User talk:Sterry2607

Archives ArchiveMay-June07 ArchiveAugust07 Archive2007-09/10 Archive2007-11/12 Archive2008-01/02 Archive2008-03/09

Thank you for uploading Image:PopcornFlowers.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

Hi, I was wondering if you would be able to look over the article of Unfinished Sky for changes or suggestions in order to improve it? Thanks, here is the link. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unfinished_Sky Carny0407 (talk) 10:54, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. J Milburn (talk) 11:43, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes my mistake, sorry about that, I have been working on the List of documentary films here on my user space. I have been double check every documentary I add to the table. you will be surprised how many articles I have come across that have listed the executive producers, senior producers etc as well as the wrong director or co-directors as directors and such. It's good that you picked that up. I do not know what projects you are doing at the moment but I would like to ask if you want to help me out. It is a very time consuming job as I am trying to get it to featured list.--intraining ^{Jack In} 08:32, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have replied to you here User_talk:Theoneintraining/List_of_documentary_films.--intraining ^{Jack In} 09:35, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

is it O.K. if we can just edit this copy rather than the one currently in the mainspace.--intraining ^{Jack In} 11:00, 11 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The December 2008 issue of the WikiProject Australia newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. This message was delivered by TinucherianBot (talk) 07:48, 17 December 2008 (UTC) [reply]

2 Bobs worth - leave a message at his article talk page that is not the correct procedure (ie ignore dont reply rubbish) - point him to

• OTRS (if there is a particular issue that he has genuine legal issue with)
• Point him to WP NOT and a few others that might point out that WP is not vanity publishing like most whos whos - (try telling me they are not) - but public record material.
• Point out what Hesp has said - if you live in the public domain and write poetry you gotta take the public flack whether you like it or not

Left at sterry's talk as well - if neither of youse folks do it I will - such a bland lack of understanding of what wikipedia is shows that it needs to be resonded to. cheers SatuSuro 13:06, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

--.../Nemo (talk • Contributions) 16:21, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply] 

No worries. Actually I only added the poetry project and I don't know if anybody there cares, but somebody may take an interest someday. Nice to see you there too, representing the non-nerds.--Grahame (talk) 12:23, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you are writing articles on lighthouses you should be aware of the excellent "From Dusk till Dawn" subsidised by my old department for the bicentenary, which I have a copy of.--Grahame (talk) 07:04, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Sterry2607 -- not sure I understand your thinking here -- if Flanagan's book, or any other, is to be cited in the entry as evidence of continuing interest in Mathinna, why wouldn't one want the publisher and ISBN at least? Certainly it's always seemed a strength of Wikipedia that one can quickly find a book that's mentioned or referenced. Clevelander96 (talk) 12:52, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I've nominated Tom Kruse (mailman), an article you worked on, for consideration to appear on the Main Page as part of Wikipedia:Did you know. You can see the hook for the article here, where you can improve it if you see fit. Bruce1ee^talk 05:33, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It's a pleasure. It may seem complicated, but if you have a look at Wikipedia:Did you know, you'll see it's not that bad. You can nominate your own work at Template talk:Did you know‎, but please have a look at the DYK rules first. --Bruce1ee^talk 08:21, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

On June 13, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Tom Kruse (mailman), which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Gatoclass 23:28, 13 June 2009 (UTC)

Congratulations! --Bruce1ee^talk 07:42, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Good to see you and meredyth still around after all this time - just cleaning up the participants lists in a re-jig of the australian participants lists (depressing) SatuSuro 03:09, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 17:47, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I saw you're listed in the ACT Wikipedian page and thought, by chance, you might like to come to this:

RecentChangesCamp, Canberra is being held at the University of Canberra, Building 7, Room 7XC37 on 11 August 2010.
ABOUT | REGISTRATION | SCHEDULE

Hope we'll see you and friends there, but please register so we can prepare lunch. Leighblackall (talk) 07:41, 22 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is your invitation to the 10th anniversary event for Wikipedia, on Saturday 15 January 2011; please see http://ten.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canberra for details, and RSVP if at all possible. (You are listed on Wikipedia:WikiProject_Canberra.) Will I see you there? Cheers, - Peter Ellis - Talk 06:45, 31 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! We're having a Canberra Wikimeetup on 20 November 2011 at Siren Bar in Gunghalin from 2pm to 4pm. It's most just a chance to chat with other local Wikipedians, get a chance to go a different sort of bar (which is reasonably kid friendly, serves real food, and has non-alcholic options), and, if you're interested, learning more about what Wikimedia Australia and local GLAM projects are happening. We'd love to see you and any Wikipedia/Wikimedia/wiki loving friends you have there. --LauraHale (talk) 07:22, 31 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, this message is to let you know about disambiguation links you've recently created. A link to a disambiguation page is almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. For more information, see the FAQ or drop a line at the DPL WikiProject.

