User talk:Ryanjo

This user may have left Wikipedia. Ryanjo has not edited Wikipedia since 10 September 2017. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

Hello, Ryanjo, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Newcomers help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

• The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Editing tutorial
• Picture tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Naming conventions
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: ~~~. Four tildes (~~~~) produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! FloNight ^talk 14:53, 2 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings! I have reverted your re-insertion of the Apple logo on to your userpage. This image is tagged with a fair use tag, and as such it may not be used in userspace, per the policy found at Wikipedia:Fair_use#Policy item #9. For further explanation, please refer to User:Durin/Removal of fair use images. I have no desire to anger you in any way, but we may not use such images in userspace. Please do not re-insert the image or any other fair use images into your userpage. If you have any questions about this, feel free to ask me. Thanks! --Durin 03:58, 18 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about the error, thanks for the clarification. Ryanjo 16:50, 18 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ryan, I think you should stop this for the time being. You have put the template in manually, which has a problem in that, if there is an error (in this case you put John Henricks instead of Jon Henricks), one would have to fix every article to fix Jon Henricks. If you put in Template: Olympic 4x200m freestyle relay for instance, and then insert {{Olympic 4x200m freestyle relay}}, then it will generate the table from the template, and when an error is fixed on all templates, it will be fixed on all of the respective articles. REgards, ßlηguγΣη | Have your say!!! - review me 01:57, 18 May 2006 (UTC).[reply]

Thank you for correcting me. I will construct a template and correct the articles. -- Ryanjo 02:08, 18 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I saw your message on Talk:Harold Hardwick. A lot of the links link to someone other than the swimmer, so I had to change them. Thanks. Blnguyen | Have your say!!! 01:56, 26 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thanks for correcting my error in the Penalty shootout article regarding goalkeepers... I had been dabing goalkeeper wikilinks and hadn't checked the context properly. Cheers, --Daveb 08:15, 2 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The "prank" was a bad heading, but it is absolutely worthy of Wikipedia. It clearly isn't worthy of it's own page, but it must be at least mentioned on the page. You cannot use fuzzy logic when determining what's "in" and what's "out". You cant leave the columbine shooting out of the Columbine High article, it was a big thing that made national television and people went to jail. This is a big thing that made national television and people will go to jail. You can just use some floppy logic to determine the difference between those two events in importance, but if someone hears something about chickens and Redwood High on Fox, it would be pretty stupid for them to find NOTHING on wikipedia. Please focus your efforts on removing information that really should be here, rather than protecting an article you practially wrote. I'll review the rules, to make sure, but I am pretty sure that you are doing something explicitly forbidden by Wikipedia. For Wikipedia to work, it must be a continually growing pool of knowledge, and reverting a page whenever someone adds information just because you don't like the unbiased truth is working against Wikipedia. --General Eskimo

I am sorry that it irked you, but I disagree that it meets Wikipedia norms. I base this on other similar articles on Wikipedia, ie: Miramonte High School (not authored by me). I think there is a difference between simple incident, and information on an encyclopedia which gives information that describes something essential about the topic. Columbine is clearly of significance. A minor incident, such as a prank or mugging just isn't. The fact that I contributed the facts of this article is just an interest of mine. The article needs more work (on Faculty and Academics for instance), and as it stands it seems incomplete. I hope that you can be of help in this way. Just my opinion. -- Ryanjo 03:43, 7 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Soitenly!Gzuckier 13:04, 23 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The images were removed from User:Ryanjo/examples. If you're in the middle of testing the redesign of a page or template, I suppose it's okay to keep the image there for a bit, although it should be removed as soon as possible. I'd also like you to take note, though, that Image:Olympic-rings.png has been replaced by Image:Olympic rings.svg. joturner 16:56, 24 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I don't need it, I was using it as a template for bio pages. Ryanjo 23:03, 24 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I find this to be an excellent article! Keep up the good work (and good work on creating a full article on your first edit.OMEN 03:21, 1 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've responded on my talk page. But suffice to say: Thanks for catching mistake! --Starwiz 03:25, 3 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the pic of the Dutch flag! By the way, I am from Serbia myself... Zhix 16:32, 4 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

