User talk:Maria Gemmi

Emilfinnerud (talk · contribs) stated in an edit summary "I am the new editor for the magazine". I tagged with {{uw-coi}}. The same content was added shortly afterwards by Badtoall (talk · contribs). Amazing coincidence! Tagged with {{welcome-coi}} Thanks for the revert. Cheers Adakiko (talk) 12:33, 4 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

What a strange coincidence. Or maybe no coincidence?Maria Gemmi (talk) 12:57, 4 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Identical except for a couple of linefeeds... Maybe a subordinate directed to make the edit? It couldn't be possible that Emilfinnerud logged out and created the Badtoall account? Cheers Adakiko (talk) 14:09, 4 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, why did you delete that? Plenty of other articles have similar date calculations in them? Kalamikid (talk) 14:05, 1 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Because of the nowiki and the * note. I put it back in without that. Maria Gemmi (talk) 14:14, 1 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Does Wikipedia strive for FACT-BASED publications? For example, describing what happened as a protest is false. Protest, while noisy and sometimes disruptive, does not include looting, breaking windows, besting up people and burning down homes and businesses. However, riots will have all the above. I would never direct anyone(including my children) on my platform to Wikipedia if Wikipedia doesn't strive to publish fact-based content. OneAmericanNoParty (talk) 12:03, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You changed titles of citations and URLs, which is bad, breaking them. You also used all caps. Besides all this, calling protests riots is not neutral. Maria Gemmi (talk) 15:11, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I am only wanted to just amend the spelling of wall to well Rajkumar12324565 (talk) 10:59, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article is at Wall of death. In each of your edits [1][2][3] you changed or added an image file that doesn't exist. Maria Gemmi (talk) 11:13, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I almost forgot this, but thank again for your revert at my UTP! VickKiang (talk) 05:34, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:48, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I believe this was an obvious change to make, and I included the reason in the edit summary. Half the article was dedicated to discussing a tenuous relationship of solar worship to the origins of Christmas- not exactly what I was looking for when I looked up "sun god". The removed information is still summarized with a link to the correct page. 76.135.106.145 (talk) 11:09, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You removed way too much, 20k of material, leaving just a single line for Christianity one of the largest world religions. The content there had good sources backing it. Maria Gemmi (talk) 11:23, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The size of the religion has nothing to do with it, the content was not relevant to the article. Christianity is not a religion that worships a solar deity, it should not account for 15 paragraphs of the article on solar deities. The information removed already exists elsewhere on the site (Christmas) and was left linked to. 76.135.106.145 (talk) 15:05, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

but it is real and itshould be said on the page? i was freaking outi htohught it was fake?... Wizard101ISREAL (talk) 12:04, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see how Wizard101 is real. Do you have a reliable source saying that? Maria Gemmi (talk) 06:03, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

what...?you undid my reiliable source... it..? Wizard101ISREAL (talk) 07:49, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Read Wikipedia:Reliable sources. Maria Gemmi (talk) 09:07, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Who the hell do you think you are? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.206.149.130 (talk) 14:07, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A Wikipedia editor and a human being. Maria Gemmi (talk) 14:13, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I QUIT! THIS IS A TOPIC BY ME MARIA GEMMI NOT ON MY ACCOUNT! 2604:3D09:A986:C700:295F:3C74:D35B:4369 (talk) 14:59, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Anyone would've reverted this edit of yours. Maria Gemmi (talk) 15:02, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

i did not do that 2604:3D09:A986:C700:295F:3C74:D35B:4369 (talk) 16:19, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

even you r mo m  ? 2604:3D09:A986:C700:295F:3C74:D35B:4369 (talk) 16:21, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:00, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. There is an error in the year of death of Francisco Prio in his article. It is 1988 (source: The Miami Herald of 23 February 1988 says he died the last Sunday = 21 February 1988), not 1986. There are some sites in the internet with this date: 21 February "1986", but it is wrong. I cannot repair his article in Wikipedia. Can you fix it ?. Thanks.

Done. Maria Gemmi (talk) 15:03, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

stop griefing the web page 155.186.142.20 (talk) 16:05, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Read this source:

I read a source on Twitter that was posted in 2018 by the official Kix account which read: “Kix is excited to share its new box with you. And, for the first time since 1979, we updated the tagline. Kix: “Kid-Tested. Parent-Approved.”

Wiki-Ikiw (talk) 15:25, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Well, that doesn't have the sexist part or other parts in the edit. And also you didn't add the source. Don't you have a better source than Twitter? Maria Gemmi (talk) 16:15, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Well there’s another source related to this from other website, Cereal.Guru, which stated “ Almost 40 years later, Kix decided to change their tagline. In an attempt to keep up with the times and stay politically correct, Kix changed their slogan to “Kid-Tested. Parent-Approved”.

Wiki-Ikiw (talk) 06:32, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

OK. Maria Gemmi (talk) 16:02, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Why are you removing edits that can save people from becoming victims. He is currently an active scammer in NJ, LA, NV. Shame on you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.244.4.169 (talk) 15:04, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You need a source. Maria Gemmi (talk) 15:13, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please see the comment I've added in the talk page about this article. I was (with a different IP address), the one who edited the first sentence to include information about the algorithm's security vulnerabilities, which you reverted.

As I noted in my comment on the talk page, the information that I added is uncontroversial and already discussed in the article.

I'd appreciate any thoughts you may have in the talk page of the article. Thank you. 75.166.157.156 (talk) 01:33, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Are you talking about this edit from a year ago? Maria Gemmi (talk) 15:01, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Are you okay with bringing the AfD to a halt, since the page creator moved the page to draft space? —C.Fred (talk) 12:58, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, never mind. Another editor has advocated delete, and the page has been moved back to mainspace. —C.Fred (talk) 13:16, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]