User talk:Xgmx
From Wikipedia the free encyclopedia
Groovy trail of mystery[edit]
There is a rather long and hillarious trail that ends here. Thanks for the comedy Xgmx and stay banned everywhere from the internet — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.246.40.139 (talk) 18:29, 27 June 2012 (UTC)
 | Please do not unblock this user. |
Block?[edit]
- Xgmx (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
- 4.245.73.33 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)
Block message:
hardening block
- Blocking administrator: Daniel Case (talk • blocks)
Oh my god why can't I edit articles, it says block! please help me.--Xgmx (talk) 00:00, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
block 2[edit]
Here I recreated this with my username instead of my IP address, its probably easier for you tech support people out there.--Xgmx (talk) 00:03, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
If you continue to post false messages of unblocking yourself and add more unblock requests, I will protect this page. It isn't a playground. IrishGuy talk 01:01, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
Well the others disappeared and I would like to get this problem fixed asap (as soon as possible)--Xgmx (talk) 01:03, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
- It isn't going to be fixed. You were blocked for disruptive actions. Your actions on this talk page give me no reason to believe you will act different in the future. IrishGuy talk 01:10, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
- I'm afraid I'm going to have to come to xgmx's defense in this case.--4.244.33.244 talk 4.244.33.244|Contributions 23:51, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
unblock[edit]
Xgmx (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I'm sorry, I believe I was wrongly banned by Daniel Case though.
Decline reason:
Reviewing your contributions, the block was appropriate. Your actions at AfD were disruptive and you were told several times to stop. Please do not abuse this template, doing so will result in this talk page being protected. — Hersfold (t/a/c) 16:31, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
unblock 2 (since the other was declined)[edit]
Xgmx (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
original unblock reason
Decline reason:
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
sry[edit]
Xgmx (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I seriously won't mess around with Wikipedia any more, I promise, that Mayasia thing was just a joke.
Decline reason:
Sorry, you've been unblocked once already when we tried to give you a second chance, and you abused that chance. You're also trying to circumvent this block using your IP address, which is not allowed. — Hersfold (t/a/c) 21:04, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- lol I think you got me unblocked, because I can edit here now, thanks, I sure won't make the same mistake again. Besides Daniel Case is a rogue admin, so his bans don't count.
Or what? lol--xgmx (T | C | D | R)
thank you[edit]
Thank you so much for unblocking me, you won't regret it. Anyone happen to know the url to the one Wikipedia administrators school?--xgmx (T | C | D | R | DR)
- You aren't unblocked. Even while blocked, you are allowed to edit your user talk page to appeal your block, assuming you are being disruptive. If you check your block log [1] you'll see that you are still indef blocked, but the protection on your user talk page has been reduced from full to semi-protected which allows you to post here once again. Feel free to appeal your block using {{unblock}} if you want an admin to review your block status. Burzmali (talk) 12:14, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
- Ah yes, I recently noticed this, thank you Burzmali, when/if I get unblocked, I'll mention u on my userpage.--Xgmx (talk) 12:22, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
unblock[edit]
Xgmx (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I'm terribly sorry for all the trouble I've caused in the past, however I know what I did was wrong, if I could change what I did I would, but I can't, and so we must move on, and embrace our new destiny, I have decided to help Wikipedia, I can get through to people who are like I used to be, I used to occasionally vandalize Wikipedia (without even knowing it), these people aren't bad people, they just need someone to show them what there doing is wrong, please, please give me another chance, I will help Wikipedians everywhere (starting with the article: Prussia, I found a lot of false information in there that needs fixing once I'm unblocked).
