User talk:Mojowiha

From Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

Welcome![edit]

Some cookies to welcome you!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Mojowiha! I am WereSpielChequers and have been editing Wikipedia for quite some time. Thank you for your contributions. I just wanted to say hi and welcome you to Wikipedia! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page or by typing {{helpme}} at the bottom of this page. I love to help new users, so don't be afraid to leave a message! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!

ϢereSpielChequers 07:59, 7 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hermann Ritter[edit]

Please see Talk:South-West Africa Campaign#Hermann Ritter -- PBS (talk) 03:11, 29 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have left a comment on User talk:XavierGreen to the conversation on SWAC as the other two articles were initially written by XavierGreen and a comment by him in the history of one article indicates he found Hermann as a first name in a source. -- PBS (talk) 04:23, 29 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Also[edit]

I just realized I responded to you at WT:NPOV. FYI, I thought you had posted at WP:NPOVN which is a noticeboard relating to neutrality issues. Best! Jesanj (talk) 04:38, 9 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

November 2014[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Okinawa Prefecture may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • Japanese base-related spending contributed $1.9 billion to the local economy.<ref name=JapanTimes>{{cite web|author1=Eric Johnston|title=Okinawa base issue not cut and dried with locals|url=http://

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 03:35, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Found & Fixed already Mojowiha (talk) 03:44, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello.

Regarding B-theory of time, TMDrew seems to of corrected a lot of the errors that were present before, especially those concerning William Craig. Despite this, there was still ALOT of bad quality editing, specifically clear violations of WP:NPOV. Examples include removing statements regarding its support in physics or the philosophical community, and simply inserting any piece of information, ever published, criticising B-theory, by a respected philosopher or not, with an absence of any posts regarding the support of the theory. I've corrected the page somewhat, though there's still an excessive amount of information in the criticism section, a lot I believe does not need to be there, which I have noted upon on the talk page.

I think the best course of action, would be to wait it out and see what happens regarding my recent edits. Reverting them would demonstrate a clear violation of WP:NPOV and suggest a personal agenda.

Thanks. DocHeuh (talk) 19:28, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:27, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, Mojowiha. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Mojowiha. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Mojowiha. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]