User talk:Housexpose

Hello, I'm Davey2010. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Starkillers without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. –Davey2010^Talk 01:27, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I did explain. It was not sourced at all. In one instance, the page read next to 'associated acts' it read 'please don't add associated acts'.

this was written like a promo piece filled with wiki:puff

i will be tagging it for deletion Housexpose (talk) 01:29, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

So you find sources or add {{CN}} to the article, You don't remove massive chunks of the text!, Tagging for deletion because of unsourced issues will only see it speedy kept. –Davey2010^Talk 01:31, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Starkillers. Your edits continue to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

• If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
• The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Starkillers was changed by Housexpose (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.891791 on 2015-08-04T01:32:05+00:00 .

Your reversions are unfounded. I'm bringing in other editors on this... the fact is THERE ARE NO SOURCES BECAUSE THE TEXT IS fake

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 01:32, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]