User talk:TheAMmollusc

v_@_

Hello, TheAMmollusc, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  - --Daemonic Kangaroo (talk) 08:09, 17 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the note. I will try to expand the Fleming article when I get time - the football career section is rather brief. With regard to the family, can you add details of his mother & wife? These things are supposed to be referenced to independent sources, but I doubt if these are available. Enjoy Wikipedia. Cheers. --Daemonic Kangaroo (talk) 11:44, 17 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The article David (DEN) Davies has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Rettetast (talk) 10:47, 29 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your compliments and if you really want to know the definition of "mesmerizing animation" my/Zom-B's Mandelbrot zoom in animation might be worth a peak too. It was originally on the Game of Life page but some user claimed it had no place there because the page already had two animations. Simpsons contributor (talk) 10:24, 8 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article Alan Wilson (composer) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No independent sources to establish WP:notability

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. noq (talk) 12:49, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, TheAMmollusc. You have new messages at Noq's talk page.
Message added 13:09, 1 February 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Hello, TheAMmollusc. You have new messages at Noq's talk page.
Message added 10:51, 4 February 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

The article Alan Wilson (composer) is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alan Wilson (composer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. noq (talk) 10:32, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If I understand correctly, I can create my own User:TheAMmollusc/Incubation area in a low-profile region of the Wikipedia. TheAMmollusc (talk) 08:14, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, you can create a sub page of your user page to create new articles in until they reach a state that fulfils the notability requirements of the main pages. noq (talk) 13:02, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Karnataka, please cite a reliable source for the content of your edit. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Wikipedia:Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. SBC-YPR (talk) 14:54, 24 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please supply proper sources for your edit? I would love to include something of the sort but it cannot go in without a reference. --John (talk) 22:05, 10 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

OK, fair enough. At least I tried :-) It is something I feel strongly about: I first mentioned it on the Talk:The_Hitchhiker's_Guide_to_the_Galaxy_(radio_series)#Cult_following page, where you will see that I list out the first 10 hits on that search in the New Scientist archive. As I say on that page, he gets about 80 hits in 1000 issues of New Scientist... which is more than I would imagine any single scientist achieving... even Einstein might struggle to get that many hits. So, yes, we could certainly turn each of those (or at least the best ones) into conventional bibliographic references. However, that's not exactly what you are asking for... we would have to go through those articles to find which ones not only liken the scientific idea to the Douglas Adams idea, but also comment on how the latter was remarkable in pre-dating the former. I am sure that I remember that some of those articles do indeed say something like that. It would just take a bit of research (which I could do), provided that you first confirm that this would be time well spent :-) (Well done, BTW, for the banner on your talk page :-) ) TheAMmollusc (talk) 07:44, 11 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I think a well-sourced addition of that sort would be well worth it. I have access to the NS online archive so maybe I can even help you. --John (talk) 06:24, 12 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I will see what I can do when I get back (after a week's break) TheAMmollusc (talk) 13:05, 12 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No rush, enjoy your break. I will have a look while you are gone and see what I can find. --John (talk) 03:00, 13 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

See also sections discouraged.--Doc James (talk · contribs ·email) 17:53, 9 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I know :-) I am aware of the danger, and certainly, I take your point. Indeed, the Wikipedia:Orphan#Suggestions_for_how_to_de-orphan_an_article section does say as much. The problem is that by tackling the orphaned articles backlog, I am constantly encountering (and thereby learning about) subjects that are new to me. Although I do my best to read each article as thoroughly as I can, I remain a novice in the new subject, and consider it safest to put the reference to the orphaned article in the See also section, and let an editor more expert than I work out how to weave it better into the main part of the article. However, as I say, I take your point. TheAMmollusc (talk) 07:48, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hiya, just to let you know, I decided, in an idle moment, to have a go at creating a page on Ron Lane. :) I created just enough to stop the page being instantly labelled a stub. But if you know any more information about him (I'm neither a resident of Dibden Purlieu nor knowledgeable about wood sculpture) then feel free to add it to the page - it could do with a bit more fleshing out. Pasicles (talk) 19:32, 3 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I noticed it yesterday, and had a look, and was suitably impressed. Well done! No, I can't say I have a great deal more to add. I know the name of the lane that he lived in (Watermans Lane) and remember the wood-carved plate on his gate (complete with little mice I think it was). Contrary to what it says on the Dibden Purlieu WP page (and hence, also, now on the Ron Lane page), I don't believe that Dibden Purlieu is technically in the New Forest (with the boundary lieing immediately outside the village, on the other side of the main road between Fawley and Totton). If you can think of anything that I might be able to look into, then do ask... but I can't guarantee anything... I live a long way away from there, now. TheAMmollusc (talk) 06:38, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have reverted your edit to nanotechnology. Adding a link to an article page in order to encourage editors to review the linked article is not helpful to our readers. If you need a review, ask at a suitable page, not in the mainspace. The article is a one sentence dicdef stub which you suspect ought to be proded. It should not be linked anywhere.

