User talk:PK2

Archives

Archive 1

This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 20 sections are present.

Hi PK2! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mdewman6 (talk • contribs) 00:22, July 9, 2023 (UTC)

I would like to repeat this reminder regarding this edit on Template:Excessive citations inline/doc on March 3. Thank you. — W.andrea (talk) 22:50, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Coat of arms of Groningen (disambiguation) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This disambiguation page contains the primary topic and one other topic for the ambiguous title and no other topics can be found within a reasonable time.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Also:

• Flag of Groningen (disambiguation)
• Atikamekw (disambiguation)
• Flag of Anzoátegui (disambiguation)

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:01, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

MkgutSE 2603:8000:700:5B6A:789F:6703:6D79:4379 (talk) 18:38, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:32, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ceratodus is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ceratodus until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Hemiauchenia (talk) 18:25, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello PK2, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Language (general concept), should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Language (general concept).

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|BuySomeApples}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

BuySomeApples (talk) 00:08, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Namespace conversion has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 14:03, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Overview of The Windsor Lines has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 January 5 § Overview of The Windsor Lines until a consensus is reached. Nightfury 20:53, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Education noticeboard has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 January 15 § Education noticeboard until a consensus is reached. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 21:07, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey PK2. I appreciate all the effort you've put into maintaining the list. I was thinking, if there are some removed charts you'd like to preserve, maybe we could create a new article on Meta called "List of Wikipedias (charts)" or something like that?

Also, I've been considering the problem of the creation dates being unsourced in the article. It might be difficult, but if we could get a developer to create a table on Meta, it could make sourcing most of the dates much easier. I also had an interesting discussion with GreenC and a few other people about this last year at User talk:GreenC § Wikipedia edition launch dates. Regards. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 02:10, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I reverted your edits on Bracket, and I explained why some of the changes were bad in my edit summary, but I just wanted to explain why some of the other changes were unnecessary. The good changes I went ahead and redid.

Firstly, I just wanted to mention that I wrote nonsense "uma dúvida ... Angle bracket pi" (copy-paste error?) in the edit summary, but I actually had that diff backwards and it was an earlier edit that introduced that change. Sorry for thinking that was you.

Changes:

1. Piped link target capitalization makes no difference. For example,

   −

   [[Writing system#Directionality|directionality]]

   +

   [[writing system#Directionality|directionality]]

   Per WP:PIPE, "In a link, the first letter of a page title is never case-sensitive." So this change had no effect. Plus, article titles normally begin with an uppercase letter anyway, so that's the format you'll see inserted by tools. There's no reason to change it.
2. Blending piped links makes no difference. For example,

   −

   [[Function (mathematics)|mathematical functions]]

   +

   [[Function (mathematics)|mathematical function]]s

   Since the link label is explicitly specified, there's no advantage to blending, whereas with a non-piped link, it makes the wikicode shorter, like say,

   −

   [[Apple|apples]]

   +

   [[apple]]s

   Although if "apples" already exists as a redirect, it's fine to use it, which is why I didn't bother to redo

   −

   [[phonemes]]

   +

   [[phoneme]]s

3. At first I thought

   −

   [[Crescent|crescent moon]]

   +

   [[crescent]] moon

   was a good change, but on closer inspection, the article Crescent says the shape is fundamentally about the moon.
4. I'm not totally opposed to having anchors for every combination of terms (like "Uses of angle brackets" and "Uses of chevrons"), it just seems excessive unless there's a compelling reason to include them. Maybe for consistency?

   For square brackets though, I don't think anchors about "brackets" are useful since the whole page is about "brackets".

   And, I added back the anchors that are useful for technical reasons (like "Uses of angle brackets" to avoid special characters in a link) and for consistency with plural/singular (like "Angle brackets"/"Angle bracket" → "Chevrons"/"Chevron").

In the future you might want to break up your edits so that instead of a big omnibus set of changes all at once, you do one "thing" at a time, like say, 1) improve whitespace in the source code, 2) fix links, 3) blend links, etc. I prefer to do them from least controversial first to most controversial last (or the ones I'm least sure about) so that they can be more easily undone if needed and so that it's easier to read and understand each change. Check out Wikipedia:Good editing practices § The normal editing process. When redoing your edits I ended up doing 9 separate edits.

