User talk:Inda19712003

Hello, I'm Roller26. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Suresh Chatwal have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. Roller26 (talk) 10:56, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Gully Boy, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. SUN EYE 1 17:03, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Inda19712003. Welcome to Wikipedia!

I'm Suneye1, one of the other editors here, and I hope you decide to stay and help contribute to this amazing repository of knowledge.

Some pages of helpful information:   Introduction to Wikipedia   The five pillars of Wikipedia   Editing tutorial   How to edit a page   Simplified Manual of Style

The basics of Wikicode   How to develop an article   How to create an article   Help pages   What Wikipedia is not

Some common sense Dos and Don'ts:   Do be bold   Do assume good faith   Do be civil   Do cite reliable sources   Do maintain a neutral point of view

Don't spam   Don't infringe copyright   Don't add original research   Don't commit vandalism   Don't get blocked

If you need further help, you can:   Ask a question

or you can:   Get help at the Teahouse

or even:   Ask an experienced editor to "adopt" you

Remember to always sign your posts on talk pages. You can do this either by clicking on the button on the edit toolbar or by typing four tildes ~~~~ at the end of your post. This will automatically insert your signature, a link to this (your talk) page, and a timestamp.

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that in this edit to Jameel Khan, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 15:02, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Omkar Kapoor, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Model. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:20, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey can you tell me how to put picture on someone’s Wikipedia page ? Inda19712003 (talk) 07:29, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Harsh Vashisht. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Do not add unsourced content. DO not remove source either, unless you can provide a better source. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 10:15, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Abhinav Kashyap, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gabbar Singh.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:21, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sanjay Gagnani, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gold Award.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:12, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kyun Utthe Dil Chhod Aaye is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kyun Utthe Dil Chhod Aaye until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

DasSoumik (talk) 14:25, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I see you're working on the above mentioned page. Before you go through too much trouble, I see a draft over at Draft:Kyun Utthe Dil Chhod Aaye? that appears to cover the same subject. I just want to let you know - it may be easier for us to just move that to mainspace if it's ready. I don't quite have time to review it or I would offer to do it myself, but I wanted let you know.  A S U K I T E  14:44, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article Zaan Khan has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 15:47, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A page you created has been nominated for deletion because it is a biography of a living person that is entirely negative in tone and has unsourced content, according to section G10 of the criteria for speedy deletion. 16:25, 24 March 2021 (UTC)86.0.64.29 (talk) Do not create articles about living people that are entirely negative in tone and unsourced. Wikipedia has a policy of verifiability and any negative information we use must be reliably sourced, and our articles must be balanced. Negative, unreferenced biographies of living people, along with attack pages, are not tolerated by Wikipedia, and users who create or repost such pages and images in violation of our biographies of living persons policy may be blocked from editing. 86.0.64.29 (talk) 16:23, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Inda19712003,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Umakant Bhalerao and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I have tagged an article that you started, Zaan Khan, for deletion, because a consensus decision previously decided that it wasn't suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. If you wish to restore a page deleted via a deletion discussion, please use the deletion review process instead, rather than reposting the content of the page.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the deleting administrator.

For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Umakant Bhalerao}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 17:34, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Puneet Vashisht, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. noq (talk) 19:09, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Fails WP:ANYBIO / WP:NACTOR - IMDb and Instagram are not acceptable or reliable sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Puneet Vashisht and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Puneet Vashisht, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 03:20, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Inda19712003! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dan arndt (talk) 03:20, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Zaan Khan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zaan Khan (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 10:50, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Harssh A. Singh, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Director.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:10, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mulraj Rajda, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Director and Gujarati.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:09, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article Anjum Sharma has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable actor. Article states that subject is notable for Mirzapur, but is not listed as having a major role in Mirzapur. A draft has also been created, possibly to game the system, so that this article cannot be pushed back into draft space.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Robert McClenon (talk) 16:39, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Anjum Sharma is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anjum Sharma until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Robert McClenon (talk) 14:50, 22 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article Gaurav Sharma (actor) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable actor who doesn't satisfy any criterion from NACTOR and also fails WP:GNG. IWMBuzz is a wedding announcement.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 09:53, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

