User talk:Tatasport
From Wikipedia the free encyclopedia
This user left Wikipedia. Tatasport has not edited Wikipedia since May 31, 2019. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else. |
Welcome
[edit]Hello, Tatasport, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}}
and your question on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
- The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Editing tutorial
- Picture tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Naming conventions
- Manual of Style
We hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on talk and vote pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! CT Cooper · talk 10:38, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks so much! tatasport&nbselarusp; talk with me here 06:34, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
Celtic F.C. task force
[edit]Hello, you have a userbox which suggests you are a fan of Celtic F.C. I am hoping to start up a task force for Celtic at WikiProject Football.
If you are interested please reply here. Thanks. Adam4267 (talk) 20:03, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for starting that up I was worried that no-one was going to reply, even though I sent out over 50 of those messages to people who had Celtic userboxes. Adam4267 (talk) 10:16, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
Which of these pictures do you think would be best for our template. [[1]] [[2]] [[3]] [[4]] Adam4267 (talk) 11:41, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
I think Glasgow Derby - Rangers is the Old Firm although I have never heard it referred to as that. Adam4267 (talk) 01:32, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
The article Jungle Bhoys has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- No evidence of notability
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. GiantSnowman 23:34, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
As part of Wikipedia:WikiProject Football a new Football In Scotland task force has been set up as you edit Scottish football articles i would like to invite you to become a member if you wish.Warburton1368 (talk) 15:35, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
Scottish taskforce new articles
[edit]A new article section has been set up on Scottish taskforce project page. As you are a taskforce member I would ask you to submit any new articles you create or articles you have created since the 5 August relating to Scottish football on the project page. Thank you (★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★) 14:18, 15 August 2011 (UTC))
Template:Our Sound Years has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars (talk) 23:22, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 22 August 2011
[edit]- News and notes: Girl Geeks edit while they dine, candidates needed for forthcoming steward elections, image referendum opens
- WikiProject report: Images in Motion – WikiProject Animation
- Featured content: JJ Harrison on avian photography
- Arbitration report: After eleven moves, name for islands now under arbitration
- Technology report: Engineering report, sprint, and more testers needed
The Signpost: 29 August 2011
[edit]- News and notes: Abuse filter on all Wikimedia sites; Foundation's report for July; editor survey results
- Recent research: Article promotion by collaboration; deleted revisions; Wikipedia's use of open access; readers unimpressed by FAs; swine flu anxiety
- Opinion essay: How an attempt to answer one question turned into a quagmire
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Tennis
- Featured content: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Four existing cases
- Technology report: The bugosphere, new mobile site and MediaWiki 1.18 close in on deployment
help me
[edit]Tolong donk, saya sedang diblokir nih di WBI dengan alasan melakukan intimidasi terhadap banyak sekali orang yang tidak setuju dengan pencalonan "televisi" sebagai artikel pilihan. Padahal jelas-jelas tidak ya kan pak. Saya kan hanya suruh mempertimbangkan saja atau hanya bercanda. Kalo gitu sampaikan permintaan pencabutan status blokir terhadap sang pemblokir tersebut (id:Pengguna:Stephensuleeman) Kasihanilah saya to, masak saya harus menikmati liburan Lebaran yang kemudian masih dilanjutkan pada saat liburan Natal nanti dengan keadaan didalam jeruji besi gini. Lagipula jika 1 saja pengguna yang ada di WBI tidak ada/tidak aktif/mengundurkan diri/alasan lain maka berkuranglah pula pertambahan artikel disana. --Erik Evrest (talk) 11:23, 27 August 2011 (UTC)
- Kalo gitu sampaikan permintaan pencabutan status blokir terhadap sang pemblokir tersebut (id:Pengguna:Stephensuleeman) disertai dengan penyataan bahwa Anda (sebagai voters tidak setuju pada pengusulan AP "Televisi") tidak pernah diperlakukan seperti demikian terhadap saya. Itu aja sih --Erik Evrest (talk) 23:24, 27 August 2011 (UTC)
- Apaan sih Tata ni, tak perlu bukti link. Cuma perlunya kasih permohonan pencabutan status blokirnya aja sama sang pemblokir tersebut (id:Pengguna:Stephensuleeman) disertai dengan pernyataan bahwa saya tidak pernah diperlakukan seperti demikian. Apalagi saya juga diberi alasan vandalisme padahal jelas-jelas tidak. --Erik Evrest (talk) 04:44, 28 August 2011 (UTC)