A very important thing on the page WATER POLO! I cannot change the template, you could try. The flag of Yugoslavia is erroneous in many places. The flag of Yugoslavia had a red star prior to 1992. From 1992 to 2003, the Yugoslav flag dropped the red star, and it was a plain tricolour, exactly as the flag of Serbia and Montenegro. The country was later renamed Serbia and Montenegro, in 2003. so, please, change the Socialist flags in every table, and put the plain tricolour. You can use the flag of Serbia and Montenegro insted, as usual! Zhix 12:18, 5 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, it is perfect now! You know, sometimes it's a tricky business tracing all the changes in flags: the USA flag had 48, 49, 50 stars in the last 60 years, isn't it so? And the CoA on the Spanish flag after Franco, etc. So, we're here for each other! Zhix 14:15, 19 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Amazing work on that Lob shot in Waterpolo. Thanks, Tenaciousd

Thanks for your clarification on the link added to the 1956 Hungarian Revolution article. I don't read Hungarian, so I was mistaken about the nature of the page. Regards, --Ryanjo 21:56, 28 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Most welcome. No surprise you were mistaken: ads are their only source of income (anyone can start and maintain a lap.hu collection for free), thus it does look like an advertising page. That is, unless you look at it using Firefox / Mozilla plus Adblock... :) Regards, KissL 09:40, 29 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

re: lead paragraph - I see it as a work-in-progress, please change it as you wish. (Im not happy with it either) The previous was such a gordian knot it had to be moved - not deleted, but set aside for rework. Istvan 15:01, 28 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding "prelude to the revolution" If you think it should be reverted, go ahead. I won't have time to do any more work on the article.--Paul 09:04, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

uploading to commons - you have to register first, make sure you have the copyright info straight, then describe the image as per the template they provide for cut/paste (in the big box), make sure your file extension matches the format (they wont do it automatically), then press upload (it may rename the image, placing underscores in place of spaces) and voila. Be sure to make the filename descriptive - i.e. when, where, what (in whatever order works) and please post it to the commons page "Hungarian Revolution of 1956" so we can have it all in one spot. Hope that helps. Istvan 04:16, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

With your recent edits to Electronic Health Record and Patient safety, you may be intrested in this edit on Electronic medical record. Thanks, -- Argon233 ^T C _@ ∉  17:03, 4 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I did notice that edit. I posted the original reference, apparently incorrrectly, since when I reviewed the reference it didn't support the "90% of NHS general practitioners have access to EMR". Ouch! I must have mixed up the quoted reference with another article, since I know I read this fact. So I have changed the same reference on CPOE, Patient safety, and Electronic health record, which had similar statements. When I find the correct figure, I'll re-edit. Regards--Ryanjo 22:27, 4 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I agree with you that the EMR and EHR articles should be merged. How do we go about doing that? --Kawanazii 19:12, 7 August 2006 (UTC)

I think I'll post on the EMR discussion page that it will be merged into the EHR page if no objections, since the content of the EMR page is already in the EHR page, plus more. If no protests in a day, replace the text of the EMR page with the Redirect command, targeting the EHR page (see Wikipedia:Redirect). Regards, --Ryanjo 22:08, 7 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. First off I'd like to ask if you'd review the main water polo article and the new History of water polo article to make sure everything is in line. Also, I wasn't suggesting purging the entire sections on Strategy under water only making it substancially shorter, sort of like what happened with the history. Thanks for your time and effort Outside Center 23:22, 7 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

History of water polo looks like a good start. I added a brief lead section similar to the Origins of baseball, and since the whole article is history, I took out the "History" section and elevated the subsections to sections. I also added categories and a "Notes" section so the "in-line" references are displayed, and a "See also" to refer back to Water polo. I put the "Leading water polo teams" templates into the history articles, since most are team records. Someone may eventually add details on the individual teams.

