User talk:ImageRemovalBot

A fully approved image of Andrew McGibbon was removed from his page this morning without discussion, despite my providing a full and detailed explanation in the image data. He owns the copyright and supplied a high resolution copy for specific use here. This explanatory text has also been deleted, again with no discussion. An explanation please. Iangreaves (talk) 15:52, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This bot deleted pre-1923 public domain images I had uploaded after they were clearly licensed as public domain, FKCKING BOT!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Aaronlife (talk • contribs) 18:50, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The valmeyer image was my own and I clearly stipulated that I was granting wiki a license to use it. Copyright status was not and is not in question. 216.90.69.185 (talk) 18:59, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The image file includes all the necessary author, source, and usage/copyright information. Please do not delete this image again.

Hello, ImageRemovalBot. You have new messages at Rickshaw7425's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

dear sir, the images are free to use for educational purposes.why they have deleted from my IIRS page? Nistha.aslp (talk) 07:31, 25 June 2011 (UTC)nistha.aslp[reply]

Margaret Gardiner Images should NOT have been removed - I made it clear I have permission to use it (User cj1340Cj1340 (talk) 08:01, 31 October 2008 (UTC)cj1340))[reply]

An editor has nominated Harvey Delai, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Harvey Delai and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 09:00, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The bot removed a link to a dead image in the Henry Kissinger article; the article was broken before (because the image was deleted -- thus there was an "invalid image" error) but now it is still broken. Perhaps you could add some code to check if the image is linked in an image box or something similar?--71.108.167.113 (talk) 06:04, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved

 – image added Darkspots (talk) 11:19, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello sir/maam I am a new user here in wikipedia so i cannot edit protected articles like Angel locsin, i am only just concern of the article because it has no image. I am calmly requesting you to Put this image Angel_in_Dubai.jpg click here to see the image, the image was already proven licensed under creative commons and it was already inspected by Flickreviewer,please put it inside Angel Locsin's article with the caption of Angel Locsin at the Lobo Tour in Dubai. Please give me your kindness. Thankyou so much. God Bless You! Watcher Wiki (talk) 10:30, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, why did you delete the picture from the hotel pool? I have stayed there and the picture was genuine! Just that at the time I have stayed there was no water in the pool. --Shorty23sin (talk) 06:46, 25 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I am reporting a bot malfunction. A license has been obtained from the owner to use this image. Please stop your bot from removing it again. Bob BScar23625 (talk) 14:55, 17 September 2008 (UTC)IT CAN BE MORE THAN DAT BUT TOTLLY DEPENDS UPON URSELF[reply]

her photo keeps getting deleted =( I am BEGGING you to help me. Ionly work on here page and Clint Catalyst's, and Ihave been having this problem with both. The image of Liz was obtained directly from her, it was taken by her husband and they gave me permission to use it. I sent this permission to wiki permissions email. I really appreciate your help, because it is turning into a big hassle habing to re-upload all of these images so often. Tallulah13 (talk) —Preceding undated comment was added at 18:22, 14 October 2008 (UTC). IS THERI ANY FESIREABE —Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.162.237.108 (talk) 10:18, 13 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The image that was deleted-1972 Vega Kammback is a scan I made of my photograph taken in 1973 of my grandfathers car. in the discussion on the five images in question (all my photos) it was astablished that they are my photos taken by me and scanned on my Cannon 310 scanner and (trying to KEEP THEM IN THE ARTICLE.) Now that the non-free images are all but deleted I resorted to my old photograhs of vegas I have owned and my grandfather's. I would like the photo back in the article please. It says in deleted file it was admitted that it was a magazine scan. wrong file. I listed it as a scan of my photograph from 1973. The magazine scan was a non-free image that was also deleted. (VegavairbobVegavairbob (talk) 22:09, 9 April 2009 (UTC))[reply]

Go to Chevrolet Vega look the the two photos I just uploaded of the green Vega wagon...the licence plate on that car is the same as the plate on the car of the photo you deleted- the deleted photo is on the bottom. the person in the photo is me and this car is the same one in the photo that was deleted for non-free use. does this prove the photo you deleted is mine.? How can I keep the bottom (deleted)photo in the article? (VegavairbobVegavairbob (talk))

why was his picture removed Baller449 (talk) 23:50, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Does this bot malfunction ? The picture of Malik Ambar was remvoed even after sufficient sources were quoted. Without any prior intimation or discussion the image as removed. If this is the case then wikipedia might lose its cerdiblity. Please do not remove images randomly and if this bot is problematic, please ensure that its starts to work properly. Nefirious (talk) 04:45, 25 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The bot only removed a link to an image that was deleted by an administrator. See Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2009 June 14#File:Copy of 12062009755.jpg. Rettetast (talk) 07:33, 25 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Administrator claims it was not him who removed the picture Nefirious (talk) 17:59, 25 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This bot removed a picture of the band Balzac, which was taken by me in Vienna. It was uploaded by another user with my written permission, that he properly linked in the copyright section. So... what...? Is there anyone who is actually pays attention to what this bot is doing? Or was there some mysterious, unknown reason why this picture was removed? Anyways, I'm uploading it again, please leave it as it is this time, thanks.