- Tata, begini. Saya udah 5 hari tak omongin mengenai permasalahan yang jadi topik pada pesan yang saya ajukan kepada Anda. Kenapa Anda belum sedikit pun melakukan permintaan saya ? Bukannya saya parasit tapi saya butuh bantuan agar para pengurus memahami saya cuma karena yang pertama mereka tidak menyahut dan yang kedua saya diblokir jadi tak dapat menyunting di WBI. Saya melakukan hal ini karena Wikipedia menjunjung tinggi asas kebebasan berbicara secara mutlak. Tapi apa sih yang Anda lakukan di WBI hanya mengurusi kegiatan menyambut pengguna baru sama buat artikel Eurovision. Katanya Anda mau pake acara ngecek/nyelidikin bukti-bukti yang ada (saya kaga ngerti maksudnya) Maaf ini bukannya ngejek lo tapi Anda tu sok jadi sarjana hukum ya. Memang hasil yang Anda dapatkan apa sekarang. Saya pun juga minta sampaikan permohonan ini kepada si Stephensuleeman cuma Anda sedikit pun tidak bergolak. Yalah, mungkin Anda lewat email atau surel sehingga saya kaga tau. Maaf juga kalo saya sedikit kasar karena saya juga agak stres ama masalah ini. Oh ya, sampaikan juga masalah ini ke Warung Kopi biar dapat dibicarakan lebih riil --Erik Evrest (talk) 06:09, 31 August 2011 (UTC)
- Hey, kau ini kawanku atau musuhku sih sebenarnya ? Atau malah hakim, jadi kalo misalnya saya benar Anda langsung tindak lanjuti namun jika misalnya saya salah maka Anda membiarkan saya diblokir begitu saja. Ditambah kegiatan membantu saya di-nomor-dua-kan dan me-nomor-satu-kan proyek artikel berkategorikan kejuaraan olahraga tenis. Mengenai pesannya sih sebetulnya semua orang yang tidak setuju dengan pencalonan "televisi" sebagai artikel pilihan saya beri pesan yang sama (maksudnya saya copy-paste secara beruntun) jadi pesan dari halaman pembicaraan Anda itu sudah mewakili sih. Saya memang tidak memaksa tapi hanya suruh mempertimbangkan mengingat yang mengikuti pemungutan suara masih dari golongan orang baru. Dan buktinya saya tidak terlalu memaksa kan. Oh ya, saya juga mengejek pak Sentausa "Si Lamban dari WikiLand" sama saya mengejek mas Ezagren "Anak Durhako" (buktinya ada pada halaman pembicaraan mereka masing-masing di WBI) Tapi itu cuma lagi bercanda aja. Sama halnya id:Pengguna:Mimihitam beri julukan pada id:Pengguna:Willy2000 "BadutWiki" disini ==> id:Pembicaraan Pengguna:Willy2000/arsip3#Interwiki. Oh ya, di spam blokir saya juga ditulis alasannya kalo saya diblokir juga karena alasan vandalisme padahal jika Anda lihat di halaman daftar kontrib saya sama sekali tidak ada. Cek aja sendiri ==> http://id.wikipedia.org/wiki/Istimewa:Kontribusi_pengguna/Erik_Evrest
- Bahkan menurut saya pemblokiran ini amat keterlaluan karena saya ini termasuk pengguna lama di WBI (soedah sedjak tahoen 2009) Terus juga saya udah giat berkontribusi di WBI. Ditambah saya tak pernah melakukan vandalisme artikel (seperti yang saya singgung sebelumnyya) dan hanya masalah sosialisasi saja terhadap sesama pengguna (yang sebetulnya hanya salah paham saja) Jadi tidak boleh diperlakukan kaya para anon vandalis yang biasanya kaya kutu loncat (suka gonta-ganti alamat IP supaya tidak ditangkap oleh pengurus) Sebetulnya beberapa pengguna di WBI (melalui via Wikipedia bahasa Inggris) sudah saya minta dan mereka melakukannya hanya saja Anda harus sampaikan kepada Stephensuleeman dengan lebih mendalam karena siapa tau dapat merubah keadaan. Bicarakan juga hal ini di warung kopi di WBI karena agar dapat didiskusikan dengan lebih nyata. Kasihanilah saya to masak saya harus menikmati liburan Lebaran yang kemudian masih dilanjutkan pada saat liburan Natal nanti dengan keadaan didalam jeruji besi gini. --Erik Evrest (talk) 08:50, 31 August 2011 (UTC)
- Oi
###Tat, Anda itu ya menulis pesan terakhirnya itu lebay banget deh. Sok hormat gitu.
- Oi
- Tata, begini. Saya udah 5 hari tak omongin mengenai permasalahan yang jadi topik pada pesan yang saya ajukan kepada Anda. Kenapa Anda belum sedikit pun melakukan permintaan saya ? Bukannya saya parasit tapi saya butuh bantuan agar para pengurus memahami saya cuma karena yang pertama mereka tidak menyahut dan yang kedua saya diblokir jadi tak dapat menyunting di WBI. Saya melakukan hal ini karena Wikipedia menjunjung tinggi asas kebebasan berbicara secara mutlak. Tapi apa sih yang Anda lakukan di WBI hanya mengurusi kegiatan menyambut pengguna baru sama buat artikel Eurovision. Katanya Anda mau pake acara ngecek/nyelidikin bukti-bukti yang ada (saya kaga ngerti maksudnya) Maaf ini bukannya ngejek lo tapi Anda tu sok jadi sarjana hukum ya. Memang hasil yang Anda dapatkan apa sekarang. Saya pun juga minta sampaikan permohonan ini kepada si Stephensuleeman cuma Anda sedikit pun tidak bergolak. Yalah, mungkin Anda lewat email atau surel sehingga saya kaga tau. Maaf juga kalo saya sedikit kasar karena saya juga agak stres ama masalah ini. Oh ya, sampaikan juga masalah ini ke Warung Kopi biar dapat dibicarakan lebih riil --Erik Evrest (talk) 06:09, 31 August 2011 (UTC)
- Apaan sih Tata ni, tak perlu bukti link. Cuma perlunya kasih permohonan pencabutan status blokirnya aja sama sang pemblokir tersebut (id:Pengguna:Stephensuleeman) disertai dengan pernyataan bahwa saya tidak pernah diperlakukan seperti demikian. Apalagi saya juga diberi alasan vandalisme padahal jelas-jelas tidak. --Erik Evrest (talk) 04:44, 28 August 2011 (UTC)
thumb|center|Yap, terlalu hormat