I also do not approve of the practice of linking rubbish articles merely for the sake of de-orphaning them. The link should always be of some benefit to the reader. SpinningSpark 12:12, 25 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I take your points (especially the one about asking at a suitable page, which I have, indeed, done in the past on other occasions). I would like to add one observation, though: I do find it comes, to me, as a slight shock that you seem to imply the existence of two distinct populations (us and them) on Wikipedia; until you wrote that, I had always been thinking of it as a single population (those users who have never edited an article are simply users who have not yet started editing articles). As I say, though, I take your points. TheAMmollusc (talk) 10:36, 26 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Of course there are two distinct populations. The vast majority of Wikipeida users have never edited an article, and most never will. It is not "us and them" though; most editors probably read something now and then as well. Actually, you could say there were more than two groups; the community of editors has little overlap with the community of developers, who are just as important for keeping this place going. SpinningSpark 16:27, 26 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is to inform you that this article has been nominated for deletion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Night flight in the UK. - Ahunt (talk) 23:01, 11 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

OK, thanks for having kept me notified. Looking at the ensuing discussion, I think that the court-of-deletion is already well enough endowed with experts, for my lay opinions not to be required :-) TheAMmollusc (talk) 06:51, 12 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Unser Racing Museum, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Unser (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:28, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, but at least I wrote my justification for having chosen to do so in the edit summary line :-) (I hope the bot reads this reply :-) ). TheAMmollusc (talk) 06:08, 29 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Author/TheAMoullsc

My name is Nuša Farič and I am a Health Psychology MSc student at University College London (UCL). I am currently running a quantitative study entitled Who edits health-related Wikipedia pages and why? I am interested in the editorial experience of people who edit health-related Wikipedia pages. I am interested to learn more about the authors of health-related pages on Wikipedia and what motivations they have for doing so. I am currently contacting the authors of randomly selected articles and I noticed that someone at this address recently edited an article on Age-related muscular degeneration. I would like to ask you a few questions about you and your experience of editing the above mentioned article. If you would like more information about the project, please visit my user page (Hydra_Rain) and if interested, please visit my Talk page or e-mail me on nusa.faric.11@ucl.ac.uk. Also, others interested in the study may contact me! If I do not hear back from you I will not contact this account again. Thank you very much in advance. Hydra Rain (talk) 21:55, 11 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, count me "In". How do you wish to correspond... should I contact you by email, or do we communicate via our talk pages? TheAMmollusc (talk) 07:43, 13 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello TheAmoullusc, Thank you for your reply (sorry to have misspelled your name earlier!!). Yes, you can e-mail me on nusa.faric.11@ucl.ac.uk. All you will be asked to do is read the ethics form and agree to do the study- I need the informed consent from all participants. Then I will ask you you answer a short online questionnaire followed by an interview (either via Skype or I can send you a list of questions and you can write them out and send them back to me in your own time). Look forward to hearing from you! Nuša Hydra Rain (talk) 09:22, 13 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I've emailed you... looking forward to speaking with you, there. TheAMmollusc (talk) 14:58, 13 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello TheAMmollusc, Got your email, responded. :) Speak soon. Thanks. Nush — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hydra Rain (talk • contribs) 11:55, 14 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Congratulations on your linking work so far - it is doing what I originally hoped and making the list a worthwhile directory for interested readers / museum visitors. Sorry, I don't live anywhere near the museum so no chance of pics or sharing their information plaques. I have no information sources other than Google, so I doubt that I can materially help you with the article. (I tend to write articles erratically based on nothing other than whim, or something that catches my attention, often a non-sequitur or a crie de coeur or a nonsensical claim. To wit I was only at the museum list because of a Rene Lalique... car ornaments... Spirit of Ecstacy... Eleanor Thornton... Salacious illicit sex... John Douglas-Scott-Montagu, 2nd Baron Montagu of Beaulieu... Edward Douglas-Scott-Montagu, 3rd Baron Montagu of Beaulieu... more sex scandal... leading inevitably to a drop down list of old bangers :) ) Regards. Good luck. Chienlit (talk) 12:51, 27 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Vibraye ? ... I helped a bit with writing 1906 Grand Prix de l'Automobile Club de France, but mostly to declaim any trace of the idea that it was not the world's first Grand Prix for cars. As I said above I felt obliged to burst 100 years of anglophone mistranslation of the Grand Prix de Pau. Chienlit (talk) 14:10, 27 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, congratulations, excellent work. I will add GB to my ToDo list, but I have no resources other than Google, and I always thought it was Gordon Brille so my expertise is close to zero. You might find User:Malcolma a diligent and expert contact. Regards. Chienlit (talk) 13:38, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have added a bit more information to the Gray Light Car article and linked the Gray (automobile) to its company in the Gray Marine Motor Company article. NealeFamily (talk) 21:14, 20 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Great. Well done, for that. TheAMmollusc (talk) 06:13, 21 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Komaratchi block, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Karuppur (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:46, 26 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Telephone numbers in Bhutan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Tala, Dagana, Shaba, Paro and Damphu

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:24, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Gtwfan52. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Bloomington, Indiana, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. No reference for your change, The Wikipedia article linked is very weak and /Wikipedia is not an allowable reference Gtwfan52 (talk) 01:55, 21 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Thiruvananthapuram Monorail, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Pallippuram and Palayam (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:51, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

OK, done. Thanks for finding them for me. (Also, each of the previous messages like this were acted on at the time.) TheAMmollusc (talk) 15:48, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Ethnic groups of Azad Kashmir (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Poonch District and Sagra

Westfield College (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to What's Up Doc?

