User talk:Portillo

Getting started A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: Edit a page • Upload and use images • Create your first article Intuitive guide to Wikipedia • Article Creation Wizard Getting help Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Help desk: A Wiki Styled page to ask questions on Help directory: A comprehensive list-style help contents page Policies and guidelines Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons List of policies • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • List of guidelines Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The community Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists Writing articles Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Simplified manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Peer review • Featured content Miscellaneous User pages • Talk pages Awards a registered contributor can achieve and award Clean up: General • Spam • Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia!

Here are some tips to help you get started:

* If you haven't already, please add your name to the new user log to let others know a little about yourself. * Read the article describing how to edit a page and feel free to experiment in the Sandbox. * When editing pages, use the preview button before submitting and try to fill in the summary box for every edit. * Eventually, read the Manual of Style and Policies and Guidelines. * If you need help, post a question at the Help Desk or ask me on my talk page. * Explore, be bold in editing pages, and, most importantly, have fun!

Good luck!
Jbetak 02:53, 28 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. One last helpful hint. To sign your posts like I did above (on talk pages, for example) use the '~' symbol. To insert just your name, type ~~~ (3 tildes), or, to insert your name and timestamp, use ~~~~ (4 tildes)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Daniel Cordone, but we regretfully cannot accept original research. Please find and add a reliable citation to your recent edit so we can verify your work. Uncited information may be removed at any time. Thanks for your efforts, and happy editing! Can't sleep, clown will eat me 08:10, 19 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed you editing a few pages on my watch list, and I hope you don't mind me offering some helpful advice. First of all, you should familiarize yourself with talk pages and Wikiquette. On talk pages, please post new comments at the very bottom, or better yet, hit the plus sign tab at the top of the page. This will create a new topic for you. Also, every time you post something on a talk page, you must 'sign' it by typing four tildes <nowikie>Andrew c 02:09, 26 October 2006 (UTC)</nowiki>. As for the main article space, as stated above, when you add new content, you must supply a citation of a verifiable, reliable source. You may also want to review the original research and neutral point of view policy pages. Hope this helps. Happy editings!--Andrew c 02:09, 26 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Panos.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 08:59, 5 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your change to the page Total depravity was determined to be unhelpful and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. --Flex (talk|contribs) 14:53, 21 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unhelpful and unconstructive content to Wikipedia, as you did to 2000s. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Mkdw^talk 01:27, 6 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"plz don't revert" isn't an adequate edit summary — it says nothing about what you did, nor about why you did it. --Mel Etitis (Talk) 08:44, 25 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your periodic adding of mostly irrelevant links to articles such as total depravity and presuppositional apologetics (e.g., these) needs to stop. Its repetitive nature is becoming more and more like vandalism. If you have specific concerns for some of the links, please discuss them on the talk page for the article in question. --Flex (talk/contribs) 11:01, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I came across your recent edit to the article and have reverted it. I feel that the statement regarding his chronic illness, etc. requires reliable and verifiable sources. If you feel that my revert was in error, please leave a message either on Ajcfreak|my talk page or on the article talk page. Thank you. Happy Wiki-ing!!! aJCfreak yAk 07:36, 2 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, the only reason people don't like Nu Metal is because it's famous. I am just as much of a Metal head as anyone else listening to any other kind of Metal. Iamanadam 23:43, 30 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not use talk pages for general discussion of the topic. They are for discussion related to improving the article. They are not to be used as a forum or chat room. See here for more information. Thank you. ([[1], [2]) MastCell ^Talk 04:41, 18 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to use talk pages such as Talk:Planned Parenthood for inappropriate discussion, as described here, you may be blocked. -Severa (!!!) 