— W.andrea (talk) 21:23, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, colleague. How can I edit {{Wikipedia stats|tly|Talysh}} from Wikipedia:List of Wikipedias? With respect. Smpad (talk) 22:28, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Video city (disambuguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a recently created redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer, or other unlikely search term.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Dsuke1998AEOS (talk) 12:34, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Video City (disambuguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a recently created redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer, or other unlikely search term.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Dsuke1998AEOS (talk) 12:35, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pinging Headbomb, who complained to you last year (above on this page) about something similar you were doing with Template:anchor -- a complaint to which you didn't respond -- and other template tinkering that makes no sense. EEng 12:24, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Headbomb and @EEng: The reason I've been removing and substituting templates like {{nbsp}} and {{anchor}} on templates like {{Protection table}}, {{JCW-Main}}, {{JCW-Letter}}, {{JCW-DOI-rank}}, {{JCW-legend}}, {{JCW-Publisher-Warning}}, {{JCW-CRAP-rank}}, {{JCW-PUB-rank}}, {{JCW-TAR-rank}}, {{JCW-type}} and {{JCW-Citewatch-Warning}} is because I want to prevent templates like {{nbsp}} and {{anchor}} from being transcluded onto more pages and because I want to be able to more easily check on the Special:WhatLinksHere page, for example, with WhatLinksHere pages for template like Special:WhatLinksHere/Template:nbsp and Special:WhatLinksHere/Template:anchor, which templates are transcluded directly onto certain articles and non-template or module pages, and not through templates and modules. PK2 (talk; contributions) 23:18, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• I want to prevent templates like {{nbsp}} and {{anchor}} from being transcluded onto more pages – Why? What does that accomplish?
• I want to be able to more easily check on the Special:WhatLinksHere page, for example, with WhatLinksHere pages for template like Special:WhatLinksHere/Template:nbsp and Special:WhatLinksHere/Template:anchor, which templates are transcluded directly onto certain articles and non-template or module pages, and not through templates and modules – Why is that useful?

Neither of these is a valid reason for mucking up the code on dozens of pages. Stop doing this immediately, and undo what you've done. EEng 23:28, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That is not a valid reason to subst these templates, especially on technical pages. You can filter uses by namespace already. If you want to mass subst: something, go through BRFA. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 23:28, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

And I'm sorry to point this out, but you've been spoken to about these kinds of activities many times, and yet you keep doing it (as seen on this very page, and in your contribution history). You need to stop this kind of activity right now, and not do it again ever, or I'm afraid I'll have to ask that you be blocked. You've had many warnings. EEng 23:33, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

1. Do those edits include those on templates where neither Headbomb or EEng have reverted those edits of mine?

2. I don't want to end up being blocked from editing on Wikipedia.

PK2 (talk; contributions) 23:43, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

EEng's warning is perhaps worded more strongly than needed, but the point is that you've been warned / told many times these are not helpful and not desired, and it's the first time you respond/acknowledge the concerns. I'd say that for now, if no one reverted you on anything that's over a week o ld, it's probably not that big a deal. But you should probably undo your most recent spree. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 23:49, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've just reverted all my edits from yesterday that contained removals and substitutions of templates like {{nobr}} and {{nobreak}}, now. PK2 (talk; contributions) 00:07, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

For the record, I certainly don't want you to end up being blocked either. But ask an experienced editor before you start doing any more of these mass-change projects. EEng 01:36, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I understand. PK2 (talk; contributions) 22:11, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for saying so. Sorry if I came on a bit strong. EEng 22:34, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That's okay. PK2 (talk; contributions) 23:35, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Galician Wikipedia. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 04:13, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Galician Wikipedia, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Robert McClenon (talk) 00:17, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Would you mind correcting the target of Michael Lisovetsky? It is currently a self redirect. Thanks! :) ~ Eejit43 (talk) 02:11, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

		The Epic Barnstar
		For your work in splitting out the article Genocides in history into appropriate subarticles. Awarded by Cdjp1 (talk) 21:13, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Saqib was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Lahnda instead.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Western Punjabi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

— Saqib (talk I contribs) 10:29, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

My draft page Draft:Western Punjabi is based on the existing Dutch Wikipedia article at nl:West-Punjabi and is about the Western Punjabi language that's used on the Western Punjabi Wikipedia, which uses the Shahmukhi script, and is separate from the Punjabi Wikipedia (which uses the Gurmukhi script) for some reason, possibly for technical reasons. PK2 (talk; contributions) 07:22, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, PK2! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! — Saqib (talk I contribs) 10:29, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Is there a reason that you are creating unused language templates like {{Lang-oav}}? Unused templates show up on reports and are often nominated for deletion. – Jonesey95 (talk) 13:57, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The reason I've been creating unused language templates like {{lang-oav}} lately is because it's nice to have certain language templates around, even if they end up being unused, and because I didn't think there was anything wrong with creating them. PK2 (talk; contributions) 07:27, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, PK2. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Siren Head, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 06:07, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]