Neuromorphic engineering

From Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

Neuromorphic computing is an approach to computing that is inspired by the structure and function of the human brain.[1][2] A neuromorphic computer/chip is any device that uses physical artificial neurons to do computations.[3][4] In recent times, the term neuromorphic has been used to describe analog, digital, mixed-mode analog/digital VLSI, and software systems that implement models of neural systems (for perception, motor control, or multisensory integration). The implementation of neuromorphic computing on the hardware level can be realized by oxide-based memristors,[5] spintronic memories, threshold switches, transistors,[6][4] among others. Training software-based neuromorphic systems of spiking neural networks can be achieved using error backpropagation, e.g., using Python based frameworks such as snnTorch,[7] or using canonical learning rules from the biological learning literature, e.g., using BindsNet.[8]

A key aspect of neuromorphic engineering is understanding how the morphology of individual neurons, circuits, applications, and overall architectures creates desirable computations, affects how information is represented, influences robustness to damage, incorporates learning and development, adapts to local change (plasticity), and facilitates evolutionary change.

Neuromorphic engineering is an interdisciplinary subject that takes inspiration from biology, physics, mathematics, computer science, and electronic engineering[4] to design artificial neural systems, such as vision systems, head-eye systems, auditory processors, and autonomous robots, whose physical architecture and design principles are based on those of biological nervous systems.[9] One of the first applications for neuromorphic engineering was proposed by Carver Mead[10] in the late 1980s.

Neurological inspiration[edit]

Neuromorphic engineering is for now set apart by the inspiration it takes from what we know about the structure and operations of the brain. Neuromorphic engineering translates what we know about the brain's function into computer systems. Work has mostly focused on replicating the analog nature of biological computation and the role of neurons in cognition.

The biological processes of neurons and their synapses are dauntingly complex, and thus very difficult to artificially simulate. A key feature of biological brains is that all of the processing in neurons uses analog chemical signals. This makes it hard to replicate brains in computers because the current generation of computers is completely digital. However, the characteristics of these parts can be abstracted into mathematical functions that closely capture the essence of the neuron's operations.

The goal of neuromorphic computing is not to perfectly mimic the brain and all of its functions, but instead to extract what is known of its structure and operations to be used in a practical computing system. No neuromorphic system will claim nor attempt to reproduce every element of neurons and synapses, but all adhere to the idea that computation is highly distributed throughout a series of small computing elements analogous to a neuron. While this sentiment is standard, researchers chase this goal with different methods.[11]


As early as 2006, researchers at Georgia Tech published a field programmable neural array.[12] This chip was the first in a line of increasingly complex arrays of floating gate transistors that allowed programmability of charge on the gates of MOSFETs to model the channel-ion characteristics of neurons in the brain and was one of the first cases of a silicon programmable array of neurons.

In November 2011, a group of MIT researchers created a computer chip that mimics the analog, ion-based communication in a synapse between two neurons using 400 transistors and standard CMOS manufacturing techniques.[13][14]

In June 2012, spintronic researchers at Purdue University presented a paper on the design of a neuromorphic chip using lateral spin valves and memristors. They argue that the architecture works similarly to neurons and can therefore be used to test methods of reproducing the brain's processing. In addition, these chips are significantly more energy-efficient than conventional ones.[15]

Research at HP Labs on Mott memristors has shown that while they can be non-volatile, the volatile behavior exhibited at temperatures significantly below the phase transition temperature can be exploited to fabricate a neuristor,[16] a biologically-inspired device that mimics behavior found in neurons.[16] In September 2013, they presented models and simulations that show how the spiking behavior of these neuristors can be used to form the components required for a Turing machine.[17]

Neurogrid, built by Brains in Silicon at Stanford University,[18] is an example of hardware designed using neuromorphic engineering principles. The circuit board is composed of 16 custom-designed chips, referred to as NeuroCores. Each NeuroCore's analog circuitry is designed to emulate neural elements for 65536 neurons, maximizing energy efficiency. The emulated neurons are connected using digital circuitry designed to maximize spiking throughput.[19][20]