He’s an actor who has played many roles he is part of Indian industry for a decade now. On what basis, you can propose this page for deletion. It’s not acceptable. Inda19712003 (talk) 10:04, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Gaurav Sharma (actor), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. GSS ^💬 05:01, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Hitesh Makhija requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. CommanderWaterford (talk) 11:01, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kunaal Roy Kapur, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Director.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article Vinod Nagpal has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable actor. Fails WP:NACTOR.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 12:45, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Abhinn Sharma is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abhinn Sharma until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 05:24, 18 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Hitesh Makhija. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 May 27#Hitesh Makhija until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 15:43, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't create circular wikilinks that send readers to the same article that they are already reading (such as those you created at A Suitable Boy (TV series)). They are disorienting for readers and create more work for other editors who will have to fix them. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 16:25, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

So,please guide me how to make someone page which shouldn't be deleted. My last 5 pages have been deleted. Inda19712003 (talk) 17:11, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds like you might need to review our notability guidelines for inclusion, a simplified version of which can be found here. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 17:21, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Wamiqa Gabbi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Punjabi.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sameer Rajda, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Uttara.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Ajay Bahl. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 June 11#Ajay Bahl until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. -- Tamzin (she/they) | o toki tawa mi. 12:38, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Puneet Vashisht. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 June 14#Puneet Vashisht until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. noq (talk) 14:51, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Vinod Nagpal, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Blue Mountains.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:52, 16 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Harsh Vashisht, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Brahmachari.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nakul Roshan Sahdev is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nakul Roshan Sahdev until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 17:44, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'm gonna address the problem with this page. Please don't delete this. Inda19712003 (talk) 02:44, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Gagan Dev Riar, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 17:10, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Aditi Jaltare, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Marathi.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Puneet Vashisht. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 July 2#Puneet Vashisht until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. noq (talk) 09:54, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Anisha Kapur. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 July 2#Anisha Kapur until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. noq (talk) 10:08, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Inda19712003

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username MPGuy2824 and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I've asked for a discussion about the redirect Ritu Vashisht, created by you. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 July 2#Ritu Vashisht.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|MPGuy2824}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

MPGuy2824 (talk) 10:14, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Puneet Vashisht requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. DJRSD (talk) 11:48, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Brahmachari (actor). The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 July 2#Brahmachari (actor) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. noq (talk) 12:59, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Nakul Roshan Sahdev. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. noq (talk) 17:09, 4 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I addressed all the problems related to this page. That’s why I deleted the notices. Inda19712003 (talk) 17:13, 4 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The discussions are still ongoing - deleting the notices does not stop that. What it does is make it harder for anyone coming across the article to participate in the discussion and can increase the likelihood of articles being deleted. If you want to prevent that, participate in the discussion rather than hiding it. noq (talk) 14:58, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not insert more than one official website of a subject, please see WP:ELMINOFFICIAL. Social networks are already discouraged, and Wikipedia does not link to all available web-presences of a subject. Thanks. Dirk Beetstra ^{T C} 11:21, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Inda19712003, please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history. Jay ^(Talk) 13:48, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have been making plenty of edits at Rasika Dugal and not one of them have an edit summary. Jay ^(Talk) 03:58, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Inda19712003, you have made close to 100 edits on July 15,16 and August 2,3 and not a single one of them have an edit summary. It becomes very difficult for reviewers to go over your edits. Let us know if you have questions or concerns about using it. Jay ^(Talk) 08:00, 3 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Inda19712003, please use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the article will look like without actually saving it.

It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. If you have any questions, you can ask at the help desk. Jay ^(Talk) 14:38, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have made 9 edits at Rasika Dugal in the space of 10 minutes. Use the preview feature if you wish to see how your edit looks, before submitting. Jay ^(Talk) 04:00, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Inda19712003, you have made 26 edits on July 15, 48 edits on July 16, 10 edits on August 2, 11 edits so far on August 3. It becomes very hard for reviewers to go over all the quick changes. Use the Preview, make more changes and lesser Saves. Jay ^(Talk) 07:55, 3 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Abhinn Sharma. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 July 15#Abhinn Sharma until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. noq (talk) 15:46, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The earlier nomination was withdrawn. Renominated at WP:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 September 21#Abhinn Sharma. Jay ^(Talk) 14:54, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Siddhant Karnick, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page French.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Nakul Roshan Sahdev. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 July 25#Nakul Roshan Sahdev until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. noq (talk) 11:00, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Rasika Dugal, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Audible.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Chandrachur Singh, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Host.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 15 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect International Iconic Awards. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 September 11#International Iconic Awards until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 14:15, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Hitlist OTT Awards. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 September 20#Hitlist OTT Awards until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 18:13, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Inda19712003. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Puneet Vashisht, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 06:01, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Shanker Shesh, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bilaspur.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Inda19712003, please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.STC1 _talk 15:25, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have made 47 edits at Shipra Khanna and not one of them have an edit summary.STC1 _talk 15:25, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

