User talk:Universal Hero

Archives

Archive One50 messages Archive Two50 messages Archive Three50 messages Archive Four50 messages Archive Five50 messages Archive Six50 messages

Hey dude i don't think sushmitha sen is doing any role in marmayogi. Moreover the film dropped because of the film's high budget and kamal schedule is full so they had dropped the film. I think hema malini is doing the villain role(not sushmitha sen). If u still wanna do it, its ok but there is one more {Trisha's role previously given to Shriya but shriya refuse it because she was busy with her other film at that time } so tha kamal offers shriya to play as his flashback wife in the film.

Hi,

I noticed that you are removing all the justtollywood links. I have read all the guidelines for external links and articles. I am not violating any guidelines, so, I think you should stop removing my links. If you know any other rules which I am unaware of please let me know. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Srchalla (talk • contribs) 15:24, 7 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hey dude, in article Madhavan I don't understand why you have removed his name in Tamil in the first brief intro. Please do not revert. --BennyWikipedian (talk) 10:47, 5 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hey dude! I need a help from you! Will you help me to create a page called User:Thulasi12345/Vettaikaaran! Please , and if you create the page filled it up with ..(see down)..

Hey, Thulasi! This is the page you asked to create !

After you create, message me on my talk page.

—Thulasi12345 (Talk · Contributions · E-mail) 16:10, 02 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hey I need your help. Are you an admin? Is it possible for you to temporarily block the Vijay article from unauthorized users to edit it. It's been subject to too much vandalism and so much people are adding made up info to the page, like Vijay's 50th and 51st movies which are just rumours. I always find vandalism on the page everyday. Can you block the article from being edited by these people just until Vettaikkaaran starts or something -- its turning out to be a pain undoing all the vandalism. Thanks. --இளைய நாயகன் Eelam StyleZ (talk) 01:55, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Enga Veetu Pillai, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

unremarkable unreleased movie.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. -Zeus- [t|c] 19:59, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have deleted this article following a consensus at the deletion discussion. The consensus also indicated the possibility of userfication until the commencement of shooting has been announced. What I would do it move the deleted content to a subpage in your userspace, and you could move it back when you have been able to cite this missing detail. If you would like me to do this for you, please let me know on my talkpage. Best wishes, Fritzpoll (talk) 00:37, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Universal Hero, I think, the article is definitely Tamil centric, although I know well, that the makers are of course Tamils. I need the requested source please. --Ultramegasuperstar (talk) 19:26, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

 Done at User:Universal Hero/Asal Fritzpoll (talk) 22:50, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

{{mergeto}}

Hi,

The Aegan plot you have mentioned is completely irrelevant and follows the Hindi film ' Main Hoon na' story. Aegan which is supposedly a remake of the original Hindi fare underwent drastic changes in the script. I have watched the movie many times and know the story by heart. So I changed the story. But you have edited it back to the old content. On what basis did you change the story? I am new to Wikipedia so I dont know the rules around here. So please let me know why it was changed back.

Ravi41778 (talk) 15:08, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Dude I have been waiting for like 2 days now. You have provided a seriously wrong information in wikipedia.

Ravi41778 (talk) 13:54, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Dude, Aegan's plot you have mentioned is completely wrong. Why dont you accept it. Please change it. I had previously given the original plot but it seems you are not interested in the change, even if it is for the good.

Hi, I'm tagging here because I've seen you editing many Tamil film articles and would like your opinion. Please check out the discussion I've started here : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category_talk:Tamil-language_films#Standardisation_of_terms_used Ckannan90 (talk) 07:27, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Aeganaudiofront.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

• That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
• That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 04:40, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Thulasi12345 messaging here. May I know why you changed a big whole part of Mgr article ? And redirecting it to Pandhayam article. Mgr film is of real, which just havne't done it's offical announcement. Not the fictional Mgr film, featured in Pandhayam film.

---

It is about a true film. Not the fictionous film in Pandhayam. Ok! The directors nominated was a long list, so we're not so sure about the director. Please don't redirect Mgr article to Padhayam again. Please. You knew wikipedia rules right. If you did it again, I've have to take action on you.