A research project with implications for neuromorphic engineering is the Human Brain Project that is attempting to simulate a complete human brain in a supercomputer using biological data. It is made up of a group of researchers in neuroscience, medicine, and computing.[21] Henry Markram, the project's co-director, has stated that the project proposes to establish a foundation to explore and understand the brain and its diseases, and to use that knowledge to build new computing technologies. The three primary goals of the project are to better understand how the pieces of the brain fit and work together, to understand how to objectively diagnose and treat brain diseases, and to use the understanding of the human brain to develop neuromorphic computers. That the simulation of a complete human brain will require a powerful supercomputer encourages the current focus on neuromorphic computers.[22] $1.3 billion has been allocated to the project by The European Commission.[23]

Other research with implications for neuromorphic engineering involve the BRAIN Initiative[24] and the TrueNorth chip from IBM.[25] Neuromorphic devices have also been demonstrated using nanocrystals, nanowires, and conducting polymers.[26] There also is development of a memristive device for quantum neuromorphic architectures.[27] In 2022, researchers at MIT have reported the development of brain-inspired artificial synapses, using the ion proton (H+
), for 'analog deep learning'.[28][29]

Intel unveiled its neuromorphic research chip, called "Loihi", in October 2017. The chip uses an asynchronous spiking neural network (SNN) to implement adaptive self-modifying event-driven fine-grained parallel computations used to implement learning and inference with high efficiency.[30][31]

IMEC, a Belgium-based nanoelectronics research center, demonstrated the world's first self-learning neuromorphic chip. The brain-inspired chip, based on OxRAM technology, has the capability of self-learning and has been demonstrated to have the ability to compose music.[32] IMEC released the 30-second tune composed by the prototype. The chip was sequentially loaded with songs in the same time signature and style. The songs were old Belgian and French flute minuets, from which the chip learned the rules at play and then applied them.[33]

The Blue Brain Project, led by Henry Markram, aims to build biologically detailed digital reconstructions and simulations of the mouse brain. The Blue Brain Project has created in silico models of rodent brains, while attempting to replicate as many details about its biology as possible. The supercomputer-based simulations offer new perspectives on understanding the structure and functions of the brain.

The European Union funded a series of projects at the University of Heidelberg, which led to the development of BrainScaleS (brain-inspired multiscale computation in neuromorphic hybrid systems), a hybrid analog neuromorphic supercomputer located at Heidelberg University, Germany. It was developed as part of the Human Brain Project neuromorphic computing platform and is the complement to the SpiNNaker supercomputer (which is based on digital technology). The architecture used in BrainScaleS mimics biological neurons and their connections on a physical level; additionally, since the components are made of silicon, these model neurons operate on average 864 times (24 hours of real time is 100 seconds in the machine simulation) that of their biological counterparts.[34]

In 2019, the European Union funded the project "Neuromorphic quantum computing"[35] exploring the use of neuromorphic computing to perform quantum operations. Neuromorphic quantum computing[36] (abbreviated as 'n.quantum computing') is an unconventional computing type of computing that uses neuromorphic computing to perform quantum operations.[37][38] It was suggested that quantum algorithms, which are algorithms that run on a realistic model of quantum computation, can be computed equally efficiently with neuromorphic quantum computing.[39][40][41][42][43] Both, traditional quantum computing and neuromorphic quantum computing are physics-based unconventional computing approaches to computations and do not follow the von Neumann architecture. They both construct a system (a circuit) that represents the physical problem at hand, and then leverage their respective physics properties of the system to seek the "minimum". Neuromorphic quantum computing and quantum computing share similar physical properties during computation.[43][44]

Brainchip announced in October 2021 that it was taking orders for its Akida AI Processor Development Kits[45] and in January 2022 that it was taking orders for its Akida AI Processor PCIe boards,[46] making it the world's first commercially available neuromorphic processor.