10:55, 18 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I reverted a couple of your edits, to Jackass (unknown cast member) and Manny Puig (unnecessary changes). Please ensure your contributions are improving the encyclopedia, otherwise your ability to edit may be retricted. Thanks, Deiz talk 07:08, 18 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Having reviewed your contributions and concerns raised by other editors I've blocked your account for 24hrs. I would advise you to be especially careful to make useful, constructive and appropriate edits after the block expires. Thanks, Deiz talk 11:07, 18 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Deiz, I try my best not to disrupt articles only improve them and feel that for 99% of the time I havent disrupted. I accept your decision since you are a Wikipedia official. Portillo 02:20, 19 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough. The talk page edit noted above was certainly not constructive. Of course, not all editors are Shakespeare, Stephen Hawking or Mother Theresa, but in future, before you press save, ask yourself: is this edit truly going to improve the encyclopedia? Deiz talk 03:47, 19 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Citation needed? I assume you are not familiar with the discography of The Clash? As I noted in my summary of the edit, The Magnificent Seven is one of, if not the first appearance of rap-rock.Jlee562 (talk) 02:09, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I was just surprised that it wasnt added earlier. Thanks for the message. Portillo (talk) 19:55, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Heath Ledger. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. {{{2}}} Will ^(talk) 21:46, 27 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hey what's up? I realised that you have editted Slipknot related articles before and I was wondering if you would be interested in joining the Slipknot Wikiproject. The project aims to develop all Slipknot articles to create reliable, high quality articles. If you would to join, simply list yourself i nthe participants list on the project page. REZTER ^TALK ø 11:17, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The "Reception" headline you keep making is unneccesary. And the review that you are putting up doesn't belong there. The page isn't for reviews. That is why I'm removing it. Hope you understand. Juggalobrink (talk) 01:39, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah no worries Portillo (talk) 07:35, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, While browsing through recent changes I came across an edit that you have made to the Son of God article. While what you have done in terms of reverting vandalism is appreciated, please consider revising your tone when filling out edit summaries. Using profanity violates WP:Civil and will not accomplish anything useful. Thanks! --Ubardak (talk) 07:57, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I understand. Sorry Portillo (talk) 08:00, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The third AoF has been decided, Iowa (album) is the article chosen by default due to single nomination. You can see what this task is for and its aims here. As you are a member of the Slipknot WikiProject, your participation in this task is greatly welcomed and the quicker and better that we improve the article, the more efficient the project will become. Please head over the the talk page and identify areas for improvement on the to-do list and begin to achieve these goals. Collaboration is the key word for the AoF and collaborating with 1 or more users on certain tasks is recommended, communications can be made on the articles talk page or on user's talk pages. Nominations are now open for the fourth AoF so head over to the AoF talk page and nominate which article you think should recieve the attention next. REZTER ^TALK ø 22:31, 14 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Slipknot WikiProject Newsletter Issue II - May 10, 2008 If you would like to help out with future newsletters, please contact the Outreach Department.

