User talk:Angel David

   

v•d•h•e User Talk Contribs Created Empty Monobook

User:Angel David (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Please stay calm and civil while commenting or presenting evidence, and do not make personal attacks. Be patient when approaching solutions to any issues. If consensus is not reached, other solutions exist to draw attention and ensure that more editors mediate or comment on the dispute.

If Angel David is attacking people or vandalizing pages,

hit button very carefully

If you are sending me a message please state your user name, the time, the date,and put UTC in Parenthesis. To do this put in the tildes (~~~~) or by clicking this-. Do this to let me know who you are.

I will respond on your talk page. If I posted on your talk page,I will expect you to talk on mine. And I will respond back to yours if nessecary. Also, if you posted on my talk page, I will respond on yours.

I am always active on Wikipedia unless you see a template above stating I am sick meaning I am active but not healthy,or taking a wikibreak meaning I will not be in touch with Wkipedia, or vacation meaning I might user another computer in the country I visit. So if you are a user and you would want to send me a message I will respond in a snap

Hello Angel David! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! -- Levine2112 discuss 23:53, 3 June 2007 (UTC)[reply] Getting started Wikipedia tutorial • The five pillars of Wikipedia How to: edit a page • upload and use images Getting help Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Policies and guidelines Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Fair use • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The community Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community Portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists Writing articles Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Pages needing attention • Peer review Miscellaneous User name • User pages • Talk pages Clean up: General - Spam - Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

I've locked your userpage for two days so maybe you'll kick the habit. It's for your own good as a contributor to the encyclopedia. I hope you don't take this the wrong way. Thanks, --Maxim_{(talk) (contributions)} 22:33, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Of course not, but can someone please tell me why am I blocked? What's going on? What did I do?--Angel David 22:36, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think you're blocked. I simply prevented you from editing your userpage. Maxim_{(talk) (contributions)} 22:38, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not saying you blcoked me Maxim. Someone did. I don't know why?--Angel David 22:39, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No, you're not blocked, just on the verge of it. YДмΔќʃʀï^→Г_C← 10-26-2007 • 22:41:31

Not that guys. Check my log above. I'm blocked!--Angel David 22:42, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've changed the block to 8 hours, adding goatse links is just stupid, David. I talked to the blocking admin, and we agree on this length. Maxim_{(talk) (contributions)} 22:45, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

8 hours is appropriate? I was going to suggest indefinite. I don't care if it's mischief or carelessness, but there is no excuse for this. Friday (talk) 22:46, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

As far as I can tell it was an accident, says that someone else put it there, and he just thought that it was a mistake they undid his page or something. That's just my interpretation. What's the deal about whatever anyways? YДмΔќʃʀï^→Г_C← 10-26-2007 • 22:49:44

Yes, someone else put it there first. Why would an editor put back trolling of that nature? If he's going to edit without understanding what he's doing, then there's a serious problem. Friday (talk) 22:53, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

But by no means a reason for an indefinite block. A.Z. 22:57, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Angel David (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Please, Unblock me! I meant no harm. It was an accident. I'm sorry and I mean it. Just unblpck me. I'll do anything you want!

Decline reason:

As much as I'd like to believe you in claiming that you mean no harm, I'm afraid edits such as this really doesn't do much to boost my confidence in restoring your ability to edit Wikipedia. Sit this one out, and we'll see how you do when the block expires. Anthøny 22:59, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

No I'm serious please. I really mean no harm. I'm not a vandal. You can check my contributions! I reverted vandalism. I'm saying the truth. Please unblock me.--Angel David 23:01, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Personaly I would unblock you for a simple accident, but I can't and I'm in no position to critisize... How'd you find that page anyways?YДмΔќʃʀï^→Г_C← 10-26-2007 • 23:11:51

Why did you do that, David? Cheers,JetLover (Report a mistake) 23:28, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps you may want to just import them, instead of creating a mountain of subpages with them, to one central location.