Neuromemristive systems[edit]

Neuromemristive systems are a subclass of neuromorphic computing systems that focuses on the use of memristors to implement neuroplasticity. While neuromorphic engineering focuses on mimicking biological behavior, neuromemristive systems focus on abstraction.[47] For example, a neuromemristive system may replace the details of a cortical microcircuit's behavior with an abstract neural network model.[48]

There exist several neuron inspired threshold logic functions[5] implemented with memristors that have applications in high level pattern recognition applications. Some of the applications reported recently include speech recognition,[49] face recognition[50] and object recognition.[51] They also find applications in replacing conventional digital logic gates.[52][53]

For (quasi)ideal passive memristive circuits, the evolution of the memristive memories can be written in a closed form (Caravelli–Traversa–Di Ventra equation):[54][55]

as a function of the properties of the physical memristive network and the external sources. The equation is valid for the case of the Williams-Strukov original toy model, as in the case of ideal memristors, . However, the hypothesis of the existence of an ideal memristor is debatable.[56] In the equation above, is the "forgetting" time scale constant, typically associated to memory volatility, while is the ratio of off and on values of the limit resistances of the memristors, is the vector of the sources of the circuit and is a projector on the fundamental loops of the circuit. The constant has the dimension of a voltage and is associated to the properties of the memristor; its physical origin is the charge mobility in the conductor. The diagonal matrix and vector and respectively, are instead the internal value of the memristors, with values between 0 and 1. This equation thus requires adding extra constraints on the memory values in order to be reliable.

It has been recently shown that the equation above exhibits tunneling phenomena and used to study Lyapunov functions.[57][55]

Neuromorphic sensors[edit]

The concept of neuromorphic systems can be extended to sensors (not just to computation). An example of this applied to detecting light is the retinomorphic sensor or, when employed in an array, the event camera. An event camera's pixels all register changes in brightness levels individually, which makes these cameras comparable to human eyesight in their theoretical power consumption[58]. In 2022, researchers from the Max Planck Institute for Polymer Research reported an organic artificial spiking neuron that exhibits the signal diversity of biological neurons while operating in the biological wetware, thus enabling in-situ neuromorphic sensing and biointerfacing applications.[59][60]

Military applications[edit]

The Joint Artificial Intelligence Center, a branch of the U.S. military, is a center dedicated to the procurement and implementation of AI software and neuromorphic hardware for combat use. Specific applications include smart headsets/goggles and robots. JAIC intends to rely heavily on neuromorphic technology to connect "every sensor (to) every shooter" within a network of neuromorphic-enabled units.

Ethical and legal considerations[edit]

While the interdisciplinary concept of neuromorphic engineering is relatively new, many of the same ethical considerations apply to neuromorphic systems as apply to human-like machines and artificial intelligence in general. However, the fact that neuromorphic systems are designed to mimic a human brain gives rise to unique ethical questions surrounding their usage.

However, the practical debate is that neuromorphic hardware as well as artificial "neural networks" are immensely simplified models of how the brain operates or processes information at a much lower complexity in terms of size and functional technology and a much more regular structure in terms of connectivity. Comparing neuromorphic chips to the brain is a very crude comparison similar to comparing a plane to a bird just because they both have wings and a tail. The fact is that biological neural cognitive systems are many orders of magnitude more energy- and compute-efficient than current state-of-the-art AI and neuromorphic engineering is an attempt to narrow this gap by inspiring from the brain's mechanism just like many engineering designs have bio-inspired features.