"Welcome to the transformation Welcome to annihilation Welcome to the man that wanted Everything, but couldn't have it” News and announcements Welcome to the second Slipknot WikiProject Newsletter, dated Saturday, May 10, 2008. Iowa is a currently under Peer Review Slipknot (album) has been peer reviewed, and is a current GAC for the second time. The Slipknot Portal has officially been added to the Project.

From the Editors Don't forget that the Article of Focus department is up-and-running and having great success. The collaboration is currently in a "Voting Period". Please visit the talk page to nominate an article to receive the AoF attention. Since the projects inception in the early part of the year the project has grown tremendously and is currently thriving and offering great support to Slipknot related articles. Congratulations to all members and let's keep this up!

Hi, I was wondering why you removed the criticism section relating to Real Madrid's comments about their desire to sign Cristiano Ronaldo?

It seemed highly notable, related to not only Real Madrid, but the current European and English champions, Manchester United.

Normally, if one of my edits is removed, it is easy to understand why, by reading the edit summaries, however you marked your edit that removed the information as a minor edit (removal of an entire section is hardly minor) and left no information in the summary.

Anyway, just a polite suggestion, perhaps if you want to removed correctly cited and notable information, it would be nice if you left an edit summary, or even better discussed it with the other involved editors beforehand.

I'm sure your edit was done with the best of intentions, it is just a little hard to understand your motives, without discussion/summary information.

see ya

Sennen goroshi (talk) 14:31, 28 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thanks for your message. I think you should put that under Ramon Calderon's article. Portillo (talk) 01:20, 29 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Good idea, however some of the comments were made by Bernd Schuster, and Manchester United have threatened to take action against Real Madrid, but against an individual.

Sennen goroshi (talk) 03:05, 29 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings, I've noticed that you added a Q magazine review to the "Reception" section of the Arise (album) article. I wanted to know if had some extra information regarding this source, like: author of this review, it's title, the page it was in, # of the Q magazine it was featured, etc. And thank you for contribution. Musicaindustrial (talk) 13:44, 13 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I got it from here http://www.cduniverse.com/productinfo.asp?pid=1019513. Thanks for the message. Portillo (talk) 23:40, 13 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Slipknot WikiProject Newsletter Issue III - June 20, 2008 If you would like to help out with future newsletters, please contact the Outreach Department.

"What do you want? What do you need? We'll find a way When all hope is gone" News and announcements Welcome to the third Slipknot WikiProject Newsletter, dated Friday, June 20, 2008. Slipknot (album) and Iowa have been promoted to Good article status Vol. 3: (The Subliminal Verses) is a Good article nominee "All Hope Is Gone" has officially been added to the Project. Mate.Feed.Kill.Repeat. is lined up to the be the next Aof. Please contribute if you can!

Jump the Frak Up! The project will hold its first "Roll Call" over the next two weeks. All users who plan on actively contributing to the Project are encouraged to add your name to the designated section of the discussion page. Failing to add your name within two weeks will cause you to become an "Inactive member", barring you from voting in the Aof and recieving this newsletter. Remember, you can re-add your name at anytime, if you feel like becoming active again! (sic) news The band's first song from All Hope Is Gone is avalible to download (for FREE!) today. The first official single, "Psychosocial", will be avalible for digital download on July 1. All Hope Is Gone is expected to be released on August 26.

The Slipknot WikiProject Newsletter Issue IV - July 19, 2008 If you would like to help out with future newsletters, please contact the Outreach Department.

"And the rain will kill us all. Throw ourselves against the wall. But no-one else can see. The preservation of the martyr in me." News and announcements Welcome to the fourth Slipknot WikiProject Newsletter, dated Saturday, July 19, 2008. Vol. 3: (The Subliminal Verses) a Good article and the Project's first Featured Article canidate 9.0: Live and Mate. Feed. Kill. Repeat. are Good articles Disasterpieces and Voliminal: Inside the Nine are Good Article Nominees Slipknot band members is a Featured list canidate Welcome to Our Neighborhood and Slipknot Demo achieved status The Slipknot Portal has been completely revamped

From the editors Probably the best month so far for the project. Two GAs, two more GANs, one FAC and one FLC. All albums and DVDs are now high quality albums, with the exception of All Hope Is Gone which is expected to become a GA shortly after release. (sic) news Slipknot have began their tour throughout the United States on the Mayhem festival. However, after breaking both heels from a 12 foot on-stage jump #0 will be performing the remainder of the tour in a wheelchair. The band will be featured in next week's issue of Kerrang!. There are nine different collectable covers (one with each member of the band) for only the third time in magazine history. Their first music video of All Hope Is Gone for the song "Psychosocial" premiered last night.

Please stop your disruptive editing, such as the edit you made to Capybara. If your vandalism continues, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 21:32, 2 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Slipknot WikiProject Newsletter Issue V - September 22, 2008 If you would like to help out with future newsletters, please contact the Outreach Department.