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:22, 6 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

OK, done. TheAMmollusc (talk) 12:36, 6 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ICICI Manipal Academy for Banking & Insurance is not part of Manipal University, it is a joint venture between ICICI Bank Limited and the Manipal Group. Manipal University is owned by the Manipal Group. Hope this makes sense if not please read http://www.ima.manipal.edu/about-IMA.html which explains the organisational structure. Only colleges listed on the manipal.edu website are constituent institutions. Gsingh (talk) 21:55, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

OK. Thanks. TheAMmollusc (talk) 06:49, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please see Job Control Language Talk. Softtest123 (talk) 17:08, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello TheAMmollusc, I'm here onbehalf of WP:ORPHAN in which you are also a participant. So, we want your opinion to a WP:ORPHAN related matter. It is a proposal by Technical 13. Please have a look here. Your opinion (i.e support, oppose etc) are very much appreciated there. Thank you. By Jim Cartar through MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:02, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello TheAMmollusc,

WikiProject Orphanage is holding a month long Backlog Elimination Drive to de-orphan articles which have orphan tags!
The goal is to eliminate the backlog of orphan articles. There are currently 53299 articles which have orphan tags. The drive is running from April 12, 2014 to May 12, 2014.

Awards will be given out for all editors participating in the drive in the form of barnstars at the end of the drive. To add your name in the participants list click here.
So start de-orphaning articles! Click here to see the list of articles need de-orphaning.
Visit Suggestions for how to de-orphan an article to know more!

Thanks. _{Opt-out Instructions} by Jim Cartar on behalf of WikiProject Orphanage through MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:21, 11 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Stef and Jim may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• }}

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 11:21, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

	Barnstar for de-orphaning articles
	Thank you for your efforts to de-orphan articles, Although we are unsuccessful to make a dent on the huge backlog, but your efforts to de-orphan articles are very much appreciated. Happy editing! -- From: Jim Carter onbehalf of WikiProject Orphanage through MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:24, 11 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello TheAMmollusc, I hope you remember speaking to me in the summer of 2012 about your motivations for contributing to the health-related pages on Wikipedia. The great news is that the study got published this Wednesday in JMIR (Journal of Medical Internet Research). You can read it here: http://www.jmir.org/2014/12/e260 This would not have been possible without your contributions so once again, I would like to thank you for taking the time and sharing your experiences with me. I also wrote an entry about my own experience with the study, about additional observations and how I plan to further extend my research - published in the WMF blog today: https://blog.wikimedia.org.uk/2014/12/who-writes-wikipedias-health-and-medical-pages-and-why/If you have any comments or questions please get in touch.Perhaps see you at the next Wikimania conference in Mexico! Best Wishes Hydra Rain (talk) 21:09, 7 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the thanks! Congratulations. Good luck with the future. TheAMmollusc (talk) 06:39, 8 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello everyone! I was just working on responding to a couple bug reports for a script that I worked up as part of a request from this project, and I noticed that only a couple people (who weren't even on this mailing list) are actually using the script. A little history on the script: In March of 2014, Jim Cartar came to my user talk page and said he needed some help in acquiring a script for a backlog drive that he was working on that could keep track of and score deOrphanings for a scored backlog drive. I took that request to the project's talk page (BackLog Drive "DO" (De-Orphaning) script proposal) and there was near unanimous support for this. I thought about the proposal and decided the best way to do it was to build a new script (which is still no where near as comprehensive as Manishearth's OrphanTabs) and build into it a mechanism that will make BLD scoring easy.

What I'm wondering at this point is, since there appears to be only two people using the script, should I continue to develop this script with a goal of using it for scoring BLDs or just debug the existing script and leave it at that. Thanks for any replies or comments.

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list or alternatively to opt-out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Opted-out of message delivery to your user talk page.

• This message was sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of — {{U|Technical 13}} (e • t • c) 14:12, 4 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:59, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The article Axestone has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Hello, TheAMmollusc. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Gobonobo was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Edward A. Newman and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

gobonobo ^{+ c} 09:09, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, TheAMmollusc! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! gobonobo + c 09:09, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Utopes was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Insufficient sourcing, please use page numbers if the ref is offline.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Edward A. Newman and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 14:51, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]