As far as the strategy section, I wouldn't expect such detail in a history article, unless referring to trends in team play, or styles of play developing, etc. I would suggest making another post about moving or reducing the strategy sections on the Talk:Water polo page before making a big edit of that type. Future editors may simply expand the defense and offense strategy sections again, not realizing the new location, since IMHO, it's not a "natural" for a history article. Regards--Ryanjo 01:04, 8 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

		The Running Man Barnstar
		To Ryanjo for your work on Water Polo and the History of Water Polo awarded 13 August 2006

You've done great work on those articles! Outside Center 01:55, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hey look. I asked wikia if i could start a Water polo encyclopedia and they said yes and that they'll give it a shot. but i dont know hardly anything about making a main page and stuff so could you maybe give me a hand? the site is waterpolo.wikia.com. -Crion

Sounds great but the thing is i have no idea how to get the text from halo and ipod and the main page thing is kinda biting too. thnks. -Crion

Ill start working on your article suggestions --Crion

K so i got another Question lets say i want to replace the picture in the upper left corner that says wikia. How do i do that? -Crion

http://waterpolo.wikia.com/wiki/Main_Page

• Well yes but i mean the upper left where the wikia picture is. -Crion

ah i see, thank you. -Crion

sorry I am really sorry i promise it wont happen again i did it to play a prank on one of my mates and forgot to take it off sorry it wont happen again i beg for your forgiveness -Swartkat —Preceding undated comment was added at 13:32, 14 January 2009 (UTC).[reply]

Hi Ryanjo, I moved Tutmosis' list of recommendations to the 56 talk page, and have been updating them there. I believe Paul is using that one as well - you may want to copypaste what you have posted on my talk page over to the 56 talk page - that way we can all be on the (drumroll please) "same page" (to coin a phrase) BTW, I think we're close - really close. Istvan 22:53, 14 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I'm a few steps behind... Ryanjo 23:13, 14 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WE'RE FA!!!!! pop the pezsgõ !!! lets get our nom up! Istvan 20:58, 15 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well we'd better get our nom up immediately. I notice some noms mention (in the nominating text) a requested date for feature. Since 23 October is the very next one to be chosen, I would suggest that you put up Paul's version of the textbox, and a version of my text as the nom article (which includes the ref to 50th anniversary, bravest act, etc.) (please see NCurse's request to Raul654 - it worked). Would you like to do the honours this time? Paul? KL? I dont want to hog these things. If nobody has put something up in one hour, I will do it. Istvan 21:12, 15 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Ryanjo, take a look at the queue now....:) Istvan 04:45, 19 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You're quite welcome! Many thanks for your compliments as well! Regards, K. Lastochka 01:00, 16 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Whos your favorite polo player of all time? Ive got a tie between Wolf wigo and tony azevedo. -Crion

Thanks for uploading Image:Settingscreen.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Chowbok ☠ 03:20, 9 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Have you ever been to the southern hemisphere, click here to reply.AstroBoy 01:46, 11 November 2006 (UTC) Deadline for entries is December 15th[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Thaliamunro.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Chowbok ☠ 03:47, 13 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Too much football on my mind, thanks for the fix. ;) // Laughing Man 23:10, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Ryanjo,

I am trying to create a wikiproject that deals with swimming, and sports based on swimming. This would include water polo, and, as a fellow water polo player, I would like to invite you to join. Please add your name here if you are interested. See you around the pool, --wpktsfs 01:26, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Great News! WikiProject Swimming is now up and running. Your name has been added to the members list, since you noted your interest on the discussion page! If you have any questions, please contact me on my talk page, or the project talk page. For starters, my first goal is to get {{WikiProject Swimming}} on as many swimming related talk pages as possible. Please help get this new project off to a great start! Regards, wpktsfs 22:51, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Ryanjo,

Thank you for being a member of WikiProject Swimming. For all of you that have helped in our first week, thank you so much. This has been a very hard week for us in the States, with the Virginia Tech event. This project has been a way for me to remove my mind from the terrible event. Thank you for helping out, and improving the project. Please keep the motivation going in the next few weeks, and try to recruit as many swimmers, divers, water dancers and polo players as you can. Be proud of your sport!

