I already don't have enough free time as is! You can clearly see every edit I've made has been in good faith, anyways.--GalaxyFighter55 (talk) 05:25, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@GalaxyFighter55 Removing information without explanation makes the other editors think that there might be something wrong with your editing (that is why Wikipedia developed an edit summary). It will really help you be responsible with your fellow editors and to avoid a possible edit warring in the future (see WP:UNRESPONSIVE). So always provide an edit summary! Centcom08 (talk) 05:29, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Centcom08: I will keep that in mind in future edits. And I apologize for my very segmented edits, they usually just come to mind after I've already made an edit. I don't do it as a way to increase by edit count or anything like that. And I know I shouldn't use this as an excuse or anything but I actually have autism.--GalaxyFighter55 (talk) 05:31, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@GalaxyFighter55 No worries, my friend! Looking forward to your better health, be strong. At least I did not lack in sharing with you what to do in handling Wikipedia articles, particularly what we have discussed in regards to edit summary and citing sources. By the way, this is a good discussion we have, and looking forward to working with you in the future! Centcom08 (talk) 05:37, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Centcom08. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, A Certain Scientific Railgun (season 1), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Centcom08 (talk) 05:18, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Centcom08: Are you a bot or something? Because it seems you didn't receive my last reply. And yes, IT HAS AIRED on Funimation Channel!--GalaxyFighter55 (talk) 05:21, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@GalaxyFighter55 Then kindly add that source to the article instead of just mentioning it here. You should be aware that every piece of information you add on Wikipedia has a reliable source so kindly review this: Wikipedia:Citing sources. Centcom08 (talk) 05:25, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Centcom08: I was getting around to doing just that and then I came back to see you immediately reverted it. Usually I would have the time to add such things. I was originally trying to look for an AnimeNewsNetwork source if it exists.--GalaxyFighter55 (talk) 05:26, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@GalaxyFighter55 Then WP:NORUSH. For future editing, kindly try adding the information AND its source in one go. Centcom08 (talk) 05:31, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I have been editing anime pages for years and I know a thing or two when it comes to anime premiere dates. In Japan, TV anime tend to air within the first month of a season, e.g. Me & Roboco which is set to air in Winter 2023, will most likely release in January 2023, until proven otherwise. This is how we've done things relating to anime in the past. If it says a season, we put the first month of that season until proven otherwise. SimonLagann (talk) 17:33, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@SimonLagann: You can't add a month without the citation explicitly stating said month. Otherwise, that is presuming the broadcast commencement and violates WP:CITEWEB. Wikipedia is not a place for presumptions, just wait for the sources to officially state the month. There's WP:NORUSH to add months that can't be verified.--GalaxyFighter55 (talk) 19:46, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article Sola Entertainment has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I'm unable to do a japanese-lang search, but there's no evidence this meets WP:NCORP at the moment

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Alyo (chat·edits) 15:57, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please add the writers, storyboard artists and directors into the rest of the episodes please? Its hard work to do for me. Note that furinkan.com has the credits listed. They have animation directors too but their not front-credited unlike the directors, storyboarders and writers. BaldiBasicsFan (talk) 14:49, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@BaldiBasicsFan: I'll try to but I can't make any promises, it was hard enough just to do all of ONE PIECE.--GalaxyFighter55 (talk) 23:39, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Woah! I see that you have been adding in credits for ONE PIECE. Has over 1000 episodes and already you have been working hard. BaldiBasicsFan (talk) 00:51, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