What's going on! I've been autoblocked! What does that mean?--Angel David 15:56, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps you should concern yourself more with the requests for clarification of your editing, just a couple sections above. You did something rather bizarre, and some editors have asked you why you did it. Friday (talk) 15:58, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Why I did do that? I thought that was other vandalism! I didn;t know why I was erased so by undoing that. It thought I was helping. I'm sorry. And I'm not a jerk!--Angel David 16:00, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

So you blindly reverted without looking at the content you were putting back? Sorry, but we cannot have editors doing that sort of thing. How did you even find that page? If you see something you don't understand do not just undo it. Accept the possibility that perhaps whoever did it had a good reason for doing so. Friday (talk) 16:05, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

(edit conflict) You've been hardblocked, and in such mannor, your IP address was blocked to prevent a bypass (oops broke the rule) I'll put the unblock template below, but you've got to remove the tl| before it. YДмΔќʃʀï^→Г_C← 10-27-2007 • 16:02:48

I think I've lifted the autoblock, check plz. Maxim_{(talk) (contributions)} 16:08, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry about the article, but I wanted to keep you out of even more trouble. I've done something that might help out with that (finding the article), but to get it, click edit this page

Though it may be foggy to notice, but I am trying to help you. You will never fully loose an article in my hands, (if you got the hints). It's to stop your binge of userpage edits. I won't stoop so low as to have your prefixindex salted and pages protected, but you've got two things - if you get to be an admin, undelete them, and if you caught my hints, you've still got them, but will loose them if you work on them. I know what persecution feels like.YДмΔќʃʀï^→Г_C← 10-28-2007 • 00:53:34

Hi David! --Yami

Well David, I wish I hadAWB too, but I've got to stick with VP (no complicated regester, will even download to a flash drive), if you run Firefox like I occasionaly do, just click the warn button instead of remembering the templates. I'm not sure if TW's Warn still works, but you've got TW from User:Yamakiri on Firefox. I'm tired at 6, so...YДмΔќʃʀï^→Г_C← 10-29-2007 • 11:03:07

Well, do you have a USB Flash Drive (E:\\)? A floppy? A CD (don't know how it'll work on a CD)? That's all you need for VF, I assume VP could fit on one of these too, for it's based off of VF and some other things. AWB, I'll check, I wish I had AWB though... YДмΔќʃʀï^→Г_C← 10-29-2007 • 22:02:56

Our farm has mourning glories. Does your farm have mourning glories? Yes I know that's British spelling.YДмΔќʃʀï^→Г_C← 10-30-2007 • 01:07:45

It's probably best if you refrain from putting speedy delete tags on pages, or nominating them for deletion. The nomination you made at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Why Wikipedia is not so great was not very reasonable. Friday (talk) 18:14, 30 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Try Special:Upload. Love, Neranei (talk) 01:18, 31 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I'm not very good with licensing. Love, Neranei (talk) 01:42, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

OK, sorry I couldn't help. Love, Neranei (talk) 01:48, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. You were rejected before as you had never actually edited the encyclopedia, just your user pages. You've also got a pretty impressive block log. I think I was right not to rename you, BUT, I understand you are only 11 and if you start behaving better then I'll consider it in a few months. Okay? Is that fair? Secretlondon 16:47, 31 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Angel David! Happy Halloween! Cheers,JetLover (Report a mistake) 00:12, 1 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Angel David, I am curious about something; why did you do this? Cheers,JetLover (Report a mistake) 02:08, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Still, it's just not done. Even if it is a redlink. Cheers,JetLover (Report a mistake) 02:28, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Don't worry, it's just not really a good idea it all. Cheers,JetLover (Report a mistake) 02:32, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, David! Angel David, your kind words on my talk page did what they were meant to do and more. In an environment such as this, we all need a little joy every now and then, and I thank you for providing me with nothing less. Happy editing, ( arky ) 02:55, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, that was very kind of you! Love, Neranei (talk) 15:17, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the kind posting! Acalamari 02:53, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Angel David. How is this vandalism? Cheers,JetLover (Report a mistake) 00:02, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

He was asking a question and signed as "Pat." Cheers,JetLover (Report a mistake) 00:18, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Howdy. It's probably not a good idea for you to go around editing templates without getting consensus first. Templates potentially affect a large number of articles. In particular, it looks like other editors don't know why you want an image in Template:God. Putting images in there with no explanation other than "please don't remove it" is not very reasonable. We don't determine content by who pleads- we determine content by consensus. You shouldn't go around adding pictures just because you like them. If you want nice pictures, please put them on your own user page instead. Friday (talk) 17:22, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your good tidings on my talk page. I didn't know it was your birthday. Well, I didn't even know you at all until now! So forgive me when I come without a flashy gift. Maybe a little German saying about angels, which many years ago my then girlfriend told me, and which has helped me in life since. It's a pun, so it's not so easy to translate, and I'll give you the German first:

Warum können Engel fliegen? Weil sie sich leicht nehmen.