"We'll never be broken, we won't be denied, our war is the pressure we need to unite 'Til we die" News and announcements Welcome to the fifth Slipknot WikiProject Newsletter, dated Monday, September 22, 2008. Vol. 3: (The Subliminal Verses) is the project's first Featured Article List of Slipknot band members is a Featured List Disasterpieces, Voliminal: Inside the Nine and All Hope Is Gone are all Good Articles 9.0: Live is currently a Featured Article Candidate List of Slipknot awards was featured on the WP:Main Page as part of WP:DYK and is currently a Featured List Candidate The project also has three new articles; Tattered and Torn, Outside The Nine and List of Slipknot awards

From the editors We apologize about forgetting to do a newsletter last month, but the last two months have been really good for the project. We got our first FA, another FL, a further three GAs, plus a FLC and FAC in process. All Hope Is Gone is currently the AoF with the intention of becoming a featured article, so help out were possible. (sic) news Slipknot are currently taking a break from touring due to Joey Jordison breaking his ankle, it is rumoured that they have been shooting a music video for their next single "Dead Memories", which will feature Corey Taylor in some kind of mud pit/grave. Slipknot will return to touring in October and will be touring Asia, Europe and Australia until December, reportedly returning for an arena tour of the US next year.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Right Thurr, you will be blocked from editing. macy 18:00, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop introducing jokes into articles, such as those you created at John Kosmina. Wikipedia is a serious encyclopedia, and contributions of this type are considered vandalism. Continuing to add jokes and other disruptive content into articles may lead to you being blocked from editing. Your edit summary, "leave kossie alone you will die. Not by me, by kossie". See WP:CIVIL. —Largo Plazo (talk) 17:20, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I was actually getting rid of vandalism! Portillo (talk) 23:05, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Do you see anything in WP:CIVIL that says that you can ignore the rules when you're getting rid of vandalism? —Largo Plazo (talk) 23:45, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. Portillo (talk) 23:49, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I thought it was pretty funny! ...And probably true ^_^ --Soetermans | is listening | what he'd do now? 15:41, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It wasnt supposed to be a big deal really. The important thing for me was getting rid of the vandalism. Portillo (talk) 22:49, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I've reverted your edit to bee bread because the reference you provided fails to meet our criteria for reliable sources. Sites that are primarily geared towards selling products or services are not acceptable as references for Wikipedia articles. If you should find a better source with that information, feel free to restore the content. Let me know if you have any questions. Mr. Darcy talk 19:43, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm assuming your additions were all cited from Luke Ford. Unfortunately, he is not a reliable source for wikipedia and all biographical information attributable to him is supposed to be removed. Morbidthoughts (talk) 07:51, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

As is the case with the other Mortal Kombat characters, Kano's nationality does not belong in the article introduction, so please stop adding it there. Thank you. sixtynine ^{• spill it •} 04:58, 15 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there, as a member of the Slipknot Project I would just like to message you and remind you about AoF, the projects collaboration scheme. Currently the project is focused on All Hope Is Gone and we are currently going through a Feature Article candidate process in the hope of getting it classified as a Featured article. I would also like to bring to your attention that any member of the Slipknot Project can nominate an article from the projects scope to receive the projects attention, please visit the AoF talk page to nominate an article which you feel the project should focus on next. REZTER ^TALK ø 11:59, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I reversed your edits in the Christian theories centering on the End time section in the New World Order (conspiracy theory) article since you have justified why your wording is more accurate. As for your question about whether we should create a criticsm section, you seem not have noticed that the article currently has one. However, according to the Wikipedia:Criticism sections page:

“

Criticism sections can be found in many Wikipedia articles. While sometimes appropriate, this structure is not optimal, as relegating all criticisms to one section usually results in an unbalanced presentation. When present, such sections should be considered a temporary solution until the article is restructured to integrate criticism into each relevant section. It may then be desirable to have a "General criticisms" section near the end of the article, for those points which did not neatly fit anywhere else.