Thank you so much... I really appreciate it! :) --Eelam StyleZ ^(talk) 22:03, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I missed you really. We are kinda not on talking terms or what?? LOL!!! How have you been? How's life? You sent me a message I also could not move the page you asked to. I was also blocked right after seeing your message :(

Talk2me. Shahid • ^Talk2me 16:34, 14 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

May I know the reason why you had changed the Joseph Vijay's 51st film article's image and talk. You can't do that without reason. I have the rights for it, because it is in my user page. I think you should read more about Wikipedia rules. Please read it. It's better for you.

--- Thulasidasan 02:55, 15 March 2009 (UTC)

 Clerk note:

When submitting sockpuppetry cases, it is more likely that the case will be rapidly processed if you follow the following guidelines;

1. Submit your evidence in the correct section
2. Submit evidence, rather than your recommendations. The reviewing admin will decide on what needs to be done.
3. Submit evidence of sockpuppetry, rather than of general poor behaviour.

Mayalld (talk) 19:58, 15 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Prashanthfilm.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:22, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Universal Hero. I've liked your layout on your user page. I've borrowed your layout to put on my user page. Thank you.

Dark Knight Rider (talk) 13:22, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated Sahana (song), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sahana (song). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Juvenile Deletionist 19:37, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

I have nominated Sahara (song), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sahara (song). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Juvenile Deletionist 19:37, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

I have nominated Oh Ho Sanam, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oh Ho Sanam. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Juvenile Deletionist 19:42, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

Do you actually believe Jeans' budget exceeds $4m? Then, the film is a flop. Bcoz its total gross was $4m - a new peak for Prashanth. Newspapers then reported that Jeans was less than Indian.Anwar (talk) 11:37, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Why are you removing citations for Dasavatharam's gross of $16 million?[1] boxofficemojo.com gives dollar figures not rupee figures. Anwar (talk) 11:44, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Prin

Where did you get this photo? You have not mentioned the source of the image? Did you download it from the Internet? I have tagged the file as per CAT:NS

Anwar (talk) 12:12, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Kodi1.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 12:56, 31 March 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Anwar (talk) 12:56, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi universal. The guy is clearly going out of his way to make things awkward. It is a clear case of victimization. I would recommend reporting him to WP:ANI. Dr. Blofeld ^{White cat} 13:51, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Just provide as many examples as you can find like the one where he added lots of peacock words to demonstrate how he is being disruptive to existing articles and also how he is going out of his way to disrupt your editing (including spamming you with image licenses). Memtioning his huge history of blocking wouldn't hurt either. Regards Dr. Blofeld ^{White cat} 13:56, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

All you have to do is find the url link of where you got the images from to those images. Dr. Blofeld ^{White cat} 13:57, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

 Additional information needed Please could you clarify the edit that I have queried. Mayalld (talk) 14:17, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Why do you keep removing the line that Kamal's lifetime box office collections exceed $100 million? I know you are a Rajini fan. But Rajini was important after 1990 only.Let me give the box office collections of his ten films and see if you can count:

• Dasavatharam - $18 million (All-Time Blockbuster)
• Vettaiyadu Vilaiyadu - $11 million
• Vasoolraja MBBS - $8 million
• Thenali - $7 million
• Indian - $6 million
• Apoorva Sagodharargal - $5 million (All-Time Blockbuster)
• Nayakan - $4 million
• Thoongadhey Thambi Thoongadhey - $3 million (All-Time Blockbuster)
• Vaazhvey Maayam - $2 million
• 16 Vayadhinile - $1 million

These ten films together gross $65 million. He acted in over 200 films in Tamil, Malayalam, Telugu, Kannada, Hindi... The figure I quoted is a understatement of his achievements. Please stop blind revert warring. These one-liners are irreftable facts of the man's achievements.Anwar (talk) 14:45, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Prin

Here you claim to hold exclusive licence for redistribution of images from the websites behindwoods.com and kollywoodtoday.com for your uploads. Is it true? Can I see the licence agreement? Can you give me the details of your contacts at these portals so that I can verify. Anwar (talk) 11:51, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, sure, I'll upload it when I have the time. Why do you want to see it anyway? Universal Hero (talk) 11:53, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I fully believe you are not what some perceive you to be, and the checkuser will prove it. I think no useless discussions are needed. It's better if a checkuser is made and you get out of this silly story. I also cannot understand how such things are relevant after a two-year gap. It makes me laugh. You're one of the better editors I know, and I trust your fairness and goodwill (and that's what I'm going to say to anyone who has the intention to harm you and your wiki-reputation).

