User talk:Jai49

From Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Cambridge School Noida. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. EGL1234 (talk) 10:38, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
@EGL1234:, why do you think that removal of promotional content from Cambridge School Noida is vandalism? Please explain? This article is written like an advertisement and i am trying to make it in Wikipedia tone. The content is written in this article is also un-referenced.Jai49 (talk) 10:44, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Jai49, I have looked into the case, and although it is factual information, it may be interpreted as an advertisement. Should I place our case on the teahouse so admins can review and make the decision becuase I'm not sure who is correct. EGL1234 (talk) 10:48, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Sure, please place it on Teahouse. Let the other editors decide.Jai49 (talk) 10:51, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Thank You Bonadea for removing the promotional and un-sourced content from Cambridge School Noida. My dear friend EGL1234, i think it is resolved now. Jai49 (talk) 04:14, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jai49 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hi its a long time and i accept my 1st mistake. I assure you it will not happen again in future and i will follow all Wikipedia guidelines. Kindly unblock. Thank You Jai49 (talk) 12:41 pm, Today (UTC−5)

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

  • the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
  • the block is no longer necessary because you
    1. understand what you have been blocked for,
    2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
    3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. signed, Rosguill talk 21:48, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jai49 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hi respected admins, i read Wikipedia Guidelines of uses. Now i understand what you have been blocked for, I will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and will make useful contributions instead. Thank You Jai49 (talk) 06:40, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

That's too vague. You're just rephrasing the last decline. You need to say what you actually did wrong and why. PhilKnight (talk) 11:26, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jai49 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hi, i read Wikipedia Guidelines of uses very well. Now i understand the Wikipedia sockpuppet policy and it is not a place of advertisement. I will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and will make useful contributions in future. Thank You. Jai49 (talk) 11:06, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You're still just rephrasing the instructions. Please answer the question without using any of the words in the instructions. Do not use the phrase "useful contributions" or "cause damage or disruption". Don't copy-paste any of the words from the instructions in your next unblock request. An unblock request is supposed show that you understand our policies, not that you understand how to copy-paste text. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 16:17, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

So what sort of things are you interested in editing? Daniel Case (talk) 07:28, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Daniel Case:, Thank You for the response. In future, my contributions on wikipedia will be as neutral point of view. I will never use Wikipedia for advertisement or promotion. I will share only informational content as per best of my knowledge and available references. I would love to edit on Wikipedia in future on related subjects of Education, Places, society, Government related bodies and Entertainment.Jai49 (talk) 16:09, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sir :@Daniel Case: Can you please review my request? Jai49 (talk) 08:27, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Well, one other thing we like anyone blocked for sockpuppetry to do if they sincerely want to be unblocked is disclose any other sock accounts they created, regardless of whether they used them or not. If you have sock accounts we don't know about, now's the time. Daniel Case (talk) 14:44, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Jai49&oldid=1093618031"