In episode 101, "Versailles Burned with Love", the inscription on André's basement is different from how Lupin reads it. There are two scenes: when Lupin and Jigen are here for the first time, and in the ending when Oscar is finally returned here after the airship battle. Please, can you decripted those two romaji incisions? You can write it in my IP talk: I'm only interested. Thank you very much. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.252.44.22 (talk) 10:34, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:09, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I apologize if I came off as rude and curt when de-capitalizing the title, it wasn't my intention. I do agree with you removing the link, so thank you for that. Alexandra^IDV 01:18, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Big Mouth poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:07, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please fix the episode tables for 101 Dalmatians: The Series, Urusei Yatsura (both 1981 and 2022 animes (fixed for first two episodes of 2022)) and Amphibia (TV series)? The tables are now broken due to an update on the template. BaldiBasicsFan (talk) 01:16, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@BaldiBasicsFan: I honestly have no idea how to fix that; consult with the admin that edited the episode table template page on how to fix this.--GalaxyFighter55 (talk) 06:42, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I saw you changed the color of recap episodes for some animes so I was wondering if there was a rule or there was a discussion about this somewhere that I am not aware of? I was just wondering about it and it would be great If you can explain it to me so I can contribute better regarding this. Parham.es (talk) 01:31, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Parham.es: It's more so a WP:BOLD edit decision, the greyed shading is further indication for the reader that its a recap special that aired in Japan and does not constitute as an actual episode of the series.--GalaxyFighter55 (talk) 01:34, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Parham.es: Additionally, I made this decision in most part to potential confusion a reader might have if they were on the base "List of" episode article instead of the season itself, where they can't read the summary for clarification. I didn't think a slightly bold decision like this was worth bringing up on a user consensus, but if you're not ok with it we could talk it out.--GalaxyFighter55 (talk) 01:48, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

hmm, don't really have a big problem with it, I was just wondering if it could be a little brighter, that's all. right now it sticks out a lot and gives a very important episode vibe and also might be a little hard to read the episode's details in some circumstances. But as I said I'm okay with it, except it's very dark. Parham.es (talk) 02:13, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Parham.es: I used it bc it was the standard grey shad-out for Wikipedia, but let me see what other color hex codes I can use that's less obnoxious, one moment please.--GalaxyFighter55 (talk) 02:16, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Parham.es: I am now using the D3 hex code, which uses almost half the shading of BA, is that better?--GalaxyFighter55 (talk) 02:21, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it's perfect. As a matter of fact i really like it. Parham.es (talk) 02:25, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@GalaxyFighter55 I saw that you made an edit that WBTV/Williams Street doesn't own the rights to the 3 Adult Swim/Crunchyroll Co-productions any more. I'm aware its for tax purposes but they still have some rights through pay digital. I want to know does WBTV (Warner Bros. Televison) or Sony Pictures TV have full rights to these titles? Nino0303 (talk) 23:56, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Nino0303: Well, its kind of complicated, but writing off a show generally implies scrubbing most of the official material off the internet and losing a good deal of rights to the show in exchange for a tax billing deduction. In terms of licensing, this usually means dropping it. If you want I can add a note regarding the remaining digital anomalies.--GalaxyFighter55 (talk) 01:49, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@GalaxyFighter55 you can also add that it was through WBTV (for Fena and Blade Runner: Black Lotus). I hope the liscnese to the WBTV side being dropped is not for good. Nino0303 (talk) 02:10, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Nino0303: If the company really wanted it back they could reacquire it, but it would cost them some money in the process. Western entertainment companies tend to give up on their productions a lot quicker than Japan does for anime.--GalaxyFighter55 (talk) 02:12, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@GalaxyFighter55: If Warner Bros. Discovery's debt issue winds down theres a chance they can undue the write off if they chose to that is. Nino0303 (talk) 02:16, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

