User talk:MoviesandTelevisionFan

Hi MoviesandTelevisionFan! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! CommanderWaterford (talk) 22:53, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Please do not use The Sun or the Daily Mail as you did at Charlie Hauck. They are not a reliable sources. See WP:THESUN and WP:DAILYMAIL. Also, IMDb should also be avoided per WP:IMDB. All of this is mentioned at WP:RSP. Kind regards, Robby.is.on (talk) 09:33, 22 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ok sorry, thanks for letting me know. I'll make sure not to add it again. MoviesandTelevisionFan (talk) 13:44, 22 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Antony Ponzini, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nobody's Perfect. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Irving Elinson, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 23:32, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Seems notable. FloridaArmy (talk) 23:50, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Ray Girardin requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ray Girardin. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:41, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Andre Rosey Brown, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 20:10, 7 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheBirdsShedTears was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

IMDb is not a reliable source. Either cite with reliable entries or remove any unsourced material.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Michael McGuire (actor) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Michael McGuire (actor), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 09:38, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, MoviesandTelevisionFan! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 09:38, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A little while ago I noticed the Noreen Corcoran article had been deleted due to copyright problems, and I started researching her life, with the idea of rewriting the article. But, alas, I have limited ambition so I hadn't made much progress. Yesterday I decided to check if Noreen had a new article and saw that you had done the hard work of creating a good article about her. Thank you for your hard work, you did a fine job. Karenthewriter (talk) 22:25, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Much Appreciated. MoviesandTelevisionFan (talk) 0:09, 17 July 2021 (UTC)

Michael McGuire (actor), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 20% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Tame (talk) 16:11, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Warriors of Mahabharata requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. McMatter ^(talk)/_(contrib) 18:25, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Mcmatter. I don't remember creating this article. I just added the templates unsourced and orphan. But it does say, it's created by me. MoviesandTelevisionFan (talk) 18:28, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry ignore this, I see what happened, I moved the article around the same time you were tagging it and when you submitted your tags, the system flagged you as recreating the article. Feel free to remove this notice. McMatter ^(talk)/_(contrib) 18:29, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

That's alright. Regards. MoviesandTelevisionFan (talk) 18:46, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, MoviesandTelevisionFan,

Thank you for creating Peter Iacangelo.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

This article needs more articles ABOUT Iacangelo for verification. Thank you.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Whiteguru}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Whiteguru (talk) 08:15, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, MoviesandTelevisionFan,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username John B123 and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I have tagged an article that you started, John Brandon (actor), for deletion, because a consensus decision previously decided that it wasn't suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. If you wish to restore a page deleted via a deletion discussion, please use the deletion review process instead, rather than reposting the content of the page.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the deleting administrator.

For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|John B123}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

John B123 (talk) 16:14, 15 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, MoviesandTelevisionFan

Thank you for creating Wilfred M. Cline.

User:Usedtobecool, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Hi! According to the cited source, the oscar nomination was for the colored category and it was shared with a couple others. IMO, that's essential information that you could add just from the source already cited. Regards!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Usedtobecool}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Usedtobecool ☎️ 16:14, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Primetime Emmy Award for Outstanding Variety Series, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dick Martin.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 10 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for letting me know about the proposed deletion of Ricarlo Flanagan. From what I understand, a New York Times obit is a demonstration of notability and justifies an article. Thriley (talk) 19:41, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi MoviesandTelevisionFan,

well done on creating several pages about film editors!

One word on disambiguating article titles though: You created the pages William Austin (editor) and Richard Bracken (editor), which have both since been moved to William Austin (film editor) and Richard Bracken (film editor). This is important for you to remember for future articles: An editor can be many things, including all types of people, like a newspaper editor or a publisher. In the Wikipedia, a simple "editor" is the disambiguation you will find in use for these types of people, see for example Category:American book editors.

