User talk:MitchMcM

Hey, as a follow-up to your e-mail query: I don't remember much from my time spent on userboxes—I gave them up when I decided I spent more effort here at Wikipedia on vanity than on improving the encyclopedia. That being said, I used to include User:BigNate37/NathanBoxes at the top of my userpage as a template (e.g. {{User:BigNate37/NathanBoxes}}). That subpage takes advantage of Template:userboxtop, Template:userboxbreak and Template:userboxbottom. The two things I would suggest you do are (1) place {{userboxtop}} and {{userboxbottom}} around your userbox/es, and (2) move your userbox/es and {{babel}} template to the top of your page, since the text body will stay at the top of the page and wrap around the templates if you put the text afterwards. Feel free to look at my NathanBoxes template or any older version of my userpage (pre-November 2007) and borrow or ask about whatever you like. Just be careful not to indulge in userpage vanity as heavily as I did. BigNate37_(T) 05:55, 1 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks BigNate. That sorted it out. I'll resist the urge to over-indulge in the user boxes and focus on articles. Cheers MitchMcM (talk) 06:04, 1 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

For adding information to alcohol intoxication ;O) bodnotbod (talk) 13:34, 22 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Cheers for the beer! Its nice to get some appreciation, the next round's on me. But I don't want to have too many- have you heard what that stuff does to your brain chemsitry? ;)

I had a look at your profile, you are a very prolific editor. 1,000 edits in your first 3 months!! WOW!

If you've got time would you mind having a look at one of the pages I've started making changes to? Theres no great rush, whenever you have time. If you don't have time thats fine.

The page is neuropsychological test. I'm trying to figure out new sections that it requires. So far I think it needs a "history" and "criticisms" sections. Do you agree and is there anything eles you think it needs?

Thanks MitchMcM (talk) 10:44, 23 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello MitchMcM, I just thought I'd let you know that I saw your article Australian Psychology Accreditation Council in the New Articles list-- The layout of the article makes it very clear. It's always nice to see users contributing to make Wikipedia better!Amy Z (talk) 18:26, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Good on ya mate! I think you've got the UK neuroopsych requirements down just fine, thanks for checking. PaulWicks (talk) 14:40, 5 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Mitch, Thanks so much for your help with the references on the Executive Functions page - I appreciate it! Hope you're doing well! Sincerely, AZakaryan (talk) 02:15, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Premorbidity, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Personality (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:57, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Neuropsychological test, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Priming (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:47, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Frontal lobe injury, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Stimuli, Disorders and Insula (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:41, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

	Brisbane Meetup v t e Next: To be decided (watch) Last: Saturday 13 January 2018
See also: Australian events listed at Wikimedia.org.au (or on Facebook)

Hi there! You are cordially invited to a series of Paralympic History workshops and a meetup next Saturday (26 May) and Sunday. In attendance will be University of Queensland faculty members and Australian Paralympic Committee staff. Details and an attendee list are at Wikipedia:Meetup/Brisbane/5. Hope to see you there! John Vandenberg 08:10, 17 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

(this automated message was delivered using replace.py to all users in South East Queensland and Wide Bay-Burnett)

HI! Quite some time ago you said I could throw my questions your way as I am a new user. I hope that your offer remains. Here goes...I just completed a major edit to "Addictive Behavior." At the very bottom of the page it tells me that I have ref tags that are incorrect. I have looked and revisited the article numerous times and I don't see it. That is if I am understanding what the mistake is. Do you think u could take a look and advise? Thanks much. U can answer me on my talk page or here. either is fineAddictionPsychologistFrank (talk) 18:31, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Another question....how does one get rid of boxes appearing at the top of an article for example about an article having "multiple issues", etc. I did not place these here. AddictionPsychologistFrank (talk) 18:33, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is great. thanks. It sounds like I should leave the editors notes appearing at the top of the page. With time they will review again? Am I correct? — Preceding unsigned comment added by AddictionPsychologistFrank (talk • contribs) 13:32, 18 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, glad that I could be of help. I noticed that the references on addictive behavior are looking alot better. Unfortunately, they don't seem to review and remove the author notes after placing them on a page. My advice would be to thoroughly rectify the problem, remove the box and then on the talk page say that you removed the boxes and why. That will generally keep you out of trouble. If it is a page with alot of watchers, the boxes should only be removed by consensus through dicussion. To see the number of watchers click "View history" then "Number of watchers", most pages have less than 30 watchers. But more generic terms will have more eg. addiction-166 watchers and drug-159 watchers. With these sorts of pages, you need consensus before making large changes and removal of boxes. If you have any other questions as you go along don't hesistate to ask.

MitchMcM (talk) 10:17, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I'd like to bring your attention to a new learning project in Wikiversity. I noted that you had sent a message to Garrondo for whom I left a similar message to this because he had been involved with the discussion on the wikipedia Parkinson's disease page. So I Thought you too might be interested in looking at the project and perhaps even contributing material to it. Please see my Talk page, http://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/User_talk:Droflet#The_Science_Behind_Parkinson.27s_learning_project , the subpage, http://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/User_talk:Droflet/ProjectDescription or the project itself , http://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/Portal:The_Science_Behind_Parkinson%27s . It would be great if you could bring the project to the attention of others who might be interested in helping us develop it. Thanks.

Jtelford (talk) 17:24, 17 September 2012 (UTC) (My Wikiversity Username is Droflet)[reply]

Brisbane Meetup Next: 11 February 2013 5-8PM - Drinks and light dinner at SLQ with Sue Gardner Last: 3 August 2012 This box: view talk edit

Hi there! You are cordially invited to a meetup on 11 Febrary 2013 with Sue Gardner.

Details at Wikipedia:Meetup/Brisbane/7. Hope to see you there! John Vandenberg 10:35, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

(this automated message was delivered using replace.py to all users in SEQ)

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:27, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

As an Australian Wikipedian, your opinion is sought on a proposal to advocate for the introduction of Fair Use into Australian copyright law. The discussion is taking place at the Australian Wikipedians' notice board, please read the proposal and comment there. MediaWiki message delivery MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:08, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This message has been automatically sent to all users in Category:Australian Wikipedians. If you do not wish to receive further messages like this, please either remove your user page from this category, or add yourself to Category:Opted-out of message delivery

If you are in or near Brisbane, please join us on Sunday 10 December 2017 any time from noon to 4pm at The Edge at the State Library of Queensland. For more details and to sign up, please go to the meetup page. See you there! Kerry (talk) 22:38, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:13, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there wiki-buddy! I'm hoping I can attract some interested folks to consider reviewing the Wikipedia page about amyotrophic lateral sclerosis for Good Article status. As you may know, ALS is a rare and fatal neurodegenerative disease that quickly causes people to lose the ability to move, speak, and breathe. The Wikipedia page about ALS is read over 2,000 times each day in English alone, and often experiences spikes in traffic whenever a celebrity is diagnosed. There have recently been a number of genetic advances made in the space and some recent drug approvals, thanks in part to the momentum started by the ALS Ice Bucket Challenge. I've been grinding away at it since early this year but keen to see it improve further, hope you'll consider! PaulWicks (talk) 13:14, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]