	The Writer's Barnstar
	Excellent work on Mushoku Tensei (season 1), that must have taken so much effort to make! Keep up the great work. FatalFit | ✉ | ✓  04:44, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:DrStoneNewWorld.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:08, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @GalaxyFighter55:, I'm so sorry if i disturb you, But can you create home media release of five seasons of Saiyuki anime? I would greatly appreciate it. Thank you. M.A.LasTroniN910 (talk) 05:23, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@M.A.LasTroniN910: Unfortunately, I'm not in a position where I can accept contribution requests, because I barely have free time to edit my own personal projects due to my personal schedule + real life work. You'll just have to get it done yourself, sorry.--GalaxyFighter55 (talk) 05:57, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Mushoku Tensei II key visual.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:24, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for creating a SVG for the Bears head logo. There is one issue - the old Wishbone issue was a public domain issue since it's a basic geometric shape / alphabet. The "new" primary logo is a complex logo that meets the "threshold of originality" and is thus not a free image. The old "C" logo is used in quite a few placed on Wikipedia since it's a free image. I reverted your edit on File:Chicago Bears logo.svg BUT, moved the SVG of the Bear head logo to its own file at File:Chicago Bears Primary Logo - Bear Head.png. I just wanted to give you an explanation for the move. Thanks again for converting the image to an SVG. --  StarScream1007  ►Talk  00:08, 12 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@StarScream1007: Is there any possible legitimate way to get the Bears primary head logo back on that exact svg file name without violating any copyright rules? Initially I did try changing it to copyright template but they gave me a speedy deletion warning under PV, and I didn't really know how would work under these circumstances from going to a simple shape logo to a complex one with potential copyright violations.--GalaxyFighter55 (talk) 00:12, 12 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately, I do not think so. Is there a particular reason you would like it have the original file name?  StarScream1007  ►Talk  00:16, 12 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@StarScream1007: It's just that all the other NFL teams I seen match file name format and it would have been consistent with the rest, but it's not that big of a deal if there's too many complications.--GalaxyFighter55 (talk) 00:24, 12 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It's a good point, but I do not think it's possible since the C logo is used across various Wiki projects via WikiCommons. Each page would likely need to be updated. You could ask an admin on WikiCommons for their input as they may have a workaround. --  StarScream1007  ►Talk  16:24, 12 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

GF, I need your help with BaldiBasicsFan. He keeps thinking Kenshin 23 doesn't need a split for the eps, but the series is going to have 24 eps due to the home media. However, he keeps challenging me. LIJ4EVA (talk) 03:59, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@LIJ4EVA: That's not my problem, and the WP rule he brought up seems pretty reasonable and straightforward. If you build up the main 2023 TV series page with more reasonable content (and in essence, byte size) then you could have solid grounding to split the page into a list of episode article.--GalaxyFighter55 (talk) 08:27, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Blade Runner Black Lotus.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:09, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

So based on what you said If it's just a letter like Season 2: R, it is still okay to add the letter R, Correct? We just don't add the Arabic or Roman numeral subtitles. Also if it has name then we can still add it. So names and single letters are okay As long as they won't be something like (Season 2: 2). Parham.es (talk) 09:38, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Parham.es: To my knowledge, yes. This is done to give readers better visual identification markers for season sections since anime series tend to give their de facto seasons a lot more subtitle identifiers than western shows. But when its only a numeral like "II" or "2", there shouldn't be any reason for it because the season number should already get that job done. Plus, as I said before, it's a redundant copy of the season number so the reader will just be reading it twice like some kind of error. And special cases where there are seasons with other non-numeral titles or a spin-off with season title formula similarities will be a case-by-case thing that might need user group consensus to deal with.--GalaxyFighter55 (talk) 09:45, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

One last thing, we should always put years in front of the seasons correct? for example this one just says Season 1 and Season 2 and also Season 2 should be like this (Season 2: Ω) based on what we discussed before.

Another thing is that doing it like (Season 3: Alicization) is better than doing it like (Sword art Online Alicization) in episode list? I asked that because I have seen some pages that does it like that. an example for it would be this Anime. Not only it doesn't have any years in front of the seasons it also should be like (Season 1) and (Season 2: 2nd Attack).

Sorry if I'm asking lots of questions, I'm just trying to make sure I'm doing things right. Parham.es (talk) 10:10, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Parham.es: Yeah, I would say that's passable for Nagatoro. Year(s) of broadcast should only be added on if its on a separated list of episodes page. As for Demon Lord, I'm not really sure if stylization subtitles count but I'd have to find an editor with better MOS knowledge than me regarding that matter.--GalaxyFighter55 (talk) 23:49, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You removed the nihongo template on Beyblade X. why? VizDsouz (talk) 12:05, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@VizDsouz: Respectively, you are in the wrong here. The Japanese katakana is not necessary here on English WP as it is not the official title in Japan, but only exists for JP readers who cannot read the Latin script English title as you can see here. If the katakana was the official title, the article would look like this (as a matter of fact, you can clearly see "BEYBLADE X" stand out among the other Beyblade series titles in the article even without translating the page). Anything in『』is the explicitly the title as is, and anything else is just a subsidiary EN to JP or JP to EN transliteration.--GalaxyFighter55 (talk) 17:16, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