Social concerns[edit]

Significant ethical limitations may be placed on neuromorphic engineering due to public perception.[61] Special Eurobarometer 382: Public Attitudes Towards Robots, a survey conducted by the European Commission, found that 60% of European Union citizens wanted a ban of robots in the care of children, the elderly, or the disabled. Furthermore, 34% were in favor of a ban on robots in education, 27% in healthcare, and 20% in leisure. The European Commission classifies these areas as notably “human.” The report cites increased public concern with robots that are able to mimic or replicate human functions. Neuromorphic engineering, by definition, is designed to replicate the function of the human brain.[62]

The social concerns surrounding neuromorphic engineering are likely to become even more profound in the future. The European Commission found that EU citizens between the ages of 15 and 24 are more likely to think of robots as human-like (as opposed to instrument-like) than EU citizens over the age of 55. When presented an image of a robot that had been defined as human-like, 75% of EU citizens aged 15–24 said it corresponded with the idea they had of robots while only 57% of EU citizens over the age of 55 responded the same way. The human-like nature of neuromorphic systems, therefore, could place them in the categories of robots many EU citizens would like to see banned in the future.[62]


As neuromorphic systems have become increasingly advanced, some scholars[who?] have advocated for granting personhood rights to these systems. Daniel Lim, a critic of technology development in the Human Brain Project, which aims to advance brain-inspired computing, has argued that advancement in neuromorphic computing could lead to machine consciousness or personhood.[63] If these systems are to be treated as people, then many tasks humans perform using neuromorphic systems, including their termination, may be morally impermissible as these acts would violate their autonomy.[63]

Ownership and property rights[edit]

There is significant legal debate around property rights and artificial intelligence. In Acohs Pty Ltd v. Ucorp Pty Ltd, Justice Christopher Jessup of the Federal Court of Australia found that the source code for Material Safety Data Sheets could not be copyrighted as it was generated by a software interface rather than a human author.[64] The same question may apply to neuromorphic systems: if a neuromorphic system successfully mimics a human brain and produces a piece of original work, who, if anyone, should be able to claim ownership of the work?[65]

See also[edit]