”

--Loremaster (talk) 00:57, 31 January 2009 (UTC)'[reply]

I just felt that you were adding a criticism section only because it was a christian theory. I mean i really dont care what secular humanists think about christian apocolyptic theories. I originally wrote the first paragraph, so i felt like international demonic order sounded better and more accurate then theocratic whatever. I did however like the emperial cult thing. Portillo (talk) 02:58, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm trying to add criticism to all theories as quickly as I find them. The criticism of the Christian "End Time" theory mostly comes from Preterism rather than secular humanism. As for your expression "international demonic order", I've decided to replace it with "satanic world theocracy". Lastly, I removed the mention of David Allen Rivera's Final Warning: The History of the New World Order because of its lack of notability. However, we can cite it as a source for the first paragraph in the "End Time" theory section. --Loremaster (talk) 16:38, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If an someone image is uses in an article about, the someone, then it is commonly OK for fair use in wikipedia: we have lots and lots of photos of celebrities in articles about these celebs and screenshots from movies about the movies. Anything else is not fair use. you cannot illostrate the article about clipper with screenshots from Pirates of the Caribbean. You are free to consult some admins about the issue. This is a well-established understanding. See eg. this edit. - 7-bubёn >t 01:33, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Mushroomhead, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Arcanedude91 (talk) 21:36, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Bodybuilding. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. --Quartet 00:16, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I have noticed that you changed the profile from football (soccer) to the ambigious "football" player. This issue has already been discussed and agreed on. Soccer players are to be referred to football (soccer) players. If you want to voice your ideas, please visit the Association football in Australia discussion page or the Australian national football team page. Please do not revert the page again or it will be concidered as vandalisim. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 60.224.0.121 (talk) 12:16, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree. Football is fooball not soccer. Portillo (talk) 22:23, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry but wikipedia is not made for your personal views on what it should be. It has been discussed and agreed on here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Australia_national_football_(soccer)_team#Football_is_more_than_one_game.2Fcode. This is definently your last warning not to continue vandalisim. I've noticed you have been banned several time before for chaning things to your "personal views". Any further edits and you will be reported. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 60.224.0.121 (talk) 00:22, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• 60.224.0.121, please assume good faith as people have done with you. Portillo and 60.224.0.121, I have asked that the discussion be continued here in order to gain a consensus from a relevant project. Camw (talk) 00:26, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It is not my personal view only that football is football not soccer. Portillo (talk) 07:39, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I undid your contribution to musical style and influences as it constituted an opinion made on what would be considered a blog. Please refrain from adding opinions to articles. Thanks! (sorry it shows up as an IP address, I forgot I was not logged in)Nickstuckert (talk) 05:17, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! While a section on Silva's fighting style would be good, the section you restored is no good as it is (see my edit summary). Feel free to rewrite it with proper sources etc. though. Cheers, --aktsu ^(t / c) 23:27, 19 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Korn. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.--F-22 Raptor ^IV 21:46, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit of metal was also reverted. Portillo (talk) 22:23, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Korn, you will be blocked from editing. --F-22 Raptor ^IV 00:25, 31 May 2009 (UTC) What part of umbrella term don't you understand?--F-22 Raptor ^IV 00:29, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Arent you the one that was editing "metal" into the introduction? Portillo (talk) 01:09, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, better. I thought you might like to know - after all, your edit summary was interrogative, positive contributions to the article are thin on the ground, and you might welcome a positive response in return. Regards. Haploidavey (talk) 13:50, 18 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I was the first to edit the page and break news of Michael Jackson's incident. I added these edits once I saw a news ticker: Edit 1 to describe that he had suffered cardiac arrest and then was rushed to the hospital, and then another minor edit to add the "current event" tag at the top of the page. conman33 (. . .talk) 03:11, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations friend. Portillo (talk) 03:30, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