And before you attempt revert my revision, let it be known that the MOS user consensus agrees with me.--GalaxyFighter55 (talk) 22:51, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Why do you have to remove it? What could go wrong if you hadn’t removed it? And I am telling you it is not for JP readers. Just please look into the logo it has Japanese name of the season. And that doesn’t affect the article. Pls consider this and revert it back asap. VizDsouz (talk) 02:52, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@VizDsouz: Read this section I linked to better understand why this was removed in particular. Copying a subsidiary JP script that's only meant for Japanese readers who cannot read the Latin script English is not necessary here on English WP. There are some exceptions, such as English titles that are officially supposed to be written in katakana in Japan, but this isn't one of them.--GalaxyFighter55 (talk) 03:00, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

And I have read the MOS message in summary, but I still don’t agree with you. Pls don’t remove the nihongo template, and leave Beyblade X alone. VizDsouz (talk) 03:01, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@VizDsouz: You don't have to agree; the MOS and WP rules set in place and can only be changed by group consensus votes, so you have to adhere to them. Otherwise I will report you to the administrator noticeboard for edit warring over settled disputes, as it would qualify as disruptive editing. Here is the original discussion about the matter.--GalaxyFighter55 (talk) 03:04, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You are invited to participate in the move discussion and vouch your views and suggestions. VizDsouz (talk) 18:28, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Rent A Girlfriend S2 V1.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:18, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Is there any place that I can raise a petition for the page Spy × Family (TV series) to be in the same date format as other pages? Because one guy keep changing back. - Theodorethebear (talk) 06:26, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@GalaxyFighter55 Again, with the same question, because the guy kept changing it back. Is there anything I can do to dispute about this? Like escalate it to Wikipedia moderators. Theodorethebear (talk) 09:09, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Just because a series is set in the United Kingdom does not mean its date format should be changed to dmy in spite of MOS:DATERET. After all, we have pages like Black Butler and Moriarty the Patriot (which are set in the UK and are tagged as use mdy dates) and 91 Days, Earthian, and Kaleido Star (which are set in the US and tagged as use dmy dates). Link20XX (talk) 14:34, 19 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Link20XX: Even in the MOS you used it agrees that it can be changed if there are strong national ties to the format, which there are: "The date format chosen in the first major contribution in the early stages of an article (i.e., the first non-stub version) should continue to be used, unless there is reason to change it based on strong national ties to the topic or consensus on the article's talk page." It's not American media to begin with, and the main setting is the United Kingdom, and if I'm undergoing major overhauls on an edit I'd imagine there is some effort to change it while I'm at it. Format also doesn't matter as long as it's consistent, for MOS:DATEFORMAT. It's not really that big of a deal Link.--GalaxyFighter55 (talk) 02:38, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