Alice Pung (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

was linked to Footscray

Any suggestions for improving this automated tool are welcome. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 23:57, 16 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I know it isn't necessarily your interest but Wikimedians to the Games is an opportunity to help improve Australian content, with the possibility of covering Australians live at the Paralympic Games in London. If you are interested in participating, it would be really fantastic. :) --LauraHale (talk) 02:52, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I would like to inform you that the Articles for Creation submission which was previously located here: User:Sterry2607/Australian Children's Laureate has been moved to Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Australian Children's Laureate, this move was made automatically and doesn't affect your article, if you have any questions please ask on my talk page! Have a nice day. ArticlesForCreationBot (talk) 09:38, 14 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Australian Children's Laureate, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

• The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
• You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation.
• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the Help desk or on the reviewer's talk page
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Pol430 talk to me 18:56, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Adelaide Festival Awards for Literature, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Les Murray (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:14, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Canberra Meetup Next: 9 January 2013 This box: view talk edit

Hi there! You are cordially invited to attend a meetup being held on Wednesday 9 January 2013. Yes, that is tomorrow. Sorry about the short notice.

Details an attendee list are at Wikipedia:Meetup/Canberra/January 2013. Hope you can make it! John Vandenberg 09:51, 8 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

(this automated message was delivered using replace.py to all users in ACT)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Geoff Page, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Grafton and University of New England (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:24, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Canberra Meetup Next: 24 February 2013 This box: view talk edit

Hi there! You are cordially invited to attend a meetup being held on Sunday 24 February 2013. Sorry about the short notice.

Details and attendee list are at Wikipedia:Meetup/Canberra/February 2013. Hope you can make it! John Vandenberg 08:16, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

(this automated message was delivered using replace.py to all users in ACT)

WP:AURD (Australian Roads), is inviting comment on a proposal to convert Australian road articles to {{infobox road}}. Please come and discuss. The vote will be after concerns have been looked into.

• Wikipedia:WikiProject Australian Roads/RfC:Infobox Road proposal

You are being notified as a member on the list of WP:AUS

Nbound (talk) 05:31, 6 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Penne Hackforth-Jones, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Paradise Road (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:16, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the note. No, I haven't been active for a while either but have started to get back into it over the past few months. There's a lot to do on the Aust Lit side of things. Perry Middlemiss (talk) 05:08, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

There sure is. I'd love to do more again too. Sterry2607 (talk) 05:57, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Good to see you back editing. Just visiting or hoping to return for an extended visit? Perry Middlemiss (talk) 01:51, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Perry Middlemiss I'm afraid I'm not back seriously, but wish I could find the time to. So many areas need work don't they? Sterry2607 (talk) 08:13, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, it's a bit lonely out here on the Aust Lit front. Anyway, drop in when you can. Perry Middlemiss (talk) 11:31, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with the sentiments of both here... JarrahTree 06:22, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:31, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Canberra Meetup Next: 17 February 2016 This box: view talk edit

Hi, you're invited to the Canberra meetup which will take place at King O'Malley's Irish Pub in Civic on 17 February 2016. Bidgee (talk) 02:18, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jan Sardi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mao's Last Dancer. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:38, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

youre still around!! JarrahTree 09:31, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

