User talk:UGAdawgs2010

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 17:05, 14 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

As a warning, between your IP and your new account, you're at 3RR on Eric Holder. Please continue the discussion on the talk page. Dayewalker (talk) 17:13, 14 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Eric Holder. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If the edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. It should be noted that before creating an account this editor was blocked at its previous IP for the same edit warring. MarnetteD | Talk 17:30, 14 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for your disruption caused by edit warring and violation of the three-revert rule. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|Your reason here}}, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. CT Cooper · talk 18:19, 14 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your first edit after the previous block on 96.32.148.208 (talk · contribs) was to resume edit warring, and in combination with this account you have amassed five reverts on Eric Holder in the last 24 hours. 3RR applies per person, not per account. This is not on, if after this block expires edit warring resumes this account will be blocked for significantly longer. CT Cooper · talk 18:19, 14 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Due to apparent block evasion, the block on this account has been increased to 1 week. You are not permitted to edit Wikipedia until this block has expired. CT Cooper · talk 18:49, 14 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

With further block evasion, I'm blocking this account indefinitely, given it is clear you have no interest with complying with policy. All edits by you are likely to be reverted, and further sock puppets will be blocked on sight. CT Cooper · talk 19:30, 14 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/UGAdawgs2010 for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. SummerPhD (talk) 03:25, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

SummerPhD is a disgusting nigger-loving faggot. HAHAHAHA I have another username and I'm already able to edit semi-protected pages. See if you can stop me!!

I'm not disgusting. - SummerPhD (talk) 18:29, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

UGAdawgs2010 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I don't see what I did wrong...

Decline reason:

After this edit... no thanks. --Kinu ^t/_c 01:20, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/UGAdawgs2010 for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. SummerPhD (talk) 01:22, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]