User talk:Lovelyquirks1

Hello! I was like a minor editor but I didn't really know what I was doing and I started reading some rules of Wikipedia, which makes me really interested on creating/contributing to new pages for this website! One I'm mostly really excited to create is Jolyne, because 1. I really love her and one of my favorite Jojos, 2. Her anime is about to wrap up, and 3. Honestly, female characters from anime and manga are serving for more quality articles in my opinion. So I decided, if I wanted to contribute majorly for this online encyclopedia, why not start with her and if her drafts passed the test which means it's good to go to be published, who knows, I might go with the other Jojo characters like Giorno, Josuke, Kira, Bruno, and Kakyoin. I hope I'll do well since I don't really know what constitutes as a reliable source for these kinds of articles, since I don't really read anime and manga new sources in the Internet! Also, it's really late at night for me, so I'm falling asleep right now. Good night and thank you all! Louisent31 (talk) 15:57, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Also, I have midterm exams for my senior high, so it'll only occur after about a few days. Louisent31 (talk) 15:59, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Jolyne Cujoh. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 10:03, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Draft:Giorno Giovanna, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other test edits you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 15:24, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@PresN: calling my superior for help since I never reviewed a submission. The article has around 20 kylobites and a large amount of real world information covering creation and reception. There are some good GNG sources centered on her but I would suggest revising each paragraph from reception to give its own topic. See the protagonist of Bungo Stray Dogs, Atsushi Nakajima (Bungo Stray Dogs), whose reception section was divided into different aspects of his character rather than use the idea of "X said this, Y said that". Maybe the use of relatives in the infobox might come across as fancruft considering most of them do not appear in her story. Any idea PresN? Happy new year.Tintor2 (talk) 21:55, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Tintor2: I'm confused; you posted this in the section for the draft of Giorno Giovanna, but the text of that draft (since deleted) was just "Giorno Giovanna". Were you referring to the section above about Jolyne Cujoh? If so, it's up to you! I think it certainly needs work, like most things, but it looks solid enough to move out of draft space, with out-of-universe information. I have no expertise in the area and have no idea if there's a larger-scoped article that it could be a part of instead, but if you think it's good enough for mainspace you should approve it. --PresN 05:05, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, thank you for the advice! Lovelyquirks1 (talk) 22:24, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@PresN: Never did any of that so I'm lost.Tintor2 (talk) 10:25, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Tintor2: Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Reviewing instructions --PresN 13:30, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. I hope you get the chance to create more.Tintor2 (talk) 15:19, 7 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Mattdaviesfsic was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Some bits remain unsourced: the last quote in the "Creation" section has no source (a source can be reused for it though), and the "Appearances" section is basically all unsourced. Apart from that, really good, and when these things are fixed it could probably be accepted!