See you around the pool,

wpktsfs

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Fredtyler.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 21:58, 5 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:SeminoleCountyHS.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Zedla 07:51, 13 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Newsweek1200schools.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Geniac (talk) 21:19, 21 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Image:Essence05.jpg, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Image:Essence05.jpg has a copyright license type implying some type of restricted use, such as for non-commercial use only, or for educational use only or for use on Wikipedia by permission, which was either uploaded on or after 2005-05-19 or is not used in any articles (CSD I3). While it might seem reasonable to assume that such files can be freely used on Wikipedia, this is in fact not the case[1][2]. Please do not upload any more files with these restrictions on them, because content on Wikipedia needs to be compatible with the GNU Free Documentation License, which allows anyone to use it for any purpose, commercial or non-commercial. See our non-free content guidelines for more more information.

If you created this media file and want to use it on Wikipedia, you may re-upload it (or amend the image description if it has not yet been deleted) and use the license {{GFDL-self}} to license it under the GFDL, or {{cc-by-sa-2.5}} to license it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license, or use {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain.

If you did not create this media file but want to use it on Wikipedia, there are two ways to proceed. First, you may choose one of the fair use tags from this list if you believe one of those fair use rationales applies to this file. Second, you may want to contact the copyright holder and request that they make the media available under a free license.

If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. This bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Image:Essence05.jpg itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. If you have any questions about what to do next or why your image was nominated for speedy deletion please ask at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thanks. CSDWarnBot (talk) 03:03, 22 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Redwoodhs.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Zedla (talk) 02:55, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've removed the tag, it looks much better. Gyre 02:25, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Arendt, H. - Origins of Totalitarianism.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 06:10, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Toerrishuman.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 06:03, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Fina wpwl logo.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 20:27, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The caption change is no problem for me. I neither went to USC nor have I ever even been to California. I hail from Virginia and played Waterpolo for The College of William and Mary... So I'm not sure what you mean by vanity photo. At my screen resolution, the location to which you have moved the photo breaks the layout of the article. I also disagree with the assertion that the photo would be better suited to any USC specific page... This is the only photo on Wikipedia I've been able to find of a Waterpolo player out of the water, showing the full uniform. That being said, the equipment section already had ample photos, so it makes sense to move the photo to a section related, but with no photos. Cheers.  —Peco! Peco!^TALK 17:03, 25 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, Ive recently joined the WP:WikiProject Swimming team. Im committed to getting on top of the project. Since you have listed yourself as a participant i thought i'd let you know what i've done. Ive got a bot thats going through the relevant catagouries that apply to the project and tagging them with our banner. Ive done all the stub class articles and assessed them automaticlly, and im starting on the 3000 other articles that ive identified. So this will mean that we will have all the articles in the scope of the project together and we can start working on them. So if you have any spare time theres going to be thousands of articles that will need assessing. There are around 2000 articles Just in in stub class, and most of these will need the importance assessed. I think it's important we get all this assessing done, so we can start working on the articles.

Don't fell pressured to start assessing articles, i just thought that since theres going to be so many articles, you should know that theres heaps of work that needs to be done, ill be trying my best once my exams are finished. Remember many hands make light work.

