User talk:Lajsikonik

Welcome!

Hello, Lajsikonik, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  - Darwinek 16:54, 7 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Lajsikonik, thanks for your Poland-related contributions. You may be interested in the Poland-related Wikipedia notice board. Appleseed (Talk) 21:22, 8 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Cześć. Zapraszam cię do Wikipedia:WikiProject Silesia. Mam nadzieję że się wpiszesz na listę użytkowników i coś czasem poedytujesz związanego z naszym Śląskiem :) LUCPOL 22:39, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Lajsikonik! Thank you for your contributions related to Poland. You may be interested in visiting Portal:Poland/Poland-related Wikipedia notice board, joining our discussions and sharing your creations with us.

-- _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk}  15:42, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Lajsikonik! Ops, sorry. It is a one of my habit, I use Voivodship :(. But I know about it; we use Voivodeship, becouse it is a standart on English Wikipedia. Pozdrawiam! Marcin Suwalczan [our talk] 13:16, 23 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi :-) Citation is generally useful and may help improve a stub article where there is little information on anything else. As you seem to have plenty of links, why not cite? It's not mandatory, but it is useful. Mentality 15:38, 23 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Good evening Lajsikonik. "Gmina" or "Commune"? In my opinion the situation is clear - the term being used by us is "commune" (source) ;). Other topics - on IRC. Powinno być Houston, we have a problem :P. Pozdrawiam! Marcin Suwalczan [our talk] 19:15, 25 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Few notes. Our resident expert on this is User:Balcer, make sure to drop him a note. See also semi-active Wikipedia:WikiProject Geography of Poland, where most of those issues were discussed and consensus was reached in the past, and if you ever want to get attention of most active Poland-related editors, do so by dropping a note at WP:PWNB - I highly recommend watching that page and taking part in the life of our little friendly community here :) -- _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk}  20:59, 25 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. It is good to see another person interested in improving geographical articles related to Poland. I never worry too much about the precise form of article titles. They can always be easily moved to something more appropriate later. The important thing is to have the articles.

To answer your specific questions, my suggestions for ambiguous cases would be, following the practice of Polish Wikipedia (why not?)

• "Name Commune (Voivodeship)"
• and for villages "Name (Voivodeship)" - or "Name (County)" in cases where there is more than one village with a given nname in a Voivodeship. In rare cases of two villages of the same name in the same county (say Bochotnica), go with "Name (Commune").

For one example, see Hrebenne, Hrebenne (Tomaszów Lubelski County). Hope this helps. Balcer 23:38, 25 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

About my removing of content in the article about the Himavanti Confraterinty Order - sorry, I didn't know that it was true but it was controversial content added without source. You also did the same in the article about Richard Matuszewski when I added info about his activism and you deleted it. And you can't just block me for "POV" just like that - I wasn't warned and I hadd asked not to be blocked in my edit discripton. Krystian 17:46, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Aha, it's OK, you've shortened the block. Krystian 20:23, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It wasn't block "just 'cause POV", and matter this time wasn't controversial: it is well known fact that Mohan was three times arested, (you should use {fakt} temlate in this case, now it is properly sourced), but it wasn't main reason. Main reason was, again, an edit war, and you has been warned to do not "hide" a proper edits between POV to make rewert harder, and to discuss imortant change first on discussion page, you just won't search the consensus with other users (Rdrozd, Migatu, Szwedzki, and others) in controversial matter. Lajsikonik 20:54, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Why do you think the sources are insufficient. You supported the article on pl.wiki when there were even fewer sources? Kkrystian 14:37, 22 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think the link you have added addresses the concern. It appears that is just a list of links from my check of the government site. It doesn't appear to address what LZS is at all. Am I missing something within that site? Erechtheus 00:32, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Forgotten Sunrise requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. tomasz. 22:07, 14 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thankyou very very much Lajsikonik for your wonderful translation effort!

The Silesian language is very unique indeed.

May God Bless You! and may Silesian Wikipedia prosper and become a real Wikipedia soon.

In the future if you want your favourite article to be translated into the Chinese or Taiwanese language, then I would be be glad to help you.

Yours Sincerely, --Jose77 (talk) 08:16, 5 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings Lajsikonik,

The article about Padniewko has now been translated into Traditional Chinese and created Here. You are welcome. --Jose77 (talk) 21:25, 5 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations. Wikipedia:WikiProject Poland has reviewed your contributions and decided you are an active member. Thank you for your encyclopedic contributions! But creating content by yourself is only part of the collaborative Wikipedia user experience, there is an active community of editors discussing how to better improve the Poland-related content; please consider joining our discussions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Poland. There are many editors who would like to work more closely with you, benefit from your insight, and help you with their experience! PS. Please also consider editing your entry in our participants list to state your areas of expertise/interest.--_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk} 18:58, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, the reason I tagged it is that I'm pretty bad at doing copyediting myself; I tend to miss a lot of things that need work. The tag is there so that someone who does have experience in copyediting can fix it up. It works quite well; it usually takes a little time, but someone will come in to work on it. --User:AlbertHerring ^{Io son l'orecchio e tu la bocca: parla!} 13:27, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 21:19, 25 April 2011 (UTC) [reply]

Hi there, my name's Peter Coombe and I'm a Wikimedia Community Fellow working on a project to improve Wikipedia's help system. At the moment I'm trying to learn more about how people use and find the current help pages. If you could help by filling out this brief survey about your experiences, I'd be very grateful. It should take less than 10 minutes, and your responses will not be tied to your username in any way.

Thank you for your time,
the wub (talk) 18:15, 14 June 2012 (UTC) (Delivered using Global message delivery)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Piotr Osiecki, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Polish (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:24, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:58, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Europe/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like Germany, Italy, the Benelux countries, Iberian Peninsula, Romania, Slovenia etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. If you would like to see masses of articles being improved for Europe and your specialist country like Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon, sign up today and once the challenge starts a contest can be organized. This is a way we can target every country of Europe, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant and also sign under any country sub challenge on the page that you might contribute to! Thank you. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 09:27, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Lajsikonik. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Lajsikonik. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Lajsikonik. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:GdowCOA.gif has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused, low quality. Superseded by File:POL Gmina Gdów COA old.svg.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 12:29, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]