User talk:Tambok0599

This is my talkpage. Please have more respect and more politeness than you have something's involved from yours. No cussing of words, no fighting or bullying and no vandalism. So, whenever it is, don't conceal yourself from an unknown identity, we're just citizens or netizens and not an artificial robot.

[1] Thanks! I'd already used the 4 tidles to be contacted. Thanks a very lot, EvergreenFir! :) :) :) :) :) :)

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Click here to contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. 69.181.253.230 (talk) 02:48, 19 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ok but, who are you??? Are you a male or a female? Anyway, hope you like something to share about. Thank you and MERRY CHRISTMAS!  --Tambok0599 (talk) 02:58, 19 December 2013 (UTC)[reply] 

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Please help me that how to block a user, the article for that is too much technical that I can't understand easily. So, please help if there's a special request for me to do something on blocking a user. Thanks! --Tambok0599 (talk) 04:26, 19 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Who needs to be blocked and why? --Mdann52talk to me! 08:15, 19 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, you may be blocked from editing. --Mdann52talk to me! 08:14, 19 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article F1 Exhaust Note is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/F1 Exhaust Note until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. --Mdann52talk to me! 08:20, 19 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Mdann52! Well my explanation about how to block a user, because of this serial no. user: 69.181.253.230. He usually made reverted edits and possibly to be having a huge backdrop, even for an Assuming Good Faiths but usally gets wrong. So, I would need him to block him or her, ASAP. This is just a message to give some backups. Thanks!!! --Tambok0599 (talk) 08:21, 19 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

He is ok. You are not allowed to remove the speedy deletion notices from articles with a current Articles for Deletion discussion. Feel free to comment at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thrill Drive if you do not feel it should be deleted. --Mdann52talk to me! 08:24, 19 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article F1 Super Lap is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/F1 Super Lap until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. --Mdann52talk to me! 08:21, 19 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again Mdann52! I'd been updated the talk page about your nominated deletion page for F1 Super Lap. It's already there, you could see and look the description + there's 1 link that opens to an arcade encyclopedia for you to read and look the images. So, there you have it. If you gonna aske for nominated deletion, just ask me and I'll edit as I can. Thanks and MERRY CHRISTMAS!!! --Tambok0599 (talk) 08:55, 19 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again! The Thrill Drive talk page went there and it's having a short summary for that arcade game. And usually this game's originated in Japan befor US and Europe, but it's a shame that there just only a few who were able to release for a numerous cabinets from this game much else to do. I'd critically read in the Japanese wiki about this article that it was like to be a simple but defacto-like moving physics and music around the game itself. And usually, Japanese gamers are about to see last 1998 to present or until now. So, this was my observation and a comment for you. Thanks again! :) :) :D --Tambok0599 (talk) 09:24, 19 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! There you go, the F1 Exhaust Note talk page article went here and I'd been tried to write something there out to shine what's inside. Thanks again! --Tambok0599 (talk) 09:41, 19 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I am here to inform you that the part of this edit pertaining to the N64 was reverted on the basis that Wikipedia is not a forum, and posts to talk pages should only involve Wikipedia-related issues, such as issues with articles. Thank you for understanding.--十八 06:58, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ok thanks! Thanks for your comment and what does belongs to the Wikipedia issues of articles about video games instead? Is it an controversey or for just like-somes you know, the particular bases on the video games. Hope you understand! Thanks and GOD BLESS! --The Game Expert (talk) 07:03, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thanks for message. I speedy deleted your article because

• it did not provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that it meets the notability guidelines. You gave no indication of why this game was notable (most of the article was just describing it), and you had references at all for any of the text. You had external links, but they can't be considered independent sources, they are sites closely associated with the game.
• it was written in a promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic. An example of unsourced claims presented as fact include: a fast and high-speed police chase, and your text was mainly just an unsourced review of the game
• The article was created in a single edit without wikilinks or references, and looks as if may be copied from an unknown and possibly copyrighted source. This was not a reason for deletion, because I didn't check, since it failed on other grounds. Just to clarify that copyrighted text is not allowed in Wikipedia, as outlined in this policy. That applies even to pages created by you or your organisation, unless they state clearly and explicitly that the text is public domain.