I'm ready to support you. Right now I can't see where my opinion values, because I did not have the time to do anything but glance for two bits, and I understand nothing. You caught me at a time I'm not less active (more than three days ago, I was very active), so did not have the time to examine the situation, as well as when, how and why it started. While here, I've always fought for the fareness and the general sake of Wikipedia as an encyclopedia. I never cared if I had to pay for that, and eventually people on here appreciated that. I advice you to do the same. Don't get disheartened. Don't hesitate to make me a post whenever you need to. Your friend, Shahid • ^Talk2me 16:58, 2 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'd like to see you working on some GAs. You do it wonderfully. Both Blof, Rahul and myself think very high of your work on South Indian articles (just like Mspraveen, another great guy). Please don't disappear now. I like editing, and I think this place is a great experience to learning. I did leave Wikipedia because I was forced to, but came back within two months. Now I don't know what exactly will be. I've learned not to take this place seriously, bewcause people outside don't do that either (LOL!!!)... Do the same!!! Shahid • ^Talk2me 17:11, 2 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have asked for an investigation of some of your image uploads here. Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard#Repeated_Copyright_fraud GameKeeper (talk) 18:28, 2 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I sort of need some help here. A user by the name of "User:Brajbilla2007" has been constantly uploading awkward images of Ajith Kumar to the Ajith Kumar and Asal pages after several warnings I gave him and keeps trying to add a new Billa 2 link to every possible article (such as Vishnuvardhan and Billa (2007 film)). I can't seem to make him stop messing up the Asal article either. Can you look into that please? Thanks. --Eelam StyleZ ^(talk) 04:00, 4 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Kantha.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the image (or other media file) agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the GFDL or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the image to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the image has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the image's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Images lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Anwar (talk) 19:21, 5 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have claimed to have downloaded this image straight from a website. Incase you are unaware, it is illegal. Did the producer of the film give you written permission to do so? Anwar (talk) 19:23, 5 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Replacing the tag is not a good idea.Anwar (talk) 19:25, 5 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Is Chennai365.com the producer of Poda Podi?Anwar (talk) 19:28, 5 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Universal Hero just wanted to inform you that you do not need permission from the copyright holder as Anwar is claiming if you are uploading a fair use. It seems like you know what is required for a fair use image but just in case you had any doubts all a fair use image needs is a fair use rationale and a license tag, eg: File:Flushed poster.jpg. However also keep in mind this only applies to items that fall under fair use such as posters, logos, cover art, etc. Keep up the good work. Salavat (talk) 03:19, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Podapodi112.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:20, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated Naga Chaitanya, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Naga Chaitanya. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Tabercil (talk) 04:22, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I really don't know how to explain you the difference between Poorkkalam and Porkaalam, nonethess I'm trying:

Look at the Tamil writing:

போர்க்களம் - The 2009 Tamil film directed by Bandi Saroj Kumar starring Kishore & Tinnu Anand. Meaning: Battlefield

and

பொற்காலம் - The 1997 Tamil film directed by Cheran starring Murali & Meena. Meaning: Golden Time /Age

Where the hell you see the similarities between these two Tamil words. Apart from the last letter (ம்), not a single letter is the same in both the words. The main difference is the "rka", try to see the difference between "ற்கா" (in பொற்காலம்) and "ர்க்க" (போர்க்களம்). No similarities, but you have titled both the films with the same title, not possible.

THE correct anglicized spelling of "போர்க்களம்" HAS TO BE "Poorkkalam" (or "Porkkalam" as you can't make a difference between "பொ" and "போ" in English writing), but in no case "Porkkaalam"!

And yeah, it may vary always slightly (by the way, I've never seen, someone writing "Egan"!), but this, you have to understand, is actually a "major" problem, since the meanings of the words are completely different and writing "Porkkaalam" instead of "Porkkalam" will falsify the meaning of the title.