  1. ^ Ham, Donhee; Park, Hongkun; Hwang, Sungwoo; Kim, Kinam (2021). "Neuromorphic electronics based on copying and pasting the brain". Nature Electronics. 4 (9): 635–644. doi:10.1038/s41928-021-00646-1. ISSN 2520-1131. S2CID 240580331.
  2. ^ van de Burgt, Yoeri; Lubberman, Ewout; Fuller, Elliot J.; Keene, Scott T.; Faria, Grégorio C.; Agarwal, Sapan; Marinella, Matthew J.; Alec Talin, A.; Salleo, Alberto (April 2017). "A non-volatile organic electrochemical device as a low-voltage artificial synapse for neuromorphic computing". Nature Materials. 16 (4): 414–418. Bibcode:2017NatMa..16..414V. doi:10.1038/nmat4856. ISSN 1476-4660. PMID 28218920.
  3. ^ Mead, Carver (1990). "Neuromorphic electronic systems" (PDF). Proceedings of the IEEE. 78 (10): 1629–1636. doi:10.1109/5.58356. S2CID 1169506.
  4. ^ a b c Rami A. Alzahrani; Alice C. Parker (July 2020). Neuromorphic Circuits With Neural Modulation Enhancing the Information Content of Neural Signaling. International Conference on Neuromorphic Systems 2020. pp. 1–8. doi:10.1145/3407197.3407204. S2CID 220794387.
  5. ^ a b Maan, A. K.; Jayadevi, D. A.; James, A. P. (January 1, 2016). "A Survey of Memristive Threshold Logic Circuits". IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems. PP (99): 1734–1746. arXiv:1604.07121. Bibcode:2016arXiv160407121M. doi:10.1109/TNNLS.2016.2547842. ISSN 2162-237X. PMID 27164608. S2CID 1798273.
  6. ^ Zhou, You; Ramanathan, S. (August 1, 2015). "Mott Memory and Neuromorphic Devices". Proceedings of the IEEE. 103 (8): 1289–1310. doi:10.1109/JPROC.2015.2431914. ISSN 0018-9219. S2CID 11347598.
  7. ^ Eshraghian, Jason K.; Ward, Max; Neftci, Emre; Wang, Xinxin; Lenz, Gregor; Dwivedi, Girish; Bennamoun, Mohammed; Jeong, Doo Seok; Lu, Wei D. (October 1, 2021). "Training Spiking Neural Networks Using Lessons from Deep Learning". arXiv:2109.12894.
  8. ^ "Hananel-Hazan/bindsnet: Simulation of spiking neural networks (SNNs) using PyTorch". GitHub. March 31, 2020.
  9. ^ Boddhu, S. K.; Gallagher, J. C. (2012). "Qualitative Functional Decomposition Analysis of Evolved Neuromorphic Flight Controllers". Applied Computational Intelligence and Soft Computing. 2012: 1–21. doi:10.1155/2012/705483.
  10. ^ Mead, Carver A.; Mahowald, M. A. (January 1, 1988). "A silicon model of early visual processing". Neural Networks. 1 (1): 91–97. doi:10.1016/0893-6080(88)90024-X. ISSN 0893-6080.
  11. ^ Furber, Steve (2016). "Large-scale neuromorphic computing systems". Journal of Neural Engineering. 13 (5): 1–15. Bibcode:2016JNEng..13e1001F. doi:10.1088/1741-2560/13/5/051001. PMID 27529195.
  12. ^ Farquhar, Ethan; Hasler, Paul. (May 2006). "A Field Programmable Neural Array". 2006 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems. pp. 4114–4117. doi:10.1109/ISCAS.2006.1693534. ISBN 978-0-7803-9389-9. S2CID 206966013.
  13. ^ "MIT creates "brain chip"". Retrieved December 4, 2012.
  14. ^ Poon, Chi-Sang; Zhou, Kuan (2011). "Neuromorphic silicon neurons and large-scale neural networks: challenges and opportunities". Frontiers in Neuroscience. 5: 108. doi:10.3389/fnins.2011.00108. PMC 3181466. PMID 21991244.
  15. ^ Sharad, Mrigank; Augustine, Charles; Panagopoulos, Georgios; Roy, Kaushik (2012). "Proposal For Neuromorphic Hardware Using Spin Devices". arXiv:1206.3227 [cond-mat.dis-nn].
  16. ^ a b Pickett, M. D.; Medeiros-Ribeiro, G.; Williams, R. S. (2012). "A scalable neuristor built with Mott memristors". Nature Materials. 12 (2): 114–7. Bibcode:2013NatMa..12..114P. doi:10.1038/nmat3510. PMID 23241533. S2CID 16271627.