So the enhanced qualifier "film editor" is needed to indicate the subject's professional affiliation with the film industry. This usage is standard, even if people only work in television or internet formats, not in cinema. "Film" is the umbrella term for all audio-visual creations. All the best from --Sprachraum (talk) 15:43, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, MoviesandTelevisionFan

Thank you for creating Trish Summerville.

User:Celestina007, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

I have marked this article as reviewed and also I have left a {{notability}} tag on the article. I think you should continue to improve the article by adding more sources. Don’t be limited to Google hits only. You may add WP:OFFLINE sources too.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Celestina007}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Celestina007 (talk) 18:26, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You are welcome to ask me anything on. Thanks for creating. Celestina007 (talk) 18:28, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:04, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Edward Edwards (actor), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sunset High School.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Hal Millar

added a link pointing to The Wizard of Oz

The One Man Jury

added a link pointing to Patrick Wright

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

in the Burke's Law article! I'm happy that Leon Lontoc has an article; I tried to find information years ago but got nowhere. Is it possible to collaborate on expanding it a little? Cheers! Shir-El too 08:26, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sally Wheeler is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sally Wheeler (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

LADY LOTUS • TALK 15:26, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

On 25 February 2022, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Christian Herwartz, which you created. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. TJMSmith (talk) 12:36, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article Kim Spalding has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This article has two problems. It does not speak for itself in saying how the subject satisfies general notability or acting notability. It also is not clear as to whether it is about Ross Latimer or Kim Spalding.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Robert McClenon (talk) 19:40, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article Stephanie Ingram has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Coverage relates to only one instance in her career, a movie in which makeup was an especially important part. Could be argued that coverage is about the movie production, not her as an artist.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _signed, Willondon (talk) 14:58, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article Jessica Brooks (make-up artist) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

non notable make-up artist-being nominated once as part of a group for a makeup and hairstyling award does not make her notable even if its the academy awards

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Lavalizard101 (talk) 18:48, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

On 13 April 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Christian Herwartz, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Christian Herwartz, a Jesuit who lived in an open community in Berlin from 1978 to 2016, held "street exercises" and peace prayers? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Christian Herwartz. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Christian Herwartz), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:02, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article William Christian (actor) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/William Christian (actor) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

livelikemusic (TALK!) 15:10, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @MoviesandTelevisionFan: I was wondering why you moved this out of draft when the references are made up of a 4 line profile, a death notice, a machine generated profile that notes he is a professor and a library card entry for something he dug up, not one of them is a valid source to prove notability, being primary and/or non-rs and not of them is WP:SECONDARY source? scope_creep^Talk 09:19, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I only moved it out to mainspace since mostly the biography was sourced, except for one sentence. I moved it then I would just leave the refimprove tag in the article. MoviesandTelevisionFan (talk) 13:57, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @MoviesandTelevisionFan: I was wondering if can you please create an article for American actor George Walcott, who co-starred with Sylvia Sidney and Spencer Tracy in the film Fury? 181.179.27.142 (talk) 16:45, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please see WP:PROXYING. MoviesandTelevisionFan, if you assist Ham2703's block evasion, you will be reported to the relevant noticeboard. @AmandaNP: this is more of this. Эlcobbola _talk 16:50, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Just wanted to say Thanks for the Help on the Troy Melton page, and...

Would you be interested in helping with Melissa Newman? ...the Older one who co-stared with John Wayne & Rock Hudson et al in The Undefeated, not Paul Newman's daughter... although help on her page, would not be unwelcome either.

I may have goofed using the Help Me template on the talk page for Melissa Newman (actress), so I've been told/scalded, so I'm reaching out for help from other editors directly.

If you look at her Talk Page, you'll see my comments on how I want to improve both her page, and the one for Paul Newman's daughter, Melissa Stewart Newman.

In any case, Thank You! GreyElfGT (talk) 19:02, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I apologize for not responding earlier since I wasn't editing that day but sure I would help out find some other additional sources and read the talk page on what else the page needs improving. MoviesandTelevisionFan (talk) 19:16, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No apologies... I've seen your help there, and on other articles, so Thank You Again!