And how does it happen, that you can't distinguish the difference between these two words, since everyone, who can speak, write and understand Tamil, will notice, that both the words can't be written in the same way, neither in English nor in another language!!!

Moreover, look at the OFFICIAL WEBSITE of that film or how other websites how written the film's title. You seem to be the only, single person in the world to spell that word in that way!

So you have to make a difference between both the words, make "Porkkalam" (or "Poorkkalam") out of "Porkkaalam" or I'll do it, in two days, at the latest!

Thanks, brother, take things easy and do try to understand, what I'm trying to tell you. I never thought, this would become such major issue! Anyhow, best wishes! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Johannes003 (talk • contribs) 11:23, 13 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but I didn't delete it, someone else did. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 13:25, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Are you going/continuing to write Sura article? Because, I'm thinking to write the Sura article on Wikipedia ?

World Cinema Writer (talk) 07:39, 21 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Kabir Toor, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Fails WP:CRIN and WP:ATHLETE, cricketer who is yet to play professional cricket, can be recreated when he does

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Jpeeling (talk) 10:02, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Some context for your comment would be excellent, then I might actually know what you're on about. PC78 (talk) 11:40, 3 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It's not my job to inform you -- if you care about the article you should have it on your watch list. The article quite clearly fails the applicable notability guidelines, so I would be very interested to read your "keep" rationale. PC78 (talk) 12:07, 3 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I hope you are doing well. I am sending you this message since you are a member of the GA WikiProject. I would like to invite you to consider helping with the GA sweeps process. Sweeps helps to ensure that the oldest GAs still meet the criteria, and improve the quality of GAs overall. Unfortunately, last month only two articles were reviewed. This is definitely a low point after our peak at the beginning of the process when 163 articles were reviewed in September 2007. After nearly two years, the running total has just passed the 50% mark. In order to expediate the reviewing, several changes have been made to the process. A new worklist has been created, detailing which articles are left to review. All exempt and previously reviewed articles have already been removed from the list. Instead of reviewing by topic, you can consider picking and choosing whichever articles interest you.

We are always looking for new members to assist with the remaining articles, so if you are interested or know of anybody that can assist, please visit the GA sweeps page. In addition, for every member that reviews 100 articles or has a significant impact on the process, s/he will get an award when they reach that threshold. If only 14 editors achieve this feat starting now, we would be done with Sweeps! Of course, having more people reviewing less articles would be better for all involved, so please consider asking others to help out. Feel free to stop by and only review a few articles, something's better than nothing! Take a look at the list, and see what articles interest you. Let's work to complete Sweeps so that efforts can be fully focused on the backlog at GAN. If you have any questions about the process, reviewing, or need help with a particular article, please contact me or OhanaUnited and we'll be happy to help. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 08:51, 8 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you recently tried to give Aaskar Films a different title by copying its content and pasting it into Aascar Films. This is known as a "cut and paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history which is needed for attribution and various other purposes. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page. This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other articles that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Cut and paste move repair holding pen. Thank you. R'n'B (call me Russ) 14:52, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for restoring the proper page--I couldn't see the forest for the trees anymore. Drmies (talk) 18:26, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Singam. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Singam. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:11, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

When you are creating a new article which is not yet complete, consider adding the {{underconstruction}} tag to the top when submitting it for the first time. This lets other editors know that you are actively working on it and plan to improve it with more information and references very soon. Without this tag it's difficult for other editors to distinguish articles which are being actively worked on from those that are incomplete and are likely to stay incomplete.--RadioFan (talk) 11:50, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Every film does not deserve an article, only those which meet Wikipedia:Notability (films) do. In any film articles you create, make sure that it's clear that the film has been widely distributed and/or include any major awards the film has won. Be sure to provide references for these facts or the article is likely to be nominated for deletion.--RadioFan (talk) 12:08, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding your comment here, please follow Wikipedia policy of assuming good faith. And if you cant assume good faith, you must not attack a fellow editor by making accusations of sockpuppetry across the site. If you feel the editor is an abusive sock puppet, make the appropriate request here Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations and await the results. -- The Red Pen of Doom 05:30, 2 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, guys. I'me sorry for what I've done. World Cinema Writer (talk • contributions) 05:58, 2 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Kabir Toor. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kabir Toor. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:18, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Thirumangalam (film), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