  17. ^ Matthew D Pickett & R Stanley Williams (September 2013). "Phase transitions enable computational universality in neuristor-based cellular automata". Nanotechnology. 24 (38). IOP Publishing Ltd. 384002. Bibcode:2013Nanot..24L4002P. doi:10.1088/0957-4484/24/38/384002. PMID 23999059. S2CID 9910142.
  18. ^ Boahen, Kwabena (April 24, 2014). "Neurogrid: A Mixed-Analog-Digital Multichip System for Large-Scale Neural Simulations". Proceedings of the IEEE. 102 (5): 699–716. doi:10.1109/JPROC.2014.2313565. S2CID 17176371.
  19. ^ Waldrop, M. Mitchell (2013). "Neuroelectronics: Smart connections". Nature. 503 (7474): 22–4. Bibcode:2013Natur.503...22W. doi:10.1038/503022a. PMID 24201264.
  20. ^ Benjamin, Ben Varkey; Peiran Gao; McQuinn, Emmett; Choudhary, Swadesh; Chandrasekaran, Anand R.; Bussat, Jean-Marie; Alvarez-Icaza, Rodrigo; Arthur, John V.; Merolla, Paul A.; Boahen, Kwabena (2014). "Neurogrid: A Mixed-Analog-Digital Multichip System for Large-Scale Neural Simulations". Proceedings of the IEEE. 102 (5): 699–716. doi:10.1109/JPROC.2014.2313565. S2CID 17176371.
  21. ^ "Involved Organizations". Archived from the original on March 2, 2013. Retrieved February 22, 2013.
  22. ^ "Human Brain Project". Retrieved February 22, 2013.
  23. ^ "The Human Brain Project and Recruiting More Cyberwarriors". January 29, 2013. Retrieved February 22, 2013.
  24. ^ Neuromorphic computing: The machine of a new soul, The Economist, 2013-08-03
  25. ^ Modha, Dharmendra (August 2014). "A million spiking-neuron integrated circuit with a scalable communication network and interface". Science. 345 (6197): 668–673. Bibcode:2014Sci...345..668M. doi:10.1126/science.1254642. PMID 25104385. S2CID 12706847.
  26. ^ Fairfield, Jessamyn (March 1, 2017). "Smarter Machines" (PDF).
  27. ^ Spagnolo, Michele; Morris, Joshua; Piacentini, Simone; Antesberger, Michael; Massa, Francesco; Crespi, Andrea; Ceccarelli, Francesco; Osellame, Roberto; Walther, Philip (April 2022). "Experimental photonic quantum memristor". Nature Photonics. 16 (4): 318–323. arXiv:2105.04867. Bibcode:2022NaPho..16..318S. doi:10.1038/s41566-022-00973-5. ISSN 1749-4893. S2CID 234358015.
    News article: "Erster "Quanten-Memristor" soll KI und Quantencomputer verbinden". DER STANDARD (in Austrian German). Retrieved April 28, 2022.
    Lay summary report: "Artificial neurons go quantum with photonic circuits". University of Vienna. Retrieved April 19, 2022.
  28. ^ "'Artificial synapse' could make neural networks work more like brains". New Scientist. Retrieved August 21, 2022.
  29. ^ Onen, Murat; Emond, Nicolas; Wang, Baoming; Zhang, Difei; Ross, Frances M.; Li, Ju; Yildiz, Bilge; del Alamo, Jesús A. (July 29, 2022). "Nanosecond protonic programmable resistors for analog deep learning" (PDF). Science. 377 (6605): 539–543. Bibcode:2022Sci...377..539O. doi:10.1126/science.abp8064. ISSN 0036-8075. PMID 35901152. S2CID 251159631.
  30. ^ Davies, Mike; et al. (January 16, 2018). "Loihi: A Neuromorphic Manycore Processor with On-Chip Learning". IEEE Micro. 38 (1): 82–99. doi:10.1109/MM.2018.112130359. S2CID 3608458.
  31. ^ Morris, John. "Why Intel built a neuromorphic chip". ZDNet. Retrieved August 17, 2018.
  32. ^ "Imec demonstrates self-learning neuromorphic chip that composes music". IMEC International. Retrieved October 1, 2019.
  33. ^ Bourzac, Katherine (May 23, 2017). "A Neuromorphic Chip That Makes Music". IEEE Spectrum. Retrieved October 1, 2019.
  34. ^ "Beyond von Neumann, Neuromorphic Computing Steadily Advances". HPCwire. March 21, 2016. Retrieved October 8, 2021.