Hi my friend, how are you? I've seen you took off the picture in this page. If you go on the Italian, Frech, Latin pages there's the picture I've taken to him, and I gave free licence. You can put also in the Englis page!

Have a nice Sunday

Rei Momo - Wiki.IT —Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.171.181.38 (talk) 22:39, 17 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The picture demosntrating the ANAT AMI-100 displayed in the wikiedia was removed without reason, along with a second and third demonstrati ng the ANATWALKER and an ANAT module. These pictures can be displayed on wikipedia though they belong to Robotocis Design inc, who has authorized their use on wikipedia. Please revert the changes and return these pictures to the page, if there are to many with 3, the picture of the ANAT walker robot would be adequate, and it demosntrates the same coniguriation as the arm. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Canadiansteve (talk • contribs) 19:42, 19 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is List of creatures in the Resident Evil series. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of creatures in the Resident Evil series (2nd nomination). Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:16, 27 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Light Finding Operation. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Light Finding Operation. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:11, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Devia. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Devia. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:15, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated articles are Previous Bose headphones, RGM-89 Jegan, Starwars: The New Era. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to the relevant discussion pages: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Previous Bose headphones for Previous Bose headphones, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RGM-89 Jegan (2nd nomination) for RGM-89 Jegan, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Starwars: The New Era for Starwars: The New Era. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:05, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please use a higher delay. I deleted an image after moving it to Commons, and before my edit for the article to fix the name went trough, I got into an e/c with the bot. —TheDJ (talk • contribs) 21:00, 22 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

In a perfect world yes, but with multiple tabs open on a slow internet connection, sometimes accidents happen. —TheDJ (talk • contribs) 15:47, 23 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately, I find Wikipedia userunfriendly. I spent more than 4 hours to upload 4 images of Shah Baleeghuddin saheb, which I received from the Shah Baleeghuddin Foundation with permission. Reason, user unfriendly information on the help pages. Wikipedia seems to be only for those individuals who are either expert Programmers or have some understanding of programming. I have fairly advanced computer skills but sorry to say I find instructions difficult to follow. I have two requests: - Please help me in clear steps as to what I need to do to establish the permission of the images you removed. Do not refer me to another page filled with jargon baout programming. - this is a plea, as Wikipedia is a very informative and valuable project, please simplify the instructions not all the people uploading and editing are Programmers. Instructions are very difficult to understand. More people would conform to the Wiki policies, if they understand the instructions.

Thanks

(Mandy Zaki (talk) 05:18, 8 January 2010 (UTC))[reply]

Why was Nick griffin matriculation.jpg deleted? There is an ongoing discusion here [[1]] and this looks pre-emptive?Slatersteven (talk) 19:38, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I reverted this edit of your bot, as there seems to be no reason for the deletion of the image. It seems to have deleted the image from all the articles it is in use in. Surely this is a mistake?. --Saddhiyama (talk) 22:20, 7 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your so called bot removed at least four images from the page List of U.S. National Parks by Elevation. Someone else had previously deleted the image from wikipedia for supposed unclear copyright issues, a separate issue, but then ImageRemovalBot comes along and takes out the blank box where the picture used to be without making sure the article still makes sense without the image. The four images were part of the references at the bottom of the article. The footnotes make reference to these images. Without the images, the footnotes don't make sense. Now, unless you actually read the footnotes, you won't notice that something is wrong. The images need to be replaced, not removed. —Preceding unsigned comment added by ArcticBartek (talk • contribs) 22:42, 12 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. This image removal bot is getting more and more obsolete and useless. It actually mars pages rather than being helpful...very poor performance. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.100.138.11 (talk) 17:37, 25 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

An picture of Ian Hacking that I personally took, uploaded and licensed for Wiki Commons, was removed without any notice. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 189.146.0.129 (talk) 23:43, 5 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Just noticed edits are not marked as bot edits. Thought you should know. --Muhandes (talk) 23:17, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I just noticed that again. Edits are not marked as bot edits. --Muhandes (talk) 10:46, 20 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Glad to see this bot is back up in action. Less tedious work for me. — ξ^xplicit 20:37, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Can someone tell me why this program has deleted a picture I have full rights to?! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Roxie best (talk • contribs) 09:36, 1 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Polar concept argument, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you! -- CP72 01:54, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

How fast does this bot need to move? For example, when removing deleted images from articles, should it do so immediately after they are deleted, or should it take into consideration active, non-automated, editing by real logged-in users?