- Kaga perlu gitu juga kali, biasa aja kali. Udah deh saya dah tau diskusi Anda dengan si Stephen. Kaga perlu disampaikan. Cuma gini, soal canvassing itu saya sebetulnya cuma ngasih info aja. Tidak nyuruh buat vote setuju. Liat saja pesan saya tentang ini di halaman pembicaraan Anda. Dan kenyataannya yang saya infokan malah kebanyakan vote tidak setuju. Sama halnya dengan Anda menginfokan soal pengikut sertaan ProyekWiki Tenis. Lagipula alasan pemblokirannya tetap "Perilaku intimidasi/pelecehan: vandalisme" dan tidak ada kata "canvassing" sementara alasan pemblokiran yang masih tertera (seperti yang telah saya singgung sebelumnya) juga tidak terlalu bukan. Jikalau diubah kan sama saja "menyalah-nyalahkan" kan. Pengurus, birokrat, bahkan steward di seluruh Wikipedia itu kan semuanya manusia yang tak lepas dari kesalahan. Begitu pun Stephen. Ia kelihatannya bersikap teguh demi menjaga mana baiknya sebagai pengurus. Jadi mungkin dengan melakukan kegiatan pemblokiran dengan alasan paling kecil pun menjadi kebanggaan tersendiri baginya dan jika mencabut status blokirnya mungkin suatu rasa hina baginya. Jadi mungkin Anda perlu bicarakan ini ke pengurus lain atau ke Warung Kopi di WBI (seperti yang telah saya singgung sebeblumnya cuma Anda ngeyel) agar dibicarakan secara lebih nyata serta semoga masalahnya dengan cepat terselesaikan. --Erik Evrest (talk) 04:14, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
- Terserah Anda sih. Bahkan kalo sampe konferensi Wikimania juga boleh. Silahkan saja --Erik Evrest (talk) 04:30, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
- WWWWAAAAAA!!!!!! TTTTIIIIDDDAAAKKKKK!!!!!!
- Terserah Anda sih. Bahkan kalo sampe konferensi Wikimania juga boleh. Silahkan saja --Erik Evrest (talk) 04:30, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
- Kaga perlu gitu juga kali, biasa aja kali. Udah deh saya dah tau diskusi Anda dengan si Stephen. Kaga perlu disampaikan. Cuma gini, soal canvassing itu saya sebetulnya cuma ngasih info aja. Tidak nyuruh buat vote setuju. Liat saja pesan saya tentang ini di halaman pembicaraan Anda. Dan kenyataannya yang saya infokan malah kebanyakan vote tidak setuju. Sama halnya dengan Anda menginfokan soal pengikut sertaan ProyekWiki Tenis. Lagipula alasan pemblokirannya tetap "Perilaku intimidasi/pelecehan: vandalisme" dan tidak ada kata "canvassing" sementara alasan pemblokiran yang masih tertera (seperti yang telah saya singgung sebelumnya) juga tidak terlalu bukan. Jikalau diubah kan sama saja "menyalah-nyalahkan" kan. Pengurus, birokrat, bahkan steward di seluruh Wikipedia itu kan semuanya manusia yang tak lepas dari kesalahan. Begitu pun Stephen. Ia kelihatannya bersikap teguh demi menjaga mana baiknya sebagai pengurus. Jadi mungkin dengan melakukan kegiatan pemblokiran dengan alasan paling kecil pun menjadi kebanggaan tersendiri baginya dan jika mencabut status blokirnya mungkin suatu rasa hina baginya. Jadi mungkin Anda perlu bicarakan ini ke pengurus lain atau ke Warung Kopi di WBI (seperti yang telah saya singgung sebeblumnya cuma Anda ngeyel) agar dibicarakan secara lebih nyata serta semoga masalahnya dengan cepat terselesaikan. --Erik Evrest (talk) 04:14, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
- Kenapa namanya "Minta Tanggapan". Berarti yang kita dapatkan cuma komentar aja donk. Bukan tindakan. Harusnya "Jadi gimana nih?" (untuk kalimat terakhir harusnya gitu) Oh ya, Warung Kopinya juga jangan di bagian "Kebijakan". Mendingan di "Lain-Lain" karena selain lebih diperhatikan juga kalo dikebijakan kita mintanya kebijakan bukan tanggapan. Jadi yang di bagian "Kebijakan" harus dipindah pokoknya dan diubah dari minta tanggapan (komentar) jadi minta tindakan. Itu aja. Karena jika kita hanya mendapatkan tanggapan maka sama halnya menulis diatas air sementara jika tindakan maka sama halnya menulis diatas batu. Oh ya, diskusikan hal ini juga ke pengurus WBI yang lain juga donk biar lebih eksklusif. Kalo perlu steward di Meta-Wiki. Oh ya, apa Anda juga memperdebatkan ini di Facebook ? Atau bahkan juga di Twitter, Yahoo!, Gmail, atau di blogspot. Hhhmmmm.... mungkin hanya ini saja yang dapat kuminta kepada Anda. Tapi semoga Allah merahmati kita. --Erik Evrest (talk) 06:25, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
- Tapi bagaimana dengan melaporkannya dengan pengurus WBI yang lain ? Makasih--Erik Evrest (talk) 09:03, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
- Kenapa namanya "Minta Tanggapan". Berarti yang kita dapatkan cuma komentar aja donk. Bukan tindakan. Harusnya "Jadi gimana nih?" (untuk kalimat terakhir harusnya gitu) Oh ya, Warung Kopinya juga jangan di bagian "Kebijakan". Mendingan di "Lain-Lain" karena selain lebih diperhatikan juga kalo dikebijakan kita mintanya kebijakan bukan tanggapan. Jadi yang di bagian "Kebijakan" harus dipindah pokoknya dan diubah dari minta tanggapan (komentar) jadi minta tindakan. Itu aja. Karena jika kita hanya mendapatkan tanggapan maka sama halnya menulis diatas air sementara jika tindakan maka sama halnya menulis diatas batu. Oh ya, diskusikan hal ini juga ke pengurus WBI yang lain juga donk biar lebih eksklusif. Kalo perlu steward di Meta-Wiki. Oh ya, apa Anda juga memperdebatkan ini di Facebook ? Atau bahkan juga di Twitter, Yahoo!, Gmail, atau di blogspot. Hhhmmmm.... mungkin hanya ini saja yang dapat kuminta kepada Anda. Tapi semoga Allah merahmati kita. --Erik Evrest (talk) 06:25, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
Hey there Tatasport, thank you for your contributions! I am a bot, alerting you that non-free files are not allowed in user or talk space. I removed some files I found on User talk:Tatasport.