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jolyne Cujoh and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 20:31, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Louisent31! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 20:31, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Jolyne Cujoh, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a fantastic rating for a new article, and places it among the top 3% of accepted submissions — major kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 17:23, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much! I hope I’ll do great as well in my editing experience here Lovelyquirks1 (talk) 02:39, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations with Jolyne's article. I guess you should upload one image for the infobox. Since she is a manga character primarily, I suggest uploading a nonfree illustration by Araki. For creation, you can easily add the free images of her three actress together. Kinda like how Vash the Stampede and Shinya Kogami has two free images of their actors. Happy editing.Tintor2 (talk) 22:08, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much! Yeah, I wanted to use one of Araki’s illustrations as her image. However, where would I find one? I know there are a lot of images of his illustrations of her flying around the Internet, but as an experienced editor, what would you say is the best option? Lovelyquirks1 (talk) 02:38, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nevermind! I finally uploaded her image. Just waiting for the response. Lovelyquirks1 (talk) 07:56, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Noticed you are working in Giorno's article. Comic Book Resources lately tends to make articles centered around characters like this so I suggest using it to add more weight to the notability or this poll.Tintor2 (talk) 19:41, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much! This is really appreciated! Lovelyquirks1 (talk) 21:29, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Giorno Giovanna. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 18:24, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Chisato Nishikagi, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 20% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 04:41, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Lovelyquirks1, is it Nishikagi or Nishikigi, or both as acceptable spellings?? Pondering if we should remove the redirect. AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 04:58, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It’s actually Nishikigi. I actually mistook her last name as Nishikagi because I have perception problems. Sorry for the trouble. Lovelyquirks1 (talk) 05:00, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ok will request removal on the redirect then AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 06:12, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Congrats with Chisato's article. It's amazing how much coverage you found about her. By the way, besides the regular Jojo protagonists, did you think about Rohan Kishibe? Since he is a break out character with liveactions and OVAs, I guess he might have potential. If so I remember reading how Makoto Yukimura said once he would like being a mangaka like Rohan in a joke. Cheers. Good luck too with Jotaro's article. Sorry for taking so long to comment on the peer review.Tintor2 (talk) 01:30, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the compliment. Aside for the rest of the Jojo protagonists and antagonists (Johnny and Gappy might take a while since I feel there isn’t enough significant coveragw about them for me to make drafts for them since their anime adaptation or English manga translation hasn’t been released yet), I think Rohan has emough potential, as his spin-off manga is quite populat to even warrant a live-action series and movie and Araki will never stop releasing future chapters for him. And I’ll work on Jotaro’s article soon, since I’m quite busy with my personal life. Lovelyquirks1 (talk) 04:21, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

This draft is for a title that was previously an article, but was then cut down to a redirect. If this draft is accepted, the history should be preserved. Do not tag the redirect for G6.

Reviewers should check the history and verify whether there was a consensus to cut the article down to a redirect, or whether the action was taken boldly without discussion. If there was a consensus for the cutdown, do not accept this draft without verifying that the draft improves the article or that consensus has changed. If in doubt, please discuss.

This draft is a draft on a subtopic of an existing article, List of JoJo's Bizarre Adventure characters. Discussion as to whether a separate article for the subtopic is warranted should be on the talk page of the parent article, Talk:List of JoJo's Bizarre Adventure characters.

Please discuss the suitability of creating a separate subtopic article on the talk page of the parent article. Please resubmit this draft if there is rough consensus at the parent talk page to create the child article, or with an explanation that the child draft satisfies either general notability on its own or a special notability guide.

Due to the history of this topic, please discuss on the parent article talk page. This draft will be accepted if there is rough consensus that it should be accepted.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Giorno Giovanna and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 22:58, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Giorno Giovanna, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 20% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

– robertsky (talk) 09:58, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:48, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Zxcvbnm was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Requires more reception from WP:RS in order to pass GNG.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:ShiningNikki and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 10:30, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Vrxces was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

The article continues to lack secondary reception from reliable sources. As it is, the content of the section is not adequately focused on secondary sources evaluating the overall game in the same manner as TheGamer. The Vice article is an interest piece on a niche quirk of the game and not really a review. Player counts are also not generally reliable evidence of reception, but useful as release information. However, the article notability seems to have potential, given some reliable Japanese sources have written about it briefly. It may help to expand on whether4Gamer and Den Fami Nico Gamer have evaluated the game and what they had to say about it, including any other Japanese sources you can find.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:ShiningNikki and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

ＶＲＸＣＥＳ (talk) 08:30, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Vrxces was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Whilst I recognise you've put more work into describing the development of the game, as outlined in the previous decline, the article still lacks adequate secondary review coverage to establish notability. Happy to chat if I haven't explained the notability standard clearly.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:ShiningNikki and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

ＶＲＸＣＥＳ (talk) 22:29, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Admittedly, I have a very hard time finding notable websites that review Shining Nikki of its own merit and so, I have no idea on how to expand the reception section. There is this Hardcore Droid review that I could find. And also one from GeekySweetie but I'm unsure if using the review of this website would be allowed. And that's about it. If there's any more advice you could give me to raise the notability of the article, it would be appreciated. Lovelyquirks1 (talk) 06:13, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ShiningNikki, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

IgelRM (talk) 23:58, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]