unreleased film lacking significant coverage in reliable source_s_

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. -- The Red Pen of Doom 12:31, 5 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, I'm really suprised seeing your article, Dasavathaaram didn't get WP:GA. I'm really taking deep interest on the article. I'll try to make edit and let's bring it up to WP:GA again. Regards, World Cinema Writer (talk • contributions) 05:09, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Furthermore, the title Dasavatharam, not Dasavathaaram. The ImdB reports the same too. Any testdirve, you can do here. Thank you. World Cinema Writer (talk • contributions) 05:49, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've finished my work and has nominated it to DYK and GA - Talk: Dasavathaaram/GA2. Hope it gets GA. World Cinema Writer (talk • contributions) 03:53, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fine, if you really doesn't need my help, nevermine. Anyway, the article was better in my edit. Are you still in fight with me. Because, I forget that long time ago. World Cinema Writer (talk • contributions) 11:40, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, if you see, that was th article i went so much active. And you reverted it. Just, make me felt sad. World Cinema Writer (talk • contributions) 11:46, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:TanishaVinay.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:12, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not make edits like this one where you inserted much unsourced , POV, superlative laden , commentary. Content in Wikipedia articles must be sourced and presented in a manner appropriate for an encyclopedia, not a fan homage or celebrity gossip mag. -- The Red Pen of Doom 11:55, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hey buddy! It has been a long time since I last talked to you. I am doing fine. How are you?? I managed to catch KI today, which, apparently was released two days earlier here in Toronto. The film is quite entertaining and I enjoyed it quite a lot. I haven't seen Pammal K. Sambandam so I am not sure if KI is indeed a remake of the film. Unfortunately, I haven't seen 13B though I will definitely try to get my hands on the DVD. Regards -- Bollywood Dreamz ^talk 02:30, 3 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unreferenced controversial biographical content to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Kamal Haasan. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -- The Red Pen of Doom 22:51, 3 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re your response on my page: you may not be a new editor, but even long term editors who continue to add unsourced and poorly sourced gossip to articles about living people will be blocked.-- The Red Pen of Doom 23:20, 3 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Universal Hero, and thanks for your work patrolling new changes. I am just informing you that I contested the speedy deletion of Vaana(Tamil film) - a page you tagged - because: The reason given is not a valid speedy deletion criterion. Please review the criteria for speedy deletion before tagging further pages. If you have any questions or problems, please let me know. NW (Talk) 23:24, 8 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, Universal Hero. If can, I'm planning to bring the article to WP:GA, if can as a competitor to Lage Raho Munna Bhai. World Cinema Writer (talk • contributions) 07:11, 23 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

As on the title, you knew that I writing an article entitled, Urimai Kural. I was in an intention to bring up the article to WP:FA. As if, I took Lage Raho Munna Bhai as my idol, not fully. I see that the article has a WP:IPA. So, I planned to put up a WP:IPA on my article. But, I don't know whether the IPA I wrote was correct or not. So, what I want you to help me about is to check the IPA. Cheers, World Cinema Writer (talk • contributions) 02:55, 24 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Come one, I knew that fact. What about the IPA? World Cinema Writer (talk • contributions) 12:03, 24 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. Of course on WP:GA first. World Cinema Writer (talk • contributions) 12:20, 24 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Look at WP:GA now? The article is still in sub-page. World Cinema Writer (talk • contributions) 12:33, 24 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Of course now. But, if you find a problem, don't move it. Tell me first. We'll discuss.World Cinema Writer (talk • contributions) 12:42, 24 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The names of Priya Anand's roles have been confirmed by reliable sources. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Arivoli.r (talk • contribs) 22:26, 24 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Universal Hero, and thanks for your work patrolling new changes. I am just informing you that I declined the speedy deletion of Yatra (Tamil Film) - a page you tagged - because: The reason given is not a valid speedy deletion criterion. Please review the criteria for speedy deletion before tagging further pages. If you have any questions or problems, please let me know. SoWhy 09:29, 28 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Dashaavataram-Gallery-2.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 07:21, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Dasavatharam-Stills-30.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 07:21, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding "Parattai Engira Azhagu Sundaram" music, the entire soundtrack, comprising of six songs, was defintely retained from the original Kannada version, composed by Gurukiran! As far as I know Yuvan Shankar was a part of the earlier crew, when Raju Sundaram was supposed to direct the film, so I guess, his name is still mentioned there, even after the director got changed. It is also possible, that Yuvan Shankar had scored only the background score, though I'm sure about this either.