- See a log of files removed today here.
- Shut off the bot here.
- Report errors here.
- If you have any questions, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
Thank you, -- DASHBot (talk) 05:03, 2 September 2011 (UTC)
inpoh link
[edit]Oh ya, sekedar inpoh aja kalo saya juga punya 1 link yang (diyakini) dapat menuntaskan masalah pemblokiran saya di WBI ==> http://id.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Pembicaraan_Pengguna:Stephensuleeman&diff=prev&oldid=4693300
Yap, itu pesan seorang user WBI bernama Sentausa yang mendapatkan pesan kalo saya sedang diblokir dan minta dicabut status blokirnya dan menyinggungnya kepada Stephensuleeman si tukang blokir. Sentausa bisa jadi kunci akan penuntasan masalah ini mengingat Mimihitam (seorang pengurus) mengatakan bahwa Sentausa merupakan salah seorang yang saya intimidasi-kan (bukti) Bukankah yang namanya "masalah" adalah "dimana ada 1 pihak yang dirugikan" yang itu berarti pihak tersebut merupakan kunci ke arah mana "masalah" ini akan berakhir. Keputusan pengurus itu kan (kurasa) hanya karena mereka merasakan kalau saya sedang bertindak seperti itu. Padahal sebetulnya tidak. Sama halnya Anda lihat orang lagi kecopetan terus copetnya lari dan Anda gebukin tuh copet namun Anda haruslah hentikan karena sebetulnya adegan pencopetan itu cuma sedang syuting sinetron aja Demikian juga dengan permasalahan saya sekarang ini, saya diblokir tapi sebetulnya dengan "korban" menyatakan bahwa permasalahan ini cuma karena pelecehan yang sebetulnya bercanda, intimidasi yang sebetulnya cuma memperingatkan untuk mempertimbangkan kembali saja, vandalisme yang sebetulnya cuma hoax, dan canvassing yang sebetulnya cuma memberi info saja. Kiranya Anda dapat menggunakan link tersebut untuk pembebasan saya dari status blokir tersebut dengan mencantumkannya di diskusi warung kopi di WBI atau jika Anda berkomunikasi terhadap pengurus. --Erik Evrest (talk) 12:59, 3 September 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 05 September 2011
[edit]- News and notes: 24,000 votes later and community position on image filter still unclear; first index of editor satisfaction appears positive
- WikiProject report: Riding with WikiProject London Transport
- Sister projects: Wiki Loves Monuments 2011
- Featured content: The best of the week
- Opinion essay: The copyright crisis, and why we should care
- Arbitration report: BLP case closed; Cirt-Jayen466 nearly there; AUSC reshuffle
cepat-lah
[edit]Tata, seharusnya Anda sampaikan donk permasalahan saya kepada para pengurus lainnya selain ke Stephensuleeman. Lebih cepat lebih baik. Anda taukan kalo ini permasalahan diskriminasi. Anda tentunya harus segera cepat tanggap sebisa mungkin jika mengetahui hal tersebut. Sama halnya Anda melihat suatu kejahatan di dunia nyata (misalnya pembunuhan, kemalingan, dll) maka sebelum keburu terjadi Anda tentu laporin ke pihak berwajib kan. Ibaratnya "Jangan pernah kau menjadwalkan pengampunan dosa pada pukul 10 karena siapa tau kau mati jam 8". --Erik Evrest (talk) 06:23, 11 September 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 12 September 2011
[edit]- News and notes: Foundation reports on research, Kenya trip, Mumbai Wikiconference; Canada, Hungary and Estonia; English Wikinews forked
- WikiProject report: Politics in the Pacific: WikiProject Australian Politics
- Featured content: Wikipedians explain two new featured pictures
- Arbitration report: Ohconfucius sanctions removed, Cirt desysopped 6:5 and a call for CU/OS applications
- Technology report: What is: agile development? and new mobile site goes live
- Opinion essay: The Walrus and the Carpenter
The Signpost: 19 September 2011
[edit]- From the editor: Changes to The Signpost
- News and notes: Ushahidi research tool announced, Citizendium five years on: success or failure?, and Wikimedia DC officially recognised
- Sister projects: On the Wikinews fork
- WikiProject report: Back to school
- Featured content: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: ArbCom narrowly rejects application to open new case
- Technology report: MediaWiki 1.18 deployment begins, the alleged "injustice" of WMF engineering policy, and Wikimedians warned of imminent fix to magic word
- Popular pages: Article stats for the English Wikipedia in the last year
The Signpost: 26 September 2011
[edit]
- Recent research: Top female Wikipedians, reverted newbies, link spam, social influence on admin votes, Wikipedians' weekends, WikiSym previews
- News and notes: WMF strikes down enwiki consensus, academic journal partnerships, and eyebrows raised over minors editing porn-related content
- In the news: Sockpuppeting journalist recants, search dominance threatened, new novels replete with Wikipedia references
- WikiProject report: A project in overdrive: WikiProject Automobiles
- Featured content: The best of the week
The Signpost: 3 October 2011
[edit]
- News and notes: Italian Wikipedia shuts down over new privacy law; Wikimedia Sverige produce short Wikipedia films, Sue Gardner calls for empathy