Cheers Printer222 (talk) 13:21, 14 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Meetup/Tampa -- You're invited! Hires an editor (talk) 22:01, 2 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nice catch [3] thanks. István (talk) 21:06, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

![4] Thanks István (talk) 16:57, 22 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, added a couple more refs (we are up to 168!) I think we have lost several images over the past 2 years though - this page, above all others, seems to attract copyvio attention. I really don't like getting into those type arguments (I mean seriously, these images have no copyright in the western sense, who's rights are being infringed/defended?) but sometimes the anklebiting goes too far. István (talk) 16:19, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. When you add a blatantvandal template to a user’s page please remember to substitute it. If wish to reply please use my talk page and if you need help feel free to talk to me there or you may find Wikipedia:SUB helpful. ·Add§hore· ^Talk/_Cont 16:01, 27 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:TimeCover10Dec1956.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Damiens.rf 15:49, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have re-tagged this mage as non-free seeing as the listed conditions say modifications are not allowed (no-derivatives style licenses are not considered free). As a non-free image it will however require a rationale for it's use to avoid deletion (I'm not writing one myself because I personaly don't rely see what significant information it adds to the article). --Sherool (talk) 17:13, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

How tiresome. The amount of time spent quibbling over this minutia is such a monumental waste. Ryanjo (talk) 00:45, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Believe me, I have no intention of uploading any more images to Wikipedia. The "moving target" model of constantly revised requirements and restrictions is a huge waste of time for any editor who has a life. A pox on you and your 'bots. Ryanjo (talk) 02:26, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Concerning your contribution, File:Tony Azevedo.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.usocpressbox.org/usoc/pressbox.nsf/0/d8f5fa1359a0832c85256eed0047c37a?OpenDocument, non-commercial. As a copyright violation, File:Tony Azevedo.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. File:Tony Azevedo.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

• If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at [[Talk:File:Tony Azevedo.jpg]] and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
• If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at [[Talk:File:Tony Azevedo.jpg]] with a link to where we can find that note.
• If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on [[Talk:File:Tony Azevedo.jpg]].

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you. Martin H. (talk) 17:21, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Patient safety organizations has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 22:35, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please note, Wikipedia:Featured_article_review/Hungarian_Revolution_of_1956/archive1 Fifelfoo (talk) 14:56, 22 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You are actually a bit late with your notification as I already commented on Fifelfoo's "request" a few minutes earlier. Thanks anyway. Hobartimus (talk) 21:00, 6 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've responded on my talkpage. --Elen of the Roads (talk) 23:06, 7 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I’ve also responded to your notification on my talk page. Thanks! — SpikeToronto (talk) 00:16, 8 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

THX! I voted.--B@xter⁹ 08:42, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 18:39, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I'm an italian user. I don't speak very well english. We need the pages of the books A Guide to Water Polo and The World Encyclopedia of Water Polo from you or another user did you get the information. Can you help me? You can answer me here. --79.33.220.195 (talk) 10:36, 2 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I am a college student writing a research paper on China's takeover of Tibet, so I came to Mao's page for some information but I don't see anything about Tibet on his page. I looked through the history of his page and noticed that you have written on the talk page several times. Why do you think that no one has written or mentioned anything about Tibet? Would you consider adding something about Tibet on his page? I know that there are people who reject Tibet as its own country but don't you think there should be at least something about Tibet? Thank you for your time.--Madeintibet59 (talk) 04:14, 26 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Clinicalguidelines.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 19:42, 23 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your upload of File:Coachtyler.jpg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 15:15, 13 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Maureen O'Toole.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 08:47, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I see that you wrote most of the content at the Pay for performance (healthcare) article. You did fantastic work - it is a brilliant compilation. Thanks for that. Blue Rasberry (talk) 15:38, 19 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:52, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Kellyrulon.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 08:55, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ryanjo. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:Phhszone.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Wikiacc (¶) 19:31, 19 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:Redwoodhscampus.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 22 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:Fredtyler1.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 15 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:Dachau Brausebad.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

orphaned image, text on image page indicates there are questions about what is seen in the image

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Also:

• File:Sentinelgraph.png

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:Pathenhs.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 01:45, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]