However, this has to be clarified at first, until then I will hide your comment! Thanks, anyway!

Johannes003 (talk) 09:51, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, you're right, but I think, it was Simbu's opening song ("Thotta Powerda") that was composed by Yuvan! Johannes003 (talk) 10:21, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

hi buddy ! saw ur effort's ....welldone....nice work....i wish to work on Mullaperiyar Dam ....if possible it would be great to see u there ...regards--Doctor muthu's muthu ^{wanna talk ?} 13:16, 30 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please read and understand our policies about neutral point of view, original research, puffery. Do not return these unencyclopedic content to the article. -- The Red Pen of Doom 01:53, 4 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hey buddy!!! I'm happy to hear from you and I'm happy you're working on the south Filmfare Awards which have been in need of editing a long time ago. Sadly, there' not enough info about them, and there are so many languages that it's quite confusing. You created a wonderful page. Shahid • ^Talk2me 18:29, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

First, I hope you were not upset with what was happening on the Asin page. I had several discussions with TheRedPenofDoom as you can see on my and his talk pages.

New films. The only new film I saw was New York, which was good. BTW, it's quite amazing but several days back I saw a film with Kamal Haasan and Hema Malini - forgot the name. It is an amazing Hindi art film. Raaj Kumar plays his father and Padmini Kolhapure her daughter. And the elders fall for the youngsters. Kamal - well, as always great. He played an angry young man... LOL! Shahid • ^Talk2me 18:42, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

How can you compare Rajni to Haasan? I honestly was never impressed much by Rajnikanth. Kamal is a THREE-time National Award winning actor and he's had a great share of hits as well. He's an accomplished actor while Rajni is a star for no evident reason. It's my opinion of couse - I don't want anyone to get offended. I'm happy you appreciate art films. Have you seen Deepa Mehta's Heaven on Earth (film)? Preity was really really amazing!! She was nominated for several international awards and won an award at the international film festival of Chicago!

Looking forward to all these three films. And Kaminey, which releases tomorrow. Shahid • ^Talk2me 10:35, 13 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You said it very well: He is the master! He's made such amazing films - it's unbelievable. He's one of the few filmmakers who are able to combine total relality with art and making exceptionally artistic films without having to take anything from their realism. Dil Se is surprisingly enough one of my favourite Preity performances - although it's such a brief role. Mani sir has always extracted good performances from his actors - every actor has given one of his best in his films. Shahid • ^Talk2me 11:13, 13 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've deleted the article you created for Naga Chaitanya. Back in April of this year an earlier article on Naga was deleted after discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Naga Chaitanya, and I do not see any new information which would cause the article to overcome the earlier arguments for deletion. Tabercil (talk) 03:27, 19 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Okay... I've done some checking and I've undeleted the article. I'm not convinced he is notable, but I'll hold off on acting to allow others to start work on the article. Tabercil (talk) 01:59, 21 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Pokkisham, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a copy from http://kollywoodtopics.blogspot.com/2009/08/movie-review-pokkisham.html, and therefore a copyright violation. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under allowance license, then you should do one of the following:

• If you have permission from the author leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Pokkisham and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
• If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted ''under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL), versions 1.3 or later and Creative Commons Share Alike (CC-BY-SA), versions 3.0 or later, under CC-BY-SA, versions 3.0 or later, or that the material is released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Pokkisham with a link to where we can find that note.
• If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL and CC-BY-SA, and note that you have done so on Talk:Pokkisham. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Pokkisham saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Crowrlg (talk) 22:04, 19 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Azhagar Malai, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a copy from http://sify.com/movies/tamil/review.php?cid=2429, and therefore a copyright violation. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under allowance license, then you should do one of the following:

