User talk:Hiltonhampton

Welcome!

Hello, Hiltonhampton, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  --Alex ^(talk) 17:19, 16 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors.

Thank you for experimenting with the page Lindsay Lohan on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. RadioKirk (u|t|c) 15:46, 17 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:CBB.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 21:05, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

Celebrity Big Brother 5 Housemates has been proposed for deletion. An editor felt this information might be inappropriate for Wikipedia because it is about something which has not happened yet. Please review Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not for the relevant policy. If you can improve the article to address these concerns, please do so, citing sources.

If no one objects to the deletion within five days by removing the "prod" notice, the article may be deleted without further discussion. If you remove the prod notice, the deletion process will stop, but if an editor is still not satisfied that the article meets Wikipedia guidelines, it may be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion for consensus. NickelShoe (Talk) 03:43, 20 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content from Wikipedia, as you did to Celebrity Big Brother 2007 (UK). It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. J Di ^talk 15:40, 20 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia! We could really use your help to create new content, but your recent additions (such as Jade Cole) are considered nonsense. Please refrain from creating nonsense articles. If you want to test things out, edit the sandbox instead. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Jammy Simpson | Talk | 15:00, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Paris hilton086-789654.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 17:11, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

Please do not delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, as you did at Talk:Big Brother 2007 (UK). Such edits are disruptive and appear to be vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. John Hayes^talk 00:01, 2 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, such as in Talk:Big Brother 2007 (UK), you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. John Hayes^talk 00:04, 2 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unreferenced controversial information to Wikipedia articles on living persons, as you did to Charley Kazim Uchea. Thank you. John Hayes^talk 22:22, 2 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know if I am the one who screwed or it was you, but I think I fixed the problem that your nomination of List of glamour models‎ was appearing in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/300-page iPhone bill (second nomination). You voted "Delete/merge" but I couldn't figure out which article it was meant for. Was it for "List of .." or "300-page .."? Please fix my edit if I misjudged your intension. If I made a mistake, that was noting editorial but technical problem. -- Taku (talk) 12:42, 18 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Yes it was for List of--Hiltonhampton (talk) 12:45, 18 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I am the person who asked about whether we need the Bushtucker trials mentioned for Series 7 on the Talk page for I'm a celebrity. I said due to the fact that none of the other series have lists of who performed the Bushtucker trials for their respective series mentioned and I don't think anyone can research it. It is kind of unnecessary, as administrators have told me that if you make charts for one series you need to make ones for previous series to protect the balance of the article. Also seeing that there was a paragraph about the Bushtucker trials underneath Series 7. If someone was able to provide Bushtucker trial stats for all the series, They would most likely have to make separate articles for each series just like Strictly Come Dancing or Dancing on Ice (but those shows have their diehard fans.)

Now I see that they have made a separate page for Series 7 which is a step in the right direction, but is it unnecessary due to Series 1-6 not getting pages. and what will happen next year when and if Series 8 happens. Do we integrate Series 7 into the main page? This is all confusing. I tried to contact an administrator for advice, but I have not heard back. Do you have any solutions? Thanks 69.90.207.148 (talk) 21:49, 25 November 2007 (UTC) samusek2[reply]

Hmm, this is a tricky one. Although I don't necessarily think that a page for Series 7 is a bad thing it does make the other ones look bad. However, If we do integrate it with the main page, then we would have to either find Bushtucker trials for all the others series. So its kinda a lose lose situation no matter what way we go it will take a lot of work (not that I mind doing it). I reckon we'll be able to find the required info up til about series 3 as thats when it really took off. Let me know if you hear word from an adminstrator. Also I have a feeling the reason you haven't heard is because you don't have a userpage:S--Hiltonhampton (talk) 22:05, 25 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:HeatworldLogo.gif. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 00:33, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have to say I apsolutely love your page and your boxes. Awsome. I would love it if you would keep in touch..... Also if you would like to email me you will have to go through my boyfriend it's crazybob639@hotmail.com... I would love to hear from you... and also see messages on my page..... Take a look at it it's being redone by someone who adopted me but It's cool. So your a big brother hugh... what does it take to get a big brother?????? Well talk to you soon hopefully.....

