User talk:Spiderone

Archives

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90 91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99, 100 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110 111, 112, 113, 114, 115, 116

This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.

The fourth round of the competition has finished, with anyone scoring less than 673 points being eliminated. It was a high scoring round with all but one of the contestants who progressed to the final having achieved an FA during the round. The highest scorers were

• Epicgenius, with 2173 points topping the scores, gained mainly from a featured article, 38 good articles and 9 DYKs. He was followed by
• Sammi Brie, with 1575 points, gained mainly from a featured article, 28 good articles and 50 good article reviews. Close behind was
• Thebiguglyalien, with 1535 points mainly gained from a featured article, 15 good articles, 26 good article reviews and lots of bonus points.

Between them during round 4, contestants achieved 12 featured articles, 3 featured lists, 3 featured pictures, 126 good articles, 46 DYK entries, 14 ITN entries, 67 featured article candidate reviews and 147 good article reviews. Congratulations to our eight finalists and all who participated! It was a generally high-scoring and productive round and I think we can expect a highly competitive finish to the competition.

Remember that any content promoted after the end of round 4 but before the start of round 5 can be claimed in round 5. Remember too that you must claim your points within 10 days of "earning" them and within 24 hours of the end of the final. If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. It would be helpful if this list could be cleared of any items no longer relevant. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send.

I will be standing down as a judge after the end of the contest. I think the Cup encourages productive editors to improve their contributions to Wikipedia and I hope that someone else will step up to take over the running of the Cup. Sturmvogel 66 (talk), and Cwmhiraeth (talk)

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Tagged with…
26		KSCO (talk)	Add sources
138		Bakhchysarai (talk)	Add sources
48		Orange Bowl (tennis) (talk)	Add sources
155		Ekaterina Alexandrova career statistics (talk)	Add sources
132		Hromada (talk)	Add sources
12		Balearic Islands autonomous football team (talk)	Add sources
384		TNT Sports (United Kingdom) (talk)	Cleanup
3,212		Crimea (talk)	Cleanup
16		Russian Tennis Federation (talk)	Cleanup
1,044		Peyton Stearns (talk)	Expand
60		Jessika Ponchet (talk)	Expand
10,798		COVID-19 pandemic (talk)	Expand
331		Rec. 709 (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
67		Al-Burooj (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
7		San Benancio, California (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
700		Republic of Crimea (talk)	Merge
14		Queens Park Rangers F.C. Women (talk)	Merge
33		Kepler-1625b (talk)	Merge
3		Mazlan Ismail (talk)	Wikify
1,265		James Arthur (talk)	Wikify
13		Ruslan Gurbanov (talk)	Wikify
2		Zevri Abseitov (talk)	Orphan
2		Serjan Repaj (talk)	Orphan
2		Hassan Al-Basri Brigades (talk)	Orphan
133		Triller TV (talk)	Stub
5		Dorothy Stevenson (talk)	Stub
7		KGAM (FM) (talk)	Stub
200		Yuan Yue (talk)	Stub
69		Jan Zieliński (talk)	Stub
28		Bai Zhuoxuan (talk)	Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:33, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

We are approaching the end of the 2024 WikiCup's second round, with a little over two weeks remaining. Currently, contestants must score at least 105 points to progress to the third round.

Our current top scorers are as follows:

• Sammi Brie (submissions) with 642 points, mostly from 11 GAs about radio and television;
• voorts (submissions) with 530 points, mostly from two FAs (Well he would, wouldn't he? and Cora Agnes Benneson) and three GAs;
• Generalissima (submissions) with 523 points, mostly from 11 GAs about coinage and history;
• SounderBruce (submissions) with 497 points, mostly from a FA about the 2020 season of the soccer club Seattle Sounders FC and two GAs;
• Tamzin (submissions) with 410 points, mostly from a FA about the drink Capri-Sun and three GAs;
• Kusma (submissions) with 330 points, mostly from a FA about the English botanist Anna Blackburne and a GA.