• If you have permission from the author leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Azhagar Malai and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
• If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted ''under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL), versions 1.3 or later and Creative Commons Share Alike (CC-BY-SA), versions 3.0 or later, under CC-BY-SA, versions 3.0 or later, or that the material is released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Azhagar Malai with a link to where we can find that note.
• If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL and CC-BY-SA, and note that you have done so on Talk:Azhagar Malai. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Azhagar Malai saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Crowrlg (talk) 22:05, 19 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not unnecessarily make text bold. This also applies to cast lists. Please check out the system we use for the rest of the film articles and try and keep your additions as closely linked to the system as possible. Thanks --Maurice45 (talk) 20:33, 30 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

That's all very well, but my edit wasn't vandalism, and I don't see how calling it "cheeky vandalism" helps prove anything. Please be more constructive and not criticise another's edits in such a way, simply calling it "vandalism" if you don't agree with it --Maurice45 (talk) 15:10, 2 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Concerning your contribution, File:Shriya Saran.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.flickr.com/photos/8286281@N08/2311107795/. As a copyright violation, File:Shriya Saran.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. File:Shriya Saran.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

• If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at File talk:Shriya Saran.jpg and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
• If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) and CC-BY-SA, under CC-BY-SA, or released into the public domain leave a note at File talk:Shriya Saran.jpg with a link to where we can find that note.
• If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on File talk:Shriya Saran.jpg.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. Martin H. (talk) 13:26, 19 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Uploded to Flickr in a larger size and befor you transfered it to Commons. Also you should archive this note instead of deleting this and you should take this as a warning to NOT repeat this false claims "This photo was taken by me in India" - which is a bloddy lie! I dont know what makes you lying in the anonymity of the internet, I just want to say you that this is a really bad behaviour. --Martin H. (talk) 13:30, 19 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

commons:Commons:Deletion requests/Files by User:Universal Hero is related to your uploads. Regards, --Martin H. (talk) 14:35, 19 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Rechipo, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.greatandhra.com/ganews/viewnews.php?id=16302&cat=&scat=12. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 13:32, 26 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi dude! whenever you get time. Can you please check the article Sri Lankan Tamil cinema and improve the quality of this article. Thank you .--BlueLankan 14:16, 26 September 2009 (UTC)

Dear hero pls dont modify/redirect unnikrishnan page to P. Unnikrishnan. you may be his fan. dont spoil me. it is a request. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.241.57.103 (talk) 08:46, 10 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Universal Hero,

just wanted to say thank you! Thank you for cleaning up those sites and thank you for helping me! These articles are full of fake and biased information and so cleaning up and putting references in order to prevent (or at least try to prevent) vandalism, was mandatory. It was actually actress Simran's page that made me to do so. (I'm sure, it's still not "clean"!) So, thank you for your help and support and keep on your good work! Johannes003 (talk) 15:44, 20 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Hello (1999 film), and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.thenisai.com/tamil/movies-cinema/hello-tamil-movies.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 17:42, 21 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

hey i found a lot of false facts in the page A.R.Rahman.Can u please debug that article please —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jasperroy (talk • contribs) 13:10, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Magadheera-wallpapers9 (1).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 06:39, 12 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Ajith party.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Amalthea 00:17, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
I can't see that page you just added, http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?pid=1940531&id=607246116. Main question is, does the owner of that picture explicitly release it into the public domain there?
Amalthea 00:27, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The page, goes to her official facebook page - where according to the new guidelines all material is accessible to the public. Furthermore, she has given me verbal authorisation, if you wish, I'll kindly ask her to produce some sort of note or so. :) Universal Hero (talk) 00:34, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

"Accessible to the public" is very different to releasing an image into the public domain, which is what you put on the file page! If she owns that image and wants to release it into the public domain or under a free license, she would need to follow the procedure laid out in Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. As it stands, it will have to be deleted (and believe me, I'd very much like having a clearly policy compliant picture for that actor so that I could stop deleting the copyright infringing ones!).
Amalthea 00:43, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply