User talk:HCPUNXKID

Welcome!

Hello, HCPUNXKID, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! --John (talk) 18:39, 25 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add content (particularly if you change facts and figures) please cite a reliable source for the content you're adding or changing. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. Take a look at Wikipedia:Citing sources for information about how to cite sources and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.--John (talk) 18:39, 25 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please cite your sources when you change dates of historic events, as you did in El Aaiún. Your edit has been reverted since you gave no explanation or reference for the edit. -kotra (talk) 19:39, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to this article. I did find earlier a website that said there were Saharawi missions in Madagascar and India, but then I found something else that said India no longer recognised the Saharoud government, so I presume there is no presence in New Delhi.

I recall back in the 1990s there was an embassy or some kind of mission in Hanoi. Do you know anything about it?

On some of your more recent edits:

• I am pretty sure there is no mission in Dili. The website you used as a source only mentioned that the Ambassador presented his credentials. Most ambassadors to Timor Leste are usually resident elsewhere, typically Jakarta or Canberra.
• Speaking of which, I live in Canberra, and I am certain there is no Sahrawi office or delegation here.
• If you wish to contribute in future, could I ask that you follow the same formatting as we use in all the other articles? We do not list types of missions separately. We group missions according to specific continents. We do not list cross-accreditations etc.

Thanks! Kransky (talk) 13:19, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello!. I have no idea of that Sahrawi delegation in Hanoi you mention, I will search about it. In the case of India & Madagascar, both countries suspended relations with the SADR in 2000 & 2005, so the Sahrawi embassy in New Delhi was closed. I dunno if there's still a General delegation there. In the case of Timor Leste, I think there's a non-resident embassador (Timorese foreign affairs page ain't updated since 2004). Perhaps he lives in Australia, because he's also the representative for Australia & New Zealand (see the link[1]). Perhaps the General Delegation is in Melbourne,Perth or other major Australian city. The problem is that Australia dont have official diplomatic relations with the SADR. Regards.--HCPUNXKID (talk) 16:29, 9 May 2010 (UTC)

If you can find details about Hanoi, include it, but I suspect there has been a global shift away from recognising SADC.

The Diplomatic Missions by Country (DMBC) articles are only intended to list diplomatic missions (as their names imply), and not non-resident accreditations or honorary consulates. There is also a consistent format that we follow in terms of what information we include and how we present it. You can visit the other 180+ articles and see how this consistency is applied Kransky (talk) 11:02, 10 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I understand there is a consistent format to be used at the DMBC pages, but that cannot be an obstacle to bring as more info as we can (This is suppossed to be a encyclopedia, ain't it?). Also, the case of the SADR (as for example, the case of Palestine) is special, as it's a limited-recognition state, so it's not equal as, for example, Morocco or Algeria. P.D. I finally find that the Australia & New Zealand general delegation is based in Sidney.--HCPUNXKID (talk) 15:29, 10 May 2010 (UTC)

I appreciate your enthusiasm, but just because you have found a novel fact does not warrent its inclusion in Wikipedia (see WP:INDISCRIMINATE). Nor is it appropriate to propose a totally new style - the Wikipedia:Manual of Style expressly forbids edit-warring over styles. If you want to become involved with DMBC articles, may I suggest you first look at how these 180+ articles are developed together before proposing something revolutionary to the broader community.

Do you have evidence of a SADC presence in Sydney? I could only find the Australian Western Sahara Association (awsa.org.au), which is an advocacy group and does not claim to speak on behalf of the SADC government-in-exile, or have any other quasi-diplomatic status.

So, why does consistency matter? To demonstrate that all countries, irrespective of how well recognised or powerful they are, are treated equally in being represented on Wikipedia. Consider consistency as a means of protection, as equality and "one-rule-for-all" principles has helped prevent conflicts emerging by people claiming a certain article should not be included, or included in a different way. Kransky (talk) 09:00, 11 May 2010 (UTC) Kransky (talk) 09:00, 11 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Also, If you ask me to not change or delete info, I ask you for being more careful & not deleting references (for example the reference of the SADR embassy in South Africa).--HCPUNXKID (talk) 16:05, 11 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for accepting the formatting to this article. It is true that we encourage editors to cite sources, however if they have linked the page to a reliable primary source (such as the website of the country's foreign ministry where all their missions are listed) then this is not really necessary. In the SADR case because a comprehensive official list does not exist, we need to find other sources to confirm our facts and be accountable to them. As it is, I have searched for a SADC presence in Australia, and having not found anything, any mention of a SADC in Australia would definitely need some form of citation.