One thing I'm not good on is sourcing Public Domain and/or Creative Commons Images... the two different Melissa Newman's are clearly not the same person... if the public were to see that, they wouldn't be so confused about who's who. So... and as long as I don't actually upload to Wiki Commons, and only use a Web Link here, in Talk, it's not in Violation, correct?

I'd like someone who's knowledgeable about provenance/copyright verification (and/or Requests for Permission to Post) to see if any of the following images can be safely uploaded and serve as the front InfoBox image for each actress, and if not you, than Who can we reach out to?

Here is what the older Melissa looks like.

• from The Undefeated
• from The Undefeated
• others from The Undefeated
• from Getting Away from It All
• from River of Gold
• from River of Gold
• from Starsky & Hutch
• from One Dark Night

And here is Paul Newman's daughter:

• from a (YouTube) Virtual Conversation: Melissa Newman by The Lambs

... and I think the following are of the same jazz singer as above, but need help verifying before I add her gig's & music info to her article, but here it is...

• The Melissa Newman Quartet
• The Melissa Newman Quartet @ All About Jazz

GreyElfGT (talk) 06:32, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

For the images, I don't think The Undefeated film is in public domain. I use the The Public Domain Catalog website since there are films and episodes of television programs that are public domain. Fair use images can't be used since the subject is still living and it violates one of the rules if I remember. I don't think some of the images there could be uploaded since they seem like fair use items. MoviesandTelevisionFan (talk) 14:03, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Montana Levi Blanco shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Morbidthoughts (talk) 23:11, 17 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

On 16 October 2022, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Andy Detwiler, which you created. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Stephen 01:31, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

FYI, Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Utterly horrendously written articles from an auto patrolled user. (I did not start the thread but am just informing you of it.) Levivich (talk) 20:13, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Please do not edit anything before you read and respond to the ANI discussion. In particular, do not create any new articles, or move any from draft form into mainspace. Beyond My Ken (talk) 01:06, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Meanwhile, I have removed your autopatrolled right. Bishonen | tålk 13:22, 30 October 2022 (UTC).[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing certain namespaces ((Article)) for WP:CIR, inadequate English skills.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Bbb23 (talk) 22:32, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article Adam Hofstedt has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Meets neither WP:GNG, WP:NSPORTS

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:04, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

	The Civility Barnstar
	For what it's worth, I thought you handled yourself well at ANI. (A lot of editors implode or get very visibly frustrated when subject to high-participation discussions on that page, especially when shortcuts like WP:CIR are thrown around.) ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 19:45, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Gerald Quist, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 08:45, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

	The Original Barnstar
	For consistently high quality new article creation. Theroadislong (talk) 22:08, 7 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate it! MoviesandTelevisionFan (talk) 00:46, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Barry M. Jensen, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 14:12, 21 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Richard W. Kloubec, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

KylieTastic (talk) 14:18, 21 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Curtis C. Herndon, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Qcne (talk) 19:40, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Alton Desnoyer, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

KylieTastic (talk) 19:15, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Richard O. Gregerson, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

 Lefcentreright  Discuss  21:46, 25 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Steven R. Cranfill, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

KylieTastic (talk) 13:28, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Marie C. Ingalls, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

KylieTastic (talk) 16:31, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Fred B. Hagan, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Qcne (talk) 18:56, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Harry Botts Jr., which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Qcne (talk) 19:23, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Lawrence F. Shackelford, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 16:29, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Clarence Y. Akizaki, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

 Lefcentreright  Discuss  17:01, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

James J. McNamara, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 23:33, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Carroll Webb, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 23:40, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, MoviesandTelevisionFan. Thank you for your work on James J. McNamara. User:Lightburst, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for the article

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Lightburst}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Lightburst (talk) 23:55, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Harvey D. Tallackson, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

— Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 02:45, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Mike Langton, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

— Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 02:51, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wendell H. Watson, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Comr Melody Idoghor (talk) 04:55, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]