User talk:TylerBurden

Archives

Index 1, 2, 3, 4, 5

This page has archives. Sections older than 1.5 days may be automatically archived by ClueBot III when more than 5 sections are present.

Sorry Tyler Does this sound better at the article? I use original research here and I used an old source. But they do not know who Rurik of Dorestads father is and he is literally described as king. Hence the king of Sweden. Erik Björnsson.

Erik and Rörik could be like Anund and Emund similar names that Norse people did no distinction between. Just like Olof von Dalin claims. Gostomysl is a character that according to Vasily Tatishchev was the proteginator of Rurik and supported by the Russian empires imperial efforts. The Swedish Empire on the other hand meant Rurik was Erik Björnsson a son of Björn Ironside. And that Oleg of Kiev was a son of Olof (Swedish king 852) according to traditional Swedish historiography Germanic tradition of Coregency. According to traditional Swedish histiriography Erik and Rorik of Dorestad were the same person. According to Dalins norse sources Eric/Rerik Björn Ironsides son left to Friesland and took over and let his son Björn at Haugi rule Sweden instead. Then after returning to Sweden Rörik/Eric decided to go to Russia and Sweden to meet his son Björn again. According to Swedish traditional historiography Sweden and Denmark were allies at the time and Swedish king Erik and the Danish king were good friends since their fathers were both sons or Ragnar Lodbrok and Eric or Rörik found Friesland more exciting than being a king of Sweden so the Danish king gave it to him as a gift. Later he decided to become king of Russia after his uncle Hvitserk died and like his father Björn liked adventure so did Eric. Rurik and Eric is similar like the names Emund and Anund so much as Norsemen did no distinction according to traditional Swedish history according to Dalin. Since Eric is described as Rörik in french sources and as king Eric in older Norse sources earlier Swedish historians used. Probably lost from the fire at Tre Kronor (castle) were the primary Norse sources he used were lost when the royal library burnt down and the national archive. But that he has Norse sources that confirms Erik Björnsson and Rorik of Dorestadt were the same person but that Rurik and Rorik of dorestadt is the same person is a guess from his side.Gostomysl is a character that according to Vasily Tatishchev wa the proteginator of Rurik and supported by the Russian empires imperial effort. The Swedish Empire on the other hand meant Rurik was Erik Björnsson a son of Björn Ironside. And that Oleg of Kiev was a son of Olof (Swedish king 852) according to traditional Swedish historiography Germanic tradition of Coregency. According to traditional Swedish histiriography Erik and Rorik of Dorestad were the same person. According to Dalins norse sources Eric/Rerik Björn Ironsides son left to Friesland and took over and let his son Björn at Haugi rule Sweden instead. Then after returning to Sweden Rörik/Eric decided to go to Russia and Sweden to meet his son Björn again. According to Swedish traditional historiography Sweden and Denmark were allies at the time and Swedish king Erik and the Danish king were good friends since their fathers were both sons or Ragnar Lodbrok and Eric or Rörik found Friesland more exciting than being a king of Sweden so the Danish king gave it to him as a gift. Later he decided to become king of Russia after his uncle Hvitserk died and like his father Björn liked adventure so did Eric. Rurik and Eric is similar like the names Emund and Anund so much as Norsemen did no distinction according to traditional Swedish history according to Dalin. Since Eric is described as Rörik in french sources and as king Eric in older Norse sources earlier Swedish historians used. Probably lost from the fire at Tre Kronor (castle) were the primary Norse sources he used were lost when the royal library burnt down and the national archive. But that he has Norse sources that confirms Erik Björnsson and Rorik of Dorestadt were the same person but that Rurik and Rorik of dorestadt is the same person is a guess from his side.

^{[1] [2]}

^{[3] [4]}

— Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A00:801:7B5:D60E:958D:8695:7A35:FB5D (talk) 21:38, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply] 

The Swedish national archive burnt down 1697 so giving more weight to older sources is something I like. If the italian wiki use Russian imperial sources. Why cant the English wiki use imperial Swedish sources? At least the Swedish version is much more easy to believe. Since Frankish sources literally states Rurik of Dorestadt was a king. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A00:801:7B5:D60E:958D:8695:7A35:FB5D (talk) 22:04, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I suggest you take it to the article talk page. TylerBurden (talk) 11:31, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! My edit was recently reverted by another user, so I want to ask you to review if there anything wrong with my changes [1]. So if there isn't, I can safely restore them. Shahray (talk) 12:01, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Shahray Hello, I don't really have the expertise or time to proofread your edit, if you want to be safe it's best to clearly establish a consensus on the talk page first. If you think the discussion is stuck you could try something like WP:DRR/3 to ask for a third uninvolved opinion. TylerBurden (talk) 12:20, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Understood, thanks. Shahray (talk) 12:26, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello TylerBurden, with regards to the subject in caption, can you please add that Ukraine is supported by NATO, and that Russia, besides Belarus is also supported by North Korea? I feel this change would make the information more correct. I would have added this myself, but I have not yet reached 500 edits. Thank you. Benzekre (talk) 17:06, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

lol TylerBurden (talk) 17:11, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

wtf? what's so funny about my valid suggestion? Benzekre (talk) 17:16, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yea sure, the entirety of "NATO", especially Russian puppets like Hungary support Ukraine, and Russia is only supported by North Korea. Go ahead and be person number 5,000 to suggest this change on the article talk page, I have no idea why you came here with this delusional request. TylerBurden (talk) 17:23, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have a point about Hungary. You could consider adding the rest. I came here because you were the last user who edited the page. I am not aware that the page has its own talk page. Last but not least, I suggest that you treat a fellow Wikipedian with more respect. Else, I will be forced to report you. Benzekre (talk) 17:31, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You do that. TylerBurden (talk) 17:33, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

(Came here from the Teahouse) "Delusional" is not that nice, WP:BITE and all that. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 18:38, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

TylerBurden, there's no need to mock a new editor who is asking for help. You are the experienced editor here, lead by example (and civility). Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:51, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes you are both correct, there is no point in responding the way I did. Noted. TylerBurden (talk) 12:46, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

		The Current Events Barnstar
		For your contributions to articles such as Russian invasion of Ukraine, War crimes in the Russian invasion of Ukraine and Human safari. Lklundin (talk) 21:02, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You better learn the rules here, or you will be banned permanently. This is your ONLY warning! 130.0.28.122 (talk) 07:27, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You're dealing with the IP sock of a LTA here.[2] Thought you might be interested. - LouisAragon (talk) 01:18, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]