And thank you again for ceasing your bold edits to the rest of the articles. To get a consensus could you contact some of the editors and ask them what they think? I will see what the general mood is before casting my vote Kransky (talk) 10:06, 12 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Could I ask you to propose bold ideas first, on one or two articles first? T think you may have a reasonably good idea, but lets think it through first (I think it is more appropriate to refer to multilateral organisations by their formal names, not acronoms). Other editors may have a contrary view. Could you please revert back all the articles except one, and then seek a consensus from other established editors? Some editors are listed here: Category talk:Lists of diplomatic missions by sending country Kransky (talk) 15:24, 11 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

HCPUNXKID, As a consequence of you reversion of List of diplomatic missions of the Sahrawi Arab Democratic Republic, and your decision not to provide a source proving Australia hosts a SADR diplomatic mission (or to provide a reason why a source was unnecessary), unfortunately I have been compelled to place a warning template on your talk page. Could you please provide evidence that Australia hosts a SADR mission? I have also flagged a warning template on your decision to change the formatting of the article without seeking consensus, when I have on two occasions raised this concern with you directly. Please refer to the General Principles of Wikipedia:Manual of Style.

Kransky (talk) 15:52, 11 May 2010 (UTC)[reply] 

As cited above, thank you for your cooperation. If this does not go ahead, could you please revert back all the changes you made? Kransky (talk) 10:06, 12 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Initiation of dispute resolution procedures[edit]

Evidently we cannot agree to what goes into this article, and I note a previous editor also had issues with your edits. This is no great drama - good faith disputes are a common occurance in Wikipedia, and there are processes in place to resolve them.

My argument is that you have not yet provided what I consider is reliable evidence that the SADC government has an official presence in a number of countries, particuarly countries which do not recognise the SADC's sovereignty in Western Sahara. Indeed I have actively searched for anything that could corraborate your claims, but I have found nothing, although I stand corrected on the SADC having a presence in Addis Ababa (I am still uncertain about the authority of the website that claims SADC missions in New York and Geneva, but I will let that slide).

You have repeatedly told me to refer to sources (like this website) which you claim proves your point, but I cannot see any evidence that the persons mentioned run are "general delegations", or even if they have any form of legitimacy within the SADC.

If you consider other DMBC articles are insufficiently referenced, your efforts to improve those articles by finding references or adding "citation required" annotations would be appreciated. Just because one article is not to-the-letter consistent with a policy doesn't justify the elimination of that policy.

I understand your keen interest in the rights of the Sawahari people, as you specify on your user page, but I do not believe their cause is advanced by misrepresenting particular persons as "general delegations", no matter how well meaning the intent. In recognising your good faith, might I also politely ask you review what exactly Vandalism is before making such accusations.

Consequently I will revert the article back, but I am happy to direct this dispute to a third party to have it resolved if you still want to press the issue. Since the crux of our disagreement is over your reference material, might I suggest the matter be directed to the Reliable Sources noticeboard? Alternatively Wikipedia:Third opinion could be another option. Any thoughts?

I will post this message on both our talk pages, and the article talk page. As indicated earlier please lets debate this on just one board. Kransky (talk) 05:50, 20 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, HCPUNXKID. Please be aware that a request for comments has been filed concerning your conduct on Wikipedia. The RFC entry can be found by your name in this list, and the actual discussion can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for comment/HCPUNXKID, where you may want to participate. Kransky (talk) 14:29, 25 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks I would definitely be happy to help you--and I'd like to point out how much I appreciate your effort on Western Sahara-related articles--but I'm not sure how much I could help you. Honestly, the best thing I could do is probably stay out of it. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 20:31, 25 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop You cannot have an edit war on this page; it will result in some kind of block or ban. Please seek an admin at WP:AN to intervene. He can protect, mediate, etc. Please see WP:DISPUTE. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 20:42, 12 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