For example, if two images are duplicates of each other but the image to be deleted has the title which is wished to be kept, then the unwanted image must be deleted and then the desired image must be moved to the title of the deleted image. This takes far less time than it took me to type the above (click 'delete', type a quick reason, click 'move', type a quick reason) and the image would been back in the article, unless it gets removed from the article by a bot without a stopwatch. Hyacinth (talk) 03:08, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

An image was removed from the article http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stevan_Aleksi%C4%87

It had the proper license tag and everything. Another image, with exactly the same license tag, was not removed. Could I please receive an explanation for this? I would like to include this image again, but what is the point if the bot will delete it every time :(--Nslazstc (talk) 19:48, 15 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have the same complaint about the removal of File:TK_Donaldson_27Oct90_London.JPG which I have restored. Please discuss before future automated removal. The file is licenced as Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License with attribution: "Private photo taken-by and owned-by former Alcor Life Extension Foundation President Mike Darwin who sent the photo to me requesting that it be used as the photo for Dr. Donaldson's Wikipedia page". --Ben Best (talk) 03:31, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, An image was removed from the article Andhra Pradesh It had the proper license tag and everything. Could I please receive an explanation for this? I would like to include this image again, but what is the point if the bot will delete it every time. (Dragonbooster4 (talk) 07:37, 27 August 2011 (UTC)).[reply]

The image that I uploaded that showed the MetLife Building under construction was deleted. But why? Administrators and helpers like you must help other people and not starting erasing pictures and links like maniacs! - steven1098s 12:26 (UTC_, August 30th, 2011. —Preceding undated comment added 09:26, 30 August 2011 (UTC).[reply]

I put a picture of Bob Turner why whas it deleated. You are stupid. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.195.202.15 (talk) 19:56, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker)See NPA and learn to read. Acather96 (talk) 17:33, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. May i know why you deleted so many images of Beyonce? ★Jivesh 1205★ (talk / ♫♫Give 4 a try!!!♫♫) 20:08, 21 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please reply. ★Jivesh 1205★ (talk / ♫♫Give 4 a try!!!♫♫) 17:43, 22 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Which images? --Carnildo (talk) 23:37, 22 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

All images related to 4 Intimate Nights with Beyoncé. There were around 8 images. ★Jivesh 1205★ (talk / ♫♫Give 4 a try!!!♫♫) 05:14, 23 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The six images recently removed from that article were all deleted as copyright violations: the uploader made clearly false claims to be the photographer, when he was in fact taking somebody else's images and claiming them as his own. --Carnildo (talk) 22:35, 23 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. ★Jivesh 1205★ (talk / ♫♫Give 4 a try!!!♫♫) 03:17, 24 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'm seeing a bunch of removals of images from pages with the edit-summary that the image was deleted. However...not really, the image was just moved to commons (perhaps recently or long ago) and only the local copy was what got deleted (the commons image itself still appears at the same filename). I just reverted a bunch of them (easy to find by looking for bluelinks in the edit-summaries of Special:Contributions/ImageRemovalBot). I don't recall seeing problems like this before the recent MW upgrade. In the first case I checked, I did go to the page on en and got a weird display (what one usually sees for a deleted image) rather than the usual way the commons one is displayed--server-purge on the page fixed it so that the commons image appeared "as if local". I wonder if there's a general caching problem or delay when images are deleted that is confusing the bot, or a change in the way "does a file exist?" tests work when there's a commons file of same name? DMacks (talk) 20:50, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'm guessing this was a side effect of MediaWiki bug 31383, which has been fixed. --Carnildo (talk) 00:57, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds plausible, yes. Have not seen any such mis-removal edits today. Thanks for the followup! DMacks (talk) 01:20, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

MORE[edit]

MORE problems with eclipse diagrams being removed (commented out) after being moved to commons, seemingly due to a delay of some sort, some show up on commons that have been delinked, some not. SockPuppetForTomruen (talk) 00:56, 28 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

NOW EXIST?

