User talk:Novidmarana

Denial of citizenship is a denial of suffrage. There is nothing "personal" about that.

For the Jin Jing madness see /Jin Jing.

Hola Novidmarana,

Regarding you edit here, I assume you were notified by some other editor of the dispute and asked to intervene, but could you please read the article talk page and join the discussion there first?

Many thanks and kind regards, pedrito - talk - 31.10.2008 08:29

Nope, I wasn't notified to intervene. But maybe I am just a sockpuppet. Novidmarana (talk) 08:41, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well, you should still read the talk-pages ;)

Cheers, pedrito - talk - 31.10.2008 08:42

Hi, I will merge the article (you are welcomed to help). I will do it in the next couple of days as I don't have time now. Imad marie (talk) 07:11, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, sounds like a good idea. Novidmarana (talk) 21:13, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

To those who may read this page I add :

A disturbing wiki-event - PLEASE visit the talk page at Al Aqsa Massacre - changed to Temple Mount Riots and join the discussion . Unfortunately , I understand now that this person or people using this Novidmarana AKA. may be too hasty to have thing his/their way .After I agreed to basic changes - and made them , after agreeing to improve on that , the page of more than one editor was re-directed ( with an equally POV titel , one could argue ), the text deleted , all within an hour . I was told I could re-write if I choose to .

Replaced text contains verifable , but incorrect intial reports that were later de-bunked entirely . The death toll is 18 based on Human Rights organisations and governmental-non governmental organisations, as we know today (see my footnotes) . I provided their names, ages and the source of that information . Yet , this person or persons Novidmarana , writes 20 dead . Other sources 22 . The organisation that is my source counted the death certificates , determined that ONLY 18 died as a result of force at the Temple Mount or Haram Al Sharif( it was found that 2 died of heart attack , one at the scene and one at home )Therefore the number 18 NOT 20 or 22 . The report is obtainable at Amazon . Additional sources included CBS 60mins , The Village Voice , Israeli and Palestinian Human Rights organisations , TV NRSK Norway .

As this person or people is/are known for or accused of Stalking , POV editing , being a Sock Puppet (see above) violating wiki rules - I choose not to go on - not to wiki-rage / wiki-war and work in other media that are not subject to such behavior and which can not be revised in an hour at any one persons or peoples will .

Novidmarana appears to be a misguided or hell-bent individaul or individuals , therefore I will waste no futher time in the Encyclopedia of Babel - WikiPedia.

alaqsa81090 (talk) 12:40, 8 November 2008 (UTC)Alaqsa81090alaqsa81090 (talk) 12:40, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for socking. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. —Wknight94 (talk) 14:32, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I have been using wikipedia to research things that interest me for as long as I have been using a computer. I have just now come to realize that messages have been left at my IP adress talk page (which I didn't know existed until about 5 minutes ago, about me editing articles. I HAVE NEVER EDITED A WIKIPEDIA ARTICLE, and all of the articles that I'm getting bitched at about are articles that I HAVE NEVER EVEN READ OR VISITED THE PAGE THAT THEY EXIST ON.

What the fuck is going on? I have been blocked from editing for this, which, is not really a big deal for me because I don't edit, but, could this mean that someone has been using my IP address? Or worse, could this mean that someone has hacked my computer? And if so why on God's green earth would they edit wikipedia from my computer?

Just in case this confuses you, these are the messages that you left at my IP adress talk page:

"Given your edit history of vandalism it would be better if you would leave Wikipedia alone as you are clearly not able to contribute in a meaningful way. Heck, you are not even able to read sources on our own and need someone to read it to you aloud. What a great qualification. Novidmarana (talk) 00:54, 2 May 2008 (UTC) Could you please follow the consensus that has been established on talk pages. And read Wikipedia policies, like for example WP:AWW. And no, I am not going to read it out to you again, as that is your responsibility if you want to contribute in a meaningful way (though given all the vandalism originating from your ip address that is very doubtful). Novidmarana (talk) 01:16, 2 May 2008 (UTC) "

By the way, that was very rude.

Please help me figure this out.