User talk:Number1spygirl

I think this link is useful for complete the Biography. Claudia Schiffer Website Argentina Read this:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:External_links

That site falls under conflict of interest. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:External_links#Advertising_and_conflicts_of_interest

What is the conflict of interest, the website is about Claudia Schiffer, with bio, wallpaper, videos, pictures, gallery... Say me, I read the link, I dont find nothing bad. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 200.3.222.13 (talk) 03:01, 13 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That it's not an official website thus it lacks verifiable sources.

Fashion Model Directory is one official web site? IMDB is one oficial website? My website is verifiable, you only need the time to read the bio, watch the photos, the videos... all information is OK. Claudia Schiffer dont have one Oficial Website. You dont are correct, this is information. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 200.3.222.13 (talk) 22:34, 15 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No but they are recognized by Wikipedia. Like I said, that site falls under conflict of interest.

How they where recognized by wikipedia, how I can make. Thanks. No conflicts of interest, only one website with information, you can say me where you find one lye? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 200.3.222.13 (talk) 02:30, 17 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the talk page note, I've updated Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2007 October 20. — xaosflux ^Talk 23:45, 19 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the barnstar. Yes, that one user loves to vandalize the Supermodel article. There are others that I have reverted, of course, but that one keeps returning. If that user returns again, I'm going to look into getting that article semi-protected. Flyer22 02:53, 1 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that Naomi Campbell is most famous than Gisele Bündchen, but Kate Moss is well known just in Europe and U.S.A., Tyra Banks only in U.S.A. When the people say that Gisele Bündchen the most famous, they're explaining about the most contemporany models. Naomi, Kate and Tyra have a image very associated to 1980 and 1990 years. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 200.157.48.2 (talk) 21:41, 23 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

As a leading editor at Ana Beatriz Barros you may have an interest in the debate at Wikipedia:Templates_for_deletion/Log/2008_June_27 regarding swimsuit issue templates.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 01:26, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

As a leading editor at Selita Ebanks you may have an interest in the debate at Wikipedia:Templates_for_deletion/Log/2008_June_27 regarding swimsuit issue templates.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 04:27, 2 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Cdulogo.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 05:35, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Life is pink.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:09, 18 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Cimlogo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 04:00, 18 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Dear fellow Fashion Project editor, I am working on a major rework of the artice about Damiani (jewelry company) at my sandbox User:Geraldshields11/sandbox/Dalminia. Please would you add comments or suggest edits on that sandbox page. Thank you in advance. My best regards, Gerald Shields Geraldshields11 (talk) 13:49, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:39, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]