If you think you can bring this up to standard I can recreate it in a sandbox for you Jimfbleak - talk to me? 15:06, 22 December 2013 (UTC) Jimfbleak - talk to me? 15:00, 22 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ok but, next time, you must think about the article that you look and be careful, always reminded that you must not have Speedy Deletions, just like what you did a while ago. Use the Articles for deletion first, before you delete all of the contents of one article fastly. So, do you understand again? Yet, I'm truly approved that there are evidences for that game. So, thanks and MERRY CHRISTMAS! :) --The Game Expert (talk) 15:10, 22 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Tambok0599! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Nathan2055 (I'm a Teahouse host) Visit the Teahouse This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 20:42, 22 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tokyo Cop is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tokyo Cop until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 07:15, 23 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Epicgenius (talk) is wishing you a Merry Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!

Spread the cheer by adding {{subst:Xmas2}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Epicgenius (talk) 18:19, 23 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You too, Mr.Epicgenius! Just celebrate our main event, the Christmas Eve where Jesus Christ was born in December 25 within the Nativity Story of Jesus! HAPPY HOLIDAYS AND MERRY CHRISTMAS! --The Game Expert (talk) 02:41, 24 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Tambok0599. This is the user who had recently modified the Fighting Bujutsu article. The reason of why I did it is because the explanation of the article seemed very amateurish and something that you'd expect to see from within a video gaming forum. Wikipedia is to be used a way to explain things with an encyclopedia-like and detailed manner and that you musn't add personal or cheap jabs from within the article. If you need an example on how to write the article the right way, look at some of the other fighting game articles from within the sight and learn on how to copy their way of explanation so that you'd be able to do the same thing for the Fighting Bujutsu article. I hope that this helps on why I did what I did for the Fighitng Bujutsu article. Thank you for your time. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.186.243.201 (talk) 17:12, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hey guys! I'm finally back here and I'll gonna return to school in January 6, 2014, Monday, in the early morning. Well, hopefully my contributions are being added to my lists and finally, I've many improvements for some articles here, since December 18, 2013, when I finally joined Wikipedia in the morning. I'm also in the Philippines when I lived last July 5, 1999 ( My birthday date.) And yes, the Christmas days would be ended tomorrow, as I sure that the Epiphany, the Three Kings celebration, would be celebrated tomorrow morning and Christmas would have ended also for 12:00 A.M tomorrow, plus, the Christmas vacation would ended too. For Monday to Friday, I would still check Wikipedia for the articles that I've been created, if I have some time, because, my time's limited much else and I have school days, of course. Anyway, please keep writing on the comments on my talk page, if you have to do something. GOD BLESS AND HAPPY THREE KINGS! --The Game Expert (talk) 14:17, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Just a friendly note per your comments at the AFD's of These articles. As someone involved in the discussion and writing them, you should not close them. I have also reformatted your duplicate votes, as you should only vote once on a discussion. --Mdann52talk to me! 13:18, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Nur Misuari, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Zamboanga (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Tambok0599. You have new messages at Guerillero's talk page.
Message added 19:32, 16 January 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Guerillero | My Talk 19:32, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Thrilld MAME 0.147 Japan.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 17:33, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings Recent Changes Patrollers!

This is a one-time-only message to inform you about technical proposals related to Recent Changes Patrol in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey that I think you may be interested in reviewing and perhaps even voting for:

1. Adjust number of entries and days at Last unpatrolled
2. Editor-focused central editing dashboard
3. "Hide trusted users" checkbox option on watchlists and related/recent changes (RC) pages
4. Real-Time Recent Changes App for Android
5. Shortcut for patrollers to last changes list

Further, there are more than 20 proposals related to Watchlists in general that you may be interested in reviewing. (and over 260 proposals in all, across many aspects of wikis)

Thank you for your consideration. Please note that voting for proposals continues through December 12, 2016.

Note: You received this message because you have transcluded {{User wikipedia/RC Patrol}} (user box) on your user page. Since this message is "one-time-only" there is no opt out for future mailings.

Best regards, Stevietheman — Delivered: 01:09, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]