MOS:DATETIES does not apply since the series is Japanese (despite where its plot is set, hence why American shows set and filmed in the UK use mdy and vice-versa), so we default to retaining the existing format. If it's not really that big of a deal, then why did you change it in the first place? Link20XX (talk) 02:42, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Link20XX: The main objective of my edits were cleanup and seeing how it was based in London, naturally it only made sense to give it such format. And the MOS appeared to agree with me. That's all there is to it.--GalaxyFighter55 (talk) 02:45, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The MOS does not support that particular change, so I will revert it. Your other edits were helpful though, so thanks. Link20XX (talk) 02:49, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Link20XX: Wow, spiteful much?--GalaxyFighter55 (talk) 02:53, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I did not intend any of my comments to be spiteful or disrespectful, so if they came off that way I would like to apologize. Link20XX (talk) 02:55, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Link20XX: Well, to be honest, I feel as if it was pretty silly to revert something like that, but I'm not gonna edit war with you over it or anything, that would be pretty WP:LAME.--GalaxyFighter55 (talk) 23:35, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sadly I don't remember what happened in each episode and it gets hard with remembering each detail from Ranpo's case Tintor2 (talk) 11:11, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Kimetsu no Yaiba Ent Dist Blu-ray Disc Box 1.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:26, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Kimetsu no Yaiba Swd Vill Blu-ray Disc Box 1.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:27, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:42, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:My Hero Acadmia Season 7 Poster.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused duplicate or lower-quality copy of another file on Wikipedia having the same file format, and all inward links have been updated.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 02:19, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I should have removed some bits but your edit summary behavior is unprofessional. I never called anything disrespectful on my edit summary. Please be professional and read edit summary, avoid assuming. Centcom08 (talk) 03:23, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Centcom08: Nothing personal, but I don't appreciate having other parts of my single revision lumped in together with a smaller aspects you deem as revertable. If you have any issues with something and the edit involves other helpful aspects in the revision, simply copy and paste the previous revision's aspect, paste it in a clean edit and be on with your day. I don't have a problem with being reverted for a single aspect edit, but surely you saw the revision when you hit revert. Also, the increment hidden note stays as it'll be needed for when it airs anyways.--GalaxyFighter55 (talk) 03:30, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I understand and will keep that in my mind but next time, do not become uncivil on edit summaries. It falls under WP:SUMMARYNO. Centcom08 (talk) 03:34, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Centcom08: I apologize for that. I don't want any bad blood between you and me. I know it's probably ridiculous of me to say this nor am I trying to blame it on this, but I think Wikipedia should change the color of the revert notice from red to something less aggressive. The color red has a psychological effect on people in general and it's usually one of negative-ness and/or anger. I believe at the very least 1/8th of edit wars or uncivilty incidents could be avoided if the color was changed.--GalaxyFighter55 (talk) 03:42, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I want you to update the formatting on The Loud House episode lists so they can meet their quality standards. Starting with the original show, then the spin-off and finally the live-action show. BaldiBasicsFan (talk) 03:01, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@BaldiBasicsFan: Would love to, but I can't. I'm struggling just to keep up on the current projects I've set before me and my real life work comes before my editing hobby here at Wikipedia above all else.--GalaxyFighter55 (talk) 07:37, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on List of programs broadcast by Adult Swim. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. The Grand Delusion^{(Send a message)} 03:34, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Jacksonville Jaguars owner navbox has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. --woodensuperman 15:17, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I left some new information on both the main and 2024 series pages linking to the official anime website, but you took them out. Is it really necessary for this? KANLen09 (talk) 13:09, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@KANLen09: First off, on the episode list you spaced out the episode coding, something I told you not to do very recently. Secondly, I just felt as though you overexplained things. Announcement info dates don't need the day-of, and your addition on the explanatory note was simply too over-complicated. I was meaning to revise it and maybe add some of the stuff edited back, but putting actual bread on my table just got in the way and I couldn't do it for the past 2 days. So I do apologize in that regard. I'll see to it right away.--GalaxyFighter55 (talk) 03:14, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If there is a way to minimize the coding to effective use, then I'm all ears since I also edit the episode tables from time to time. Could use some help and learning guidance as well, hopefully we can come to a consensus on this? Also, the episode tables were standard templates themselves, of which I've been copying pasting for multiple shows current and new since I'd rather preserve the coding as succinct as possible.KANLen09 (talk) 13:30, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@KANLen09: Not sure I'm following you on your reply here; the way you see me setting it up is the standard. Somewhere along the way it got warped due to the addition of the necessary language code tag for the episode titles many anime. And break lining each staff member that extends beyond 2 individuals in any one particular production staff column (NAME br NAME br NAME) should almost never happen except in very specific and rare cases. Just keep that in mind for future edits, please. And although this hasn't been fully agreed on, I'd recommend using a (NAME, NAME & NAME) pattern rather than (NAME, NAME, NAME) since this is how the American series do it on their episode tables.--GalaxyFighter55 (talk) 22:19, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]