Rianon Burnet 21:14, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:PetePA.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 16:34, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Rough Justice.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 23:57, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, please note in future when listing articles for deletion that you should follow the directions at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion#How to list pages for deletion, making sure you follow all three steps and not just the first one. I've fixed it for you this time. ^anemone│_projectors 22:12, 18 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Ding dong logo .gif. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 00:45, 2 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:FNP Unleashed.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 18:30, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I am interested in American/British Arts. I'm an artist and am very unfamiliar with the technical jargon on wikipedia. I have written an article on a famous photographer and film director of the nineties and eighties but I don't know how to format the article let alone how to post it. It took me over an hour to be able to send this message. I am a fast learner. I just need help posting this article and others that I am busy working on. All are media related.--Rubyen 14:25, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 06:36, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated Aisleyne Horgan-Wallace (Model), an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aisleyne Horgan-Wallace (Model). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Knock-Off Nigel (talk) 14:31, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Care to adopt me?

--HotBuch (talk) 21:57, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above newsletter was delivered by an automatic bot because you are registered on the WikiProject Big Brother spamlist. Please feel free to remove yourself if you do not wish to receive these messages anymore.

→ Please direct all enquiries to the WikiProject talk page.
→ This newsletter/release was delivered by ENewsBot · 14:04, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Rough Justice.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:25, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

mmmmm Does verifiability not over-rule comments like that? If a statement is provable by verifiable media it does not disrupt the page. <small-caps>THEY WILL IMMEDIATLEY(sic) BE DELETED</small-caps> sounds like wishing to edit war. I trust that wasn't your intention. Please treat other editors with respect and discuss problems in the talk page. Please. -- BpEps - t@lk 21:34, 11 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

if you post the 17 sources on the talk page it would definitely help diffuse an editing problem. Can you do it in the next day or two please? -- BpEps - t@lk 00:51, 12 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above newsletter was delivered by an automatic bot because you are registered on the WikiProject Big Brother spamlist. Please feel free to remove yourself if you do not wish to receive these messages anymore.

→ Please direct all enquiries to the WikiProject talk page.
→ This newsletter/release was delivered by ENewsBot · 10:42, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a backlog of 56 users at Category:Wikipedians seeking to be adopted in Adopt-a-user. Please consider offering adoption to one or more of these users. Don't forget to change their {{adoptme}} template to {{adoptoffer|Hiltonhampton}}. Thank you for your continued participation in Wikipedia:Adopt-a-User. xenocidic (talk) 19:44, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Jasjdgs, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Jasjdgs is a redirect page resulting from an implausible typo (CSD R3).

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Jasjdgs, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 01:31, 1 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to be adopted. My reasons are that I would like to learn how to make a userbox, among other others. Thank you. cdmajava There are always possibilities... 19:28, 11 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A friendly reminder from the Adopt-a-User project =)

Hey there Hiltonhampton! This is a friendly reminder to update your status at Wikipedia:Adopt-a-User/Adoptee's Area/Adopters whenever it is appropriate in order to provide new users with the most up-to-date information on available adopters. Also please note that we will be removing adopters who have not edited in 60 days. If you become active again (and we hope you do!) please feel free to re-add yourself. Cheers!

• Notice delivery by xenobot 14:20, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think there's enough now to fork Imogen Thomas off to her own article. Aside from the Miss Wales and BB2006 stuff, she's probably done enough in her modelling career (Playboy, Page 3 and Zoo Weekly, for example) to establish notability. The AfD that resulted in the redirect was over 2 1/2 years ago and since then there have been more than enough published stories about her to warrant inclusion. Any objections to forking this off? caknuck _° resolves to be more caknuck-y 19:35, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for you contribution to this article. However, dates of birth and the like need to be confirmed and supported by reliable sources that pass WP:RS. If you can find such a source to back up this claim, please edit the article and cite the source with the {{Cite web}} or {{Cite news}} templates. I reccomend you see this discussion on where to find reliable sources. Thanks, DJ 13:10, 6 June 2009 (UTC).[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:FNP Unleashed.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 14:55, 4 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion has begun about whether the article Rough Justice (novel), which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rough Justice (novel) until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 22:59, 20 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Aisleyne Horgan-Wallace is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aisleyne Horgan-Wallace (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. scope_creep 19:53, 23 August 2014 (UTC)

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:10, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sent by DannyS712 (talk) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) at 08:53, 13 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sent by User:ZLEA via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:16, 19 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:19, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User:TheDoctorWho (talk) 08:14, 14 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article Wannabe (TV series) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Appears to fail notability guidelines

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DonaldD23 talk to me 02:59, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:FamilyFortunes.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:13, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Pete's PA (title card).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:03, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]