18:00, 27 October 2011 (diff | hist) August 1971 lunar eclipse ‎ (Removing links to deleted file File:Lunar eclipse from moon-1971Aug06.png) (top)

18:00, 27 October 2011 (diff | hist) List of central lunar eclipses ‎ (Removing links to deleted file File:Lunar eclipse from moon-1971Aug06.png) (top)

17:59, 27 October 2011 (diff | hist) March 2024 lunar eclipse ‎ (Removing links to deleted file File:Lunar eclipse from moon-2024Mar25.png) (top)

17:59, 27 October 2011 (diff | hist) List of 21st-century lunar eclipses ‎ (Removing links to deleted file File:Lunar eclipse from moon-2024Mar25.png) (top)

17:59, 27 October 2011 (diff | hist) April 1995 lunar eclipse ‎ (Removing links to deleted file File:Lunar eclipse from moon-1995Apr15.png) (top)

STILL MISSING?

17:58, 27 October 2011 (diff | hist) November 2021 lunar eclipse ‎ (Removing links to deleted file File:Lunar eclipse from moon-2021Nov19.png) (top)

17:58, 27 October 2011 (diff | hist) List of 21st-century lunar eclipses ‎ (Removing links to deleted file File:Lunar eclipse from moon-2021Nov19.png)

Well, I'd like your help to delete the "File:Te wo tatake music video.jpg" .I made a mistake so, I'd like your help to delete it so I can make it right. Thanks! Gleyson (talk) 14:01, 13 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Alchemist - - I've uploaded a photo and wrote the copyrights. WHY??? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Orr971 (talk • contribs) 18:13, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Logos and uniforms of the New York Giants, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Calu Thanks 16:25, 2 March 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Calu2000 (talk • contribs)

This edit looked fine; I undid Calu's edit and left a note on his talkpage about it. DMacks (talk) 16:37, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Victoria Park, Regina. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Calu Thanks 17:59, 2 March 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Calu2000 (talk • contribs)

ERIK PEVERNAGIE _ TERRA INCOGNITA[edit]

Hello, Licence has been given by the artist to International-critics

"Herewith Erik Pevernagie declares to grant the license to webmaster Marc Degraef and Wikipedia user Sabinep and Wikipedia user International Critics to use all texts and images from and about his work. They can dispose of any use or the disclosure of the work. Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation; with no Invariant Sections, no Front-Cover Texts, and no Back-Cover Texts. A copy of the license is included in the section entitled "GNU Free Documentation License". Erik Pevernagie. erik_pevernagie@msn.com

I, the copyright holder of this work, release this work into the public domain. This applies worldwide. In some countries this may not be legally possible; if so: I grant anyone the right to use this work for any purpose, without any conditions, unless such conditions are required by law."

Thanks and best regards International-critics (talk) 19:03, 22 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

that image is use full to that article,and also i got that picture,owner of the picture is me. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 112.135.57.81 (talk) 12:34, 20 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The bot does not, apparently, handle galleries correctly -- it began the removal shown here after the pipe, when it should have been before. That messed up all the later images in the gallery. . . Jim - Jameslwoodward (talk to me • contribs) 14:29, 28 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have a question. How do I upload an image such as "Birthday Emotions" from the Sesame Street TV Show? Dcelano 23:39, July 12, 2013 (UTC)

File:Sino-American Dream.jpg Without reading the publisher's legal authorization, you removed the image. It appeared that the publisher, who has the copyrights to the image, uploaded it. Why did you remove the legally authorized image for wiki publication? Please reconsider and read the legal content responsibly for the service of others. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lui Kaiping (talk • contribs) 14:44, 14 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The bot just deleted links to File:Rocket mass ratio versus delta-v.png, but it was deleted as there's an SVG version, File:Rocket mass ratio versus delta-v.svg. I've been though and replaced the images (only 6 occurrences); is there some way this could have been done automatically, if not by this bot by some other as I'm sure I've seen a bot doing this before?--JohnBlackburne^words_deeds 21:25, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

	The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
	Great job removing broken images.  :) Batreeqah (Talk) (Contribs) 21:15, 18 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, your bot keeps removing my pictures and I am not sure why.

File:Robbie Gold LA.png, File:Robbie Gold Ernie Banks 2014.JPG, File:Robbie National Anthem.JPG

These are not copyrighted and free use images, permission even granted by artist. Please advise.

Bmedick (talk) 20:00, 24 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your addition to Kid Kulafu has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. RoiVladimir (talk) 06:50, 20 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

	The Photographer's Barnstar
	For all your hard work removing now obsolete images; I thought you should get a "Photographer's Barnstar" Kandiwell 14:28, 22 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

I just was wondering why the image i uploaded on Mohammed Khaled Al-Khadher was removed. And i would like to know how to successfully add one in the future.

