User talk:Grashoofd

Please post your messages on my Dutch discussion page

Sorry that I wrote this post on this page I can't understand Dutch. Please don't put Dwayne as Lil Wayne's first name again because Dewayne is his real name. I got it from his official website so that has to be his real name. You also need a source to change something so you know that it is a fact. But don't change Dewayne to Dwayne because Dewayne is his real name. I look forward to your responce. RobertRay45821 (talk) 11:45, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I found it odd to find out that Dewayne was indeed his real name. In fact, his full name is 'Michael Dewayne Carter, Jr.', according to that same website. Grashoofd (talk) 11:12, 9 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited List of The Legend of Dragoon characters, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Character (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:44, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me now about Wikipedia NL's use of CSVLoader. That's awesome. They are using a older version of the DLL though (the current one is v1.0.0.15). — Ganeshk (talk) 19:27, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

That's very well possible, we're working with a CSV-database of 50 million cells. I remember the new dll version outputting errors, but I can't remember what went wrong exactly.. so we kept using the old one, which works excellent. We used CSVLoader for about 30% (300.000+ articles) of our entire encyclopedia, producing stub-sized articles about animals - you might've heard about it, it was all over the news internationally, and it's on nearly every iw-page about the Dutch Wiki, also on enwiki. Never got the chance to thank you, so hereby, thank you so much, your tool has been a great help! Grashoofd (talk) 21:00, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wow! I am very glad to hear that the plugin has been useful. Please do test the new version, 1.0.0.15 and let me know if you run into any errors. It has some useful validations/checks. — Ganeshk (talk) 21:59, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Grashoofd; I'm dropping you this note because you've used the article feedback tool in the last month or so. On Thursday and Friday the tool will be down for a major deployment; it should be up by Saturday, failing anything going wrong, and by Monday if something does :). Thanks, Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 22:14, 13 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

When marking a page as NowCommons, please don't delete the old text. Administrators need it to make sure everything has been copied to Commons properly. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 23:12, 29 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Got it, thank you! Grashoofd (talk) 09:45, 30 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Kaitlyn Fritz.
• To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Thank you for your
contributions to Wikipedia!

• Please remember to link to the submission!

• You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Kevin Rutherford (talk) 20:47, 6 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Parque das Aves may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• Cariama cristata at Parque das Aves (Foz do Iguaçu)-1.jpg|Screaming ''Cariama cristata'').

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 17:48, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Ziekte. Since you had some involvement with the Ziekte redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Mr. Guye (talk) 21:51, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:47, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Vuil. Since you had some involvement with the Vuil redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Tavix ^(talk) 03:30, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Grashoofd. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Akhadir Recordings Amsterdam requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Atlantic306 (talk) 16:22, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Grashoofd. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Neuken. Since you had some involvement with the Neuken redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Plantdrew (talk) 06:00, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Amin Rozani is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amin Rozani until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

M4DU7 (talk) 08:16, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, this is notice that you have one or more registered bot accounts that will be retired and deactivated. See Wikipedia:Bots/Noticeboard#Inactive_bots_-_February_2022. Should you wish to reactivate your bot please reply there within the week. Else, no action is needed. Should you wish to reactivate the bot in the future, please file a request at WP:BRFA. Best regards, — xaosflux ^Talk 10:46, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]