Why is it that angels can fly? Because they take themselves lightly (meaning: not so seriously). - All the best, and enjoy your flying, — Sebastian 07:51, 15 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I am so impressed with your userpages. And happy birthday! However I have something serious I want to ask you- could you email me, or enable your email? (- you just go in your preferences and add one- please don't post it on this page.) Happy Birthday again!Merkinsmum (talk) 02:47, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi David, I haven't been around in a while, but I've got a few things to tell you. I'm going to probably stay as active as I have been in the last week and a half, but I was User:Susan Walton User:KkrouniUser:Douglas Bradford Oliver and a few others, though I didn't posess my friend in real life cowboy rocco's account. Also, don't watch the golden compass, the author is atheist (and I know you're orthodox Catholic), and in the end, the children kill God, and since you're Catholic, you've probably heard at Church. YДмΔќʃʀï^→Г_C← 12-1-2007 • 02:29:20

They don't kill God, they kill a fallen angel pretending to be God. thx1138 (talk) 06:31, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I just thought I would say hello! I'll be it I hae nae actually tatter tae ye afore, I was thinking I may as well begin ae? -- Librarianofages (talk) 05:55, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas and...

Happy New Year! -- Chetblong^Talk_Sign

Alrighty, sounds good to me. Midorihana_{(talk)(contribs)} 05:36, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Midorihana_{(talk)(contribs)} has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Why, in this edit, did you remove a useful piece of code without an edit summary? Thanks. —Vanderdecken∴ ∫ξφ 09:17, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the kind words and barnstar on my talk page! I really appreciate it! Cheers and happy editing (happy holidays too), Midorihana_{(talk)(contribs)} 20:03, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I'll get the template eventually. Until then entertain yourself with this Romanian Love song. Some versions are [1] [2] and [3]

Blessed editing, and...

Happy Holidays from YДмΔќʃʀï^→Г_C← 12-22-2007 • 21:01:25

Credits: This card was inspired by Macy's123, assistant of V's Shop

YДмΔќʃʀï^→Г_C← 12-22-2007 • 21:01:25

Aaw, Puss in Boots! [4]. Glad to hear you've been well (well, not hear but assume) and do you want the email I sent Marlith? It's about hacking and computer tricks, I'm in to programming, and it's part of a compilation of notes I've made (I say part, because some of the information is probably unlawful to disseminate). I wonder why the Nativity play was two weeks early at our Church... YДмΔќʃʀï^→Г_C← 12-23-2007 • 00:18:25

Do you want help uploading an image, or do you want me to critique it? I'd like you to take a look at this MfD. I do not want you to think I'm canvassing, so I'd just like to let you know it's there, and I'm not going to tell you which side I'm on (though you could tell by scrolling through arguements). YДмΔќʃʀï^→Г_C← 12-23-2007 • 18:42:38

There's something called WP:USER that gives us the power to take off racist and offensive userboxes. I've had that used on me around 6 times, so why not use it myself. I took that userbox on that guy's page off. Is it wierd that I just go around through everyone's contributions that I see? Silver seren did the same thing... You should do more AfD's, they look good on your record, you'ld be that guy who tells us all to stop name calling, with a firey passion for his ballot. YДмΔќʃʀï^→Г_C← 12-23-2007 • 22:28:58

BTW how do you manage to keep finding these users who have been inactive for months? That guy a month ago who had that goatse link etc. ? You may want to get acquainted with policy, to take things into your own hands. YДмΔќʃʀï^→Г_C← 12-23-2007 • 22:32:41