We've discussed this in depth before here, and here with community involvement with specific examples seen here by Sony and here by CNN. In a nutshell, "recording artist" covers singing, songwriting, producing, "entertainer" covers choreographer, acting, performing, and "businessman" covers all other professional dealings, including his philanthropy and contractual agreements and ventures. The Bookkeeper (of the Occult) 07:31, 27 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I missed it. Portillo (talk) 08:03, 27 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I saw your suggestions in the talk page of the article and in Ian's talk page. I like your idea very much. Would you be fine with the following version: "MJJ, dubbed the King of Pop, was an American musician and entertainer, widely regarded as one of the most commercially successful recording artists of all time"? As for citations, they are given in the last section, Legacy and influence, where he is cited as the greatest selling male solo act ever. We don't have to clutter the lead with citations so I think that should be good enough. Let me know what you think. Thank you.UberCryxic (talk) 18:42, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah im sure i can live with that. The other option is to simply leave it as it is "Michael Joseph Jackson (August 29, 1958 – June 25, 2009), dubbed the "King of Pop", was an American recording artist and entertainer." Portillo (talk) 23:31, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, you apparently linked "guttural screaming" to the death grunts article, however, the two aren't the same. I'm sure it wasn't a bad faith edit, but I undid it, anyway. Thanks, --Danteferno (talk) 21:47, 14 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please find a reliable source. Thanks, --Danteferno (talk) 21:58, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Can you help me geting family Guy to a GA/FA. --Pedro J. ^{the rookie} 01:24, 23 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for asking, but im no good at getting articles to GA/FA. Portillo (talk) 06:34, 23 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated Hood 2 Hood: The Blockumentary, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hood 2 Hood: The Blockumentary. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Niteshift36 (talk) 08:15, 1 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Just because it was (uncited) in the main article doesn't mean it's appropriate. The subject of "chickens as pets" isn't an encyclopedic article detailing how people keep pet chickens, but about the phenomenon of pet chickens, i.e. where and why chickens became pets. Any how to content describing how pet chickens are kept is almost entirely too general. The line between pet chickens and regular poultry keeping isn't clearly defined by the manner of keeping them, only in the attitude people have toward their chickens. Steven Walling 06:05, 17 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

So how exactly do you plan to expand the article? I believe that the article is about pet chickens such as in an urban environment, not a farm or hatchery. I understand there may be a few how-to sentences, but theres really nothing wrong with writing what pet chickens eat or the fact that chickens need to have dust baths in order to keep parasites in check. Portillo (talk) 08:41, 17 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

My point is that all chickens take dust baths and have the same dietary requirements. The content I removed is by-and-large not unique to keeping pet chickens. Steven Walling 20:14, 17 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well its not mentioned anywhere else, so maybe it should be mentioned here. Plus, pet chickens are kept differently to hatcheries. Hatcheries have cages with only a tiny bit of food and water for each chicken, no grass, no dustbaths, etc. Portillo (talk) 21:35, 17 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

General chicken information should go in the main chicken article. Also, your comment about hatcheries is totally incorrect. Not all farms and hatcheries are the same, and some are better or worse than others. Steven Walling 21:18, 18 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well you better get busy, because i checked the chicken article, and dont see anything about what chickens eat or how they are maintained when kept as pets. Portillo (talk) 09:32, 19 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The article Derek ramsey has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails notability requirements. Nice for a userpage to mention, but nothing for the mainspace.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Excirial ^{(Contact me,Contribs)} 11:25, 24 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on StrongLifts, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Guy0307 (talk) 02:31, 25 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is StrongLifts. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/StrongLifts. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:18, 27 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. It appears that you have been canvassing—leaving messages on others' talk pages to notify them of an ongoing community decision, debate, or vote—in order to influence Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/StrongLifts. While friendly notices are allowed, they should be limited and nonpartisan in distribution and should reflect a neutral point of view. Please do not post notices which are indiscriminately cross-posted, which espouse a certain point of view or side of a debate, or which are selectively sent only to those who are believed to hold the same opinion as you. Remember to respect Wikipedia's principle of consensus-building by allowing decisions to reflect the prevailing opinion among the community at large. --Yankees76 (talk) 15:05, 27 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Blanking my user page to write your tripe perfectly demonstrates the ignorant arrogance of the "ex-premies". There is none so deaf as those who don't listen.Momento (talk) 09:21, 14 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I didnt write anything, i reverted. Portillo (talk) 09:48, 14 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