- In the news: QRpedia launches to acclaim, Jimbo talks social media, Wikipedia attracts fungi, terriers and Greeks bearing gifts
- WikiProject report: Kia ora WikiProject New Zealand
- Featured content: Reviewers praise new featured topic: National treasures of Japan
- Arbitration report: Last call for comments on CheckUser and Oversight teams
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Signpost: 10 October 2011
[edit]
- Opinion essay: The conservatism of Wikimedians
- News and notes: Largest ever donation to WMF, final findings of editor survey released, 'Terms of use' heavily revised
- In the news: Uproar over Italian shutdown, the varying reception of BLP mischief, and Wikipedia's doctor-evangelist
- WikiProject report: The World's Oldest People
- Featured content: The weird and the disgusting
tulung
[edit]maukah Anda buat sebuah halaman voting di WBI untuk memutuskan soal masalah diatas (dilepaskan status blokirnya apa tidak, seperti ini lho ==> http://id.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Peringanan_persyaratan_menjadi_seorang_pengurus ) Diberi pula keterangan berupa pesan saya yang paling atas sebagai alasan saya kalo saya mau dilepaskan masa blokirnya.--Erik Evrest (talk) 23:16, 7 October 2011 (UTC)
- Segeralah Anda buat halaman voting itu, tak perlu mikirin "kaidah kalimat" karena tinggal Anda copy-paste semua ke halaman votingnya. --Erik Evrest (talk) 03:08, 16 October 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 17 October 2011
[edit]
- News and notes: Arabic Wikipedia gets video intros, Smithsonian gifts images, and WikiProject Conservatism scrutinized
- In the news: Why Wikipedia survives while others haven't; Wikipedia as an emerging social model; Jimbo speaks out
- WikiProject report: History in your neighborhood: WikiProject NRHP
- Featured content: Brazil's boom-time dreams of naval power: The ed17 explains the background to a new featured topic
The Signpost: 24 October 2011
[edit]- From the editors: A call for contributors
- Opinion essay: There is a deadline
- Interview: Contracting for the Foundation
- WikiProject report: Great WikiProject Logos
- Featured content: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Abortion; request for amendment on Climate Change case
- Technology report: WMF launches coding challenge, WMDE starts hiring for major new project
The Signpost: 31 October 2011
[edit]- Opinion essay: The monster under the rug
- Recent research: WikiSym; predicting editor survival; drug information found lacking; RfAs and trust; Wikipedia's search engine ranking justified
- News and notes: German Wikipedia continues image filter protest
- Discussion report: Proposal to return this section from hiatus is successful
- WikiProject report: 'In touch' with WikiProject Rugby union
- Featured content: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Abortion case stalls, request for clarification on Δ, discretionary sanctions streamlined
- Technology report: Wikipedia Zero announced; New Orleans successfully hacked
The Signpost: 7 November2011
[edit]- Special report: A post-mortem on the Indian Education Program pilot
- Discussion report: Special report on the ArbCom Elections steering RfC
- WikiProject report: Booting up with WikiProject Computer Science
- Featured content: Slow week for Featured content
- Arbitration report: Δ saga returns to arbitration, while the Abortion case stalls for another week
The Signpost: 14 November 2011
[edit]- News and notes: ArbCom nominations open, participation grants finalized, survey results on perceptions on Wikipedia released
- WikiProject report: Having a Conference with WikiProject India
- Arbitration report: Abortion and Betacommand 3 in evidence phase, three case requests outstanding
The Signpost: 21 November 2011
[edit]- Discussion report: Much ado about censorship
- WikiProject report: Working on a term paper with WikiProject Academic Journals
- Featured content: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: End in sight for Abortion case, nominations in 2011 elections
- Technology report: Mumbai and Brighton hacked; horizontal lists have got class
Celtic F.C. task force
[edit]Hi, are you still interested in participating in the WikiProject Football/Celtic F.C. task force, you don't appear to have made an edit to a Celtic-related article for a significant period of time. If you would like to continue as a member of the task force please say so, the more people participating the better. But if not I would request that you remove your name from the particicpants list. Thank you. Adam4267 (talk) 22:04, 23 November 2011 (UTC)
- Oh ok, I see you are mainly focusing on songs. This isn't really an area the task force has been covering, I think it is better that we improve existing articles rather than create lots of new stub articles. Although if you are looking to create new articles, there are plenty of season articles to be made, we can easily get sources for the later ones so they can be made better than stubs. Adam4267 (talk) 18:39, 29 November 2011 (UTC)