See #Edit_summaries where I requested Inda19712003 multiple times to add an edit summary. I don't think there has been an edit summary in the last 2000 edits by the user since July (I didn't check further back). This is a candidate for the noticeboard per WP:LISTENTOUS. Jay ^(Talk) 17:36, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Chandrachur Singh shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. PRAXIDICAE🌈 18:44, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Inda19712003. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Puneet Vashisht".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:28, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Mahaakshay Chakraborty, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Tayi Arajakate _Talk 14:39, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Parmeet Sethi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Punjabi.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:59, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Tryst With Destiny (film). The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 November 23#Tryst With Destiny (film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 18:16, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Inda19712003. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Sameer Saxena".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:09, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Inda19712003. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Gaurav Sharma (actor), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:01, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Inda19712003. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Gagan Dev Riar, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:02, 2 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Abhilash Thapliyal, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page TVF.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 6 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mithun Chakraborty filmography, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bengali cinema.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Zippybonzo. I noticed that you recently removed content from Annu Kapoor without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Zippy (talk) 13:50, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Malvika Raaj requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Mccapra (talk) 08:40, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Rinzing Denzongpa requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Mccapra (talk) 08:40, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ahmed Masi Wali is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ahmed Masi Wali until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:34, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Ahmed Masi Wali. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. This is an automated message from a bot about this edit, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it.—^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 15:58, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Inda19712003. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Gaurav Sharma".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:58, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Inda19712003 (talk · contribs), I was trying to create an article for Kaun Banegi Shikharwati & found that it has been redirected.
Questions -> Can you share the reason for redirection? & Is it fine to create an article? -- VKG1985 (Talk | E-Mail | Contrib) 07:09, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, no problem go ahead and create Inda19712003 (talk) 07:12, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Sohaila Kapur requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://theatretime.wordpress.com/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 16:52, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jackie Shroff, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gujarati.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Namashi Chakraborty is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Namashi Chakraborty until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Ab207 (talk) 07:35, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Faisal Rashid (actor) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Faisal Rashid (actor) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

hemantha (brief) 09:55, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jatin Sial is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jatin Sial (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Skarmory (talk • contribs) 09:53, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm IAmChaos. I noticed that you recently removed content from [[:Manoj Kumar filmography]] without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. As the original author of this redirect, you might also choose to have the pages deleted under the Criteria for Speedy Deletion number G7. TO do that, go to the page, and add {{Db-G7}} to the top (before the line that says REDIRECT). Happy Editing--IAmChaos 22:36, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Sunil Lahri, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Do not change sourced content, do not add unsourced. See WP:V. Use reliable sources WP:RS. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 19:56, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

All awards require citation. When you add awards, please add citations for them at the same time. Thanks. Skyerise (talk) 17:27, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of awards and nominations received by Daniel Radcliffe, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kill Your Darlings.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Pratik Gandhi ‎. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. WP:BLP is quite serious. Toddst1 (talk) 14:53, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Accompany newly added content with reliable sources, which you are still not doing in a lot of places. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 19:23, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from one or more pages into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you.

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sidharth Malhotra, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page IWM.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Inda19712003

Thank you for creating Shekhar Kapur's unrealized projects.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Nice work. Probably should be merged into his article bu I marked it as reviewed. Happy editing!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 02:10, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@North8000: glad you liked it. Inda19712003 (talk) 17:57, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Abhay Chopra, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page New York.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:40, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Juno Chopra requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator.  DIVINE  05:09, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]