What's this then? [3]Momento (talk) 21:25, 14 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I reverted that. 1 Portillo (talk) 00:10, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Let me get this clear. You're saying you didn't write "To Momento, Prem Rawat said in the early 1970's" etc.? You just inserted someone else's crap? Momento (talk) 02:43, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Heres what happened. I noticed that you were banned from editing an article so i checked your userpage. I wanted to revert it back to "this is momentos page" (it was blank at the time), but i accidently reverted that paragraph which i dont know what it meant or what it was about. Portillo (talk) 06:11, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The truth at last. OK. According to the conditions of my ban we can have no further discussion about why I was banned and the circumstances around it. How's the weather? Momento (talk) 10:22, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I had never seen a user get banned from 1 article :). Weathers fine. Portillo (talk) 10:40, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The article Summer body has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Dictionary-type definition of a non-notable neologism

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. LadyofShalott 06:18, 28 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The article The Death of a Ghost Hunter has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unremarkable film. Does not appear to have been reviewed in any reliable source.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ^Bongo_matic 07:56, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Portillo, I see that you have an "administrator willing to make difficult blocks" userbox. However, I can find no evidence that you are actually an administrator.[4] Would you please remove that userbox from your page - having it when you are not a sysop is rather deceptive. If I am somehow in error, and you really are an administrator, would you please direct me to the evidence thereof? Thank you, LadyofShalott 21:17, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for removing it! LadyofShalott 15:09, 4 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Its ok. I didnt even know i was on the list, i just liked the userbox. Portillo (talk) 22:07, 4 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Deviancy amplification spiral. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deviancy amplification spiral. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:09, 22 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on MMA Junkie requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for web content. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Favonian (talk) 12:19, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

In an attempt to breath life back in to the Project I am arranging a Roll Call and will begin making arrangement for group initiatives throughout the coming months. Just so the Project can keep an updated list of people who continue to contribute to the Project a Roll Call will happen from time to time. It is understood that over time, users may have lost interest in the Project or Wikipedia all together; if you have, it's no big deal. If you would like to keep contributing to the project please sign the list here. If you do not add your name to the list by January 16, you will become an "Inactive member", this will bar you from voting in the AoF, as well as receiving the monthly newsletter. Remember, if you ever want to join the project again, you are always welcome!!! REZTER ^TALK ø 01:33, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding this edit you made to the The Arsenio Hall Show article, please read WP:TENSE and WP:MOSTV#Lead_paragraphs for the use of proper tense for all television show articles. Thank you. Pinkadelica^♣ 02:48, 11 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article Gym junkie has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable neologism

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. E Wing (talk) 09:15, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Street fighting. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Street fighting. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:12, 14 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Leo zhang. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. ttonyb (talk) 15:50, 21 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Joe Moreira requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. iBen^talk/_contribsIf you reply here, please place {{talkback}} on my page. 01:17, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article Amarjeet Sada has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:BLP1E.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Joe Chill (talk) 01:57, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