- Hey Tatasport, if you are looking for something Celtic related to do. Could you please add squad lists to the season articles that don't have any yet. Here is a source for it [5]. Thanks very much. Adam4267 (talk) 20:51, 3 December 2011 (UTC)
- Yes it's the players the club used during that season. If you go onto one of the seaspns woth a squad list you will be able to take the template off it and use that source to fill in the players. Thanks very much mate. Adam4267 (talk) 20:57, 3 December 2011 (UTC)
- No not the matche, the squad lists. Like this [[6]. Adam4267 (talk) 11:08, 4 December 2011 (UTC)
- I don't mean to be rude but I'm not quite sure why you don't understand what I'm saying. Can you actually speak English? Adam4267 (talk) 17:09, 4 December 2011 (UTC)
- Ok, can you do the squad lists for the seasons that don't have squad lists. Adam4267 (talk) 12:53, 5 December 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks. Adam4267 (talk) 13:10, 5 December 2011 (UTC)
- No you still don't get what I mean. I want you to add a squad section to this article. Using the source I gave you above. Adam4267 (talk) 13:58, 5 December 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks man, that's really helpful. Great job :) Adam4267 (talk) 12:17, 6 December 2011 (UTC)
- Haha, cheers for the cupcake. But you are helping me more than I am helping you. Great job and I hope you continue to improve Celticc's coverage on Wikipedia. Adam4267 (talk) 15:55, 6 December 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 28 November 2011
[edit]- News and notes: Arb's resignation sparks lightning RfC, Fundraiser 2011 off to a strong start, GLAM in Qatar
- In the news: The closed, unfriendly world of Wikipedia, fundraiser fun and games, and chemists vs pornstars
- Recent research: Quantifying quality collaboration patterns, systemic bias, POV pushing, the impact of news events, and editors' reputation
- WikiProject report: The Signpost scoops The Bugle
- Featured content: The best of the week
Disambiguation link notification
[edit]Hi. In 2004–05 Celtic F.C. season, you recently added links to the disambiguation pages Craig Reid, Alan Thompson and Paul Lawson (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. For more information, see the FAQ or drop a line at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:56, 6 December 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 05 December 2011
[edit]- News and notes: Amsterdam gets the GLAM treatment, fundraising marches on, and a flourish of new admins
- In the news: A Wikistream of real time edits, a call for COI reform, and cracks in the ivory tower of knowledge
- Discussion report: Trial proposed for tool apprenticeship
- WikiProject report: This article is about WikiProject Disambiguation. For other uses...
- Featured content: This week's Signpost is for the birds!
The Signpost: 12 December 2011
[edit]- Opinion essay: Wikipedia in Academe – and vice versa
- News and notes: Research project banner ads run afoul of community
- In the news: Bell Pottinger investigation, Gardner on gender gap, and another plagiarist caught red-handed
- WikiProject report: Spanning Nine Time Zones with WikiProject Russia
- Featured content: Wehwalt gives his fifty cents; spies, ambushes, sieges, and Entombment
The Signpost: 19 December 2011
[edit]- News and notes: Anti-piracy act has Wikimedians on the defensive, WMF annual report released, and Indic language dynamics
- In the news: To save the wiki: strike first, then makeover?
- Discussion report: Polls, templates, and other December discussions
- WikiProject report: A dalliance with the dismal scientists of WikiProject Economics
- Featured content: Panoramas with Farwestern and a good week for featured content
- Arbitration report: The community elects eight arbitrators
The Signpost: 26 December 2011
[edit]- Recent research: Psychiatrists: Wikipedia better than Britannica; spell-checking Wikipedia; Wikipedians smart but fun; structured biological data
- News and notes: Fundraiser passes 2010 watermark, brief news
- WikiProject report: The Tree of Life
- Arbitration report: Three open cases, one set for acceptance, arbitrators formally appointed by Jimmy Wales
- Technology report: Wikimedia in Go Daddy boycott, and why you should 'Join the Swarm'
The Signpost: 02 January 2012
[edit]
- Interview: The Gardner interview
- News and notes: Things bubbling along as Wikimedians enjoy their holidays
- WikiProject report: Where are they now? Part III
- Featured content: Ghosts of featured content past, present, and future
- Arbitration report: New case accepted, four open cases, terms begin for new arbitrators
The Signpost: 09 January 2012
[edit]- Technological roadmap: 2011's technological achievements in review, and what 2012 may hold
- News and notes: Fundraiser 2011 ends with a bang
- WikiProject report: From Traditional to Experimental: WikiProject Jazz
- Featured content: Contentious FAC debate: a week in review
- Arbitration report: Four open cases, proposed decision in Betacommand 3
The Signpost: 16 January 2012
[edit]
- Special report: English Wikipedia to go dark on January 18
- Sister projects: What are our sisters up to now?
