User talk:Peterpie123rww

Welcome to my talk page. You can create a new section here.

Archives:

• Archive 1

Hey! I was looking at the file that you uploaded today ( File:Taylor Swift Feat Maren Morris - You All Over Me (From the Vault).jpg), as I noticed the file was in JPG format and I wanted to upload a PNG version as PNG is the preferred file type. I went to the source you provided and saved the image to my device, and noticed that the yellow download arrow came with it. On your file, however, it didn’t have the yellow arrow. I inspected it closer and noticed that part of the "T" was cut off from the "Vault", and that there was a visible smudge there, neither of which are in the original photo. I just wanted to clarify: did you edit the photo in a photo editing software? You’re not in trouble if you did, but if you edited it, that means it’s no longer non-free as you would have made changes to it, therefore making it your file, and therefore it wouldn't be allowed in the article. Pixel reducers and image converters are fine because they only change the size/type of the file, but actually editing the image would be altering what people see. If you could please clarify this, that would be great, and we can plan out next steps from there. Thanks! D🐶ggy54321 ^{(let's chat!)} 14:59, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Doggy54321 Hmmm, the file was actually sent to me by a friend. Is there any way we can get around this? the green circle on the actual website is really unfortunate and unhelpful. - Peterpie123rww (talk) 18:39, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I’m going to ping Nahnah4 as they were the one who uploaded File:Taylor Swift - Love Story (Taylor's Version).png, and that didn’t have the download button on it. Nahnah, how did you obtain the file without the download button? As well, I’m going to remove the file from the page and tag it for deletion as you (the uploader) said that you didn’t get it from the source provided. I’ll try to find the cover on other websites, so I’ll update this thread if anything arises. Thanks! D🐶ggy54321 ^{(let's chat!)} 18:54, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Doggy54321, okay, that works – sorry!!! - Peterpie123rww (talk) 21:58, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No need to apologize, and that’s coming from a Canadian! D🐶ggy54321 ^{(let's chat!)} 23:39, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Doggy54321 and Peterpie123rww, I actually got that cover off a Taylor Swift updates account on Twitter. I think that the artwork comes with the purchase of the digital single, and that's how they get it without the "download" sign. If it's any consolation, I found one from Genius here, but it still looks blur. Let me see if I can find a version without it, I'll let you guys know. Cheers, Nahnah4 (talk | contribs) 05:01, 30 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Doggy54321: I found a HD version here. Cheers! Nahnah4 (talk | contribs) 05:10, 30 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Nahnah4: Thanks! I’ll upload this now! D🐶ggy54321 ^{(let's chat!)} 12:49, 30 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Doggy54321, great! - Peterpie123rww (talk) 12:50, 30 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Taylor Swift Feat Maren Morris - You All Over Me (From the Vault).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. D🐶ggy54321 ^{(let's chat!)} 13:02, 30 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey! I saw you made an edit to You All Over Me, and just wanted to explain something. Most of the parameters in {{Infobox song}} and {{Infobox album}} already have a built-in list format that leaves items in unbulleted lists. This makes using templates like {{hlist}}, {{plainlist}} and {{flatlist}} redundant, as they are extraneous markup. I’m not going to revert your edit (I’m already at two reverts), but I wanted to let you know. If you don’t know if a parameter supports a list format, check. Type a bulleted list (* Item1<br>* Item2), go to the preview and see if bullets show up or not. If they do, use a list template as that parameter does not support a list format. If they don’t, the parameter already supports a list format, and you shouldn’t add a list template to that. Thanks! D🐶ggy54321 ^{(let's chat!)} 21:42, 30 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Doggy54321, sorry – I am learning new things every day! Cheers - Peterpie123rww (talk) 10:36, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No need to apologize! D🐶ggy54321 ^{(let's chat!)} 11:45, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

	The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
	Thank you for your tireless editing of music and TV articles. Particularly, thank you for being the most significant contributor to Line of Duty (series 6). Bibeyjj (talk) 18:29, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Bibeyjj, oh my goodness! This is so kind of you! Thank you so much!!! :) :) :) - Peterpie123rww (talk) 20:27, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

