User talk:Jotsko

Please do not add content without citing reliable sources, as you did to Shakira. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --Yamla 20:36, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your citation does not claim that Shakira is "a quarter Macedonian, a quarter Lesbanese, and half Colombian", it cites that her father is Lebanese-Macedonian but not necessarily a 50-50 mix. --Yamla 21:57, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Thehorrorsepalbumcover.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 03:10, 8 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Jotsko, Cyber metal seems better as a redirect to Industrial metal, as it's not really a well cited defined sub genre.. The sources cited appear to consist of zines, blogs and other sources which do not satisfy WP:RS. The policy when dealing with such neologisms (recently or poorly defined terms) is to redirect without appropriate verification of significance from reliable sources. Bands referring to themselves as a given type of music does not necessarily satisfy this. If you have firmer references you can go back in the history and add them to the article. There have been many previous cases where genres like this were deleted, as Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and demands a high standard of verification. Cheers, Deiz talk 08:00, 29 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent contribution removed content from Death punk. Please be careful when editing pages and do not remove content from Wikipedia without a good reason, which should be specified in the edit summary. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. → AA ^(talk) — 10:38, 29 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

In reference to your question on the Help desk, here is an example of mw:Extension:CategoryTree displaying Category:Cycling:

--Teratornis 16:13, 2 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Click the "edit" link to the right of the heading above to view the wikitext source code for this example. Also read the entire mw:Extension:CategoryTree page. --Teratornis 19:20, 2 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

ASP is neither a Gothic rock group nor a Darkwave band. Don't add wrong genres. --Breathtaker 16:31, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Emotronic, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Seraphim ^Whipp 20:15, 11 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated We Came As Romans, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/We Came As Romans. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. RT | Talk 22:17, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on We Came As Romans requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must include on the external site the statement "I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 and later." You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 22:29, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Electropunk has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. nneonneo ^talk 04:11, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Jotsko,

I noticed that your article about cyber metal was redirected again to industrial metal. ALthough I don't want to get into discussions whether this item should have it's own article or not, I wanted to let you know that I think it was worth mentioning somewhere. I have added a new chapter in the topic industrial metal with subgenres, including your text about cyber metal. Hope this will satisfy you? User:Brynnar/sig 08:21, 12 June 2008 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Ladytron has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Hardyplants (talk) 04:39, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Kick the Bass, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the article and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Ecoleetage (talk) 21:51, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

An article that you have been involved in editing, Kick the Bass EP, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kick the Bass EP. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Ecoleetage (talk) 22:01, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. Ecoleetage (talk) 03:37, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not ignore comments on pages, as you did to Cradle of Filth - a lot of time and discussion has gone into their genre, and so please do not alter it without first discussing it on Talk:Cradle of Filth. ≈ The Haunted Angel 12:21, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, just noticed you have a problem with the word "Greeks" in the above article, please talk about it on the talk page instead of remove it without explanation. Thank you. The Cat and the Owl (talk) 03:32, 20 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It wasn't removed from the WP article text but from the reference part of a citation. What this person did was falsify a citation.--Xenovatis (talk) 09:58, 20 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Mope rock requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Mr. Vernon (talk) 13:41, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. In one of your recent edits, you added links to an article which did not add content or meaning, or repeated the same link several times throughout the article. Please see Wikipedia's guideline on links to avoid overlinking. Thank you. Cannibaloki 16:13, 6 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Neo-Glam requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. JD554 (talk) 10:54, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I see you've been warned about this repeatedly in the past - please stop endlessly sub-dividing musical genres unless you have reliable sources which back up the changes being made. Readers are looking for frames of reference in the form of articles when they examine the genres in a given infobox, not one editor's personal interpretation of the exact sub-genre that a given act or album may belong to. If you want to go adding Electro-ethereal or Micropop as genres then please ensure they have articles first, especially before replacing existing genres which do have articles. Chris Cunningham (not at work) - talk 09:59, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I had to clean up a few Skinny Puppy pages for the same thing. Chris is right. You need to have reliable sources if you are going to change genres as much as you have. I would suggest using the discussion sections before making changes to genres for the time being. Xe7al (talk) 09:46, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to Holy Wood (In the Shadow of the Valley of Death). Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Please do not needlessly and tediously sub-divide genres without a reference and without first discussing the changes on articles' talk pages. DKqwerty (talk) 11:49, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

I don't know if this is the proper way to contact you for this... anyway, I'm the admin of alterna2.com a website dedicated to concerts reviews in Barcelona. We publish our contents under the Creative Commons license and we have some pictures of Cult of Luna performing in Barcelona I think they can be suitable for the article.

I specially like this one: http://www.flickr.com/photos/alterna2/3380537962/in/set-72157607747016086/. If you're going to add it please refer "Rosario López" as the author and http://www.alterna2.com as the website.

Thanks in advance :)

Best regards

Jose —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.174.154.84 (talk) 21:24, 6 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:35, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]