  35. ^ "Neuromrophic Quantum Computing | Quromorphic Project | Fact Sheet | H2020". CORDIS | European Commission. doi:10.3030/828826. Retrieved March 18, 2024.
  36. ^ Pehle, Christian; Wetterich, Christof (March 30, 2021), Neuromorphic quantum computing, arXiv:2005.01533, retrieved March 18, 2024
  37. ^ Wetterich, C. (November 1, 2019). "Quantum computing with classical bits". Nuclear Physics B. 948: 114776. arXiv:1806.05960. doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2019.114776. ISSN 0550-3213.
  38. ^ Pehle, Christian; Meier, Karlheinz; Oberthaler, Markus; Wetterich, Christof (October 24, 2018), Emulating quantum computation with artificial neural networks, arXiv:1810.10335, retrieved March 18, 2024
  39. ^ Carleo, Giuseppe; Troyer, Matthias (February 10, 2017). "Solving the quantum many-body problem with artificial neural networks". Science. 355 (6325): 602–606. arXiv:1606.02318. doi:10.1126/science.aag2302. ISSN 0036-8075. PMID 28183973.
  40. ^ Torlai, Giacomo; Mazzola, Guglielmo; Carrasquilla, Juan; Troyer, Matthias; Melko, Roger; Carleo, Giuseppe (May 2018). "Neural-network quantum state tomography". Nature Physics. 14 (5): 447–450. arXiv:1703.05334. doi:10.1038/s41567-018-0048-5. ISSN 1745-2481.
  41. ^ Sharir, Or; Levine, Yoav; Wies, Noam; Carleo, Giuseppe; Shashua, Amnon (January 16, 2020). "Deep Autoregressive Models for the Efficient Variational Simulation of Many-Body Quantum Systems". Physical Review Letters. 124 (2): 020503. arXiv:1902.04057. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.124.020503. PMID 32004039.
  42. ^ Broughton, Michael; Verdon, Guillaume; McCourt, Trevor; Martinez, Antonio J.; Yoo, Jae Hyeon; Isakov, Sergei V.; Massey, Philip; Halavati, Ramin; Niu, Murphy Yuezhen (August 26, 2021), TensorFlow Quantum: A Software Framework for Quantum Machine Learning, arXiv:2003.02989, retrieved March 18, 2024
  43. ^ a b Di Ventra, Massimiliano (March 23, 2022), MemComputing vs. Quantum Computing: some analogies and major differences, arXiv:2203.12031, retrieved March 18, 2024
  44. ^ Wilkinson, Samuel A.; Hartmann, Michael J. (June 8, 2020). "Superconducting quantum many-body circuits for quantum simulation and computing". Applied Physics Letters. 116 (23). arXiv:2003.08838. doi:10.1063/5.0008202. ISSN 0003-6951.
  45. ^ "Taking Orders of Akida AI Processor Development Kits". October 21, 2021.
  46. ^ "First mini PCIexpress board with spiking neural network chip". January 19, 2022.
  47. ^ "002.08 N.I.C.E. Workshop 2014: Towards Intelligent Computing with Neuromemristive Circuits and Systems – Feb. 2014". Retrieved August 26, 2019.
  48. ^ C. Merkel and D. Kudithipudi, "Neuromemristive extreme learning machines for pattern classification," ISVLSI, 2014.
  49. ^ Maan, A.K.; James, A.P.; Dimitrijev, S. (2015). "Memristor pattern recogniser: isolated speech word recognition". Electronics Letters. 51 (17): 1370–1372. Bibcode:2015ElL....51.1370M. doi:10.1049/el.2015.1428. hdl:10072/140989. S2CID 61454815.
  50. ^ Maan, Akshay Kumar; Kumar, Dinesh S.; James, Alex Pappachen (January 1, 2014). "Memristive Threshold Logic Face Recognition". Procedia Computer Science. 5th Annual International Conference on Biologically Inspired Cognitive Architectures, 2014 BICA. 41: 98–103. doi:10.1016/j.procs.2014.11.090. hdl:10072/68372.
  51. ^ Maan, A.K.; Kumar, D.S.; Sugathan, S.; James, A.P. (October 1, 2015). "Memristive Threshold Logic Circuit Design of Fast Moving Object Detection". IEEE Transactions on Very Large Scale Integration (VLSI) Systems. 23 (10): 2337–2341. arXiv:1410.1267. doi:10.1109/TVLSI.2014.2359801. ISSN 1063-8210. S2CID 9647290.