For the guideline on reviewing, see Wikipedia:Reviewing. Being granted reviewer rights doesn't change how you can edit articles even with pending changes. The general help page on pending changes can be found here, and the general policy for the trial can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 11:32, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Can you show me proof the Western Sahara War started in 1975 and Spain didn't participate in the war? B-Machine (talk) 14:26, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You got it wrong. The armed struggle did start in 1973 when the Polisario Front fought against the Spanish, three years before their pullout. B-Machine (talk) 16:02, 3 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article Bouchraya Hammoudi Bayoun has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. The-Pope (talk) 16:47, 23 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a search with the contents of Abdelkader Taleb Omar, and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: Abdelkader Taleb Oumar. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally trying to rename an article, please see Help:Moving a page for instructions on how to do this without copying and pasting. If you are trying to move or copy content from one article to a different one, please see Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia and be sure you have acknowledged the duplication of material in an edit summary to preserve attribution history.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. CorenSearchBot (talk) 16:52, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you recently tried to give Abdelkader Taleb Oumar a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Abdelkader Taleb Omar. This is known as a "cut and paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is needed for attribution and various other purposes. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page. This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Cut and paste move repair holding pen. Thank you. R'n'B (call me Russ) 13:44, 28 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding multiple issues, edits, etc. with this content I posted in Template talk:Western Sahara lists of positions. I don't know if you check this page (or the Template edit history where I also posted a link to there), that's why I post here. Please go on the talk so that we can discuss the issues. Alinor (talk) 09:02, 15 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I replied there, please review and respond. Alinor (talk) 09:32, 24 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last time I'm going to say this. There is no relation whats so ever to the current protests. Why are you so desperate to add it in? It doesn't matter if its similar and no one has probably heard of that little protest. The current protests started in Tunisia on December 18 and it spread from there so any protest that happened before doesn't belong on the page. By claiming it started on October, you are contradicting the article. Notice you are the only one trying to add it. There are plenty reasons on the talk page.TL565 (talk) 15:03, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Are you blind? The argument is right in front of you. Look, I know you live there and are desperate to make the WS look like it made an impact but that still does not mean you can add incorrect info to the page. Unless you can find protests in the WS that happened after December 18, feel free to add it in. If you make the same edits again it will be regarded as spam. Everyone else seems to agree.TL565 (talk) 18:37, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Owner of the page? Ask yourself that. I have people on my side, you don't. Nobody but you believes the protests started before the proper date. In that case, you might as well add all the protests that happened decades before because they are similar. Its not sacred its fact. What are you trying accomplish anyway? So far, nobody agrees with you. Why don't you add something about protests happening in WS now? I hear protests just started this month. Anyway I'm done with you. Don't comment on my page again.TL565 (talk) 20:34, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Support --I agree these protests were in no way instigational or influential to the protests in Tunisia, Algeria, Egypt etc and therefore not relevant whatsoever, one person claiming it to be does not make it so, there is absolutely no factual proof/evidence of it being related to any of the other protests, like TL565 stated, if we are to include it we might as well include countless of other protests that predate the ones that started in Tunisia on December 18Kapoon129 (talk) 20:56, 8 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Me alegró tu mensaje y saber también, que haya mas usuarios como vos editando en páginas relacionadas al pueblo saharaui y a la RASD. Te cuento que he tenido problemas con un usuario que, además de revertir mis ediciones en el artículo sobre el Sahara Occidental (Western Sahara), me acusa de vandalismo, simplemente porque agrego información de una fuente distinta (de la ONU misma) a la que él defiende (y que además es incorrecta). Te invito a que leas el artículo: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Western_Sahara y su página de discusión: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Western_Sahara, para que te enteres del altercado que tengo con el usuario http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Yusuf_ibn_Tashfin. Éste usuario también se empeña en querer imponer su punto de vista (el marroquí) en artículos de la Wiki en español, bajo el nombre de http://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usuario:Texufin, con el cual ha sido bloqueado varias veces ya, por tener problemas con otros editores. Espero puedas ayudarme a aportar para mejorar éste artículo también, añadiendo fuentes fidedignas y neutrales como lógicamente debe ser. Un cordial saludo. MauriManya (talk) 03:10, 24 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article 2011 Libyan uprising, please cite a reliable source for the content of your edit. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Wikipedia:Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. No sources describe Abdul Fatah Younis as leading the uprising. Pontificalibus (talk) 13:23, 27 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on 2010–2011 Middle East and North Africa protests. Users are expected to collaborate with others and avoid editing disruptively.

In particular, the three-revert rule states that:

1. Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. – Muboshgu (talk) 18:52, 12 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on 2010–2011 Sahrawi protests. Users are expected to collaborate with others and avoid editing disruptively.