Kind regards,

Abs Kuw84 (talk) 19:02, 12 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

	The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
	You're one of my favorite bots. Thanks for removing deleted images, it helps a lot! ~GottaGoFast Stepitup 19:54, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi ImageRemovalBot, Why do you have deleting the image of Lisa Adams? It is fair use but the Englsih wiki agree it with fair use image's.--Maxie1hoi (talk) 11:55, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Diannaa deleted the image for violating one of the criteria for non-free images: it's an image of a living person, so it's reasonable to expect that a free image can be found or created. --Carnildo (talk) 01:01, 5 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, why did you delete my picture? I don't believe that it is copy righted, And why are you answering the same answer to those other users? My picture is not a non-content picture, I tookin this picture myself. M.P. (MasterPiece) (talk) 07:24, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User:Diannaa deleted the image because it was lacking information on the image's source and copyright status. When you upload an image, you need to say where you got it, and you need to provide license information -- if you created the image yourself, you need to indicate which license you're using to give Wikipedia the right to use the image. --Carnildo (talk) 02:12, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Can you bring back my Thomas Images, because this time I'll add the Media Information please. Keefeky (talk) 12:49, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you remove the image? SUNAN (talk) 01:42, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I understand you removed the 'River Flows' image I added to the F. L. Lucas page because book-cover titles are only allowed on book-pages, not on author-pages (despite my adding a justification for the image on the author-page); so I've now written an article on the book, and would be grateful if you could unblock the image for it: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Tom_elm/sandbox/The_River_Flows_(novel)&action=edit With thanks, 193.39.159.73 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.39.159.73 (talk) 16:18, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Good day. You deleted images I uploaded to the CFB North Bay page on 17 January 2017 citing "You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image." I made it abundantly clear in the uploading and in the credit lines that these images (a) belong to the subject--22 Wing/Canadian Forces Base North Bay--and that (b) I, an officer on this base, uploaded the images with the Base Commander's permission. So there are NO licensing issues. I uploaded the images on behalf of the owner, with his full permission. I expect that you are probably not Canadian nor are familiar with how permissions work with respect to images belonging to units of the Canadian Armed Forces, so I understand your confusion in this matter. So reinstate the images please. And if you have any further concerns please contact me to discuss before you delete or alter anything. I shall do everything I can to placate these concerns to your satisfaction. Thank you. Yours respectfully, Doug Newman, Captain, 22 Wing/Canadian Forces Base North Bay 22WHERO (talk) 14:30, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you remove my image. There is a descriptions and sources about the article. What is my fault? Robin Hooke (talk) 07:37, 15 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Trout Flies designed by Richard Walker.JPG Can you explain why this file has been deleted? I created the flies shown in the picture and took the photograph and own the file and have agreed for it to go in the public domain. I cannot see a copyright problem. Can you help restore it. Many thanks Adrian Freer 12:30, 22 November 2018 (UTC)A FreerAdrian Freer 12:30, 22 November 2018 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Adrian freer (talk • contribs) --Adrian Freer 20:27, 22 November 2018 (UTC)af--Adrian Freer 20:27, 22 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hey only one question. Can I put up images on wikipedia from the same person's wikipedia page (example: I put up a picture of Amar Osim from his Bosnian wikipedia page to his English wikipedia page. That same thing I also done with Husref Musemić. Those two pictures were not deleted before I deleted them. So my question is if it is okay to upload images from a Bosnian to an English wikipedia page of the same person? BosGamBR (talk) 16:32, 27 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, please Remove this File and Delete a Image. Thanks! Albe23413 (talk) 06:30, 6 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Remove links to deleted file. Albe23413 (talk) 06:38, 6 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

HEYYY CAN YOU PLEASE DELETE THIS FILE? THANKS!!! Albe23413 (talk) 02:09, 16 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Can you please bring back the image you deleted, you have deleted the wrong one, the one to remove is the one they renamed with the random numbers name. Dalhoa (talk) 17:57, 4 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Why was the image removed? 0 Opeinoluwa101 (talk) 19:04, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello.I would like to say something. Why did you delete the photo of Christophoros Papakaliatis that I uploaded? I had said my source I don't know how to explain it in English language.Είχα παραθέσει την πηγή, έγραψα την ημερομηνία, είχα βάλει την άδεια χρήσης.What's more did you want?

Abs Γιάννης Ευαγγελίου (talk) 10:28, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This edit by ImageRemovalBot deleted one of two images used with Template:Multiple image, resulting in a single over-sized and distorted image looking like a mess. Please note, I am not contesting why the image was deleted. I wonder if there is a better way to remove the image from the page without the resutling mess? This could be a unique situation where the bot flags the page for manual deletion? Best wishes. Flibirigit (talk) 01:19, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]