- News and notes: WMF on the looming SOPA blackout, Wikipedia turns 11, and Commons passes 12 million files
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Beer
- Featured content: Lecen on systemic bias in featured content
- Arbitration report: Four open cases, Betacommand case deadlocked, Muhammad images close near
The Signpost: 23 January 2012
[edit]- News and notes: SOPA blackout, Orange partnership
- WikiProject report: The Golden Horseshoe: WikiProject Toronto
- Featured content: Interview with Muhammad Mahdi Karim and the best of the week
- Arbitration report: Four open cases, proposed decision in Muhammad images, AUSC call for applications
- Technology report: Looking ahead to MediaWiki 1.19 and related issues
The Signpost: 30 January 2012
[edit]- In the news: Zambian wiki-assassins, Foundation über alles, editor engagement and the innovation plateau
- Recent research: Language analyses examine power structure and political slant; Wikipedia compared to commercial databases
- WikiProject report: Digging Up WikiProject Palaeontology
- Featured content: Featured content soaring this week
- Arbitration report: Five open cases, voting on proposed decisions in two cases
- Technology report: Why "Lua" is on everybody's lips, and when to expect MediaWiki 1.19
The Signpost: 06 February 2012
[edit]- News and notes: The Foundation visits Tunisia, analyzes donors
- In the news: Leading scholar hails Wikipedia, historians urged to contribute while PR pros remain shunned
- Discussion report: Discussion swarms around Templates for deletion and returning editors of colourful pasts
- WikiProject report: The Eye of the Storm: WikiProject Tropical Cyclones
- Featured content: Talking architecture with MrPanyGoff
- Arbitration report: Four open cases, final decision in Muhammad images, Betacommand 3 near closure
The Signpost: 13 February 2012
[edit]- Special report: Fundraising proposals spark a furore among the chapters
- News and notes: Foundation launches Legal and Community Advocacy department
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Stub Sorting
- Featured content: The best of the week
The Signpost: 20 February 2012
[edit]- Special report: The plight of the new page patrollers
- News and notes: Fundraiser row continues, new director of engineering
- Discussion report: Discussion on copyrighted files from non-US relation states
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Poland
- Featured content: The best of the week
The Signpost: 27 February 2012
[edit]- News and notes: Finance meeting fallout, Gardner recommendations forthcoming
- Recent research: Gender gap and conflict aversion; collaboration on breaking news; effects of leadership on participation; legacy of Public Policy Initiative
- Discussion report: Focus on admin conduct and editor retention
- WikiProject report: Just don't call it "sci-fi": WikiProject Science Fiction
- Arbitration report: Final decision in TimidGuy ban appeal, one case remains open
- Technology report: 1.19 deployment stress, Meta debates whether to enforce SUL
The Signpost: 05 March 2012
[edit]- News and notes: Chapter-selected Board seats, an invite to the Teahouse, patrol becomes triage, and this week in history
- In the news: Heights reached in search rankings, privacy and mental health info; clouds remain over content policing
- Discussion report: COI and NOTCENSORED: policies under discussion
- WikiProject report: We don't bite: WikiProject Amphibians and Reptiles
- Featured content: Best of the week
- Arbitration report: AUSC appointments announced, one case remains open
The Signpost: 12 March 2012
[edit]- Interview: Liaising with the Education Program
- Women and Wikipedia: Women's history, what we're missing, and why it matters
- Arbitration analysis: A look at new arbitrators
- Discussion report: Nothing changes as long discussions continue
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Women's History
- Featured content: Extinct humans, birds, and Birdman
- Arbitration report: Proposed decision in 'Article titles', only one open case
- Education report: Diverse approaches to Wikipedia in Education
The Signpost: 19 March 2012
[edit]- News and notes: Chapters Council proposals take form as research applications invited for Wikipedia Academy and HighBeam accounts
- Discussion report: Article Rescue Squadron in need of rescue yet again
- WikiProject report: Lessons from another Wikipedia: Czech WikiProject Protected Areas
- Featured content: Featured content on the upswing!
- Arbitration report: Race and intelligence 'review' opened, Article titles at voting
The Signpost: 26 March 2012
[edit]- News and notes: Controversial content saga continues, while the Foundation tries to engage editors with merchandising and restructuring
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Rock Music
- Featured content: Malfunctioning sharks, toothcombs and a famous mother: featured content for the week
- Arbitration report: Race and intelligence review at evidence, article titles closed
- Recent research: Predicting admin elections; studying flagged revision debates; classifying editor interactions; and collecting the Wikipedia literature
- Education report: Universities unite for GLAM; and High Schools get their due.
The Signpost: 02 April 2012
[edit]- Interview: An introduction to movement roles
- Arbitration analysis: Case review: TimidGuy ban appeal
- News and notes: Berlin reforms to movement structures, Wikidata launches with fanfare, and Wikipedia's day of mischief
- WikiProject report: The Signpost scoops The Signpost
- Featured content: Snakes, misnamed chapels, and emptiness: featured content this week
- Arbitration report: Race and intelligence review in third week, one open case
The Signpost: 09 April 2012
[edit]- News and notes: Projects launched in Brazil and the Middle East as advisors sought for funds committee
- WikiProject report: The Land of Steady Habits: WikiProject Connecticut
- Featured content: Assassination, genocide, internment, murder, and crucifixion: the bloodiest of the week
- Arbitration report: Arbitration evidence-limit motions, two open cases
The Signpost: 16 April 2012
[edit]- Arbitration analysis: Inside the Arbitration Committee Mailing List
- Paid editing: Does Wikipedia Pay? The Facilitator: Silver seren
- Discussion report: The future of pending changes
- WikiProject report: The Butterflies and Moths of WikiProject Lepidoptera
- Featured content: A few good sports: association football, rugby league, and the Olympics vie for medals
The Signpost: 23 April 2012
[edit]- Investigative report: Spin doctors spin Jimmy's "bright line"
- WikiProject report: Skeptics and Believers: WikiProject The X-Files
- Featured content: A mirror (or seventeen) on this week's featured content
- Arbitration report: Evidence submissions close in Rich Farmbrough case, vote on proposed decision in R&I Review
- Technology report: Wikimedia Labs: soon to be at the cutting edge of MediaWiki development?
The Signpost: 30 April 2012
[edit]- Paid editing: Does Wikipedia Pay? The Consultant: Pete Forsyth
- Discussion report: 'ReferenceTooltips' by default
- WikiProject report: The Cartographers of WikiProject Maps
- Featured content: Featured content spreads its wings
- Arbitration report: R&I Review remains in voting, two open cases
The Signpost: 07 May 2012
[edit]- Paid editing: Does Wikipedia Pay? The Communicator: Phil Gomes
- News and notes: Hong Kong to host Wikimania 2013
- WikiProject report: Say What?: WikiProject Languages
- Featured content: This week at featured content: How much wood would a Wood Duck chuck if a Wood Duck could chuck wood?