Competitors may submit work for the second round until the end of 28 April, and the third round starts 1 May. Remember that only competitors with the top 32 scores will make it through to the third round. If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, and you hope to get it promoted before the end of the round, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. Please remember to continue to offer reviews at GAN, FAC and all the other pages that require them to prevent any backlogs. As a reminder, competitors are strictly prohibited from gaming Wikipedia policies or processes to receive more points.

If you would like to learn more about rules and scoring for the 2024 WikiCup, please read Wikipedia:WikiCup/Scoring. Further questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges (Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs), Epicgenius (talk · contribs), and Frostly (talk · contribs)) are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:06, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Tagged with…
19		FC Nyva Ternopil (talk)	Add sources
33		Ladinia (talk)	Add sources
103		FC Metalurh Donetsk (talk)	Add sources
7		Municipalities of Trentino (talk)	Add sources
925		Georgia Tech (talk)	Add sources
8		CSN International translators (talk)	Add sources
2,070		Carnegie Mellon University (talk)	Cleanup
432		Jeļena Ostapenko (talk)	Cleanup
7		KVMR (talk)	Cleanup
87		Anastasia Potapova (talk)	Expand
61		Kiki Bertens (talk)	Expand
207		Camila Giorgi (talk)	Expand
5,054		Glossary of video game terms (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
4,407		Badminton (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
77		Tennis strategy (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
290		Gandhi Institute of Technology and Management (talk)	Merge
584		Bellman–Ford algorithm (talk)	Merge
205		Bagong Pilipinas (campaign) (talk)	Merge
4		Sonaro (talk)	Wikify
283		Poltava (talk)	Wikify
6		KXRN-LP (talk)	Wikify
1		Niyi Ogunlana (talk)	Orphan
2		Abdulrasaq Wuraola (talk)	Orphan
1		Sarafa Usman (talk)	Orphan
194		Scott Morrow (ice hockey, born 2002) (talk)	Stub
13		Leonard I. Garth (talk)	Stub
451		Luciano Darderi (talk)	Stub
55		Yang di-Pertua Negeri of Sarawak (talk)	Stub
6		KAMB (FM) (talk)	Stub
371		Mariano Navone (talk)	Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:27, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey @Spiderone, hope you are doing well. I am here to learn from your experience, and I am totally of the opinon that I would have done some mistake. If you could guide me regarding this I would be very grateful to you. You nominated a draft, which was not submitted, nor it was finalized in any aspect for the speedy deletion, as much as I know, drafts are drafts and can be submitted whenever they are finalized, after which it is decided if they are approved or not.

I did read the Speedy deletion criteria, and for what I have understood, may be I am wrong, but it is applied on pages that are in live space.

I created the draft in the public space so that if there is any other editor who want's to work on the subject could improve... I did submit a draft before and it was rejected, and I wanted to be extra careful with the Arcadia School's draft. I was also thinking of getting help from teahouse as well. I do know that the draft had promotional language, all I did there was gathered the information from different sources and structured them. I didn't even cite any of the sources.

Please guide me in this regard, and tell me how can I do better, and also let me know if the draft can be retrive, so I can work on it. I promise you I won't submit it till it is in accordance to the Wikipedia policies.

Thank you.

P.S. Hopefully, I haven't offended you in any way, if I have, many apologies in advance. Annika59 (talk) 20:44, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Annika59 WP:ADMASQ is clear and says Blatant examples of advertising masquerading as encyclopedia articles can be tagged for speedy deletion with... The same applies to pages in userspace, the draft namespace, or any other namespace. Draft space is not immune from deletion for promotional text. Nevertheless, if you want it restored, you can appeal the deletion at User talk:Justlettersandnumbers or WP:DRV. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:56, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you @Spiderone. Annika59 (talk) 21:31, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Cris Ron has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 24 § Cris Ron until a consensus is reached. Mazewaxie (talk • contribs) 13:13, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]