In particular, the three-revert rule states that:

1. Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. –  TL565 (talk) 01:07, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your userpage is entirely in Spanish - while on the English wikipedia, do you not think it would be appropriate to use English userboxes? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Smart30 (talk • contribs) 03:10, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yep, you are right, I had to change them, but I had not much time, and sincerely I am not sure on how to do it. Thanks for the suggestion, I'll try.--HCPUNXKID (talk) 19:31, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. – Muboshgu (talk) 21:35, 17 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

I think that you should read WP:IRS, especially paragraph 4.2.

A primary source can't be reliable, except if it is used as a source to show the position/declaration of one of the involved actors. You can't use SPS or MAP excepting to cite Polisario and Moroccan gov's declarations and positions, neither can be reliable a blog or a website which shows a clear position in favor of one of the two sides.

Omar-Toons (talk) 19:34, 20 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Given your regular appearances on various administrators' noticeboards recently with a number of editors complaining about your combative editing style, article ownership and possible POV concerns, and the fact that you've continued edit warring despite being told at ANI not to (your edit history is shocking), I've blocked your account for 48 hours. I very strongly suggest that you take a much more cautious approach to editing when your block expires, otherwise you can expect to receive longer blocks in future. EyeSerene^talk 10:22, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. TL565 (talk) 18:29, 2 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion of this case is at WP:ANI#User:HCPUNXKID. EdJohnston (talk) 19:19, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

On the Sahrawi Arab Democratic Republic a recurring issue going back over years is that some editors insist on including Spanish in the info box. This would be fine if Spanish was an official language but it is not: Constitution - Article 4:La langue arabe est la langue nationale officielle.[Trans: The Arab language is the national official language (no Spanish!)]. I am dropping you a note here because you previously edited this article and not many people are bothered with it so perhaps you could participate and help put down these attempts to include inaccurate information...Thanks. 109.76.199.226 (talk) 09:05, 2 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Since "Saharawi democracy activists" is a subcategory of "Saharawi people", there's no need to include both the master category and the sub; just one or the other would be fine. Cheers, Khazar (talk) 17:14, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Last year's protests ended in early November, with just a couple of fights at a high school thereafter. This year's protests began in late February after commentators and later Polisario figures observed that the Arab Spring was something that Sahrawis were watching closely and taking to heart. Considering the gap in between protests in early November and late February and the change in the political conditions of the region, I think it's absolutely appropriate to split the protests into two articles. -Kudzu1 (talk) 01:52, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree strongly. Your appreciation is based wether on your personal opinion or in the personal opinion of a unique non-neutral source, as it is the Moroccan director of Dahkla music festival, wich is not a reliable source (also, he dont say that the Dahkla events where the start of something new, he only said that he believed that they were influenced by the Arab Spring. Much people also think that the Arab Spring was influenced by the Gdeim Izik camp, so who influence who?). I repeat, there are not evidences to split the article in two parts. If you use the argument of the decline of violence and protest in the gap between late 2010 and early 2011, same thing should be done for example with Yemen (since January 2011 there had been ups & downs on the level of protest until the current unrest) and so on with other countries. Please, lets try to be neutral, fair and avoid double-standarts. Regards.--HCPUNXKID (talk) 17:45, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article Oubi Buchraya Bachir has been proposed for deletion because, under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Oddbodz (talk) 21:33, 3 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Oddbodz (talk) 20:11, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Dear HCPUNXKID

I have no double standards with regard to the SADR and the other unrecognized states you mentioned. Indeed, I'm not sure if I have worked on the list of recognizing states of the states you mentioned. I was just adding that most of the early states the recognized the SADR were communist or "third worldist" states and that one of the causes, I think, that successive US presidents backed Morocco. One can say they were right or wrong to do so, but I think showing what type of states backed the SADR gives the reader a better illustration of how the western Sahara conflict fit in with the larger ideological conflict between pro-western and third worldist and communist states during the late 1970s and 1980s.

I have been thinking that including the types of states that recognized the State of Palestine, Republic of China etc. would indeed also illustrate these (still ongoing) ideological conflicts, but I haven't had much time to devote to large scale Wikipedia projects lately as I have been on the cusp of graduating from college and attempting (perhaps futilely) to enter a graduate program in political science...a stressful and time consuming process.

While I have this opportunity, could you tell me something about how the Western Sahara issue is perceived in Spain? I perceive that it is still a sensitive issue, but its ideological and political significance to domestic Spanish audiences seems unclear from what I have read online.