AfD: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amarjeet Sada. Joe Chill (talk) 02:12, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You just reverted my addition to the entry on Kai Greene, arguing that a photo that does not show his face is not acceptable. May I ask you to cite a relevant Wikipedia policy on that matter? I added the photo to illustrate the fact that Greene is interested in showing his body in artistic contexts, in addition to appearing in bodybuilding contests. It seems to me that the photo is very appropriate in that regard. To address your concern, however, I will exchange the photo for another one that does show his face. Please let me know if you have any problems with that. (By the way, I only deleted your photo because it duplicates the one at the top of the article. I thought it would be more informative to add something different.) Thanks! GBataille (talk) 23:46, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. I just wanted to clean up the article. The picture is fine. Portillo (talk) 23:51, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. You may not be aware, but a blog is never a reliable source for a biography of a living person. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 04:03, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Portillo. Before you consider any further editing at the above, please make sure you read my response (on the article talk-page) to your recent restoration of material. Thank you. Haploidavey (talk) 13:30, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Portilo. I'm just curious as to what is your opinion on the notability of the groove metal entry? There aren't many reliable sources discussing this term. RG (talk) 03:23, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure about sources. But i consider groove metal to be post-thrash/90's metal. I do think its notable. Portillo (talk) 03:28, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It's original research to say that these two terms are the same thing and neither of these term are really notable. If you think the topic's notable, then please provide some reliable sources to prove me wrong. RG (talk) 02:49, 23 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I dont really care if the article is deleted or not. I already voted for a keep. My only concern is what will groove metal bands be classified as? Portillo (talk) 04:08, 23 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

How many bands can you actually find reliably sourced with the term? RG (talk) 10:49, 23 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Pantera and Machine Head. Portillo (talk) 11:03, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The revision you reverted to has a multitude of poorly-sourced and unsourced content, original research, and overt references to the band Korn, despite the fact that the article is not about that band, and changes the lead so that it appears as a genre, not as an umbrella term (which is cited). The current revision is based on actual sourced content. (Sugar Bear (talk) 01:07, 11 May 2010 (UTC))[reply]

Your version is ugly. Remove the unsourced content then. Portillo (talk) 01:38, 11 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I take offense to your edit summary on the groove metal article. "what a stupid thing to say", that's rude. Please stay calm and be pleasant with other editors. And the Machine Head info is irrevelant. Those two allmusic links don't even use the words "groove metal", it's just talking about Machine Head in general hence why it isn't needed. RG (talk) 12:47, 12 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The link between thrash and pantera is groove metal. Portillo (talk) 23:18, 12 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Like this one... if you have the time. Wiki libs (talk) 17:21, 16 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ill try. But the groove and nu metal articles have been turned to hell recently. Portillo (talk) 05:15, 17 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:CesareBonventre1.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 09:45, 10 July 2010 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 09:45, 10 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:CesarBonventre.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 09:45, 10 July 2010 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 09:45, 10 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:250px-Harveyrosenberg.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. J Milburn (talk) 12:35, 10 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article Football Tragic has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable neologism

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Eeekster (talk) 02:59, 11 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:CesarBonventre.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:30, 17 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:CesareBonventre1.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:31, 17 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article Ariel Helwani has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fighter in a non-notable brand.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Minimac (talk) 07:15, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Portillo. I'm not sure why you reverted me here. One of the cited sources you restored is a dead link, and neither of the remaining two alleges that Michael Jackson constituted an example of so-called "Peter Pan syndrome": the Time piece does even mention "Peter Pan syndrome" and the ABC piece only mentions the so-called syndrome in connection with the characteristics of pedophiles; Jackson is not the subject of this passage. As none of the sources asserts that Jackson was an example of so-called "Peter Pan syndrome", the passage fails WP:V and I've removed it again. Cheers. -- Rrburke (talk) 01:24, 17 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Its alrite. I dont care about that anymore. Portillo (talk) 07:23, 17 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:250px-Harveyrosenberg.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Skier Dude (talk 04:07, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Fourth Ward, New York requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. — Train2104 (talk • contribs • count) 18:39, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Seven Signs Of Christ's Return, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you.  Forty two  11:09, 3 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

At 15911 edits, you are in a better position than I am in knowing that one should not de-PROD articles created by oneself.--  Forty two  11:20, 3 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]