User talk:Quessler

My compliments to you. While still a very new editor, you made a number of astute, careful, precise edits at Seka. Welcome aboard, and I, for one, am happy to have such a promising new editor here! With sincere regards, --Tenebrae (talk) 16:51, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not create pages that attack, threaten, or disparage their subject. Attack pages and files are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who create or add such material may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you. QVVERTYVS (hm?) 22:18, 1 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

To make yourself a user sub-page, its name needs to start with "User:Quessler/". See WP:USERSUBPAGE for more detail.

You made two pages starting just "Quessler:", which meant that they were pages in the main encyclopedia. Quessler/Wikipedic Malfunctions has been moved to User:Quessler/Wikipedic Malfunctions, but I have deleted Quessler:Blacklist because your proposed use of it is not a proper use of user space - please see WP:User pages, in particular the section WP:POLEMIC. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 22:34, 1 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at Terra Nova (TV series). Your edits have been reverted or removed.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. AussieLegend (✉) 11:20, 25 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Just to clarify, the content that you keep adding to the article has been only partially discussed on the article's talk page and there is no consensus yet top add it to the article, and certainly not in the format that you have added it. Your additions have been reverted multiple times now, yet you have made no attempt to discuss this on the talk page since you apparently abandoned any discussion nearly a month ago. Please do not restore the content until such time there is consensus for the change. --AussieLegend (✉) 11:26, 25 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not use unconventional formatting, as you've done at Wartime Lies[1] and other articles. Line breaks should be used between paragraphs, not in the middle of sentences for no apparent reason. Your edits at Jean Giraud demonstrate how properly formatted paragraphs were inexplicably broken into separate lines.[2][3] --AussieLegend (✉) 12:26, 25 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quessler If you continue to deliberately attempt to cause trouble by incorrectly formatting Wikipedia text, as you have just started to do again, you may be reported. Alex|The|Whovian 09:38, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'd like to know exactly what the point of this edit was. Your edit summary, ("revert" to a factually correct description, see talk page) makes no sense at all. There was no difference in the actual text. All that you did was once again improperly format the text by adding 5 unnecessary line breaks. At best, the edit seems disruptive given that you've been warned about it previously. --AussieLegend (✉) 10:33, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop harassing AlexTheWhovian on his talk page. As he has quite correctly stated in his latest edit summary talk pages are for discussions, not court hearing-style debates. Wikipedia is supposed to be a collaborative effort and we discuss issues, generally in an informal way. This is not a court-room, or a contract negotiation. and statements of demand such as "AlexTheWhovian agrees to not revert the revert of the current text" are not confrontational and appropriate. Instead, simply discuss the issue, remembering that f you wish to discuss edits at Terra Nova, the place to do that is at the article's talk page, not on user talk pages. You would do well to look at other discussions and see how editors discuss the issues. I've been waiting for you to do that for almost four weeks. --AussieLegend (✉) 17:04, 25 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

AlexTheWhovian has made it clear that he considers the discussion on his talk page ended and has told you to stop. His latest edit summary was I've asked you to stop posting. This is now officially harassment. Post again, and I'll file a report against you.[4] Editors are permitted to remove content from their talk pages and there is very little that you can do about it in this case. He has asked you not to post, so you should not continue. --AussieLegend (✉) 20:21, 25 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 19:34, 25 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:10, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]