Sincerely Jonathan--Dudeman5685 (talk) 02:49, 11 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. In Zemla Intifada, you recently added a link to the disambiguation page Sahrawi (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:30, 17 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Tifariti (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Dima, Basque Country and Bedia

Agounit (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Basque Country

Bir Lehlou (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Basque Country

Zug, Western Sahara (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Basque Country

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:18, 19 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have reopened the debate for you here. Please explain in Talk:List of diplomatic missions of the Sahrawi Arab Democratic Republic why this article should list entries you describe as being diplomatic missions. Kransky (talk) 17:32, 27 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Legal status of Western Sahara, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Terra and AFP (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:53, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Legal status of Western Sahara, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page MAP (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:26, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Foreign relations of the Sahrawi Arab Democratic Republic (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to The Daily Star and AFP

International recognition of the Sahrawi Arab Democratic Republic (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to El Heraldo

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 18:08, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Sahrawi national football team, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Sir Sputnik (talk) 23:21, 28 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sahrawi national football team is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sahrawi national football team (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 16:31, 31 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Sahrawi Football Federation, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page CAF (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:05, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Mariem Hassan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to El Mundo, Cáceres, Newcastle and Native

Deseos (album) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Debut and Independence intifada

Mariem Hassan con Leyoad (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Amazon

Shouka (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Bass

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:51, 11 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Toubou Front for the Salvation of Libya, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Telegraph (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:08, 20 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

International Union of Socialist Youth (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Young Social Democrats

Libyan Popular National Movement (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Executive

Toubou Front for the Salvation of Libya (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Libyan Army

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:34, 27 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited El-Ouali Mustapha Sayed, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cuban (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:09, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Mahfoud Ali Beiba, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page SPLA (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:51, 13 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to express my appretiation regarding your work on Western Sahara War articles - it is a really blessed thing, somebody is finally doing a serious job on it. I did begin to organize it, but it has been pretty hard task for me alone, especially considering the conflict wasn't on my top priorities list. Keep on.Greyshark09 (talk) 21:17, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for your comments, it's good to see that some people appretiate the Western Sahara War work. I agree that it's a difficult task, as there's not so much information on the issue, and sometimes it's contradictory or disputed, so every effort to made the articles better is welcomed. Regards, --HCPUNXKID (talk) 16:11, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Battles of La Güera and Tichla (1975), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Spanish (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:57, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Battles of La Güera and Tichla (1975) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Sahrawi

Muhammad (name) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Sahrawi

Sahrawi people (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Moor

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:16, 27 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Dzlinker (talk) 21:54, 28 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

2011–present Libyan factional fighting (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Egyptian, PANA, Eritrean and Courier Mail

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:21, 12 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2011–present Libyan factional fighting, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Daily Star and Basin (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:38, 19 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Former members of the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Drone and Derna

2011–present Libyan factional fighting (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Iranian

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:10, 26 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Death of Muammar Gaddafi (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Egyptian

United Nations General Assembly resolution (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Moroccan

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:05, 4 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Hamdi Lembarki (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Independence Intifada and Sahrawi

Movement for the Liberation of Saguia el Hamra and Wadi el Dhahab (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Spanish

Muhammad Bassiri (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Sahrawi

Territorial police force (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Indigenous

Wilaya (film) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Sahrawi

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:01, 11 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2011–present Libyan factional fighting, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Captain (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:19, 18 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Revenge of the Spit, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Timberland (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:41, 25 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Yellow Snow EP is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Yellow Snow EP until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. — ṞṈ™ 00:54, 31 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Back to Reality (song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Carol Williams (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:02, 4 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Aliyen kentaoui.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that this media item is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails the first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media item could be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media item is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
2. On the file discussion page, write the reason why this media item is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MilborneOne (talk) 20:04, 8 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ahmed Lakhrif, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Spanish (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:33, 11 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I've reverted your AFD nominations from this morning - Acid Rain (album) and the like. You appeared to be nominating these articles and using a closed AFD, instead of creating a new AFD. If you wish to nominate these articles for deletion, you'll want to follow the steps at WP:AFDHOWTO. Thank you. UltraExactZZ ^Said ~ Did 14:35, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

—Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 08:05, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, HCPUNXKID,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Spit No Evil should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spit No Evil .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks, — ṞṈ™ 06:41, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Oubi Buchraya Bachir, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page His Excellency (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:06, 20 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]