'kay YДмΔќʃʀï^→Г_C← 12-23-2007 • 22:33:45

~~~ has wished you well! Joy promotes WikiLove and hopefully this little bit has helped make your day better. Spread the WikiJoy by sharing the joy someone else, Try to brighten the day of as many people as you can! Keep up the great editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Joy message}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

And the same to you! Merry Christmas and a happy Chanukkah! --Son (talk) 03:14, 24 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. Don't vandalize the Sandbox like you did here. --HPJoker ^{Leave me a message} 01:18, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Don't vandalize the Sandbox like you did here. --HPJoker ^{Leave me a message} 01:18, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I understand. Thanx. You can test, not spam. You can create your own sandbox. --HPJoker ^{Leave me a message} 01:27, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

How do I know what? thx1138 (talk) 07:55, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I still don't understand what you're asking me. thx1138 (talk) 08:38, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Several friends of mine read the books the movies are based on, and told me how the series ends. thx1138 (talk) 00:15, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, no, I don't understand why you would attempt to edit war over this. And if you don't want to cause any trouble, I don't understand why you would re-insert controversial material before there is consensus. Have you ever read WP:BRD? If you make a bold edit, you shouldn't be shocked if you are reverted. You should, instead, go to the talk page and explain your edit. However, you have not made one comment to the talk page. We have been discussing images, and there very well may end up being a consensus for your image. However, it is premature to make that judgement. I ask you to please revert yourself, make your case on the talk page, and wait a few more days to see how things turn up before you go inserting a disputed image. Thanks for your consideration.-Andrew c ^[talk] 14:13, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the self-revert. I think because today is a holiday in many places around the world, there may be less editing than usual, so I personally would still give it another day or two, since most of this discussion took place yesterday and the day before. You are still welcome to make a comment yourself on the talk page. It may help if you explain why exactly you added the image, what you like about it, and perhaps try to address the issues raised by the ones who were more wary of the image. As you can see, there isn't an exact clear consensus yet on what users feel is the best image. Thanks again.-Andrew c ^[talk] 14:57, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, glad you enjoy it! Happy new year! Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 15:41, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think User:SlimVirgin has dealt with it a bit. Basically you need to read something like this http://uk.security.yahoo.com/protect-your-privacy/safe-communications-online.html scroll down a bit and it gives details for websites and messageboards, etc which would also apply to wikipedia. Don't ever if you can help it post your full name, plus home town or other info which could identify you on a public site, where everyone can read it. Even most adults wouldn't feel happy doing so themselves, as there are some real wrong'uns about! Of course most people are lovely, but you need to take care of what you post on the internet. Hope this helps. Merkinsmum 00:29, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the compliment! But I'm hardly a genius. I've just seen this debate once or twice before. Cheers! Wassupwestcoast (talk) 04:59, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Angel David. The sandbox cannot be vandalized like normal articles. The only thing that ic considered vandalism is to put racist/sexist or other offensive content into it. Thanks. JetLover (talk) (Report a mistake) 00:47, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You too. Thanks, happy 2008! JetLover (talk) (Report a mistake) 01:17, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

...but why did you replace the picture for Hieronymus Bosch? Being "more positive" as you stated in your edit summary isn't a good reason for replacement. 71.231.56.40 (talk) 04:08, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

See Wikipedia's policy on trivia. If it were desirable to simply delete every trivia section in the encyclopedia, a bot could be made to do it. It's not. Stop it. Ilkali (talk) 09:55, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Angel David. I started a thread at WT:UTM to discuss your change to the vandalism template. I believe there was some discussion on a similar vein a while back, but the consensus may change.--Kubigula (talk) 03:04, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