  52. ^ James, A.P.; Francis, L.R.V.J.; Kumar, D.S. (January 1, 2014). "Resistive Threshold Logic". IEEE Transactions on Very Large Scale Integration (VLSI) Systems. 22 (1): 190–195. arXiv:1308.0090. doi:10.1109/TVLSI.2012.2232946. ISSN 1063-8210. S2CID 7357110.
  53. ^ James, A.P.; Kumar, D.S.; Ajayan, A. (November 1, 2015). "Threshold Logic Computing: Memristive-CMOS Circuits for Fast Fourier Transform and Vedic Multiplication". IEEE Transactions on Very Large Scale Integration (VLSI) Systems. 23 (11): 2690–2694. arXiv:1411.5255. doi:10.1109/TVLSI.2014.2371857. ISSN 1063-8210. S2CID 6076956.
  54. ^ Caravelli; et al. (2017). "The complex dynamics of memristive circuits: analytical results and universal slow relaxation". Physical Review E. 95 (2): 022140. arXiv:1608.08651. Bibcode:2017PhRvE..95b2140C. doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.95.022140. PMID 28297937. S2CID 6758362.
  55. ^ a b Caravelli; et al. (2021). "Global minimization via classical tunneling assisted by collective force field formation". Science Advances. 7 (52): 022140. arXiv:1608.08651. Bibcode:2021SciA....7.1542C. doi:10.1126/sciadv.abh1542. PMID 28297937. S2CID 231847346.
  56. ^ Abraham, Isaac (July 20, 2018). "The case for rejecting the memristor as a fundamental circuit element". Scientific Reports. 8 (1): 10972. Bibcode:2018NatSR...810972A. doi:10.1038/s41598-018-29394-7. ISSN 2045-2322. PMC 6054652. PMID 30030498.
  57. ^ Sheldon, Forrest (2018). Collective Phenomena in Memristive Networks: Engineering phase transitions into computation. UC San Diego Electronic Theses and Dissertations.
  58. ^ Skorka, Orit (July 1, 2011). "Toward a digital camera to rival the human eye". Journal of Electronic Imaging. 20 (3): 033009. doi:10.1117/1.3611015. ISSN 1017-9909.
  59. ^ Sarkar, Tanmoy; Lieberth, Katharina; Pavlou, Aristea; Frank, Thomas; Mailaender, Volker; McCulloch, Iain; Blom, Paul W. M.; Torriccelli, Fabrizio; Gkoupidenis, Paschalis (November 7, 2022). "An organic artificial spiking neuron for in situ neuromorphic sensing and biointerfacing". Nature Electronics. 5 (11): 774–783. doi:10.1038/s41928-022-00859-y. hdl:10754/686016. ISSN 2520-1131. S2CID 253413801.
  60. ^ "Artificial neurons emulate biological counterparts to enable synergetic operation". Nature Electronics. 5 (11): 721–722. November 10, 2022. doi:10.1038/s41928-022-00862-3. ISSN 2520-1131. S2CID 253469402.
  61. ^ 2015 Study Panel (September 2016). Artificial Intelligence and Life in 2030 (PDF). One Hundred Year Study on Artificial Intelligence (AI100) (Report). Stanford University. Archived from the original (PDF) on May 30, 2019. Retrieved December 26, 2019.{{cite report}}: CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link)
  62. ^ a b European Commission (September 2012). "Special Eurobarometer 382: Public Attitudes Towards Robots" (PDF). European Commission.
  63. ^ a b Lim, Daniel (June 1, 2014). "Brain simulation and personhood: a concern with the Human Brain Project". Ethics and Information Technology. 16 (2): 77–89. doi:10.1007/s10676-013-9330-5. ISSN 1572-8439. S2CID 17415814.
  64. ^ Lavan. "Copyright in source code and digital products". Lavan. Retrieved May 10, 2019.
  65. ^ Eshraghian, Jason K. (March 9, 2020). "Human Ownership of Artificial Creativity". Nature Machine Intelligence. 2 (3): 157–160. doi:10.1038/s42256-020-0161-x. S2CID 215991449.

External links[edit]