User talk:Sugarcubez

Talk archives 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

"Internet homicide" has commenced at Talk:Internet_homicide#Name. ↜Just me, here, now … 20:25, 3 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

OK, thanks!--Sugarcubez (talk) 20:48, 3 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi!

I monitor the activities of a banned editor, and tend to revert their sock puppets' edits. Recently they edited Noisettes, replacing the title image with text. This was the one edit they made that I didn't revert - my thinking was that using images for bands' names was probably against policy (possibly WP:NPOV).

I noticed in your recent edit you reinstated the image. My question is: "is this within policy?" (I honestly have no idea, I'm purely curious. If it's policy-compliant it would have given me another excuse to revert the banned editor's sock...!)

Cheers, TFOWR^{This flag once was red} 12:19, 2 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hey. I have read Wiki policies use an official image of a bands name has not been against the policy as I am aware of and has been used many times before and now and any bands pages.--Sugarcubez (talk) 12:26, 2 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Cool, thanks for the clarification. Though I am now annoyed that I didn't simply revert the sock at the time... (they were blocked shortly afterwards, anyway). Cheers, TFOWR^{This flag once was red} 12:30, 2 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please see this discussion which is related to a proposed change to {{Recent death}}. An example of how this change would appear is on this userpage. --Brian McNeil /^talk 00:17, 31 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

See it's. English is weird! DMacks (talk) 18:24, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Cicagho. Since you had some involvement with the Cicagho redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - TheChampionMan1234 03:49, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:31, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Loving Hut Logo.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 23:00, 19 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]