still on the ground - HNY for 2017, trust it treats you well !!! JarrahTree 04:54, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I'll be in Canberra from the 29-30 August, there is a planned meet-up at King O'Malley's (though I'm open to suggestions) from 6pm on the 29 August. Sorry for the short noticed, only had the trip confirmed this afternoon. Bidgee (talk) 11:40, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Oh dear, thanks for letting me know, but that night is my reading group night. Keep my informed and if I can make it before reading group I will Sterry2607 (talk) 12:49, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Sterry2607. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Wikipedia:WikiProject Oceania/The 10,000 Challenge and Wikipedia:WikiProject Australia/The 5000 Challenge are up and running based on Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge which has currently produced over 2300 article improvements and creations. The Australia challenge would feed into the wider region one and potentially New Zealand could have a smaller challenge too. The main goal is content improvement, tackling stale old stubs and important content and improving sourcing/making more consistent but new articles are also welcome if sourced. I understand that this is a big goal for regular editors, especially being summertime where you are, but if you'd like to see large scale quality improvements happening for Oceania and Australia like The Africa Destubathon, which has produced over 1700 articles in 5 weeks, sign up on the page. The idea will be an ongoing national editathon/challenge for the region but fuelled by a series of contests to really get articles on every province and subject mass improved. The Africa contest scaled worldwide would naturally provide great benefits to Oceania countries, particularly Australia and attract new editors. I would like some support from existing editors here to get the Challenges off to a start with some articles to make doing a Destubathon worthwhile and potentially bring about hundreds of improvements in a few weeks through a contest! Cheers.♦ --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:12, 24 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Not satisfying our simplest standards and notability cannot be inherited from others.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ali Cobby Eckermann and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 00:49, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

have sent email - the review is rubbish

send details of the above off wiki maybe worth talking about... JarrahTree 01:33, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Thanks Jarrah Tree, am replying to your email Sterry2607 (talk) 11:33, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• no rush - just make a copy and put it in a safe place lest any further stupidity occurs JarrahTree 11:49, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• • Thanks Jarrah Tree Sterry2607 (talk) 08:16, 12 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Sterry2607. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, there will be a meetup in Canberra on the 20 January 2018 at 7pm, I hope you're able to make it but understand that this is very short notice. Bidgee (talk) 12:39, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, there will be a meetup in Canberra on the 20 January 2018 at 7pm, I hope you're able to make it but understand that this is very short notice. Bidgee (talk) 22:16, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

since we lost perry middlemiss last year the oz lit project has been quiet - good to see youre around all these years later !! JarrahTree 07:22, 8 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• thanks jarrah. How very nice to hear from you - I really appreciate your noticing. I have been doing a little bit every now and then (including creating an article a year or so ago on Ali Cobby Eckermann) but time is really tight. (Particularly since I stupidly started a LitBlog.) I keep hoping to get back to more serious article creation rather than editing existing articles because I enjoyed it immensely. What do you mean "lost perry middlemiss"? Sterry2607 (talk) 09:40, 10 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

yeah I tag pages importance because it seems that no one does it any more - [1] and it seems somehow christmas 2016 saw the end of it all [2] sad as he was systematic and persistent... JarrahTree 10:23, 10 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Phew, I feared you were suggesting he'd died, but I thought I would have heard if that had been the case. Yes, he was great. I remember when I started that he was doing a lot with Miles Franklin literary awards. I'll keep hanging in there, albeit at my slow rate. (I also get caught up in editing Trove because I do search there ... we get spread thin don't we?) Sterry2607 (talk) 05:45, 11 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

very thin - too many hats and not enough time or resources - JarrahTree 05:48, 11 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the kind thoughts. Haven't been back in here in a few years mainly because I got sick of fighting arguments I was always destined to lose with editors who wanted to delete everything. I'm doing other things at present, mainly with the Austlit database, but may be back here at some point. Perry

Thanks Perry - glad you found the comment. So AustLit? Are you volunteering there? Sterry2607 (talk) 12:39, 6 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Perry you are really missed, the Aust lit project is desperately needing your regular and constant input - so many parts of the Australian sub projects lack a constant guardian angel as you seemed for the project - sorry you had to deal with deletionists... come back !!! JarrahTree 13:12, 6 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Well said JarrahTree! (PS I did a little bit on 1965 in Australian literature last night, related to a blog post I was writing. Really wish I could find time to do more, because I use it quite a bit!! Sterry2607 (talk) 09:20, 7 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

And yes, after all this time, I seem to be back. Perry Middlemiss (talk) 07:57, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Noice! Sterry2607 (talk) 08:51, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Sterry2607. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:09, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dorothy Hewett, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kate. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:29, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:41, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:32, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:27, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:Baigai.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]