(transcribing from my talk page...) Am I in trouble?--User:Angel David (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) 02:27, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Not at all. You were bold, and that's usually encouraged. In this case the consensus seems to be against your change, but no-one is suggesting you did anything wrong.--Kubigula (talk) 02:37, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I should add that there is some sentiment that, due to their widespread use, there may ought to be some more restriction on editing some of the warning templates. Perhaps proposing substantive changes to these templates first would be a good idea. However, this was not discussed before your edits, and you were certainly acting in good faith.--Kubigula (talk) 02:52, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Angel David, my sincere thanks for your support (which was nicely worded :P) in my second request for adminship, which ended with 113 supports, 11 opposes, and 4 neutral. I would especially like to thank my admin coach and nominator, Rlevse and Ryan Postlethwaite who in addition to Ioeth all inspired me to run for a second candidacy. I would also like to make a special mention to Phoenix-wiki, Dihyrdogen Monoxide and OhanaUnited who all offered to do co-nominations, but I unfortunately had to decline. I had all these funny ideas that it would fail again, and I was prepared for the worst, but at least it showed that the community really does have something other places don't. Who would have though Gmail would have been so effective? 32 emails in one week! (Even if it does classify some as junk :P) I'm glad that I've been appointed after a nail biting and some might call, decision changing RFA, but if you ever need anything, just get in touch. The very best of luck for 2008 and beyond, Rudget. 15:23, 12 January 2008 (UTC) [reply]

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did to -cide, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. You've been repeatedly warned about your Christian-centered edits. Stop adding your POV opinions to articles. VegitaU (talk) 15:49, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

David, it's probably best to stay away from articles until you better understand what it is we do here. Friday (talk) 17:30, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment to VegitaU (talk · contribs) and Friday (talk · contribs). No one gets blocked on Wikipedia for making good faith edits. Nor, do we tell editors to stay away from editing articles. Cheers! Wassupwestcoast (talk) 20:30, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I know that. I've been an editor for a while. I also know this user's been warned before about this behavior. I can't consider those edits to be in good faith if he's already been counseled on them. -- VegitaU (talk) 23:20, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Stop harassing other users like you are at User talk:Saccerzd. Users are allowed to remove warnings from their talk page. In addition, this happened 3 weeks ago, so there's no need to keep warning him. The same goes for your warning at User talk:70.49.139.84‎. This editor made one edit in September. There is no need to warn someone 4 months after the fact. Metros (talk) 16:05, 13 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please see Wikipedia:Sig#Transclusion_of_templates and stop using a template in your signature. Metros (talk) 15:26, 13 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I knew you'd type angle one day! I did that with you for months. Anyways, this is it: {{doppleganger|Angel David}} There is no way to "transform" an account, but you could have it blocked or stop using it. It makes little difference, but unless you're an admin and tell everyone in any post (that was a hyperbole of course) then you'll probably get convicted of sockpuppetry. Yamakiri ^T_C H§ 01-13-2008 • 23:16:43

You put that on the page)

I'm willing to help out, but I just have a temporarily low workload. I will be checking all your edits in bulk chunks once every few days, since long ago I tried to mentour you. ¿Hablas español? Yamakiri ^T_C § 01-14-2008 • 22:47:31

This may be very useful for you. You may want to {{db-userreq}} your userpage, AFTER copying the contents of it and then put it back up to delete 99% of your userspace edits. I'm not sure how other people think of this (admins in particular) but it'll also kill a chunk of your lump contributions. Boy, my Spanish is better than my English... BTW I have something to tell you if you enable email (semi-private). Yamakiri ^T_C § 01-14-2008 • 23:00:14

Angel David, ignore that "advice". Admins won't delete your user page just so you can "game the system" so you seem like a more productive user. Metros (talk) 23:02, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

For a user who's considering having his user page deleted all together, you're focusing a little too much on it right now. Metros (talk) 23:40, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That's why I said "copy then delete". Please don't harass us, Metros. Yamakiri ^T_C § 01-15-2008 • 02:31:41