94.13.35.21 (talk) 19:16, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Haha I do love cookies! Thank you – I'm glad we got the article to a place where we are all happy - Peterpie123rww (talk) 20:28, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Music – Songs from and Inspired by the Motion Picture you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Some Dude From North Carolina -- Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 20:41, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article Music – Songs from and Inspired by the Motion Picture you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Music – Songs from and Inspired by the Motion Picture for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Some Dude From North Carolina -- Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 21:01, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article Music – Songs from and Inspired by the Motion Picture you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Music – Songs from and Inspired by the Motion Picture for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Some Dude From North Carolina -- Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 22:41, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Congrats! I've noted your accomplishment here. I hope you continue attempting to promote other Sia articles to good status. Happy editing! ---Another Believer _(Talk) 22:45, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Another Believer, thank you so much! I am proud – thank you for your continued support - Peterpie123rww (talk) 09:27, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey!
Very well done.
Gareth Griffith-Jones (contribs) (talk) 09:56, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Gareth Griffith-Jones, thank you! - Peterpie123rww (talk) 12:53, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I tried to add the footnotes we discussed to the tracklist, but I couldn't do it without messing up some of the formatting in the template. Instead, I added two sentences to the Singles and promotion section. -- Ssilvers (talk) 15:10, 10 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your work on Everyday Is Christmas! I hope you continue improving Sia-related entries. :) ---Another Believer _(Talk) 22:47, 4 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Another Believer, thank you! A shame that I've not been around much over the past year, but when I can contribute I do enjoy it. Thanks again for your support always :) Peterpie123rww (talk) 22:28, 5 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Doggy54321 has given you a brownie! Brownies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a brownie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. I wanted to thank you for changing all the redirect targets of various "Taylor's Version" redirects from Fearless (Taylor Swift album) to Fearless (Taylor's Version). I didn't want to spam you with thanks so I decided on a brownie instead. As well, congrats on your GA! D🐶ggy54321 (let's chat!) 13:57, 11 April 2021 (UTC)†[reply]

@Doggy54321: haha no problem at all and thank you VERY much for the brownie! - Peterpie123rww (talk) 16:11, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome!! D🐶ggy54321 ^{(let's chat!)} 16:11, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I just flattened your source fixes by mistake - sorry. Can this be fixed without undoing my copyedits? Popcornfud (talk) 13:38, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Popcornfud: Oh! That's not a problem. Yes, I'll just run the bot again! - Peterpie123rww (talk) 13:45, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Perfect. Thanks! Popcornfud (talk) 13:46, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Olivia Rodrigo - Sour (Target edition).png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. ≫ Lil-Unique1 -{ Talk }- 19:28, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Richard Okorogheye. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 April 19#Richard Okorogheye until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 18:26, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I see you removed the Razzie wins that the film won for Worst Actresses and Director. That's like removing any film with Oscar wins that didn't win Best Picture. It still qualifies as a Golden Raspberry winner. Espngeek (talk) 10:47, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Music wasn't really "controversial", although the media loves that word, as it generates clicks. A controversy is a heated "disagreement". In this case, the film received a lot of criticism for its treatment of autism, casting of a non-autistic title character, etc. There wasn't much vociferous, heated disagreement about it (No one wrote: "Yes, Sia SHOULD have cast a neurotypical actress!!!"). So, I agree with the person who changed the word from "controversy" to "criticism". -- Ssilvers (talk) 16:57, 25 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Did the movie actually play on IMAX screens in the U.S.? Box office Mojo does not give any U.S. gross for it. I wonder if the U.S. IMAX showing didn't actually happen? -- Ssilvers (talk) 22:37, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Ssilvers: It did happen but only in a handful of IMAX cinemas on one night only (Feb 10th)... This is mentioned in the Release part of the article I believe. Hope you are doing well, I've not been around much here recently! - Peterpie123rww (talk) 09:56, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article says so, but the ref does NOT support the fact -- it says that it is going to happen, but it is NOT a ref that states that it DID happen. That is why I am asking you the question. Are you certain that it did, in fact, happen, and if so, can we add a ref that actually verifies the fact? I cannot find one, and Box Office Mojo seems to indicate that it did not happen. -- Ssilvers (talk) 19:08, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:44, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I know that you have contributed to this article before. Please take a look at the recent changes to the Lead and the Talk page discussion. What do you think? -- Ssilvers (talk) 13:37, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Would you please look in on the current discussion at the Sia article and the proposed change(s) to the Lead by the new editor? Please comment if you have an opinion. All the best, -- Ssilvers (talk) 16:01, 18 June 2022 (UTC) -- Ssilvers (talk) 16:01, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect House of Gucci (upcoming film) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 August 10#House of Gucci (upcoming film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Steel1943 (talk) 21:14, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:32, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Annika (upcoming TV series) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 February 28 § Annika (upcoming TV series) until a consensus is reached. Steel1943 (talk) 17:54, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Rogue Squadron (upcoming film) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 March 16 § Rogue Squadron (upcoming film) until a consensus is reached. Jay 💬 07:59, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I hope you have GA plans for this article. One of my faves! ---Another Believer _(Talk) 17:44, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Another Believer: I think I do! I love the song too... am trying to fit in editing around my busy schedule at the moment. Thank you as always! — Peterpie123rww (talk) 20:44, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Another Believer: how is it looking? any ideas? — Peterpie123rww (talk) 19:45, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There are an awful lot of sources that spell it "Bernard", including this, this, this, this, this, this, this, this, this, this and over 1,000 other Google news hits. "Bernad" has only 20% as many Google News hits. Shouldn't we at least note that other sources think it is "Bernard"? I imagine that eventually, someone will definitively clear this up, but it appears to still be in some doubt. -- Ssilvers (talk) 16:13, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Ssilvers: Indeed, although all of these sources are wrong. People reported as Bernard initially (when they broke the story) but updated to Bernad and there were images published here about a year ago stating his name as Bernad. I'm not sure how which one we should include in the article but I do know that the correct one is Bernad... — Peterpie123rww (talk) 16:51, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Peterpie123rww: Share your thoughts regarding the album if you wish to. 183.171.122.164 (talk) 06:01, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