- Arbitration report: Proposed decision in Rich Farmbrough, two open cases
- Technology report: Search gets faster, GSoC gets more detail and 1.20wmf2 gets deployed
The Signpost: 14 May 2012
[edit]- WikiProject report: Welcome to Wikipedia with a cup of tea and all your questions answered - at the Teahouse
- Featured content: Featured content is red hot this week
- Arbitration report: R&I Review closed, Rich Farmbrough near closure
The Signpost: 21 May 2012
[edit]- From the editor: New editor-in-chief
- WikiProject report: Trouble in a Galaxy Far, Far Away....
- Featured content: Lemurbaby moves it with Madagascar: Featured content for the week
- Arbitration report: No open arbitration cases pending
- Technology report: On the indestructibility of Wikimedia content
The Signpost: 28 May 2012
[edit]- News and notes: Wikimedia Foundation endorses open-access petition to the White House; pending changes RfC ends
- Recent research: Supporting interlanguage collaboration; detecting reverts; Wikipedia's discourse, semantic and leadership networks, and Google's Knowledge Graph
- WikiProject report: Experts and enthusiasts at WikiProject Geology
- Featured content: Featured content cuts the cheese
- Arbitration report: Fæ and GoodDay requests for arbitration, changes to evidence word limits
- Technology report: Developer divide wrangles; plus Wikimedia Zero, MediaWiki 1.20wmf4, and IPv6
The Signpost: 04 June 2012
[edit]- Special report: WikiWomenCamp: From women, for women
- Discussion report: Watching Wikipedia change
- WikiProject report: Views of WikiProject Visual Arts
- Featured content: On the lochs
- Arbitration report: Two motions for procedural reform, three open cases, Rich Farmbrough risks block and ban
- Technology report: Report from the Berlin Hackathon
The Signpost: 11 June 2012
[edit]- News and notes: Foundation finance reformers wrestle with CoI
- WikiProject report: Counter-Vandalism Unit
- Featured content: The cake is a pi
- Arbitration report: Procedural reform enacted, Rich Farmbrough blocked, three open cases
The Signpost: 18 June 2012
[edit]- Investigative report: Is the requests for adminship process 'broken'?
- News and notes: Ground shifts while chapters dither over new Association
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports And Miscellaneous Articulations
- WikiProject report: The Punks of Wikipedia
- Featured content: Taken with a pinch of "salt"
- Arbitration report: Three open cases, GoodDay case closed
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Signpost: 25 June 2012
[edit]- WikiProject report: Summer Sports Series: WikiProject Athletics
- Featured content: A good week for the Williams
- Arbitration report: Three open cases
- Technology report: Second Visual Editor prototype launches
The Signpost: 02 July 2012
[edit]- Analysis: Uncovering scientific plagiarism
- News and notes: RfC on joining lobby group; JSTOR accounts for Wikipedians and the article feedback tool
- In the news: Public relations on Wikipedia: friend or foe?
- Discussion report: Discussion reports and miscellaneous articulations
- WikiProject report: Summer sports series: Burning rubber with WikiProject Motorsport
- Featured content: Heads up
- Arbitration report: Three open cases, motion for the removal of Carnildo's administrative tools
- Technology report: Initialisms abound: QA and HTML5
The Signpost: 09 July 2012
[edit]- Special report: Reforming the education programs: lessons from Cairo
- WikiProject report: Summer sports series: WikiProject Football
- Featured content: Keeps on chuggin'
- Arbitration report: Three requests for arbitration
The Signpost: 16 July 2012
[edit]- Special report: Chapters Association mired in controversy over new chair
- WikiProject report: Summer sports series: French WikiProject Cycling
- Discussion report: Discussion reports and miscellaneous articulations
- Featured content: Taking flight
- Technology report: Tech talks at Wikimania amid news of a mixed June
- Arbitration report: Fæ faces site-ban, proposed decisions posted
The Signpost: 23 July 2012
[edit]- Paid editing: Does Wikipedia pay? The skeptic: Orange Mike
- From the editor: Signpost developments
- WikiProject report: Summer sports series: WikiProject Olympics
- Arbitration report: Fæ and Michaeldsuarez banned; Kwamikagami desysopped; Falun Gong closes with mandated external reviews and topic bans
- Featured content: When is an island not an island?
- Technology report: Translating SVGs and making history bugs history
The Signpost: 30 July 2012
[edit]- News and notes: Wikimedians and London 2012; WMF budget – staffing, engineering, editor retention effort, and the global South; Telegraph's cheap shot at WP
- WikiProject report: Summer sports series: WikiProject Horse Racing
- Featured content: One of a kind
- Arbitration report: No pending or open arbitration cases
The Signpost: 06 August 2012
[edit]- News and notes: FDC portal launched
- Arbitration report: No pending or open arbitration cases
- Featured content: Casliber's words take root
- Technology report: Wikidata nears first deployment but wikis go down in fibre cut calamity
- WikiProject report: Summer sports series: WikiProject Martial Arts
The Signpost: 13 August 2012
[edit]- Op-ed: Small Wikipedias' burden
- Arbitration report: You really can request for arbitration
- Featured content: On the road again
- Technology report: "Phabricating" a serious alternative to Gerrit
- WikiProject report: Dispute Resolution
- Discussion report: Image placeholders, machine translations, Mediation Committee, de-adminship