Decline reason:
You already had one second chance after an indef block, and your behavior at the last AfD was highly disruptive despite warnings. - OhNoitsJamie Talk 14:36, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- Any admin thinking of granting the above request should read this ANI discussion. Hut 8.5 14:21, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
unblock 3[edit]
Xgmx (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Dear Wikipedia users and staff, I would like to express my sorrow for all the trouble I've caused you. Please understand that I have learned from my mistakes. I did not intentionally vandalize Wikipedia. I really really want to be a Wikipedia administrator, and please answer this question, what are the odds of a blocked user becoming a Wikipedia administrator. Well I don't really know what the odds are, but I doubt they are high. I am forced to give you this apology not in my talk page, because somebody protected my talk page so people can't contact me, and so I can't say I'm sorry. One of these days I will become a Wikipedia administrator and help people with their problems. I will also stop vandalism, I will be able to convince the vandals that are good and don't know that they are vandalising Wikipedia that what they are doing is wrong (I can get throught to these people, because I used to be one of them). I can get through to them, that way no one has to go through what I've been through ever again. I will also make very important edits about very important topics. Some of these topics include Prussia, the SS Free, Praize, Halo Delta, Subsim, Sword Forum International, Three Sixty Pacific, and others. Everyone, the only way we can fight rogue admins is if we all join together, remember there are more of us than there are of them, don't forget that 95% of Wikipedia's admins are actually good, I hate to say it but............Daniel Case could have originally been a good admin, he just likes banning people a lot. I will also pass Wikipedia rules against what Daniel Case did to me and so many others like me. I will also fix the blocking system, I will make it so people aren't automatically blocked, they will recieve a fair trial in which they are innocent until proven guilty. I will also remove the speedy deletion bot and so every article gets a fair trial before it is automatically deleted for no reason by a bot. I will also improve Wikipedia by making it more reliable, together we can make it so schools and universities allow Wikipedia as a source. I can not bring about this change alone, we must stand together, this is the world's encyclopedia/wiki/online encyclopedia, not just the admins, everyone has a say in the New Wikipedia. But before I can do all these great things, I have to be unblocked, like I said before, what are the odds of a blocked member being an administrator, some of you may say "Well if he/she is blocked, I don't think they can be that good of an admin, since they can't edit". But people, I'm not a bad person, I am here for you. I care about YOU! We need to think before we edit WIKIPEDIA! WE MUST STAND UNITED! OR VANDALS WILL DESTROY ALL OF WHICH WE FOUGHT SO HARD TO BUILD! Please people, take my hand, we shall make Wikipedia whole again. I will never again vandalize Wikipedia, the times in the past that I did, I am deeply sorry, but I can't change what I did, we have to live with it, we have to move on. Just think to yourself, what would Jesus do? Would Jesus smite me for making a mistake, or would he forgive me and give me a second or third chance? Do you know that pretty much every single day, for the past 2 years, I have apologized to Daniel Case and the other admins, for what I have done. And all they do is block the IP address and laugh at me. Please, look into your heart, I am deeply sorry. Please forgive me, I am not a poster, I am not an IP address, I am not a vandal, I am not a spammer, I am not a Wikipedian that apologizes to people just to get laughed at, I am not a Wikipedian at all, and neither are you, we are human beings, and its about time we get treated like we are. Did you know, that Daniel Case, hates me so much, that he wanted to ban all dial-up people whoi use Wikipedia. He also wanted to ban a company. If you don't believe me, read the ANI Notice led by Daniel Case about banning me. He talks about how much fun it would be to ban all Level 3 Communications Internet people. He thinks I use Level 3, which I don't, but he wanted to ban everyone for using the same type of Internet as me. He banned a company from Wikipedia, he banned Reenactor Entertainment's website and all of there games's websites just for fun. He also banned all InvisionFree users and urls, just because I use InvisionFree forums and he hates forums now. He banned all ZetaBoards forums and users as well, because InvisionFree's company, Zathyious Systems also made ZetaBoards. Can you be any more prejudice? I mean this guy makes the KKK look like a couple of Zerglings on StarCraft. Please unban me, I beg of you! People please, if you think I deserve another chance, please reply, and say it, please.
Decline reason:
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
why[edit]
Xgmx (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Why was my request denied
Decline reason:
You were given a second chance and you did nothing to become a productive contributor. All the evidence at the ANI discussion linked above is relatively straight-forward. Fool us once, shame on you... fool us twice, shame on us. No third time. Talk page protected due to unblock abuse, as your previous unblock request was really just a soapbox and didn't nothing toward helping your cause. Enough have wasted their time on this. --Kinu t/c 01:56, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Nomination of Terminal Voyage for deletion[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Terminal Voyage is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Terminal Voyage until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. /wia🎄/tlk 15:13, 13 December 2015 (UTC)