FYI, there is a new discussion at Talk:Music (2021 film) regarding how many people should be listed in the infobox under "Starring". You are the person with the most edits on that page. -- Ssilvers (talk) 20:13, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:48, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I do not have access to The Times. Is this correct? Also, even if it is correct, can we use the ref somewhere else? I know The Times is the premiere London newspaper. -- Ssilvers (talk) 06:28, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Ssilvers: Hi! Yes, that is correct, it says in the article: "In 2010, after coming close to suicide, she checked into Alcoholics Anonymous and has been sober since." Not sure why they removed it simply because they can't access it!! I'd say it's an important piece of information as it marks the start of her recovery. Maybe worth re-adding and with a url-access parameter... I'll have a read through and see if there's anywhere else it can be added — Peterpie123rww (talk) 13:16, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again. Thanks for the Philanthropy content. Some of the statements are followed by more than two cites. This is WP:CITEKILL. Would you please choose the two best ones in each of those instances and delete the third? Thanks, and happy editing! -- Ssilvers (talk) 15:46, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Ssilvers: Done! Considering adding some information about her social activism too (supporting BLM on Good Morning America, being an open ally of LGBT communities etc.) - would you suggest putting this into a 'social activism' subheading or just making it part of a general 'activism' subheading combined with the animal ones...? — Peterpie123rww (talk) 16:57, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Looks good. I think just "Activism" -- otherwise you get too many headings for comparatively short sections. -- Ssilvers (talk) 17:29, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hoping to reach a compromise on the edits of the Gaylor section of the Swifties Wiki. Proposing using neutral language and citing both sides of the conflict. You deleted may sources with evidence that were cited on the recent edit. Will seek Dispute Resolupingtion if this cannot be resolved. Musicscholar78 (talk) 02:52, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Musicscholar78: Hi there, yes, of course. However, please refrain from making disruptive edits such as replacing reliably-cited content with unsourced content (WP:OR) and fake references. Thanks — Peterpie123rww (talk) 12:51, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dance Alone (Sia and Kylie Minogue song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ofenbach.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

hello, can i ask how did u upload non free file in wikipedia? if i click button to upload file, it doesn't work. since 5 months ago, can you please help me? Arismauve (talk) 10:20, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Is this change correct, and if so, doesn't it need a ref? -- Ssilvers (talk) 02:14, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]