Yeah, I saw where you said that. So basically you're saying "take the hundred edits you've made to your user page, copy it, delete it, then restore it all in just one edit instead of hundreds." That's inappropriate. Metros (talk) 02:37, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• I'm not deleting my page. Wait a minute. I'm not blocked or anything. So why am I responding here? Strange.--Angel David (talk) 02:35, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I note your editing has been criticised by some others above. However, you seem to me to be a good-faith user who wants to help the encyclopedia, so if you need any help or advice on contributing, I will help you in what way I can. Walton^One 12:58, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the kitten. :-) Walton^One 22:43, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Knights of Saint Michael, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Knights of Saint Michael. uɐɔlnʌɟoʞǝɹɐs 20:55, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: I have contested the prod and switched it to an AfD. If you wish to participate: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Knights of Saint Michael Yamakiri ^T_C § 01-16-2008 • 01:38:59

Hi David, you can click on this link to go to the deletion discussion page and add your comments. Majoreditor (talk) 03:35, 16 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Um, no that was me forgetting to sign.

Notice at the top of the discussion how he was a sockpuppeteer. Yamakiri ^T_C § 01-16-2008 • 01:41:52

I can't help anymore tonight, SOL's are tomorrow, and SC has um... Well, they're so easy I've gotten at least two 600s on every set this year (sorry if that's bragging, I'm trying to degrade the public school system). Yamakiri ^T_C § 01-16-2008 • 01:49:32

Thanks for your comments. But it was actually someone else, with the intent to vandalize my page, who typed that over a year ago. At first, I was annoyed. Then I thought it ironic, and decided to keep it. "Maybe some discussion would come out of it", I thought. Little did I know, it turned out to be true. I am not here to insult anyone, but I like humour, especially the irony from things like this.

However, may I ask, how did you come across my page? Did you see me or my edits in a discussion? Or were you randomly looking for a fight, to "prove" your beliefs? I know many religious people who like to play the victim.

May your beliefs make you be strong, and to help others, even if we don't share the same views.

Happy New Year.

Le Anh-Huy (talk) 04:20, 16 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

As silly as it sounds, it's WP:OR to announce that no angels died because we assume them to be immortal. Because none of the "primary sources" (Bible, Milton, Popes, etc) ever said that none died, "unknown" is a better moniker than "N/A Immortal". On a theological level, it's even been debated whether or not angels are immortal, Ezekiel 28 for example refers to angels being destroyed and "shall never exist again" - but the alternative is in Luke 20, where Jesus says that after the resurrection there will be no death because we will all be "as angels". It's a debateable point, whether or not angels can be destroyed - so it's better leaving "casualties" as "unknown" rather than imposing our personal interpretation of the event and 'announcing' that it's impossible for angels to die. It's up to the readers' individual interpretation of the Bible, whether or not they believe angels are immortal :) I hope this helps! Sherurcij ^{(Speaker for the Dead)} 14:54, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed. When it comes out you might want to see the movie too. PS. You might like conservapedia although you're a Democrat (mabey there's a demopedia?). User:Yamakiri 01-28-2008 • 03:26:31

Hello. Please do not use talk pages for discussing your opinions, please use them for discussing the article or image. Thanks. JetLover (talk) (Report a mistake) 00:03, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

While it may not be POV-pushing, WP:TALK states that "talk pages should not be used by editors as platforms for their personal views." JetLover (talk) (Report a mistake) 00:37, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That dude was disgusting! It's worse that I watch the pokemon tv series... (In a sarcastic tone) Ooooh somebody cursed! Yamakiri ^T_C § 01-29-2008 • 01:10:15

Awesome programmer, you (hell). That was the worsst time to see that 'cause my cat's in my lap and I was watching an old poke rerun on tv. Yamakiri ^T_C § 01-29-2008 • 01:14:21

No, that's why I wrote (sarcastically) Yamakiri ^T_C § 01-29-2008 • 01:16:56

You'll like this! [5] Yamakiri ^T_C § 01-31-2008 • 02:16:19

Can you cipher this? [6] It's a song that (yay just learned to conjugate ir) is called I go (Me Voy). It's pretty good! User:Yamakiri 03:33, 2 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

POKEMON THE RISE OF DARKRAI COMES ON TONIGHT!!!!!!!!!!!!! Yamakiri ^T_C § 02-24-2008 • 23:44:28

You may be interested to know that your editing patterns have been used as a sort of baseline in a sock puppet investigation. I hope you don't mind. Cool Hand Luke 05:41, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Just the time stample of your edits. For example, they were used to make this comparison chart to alleged sockpuppets. Cool Hand Luke 02:11, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like you've been doing a good job at lent Rolls eyes. Anyways, please don't harass the other users even if they are freaks (cough*Ric Childress*cough). JJWY . Yamakiri ^T_C § 03-4-2008 • 20:19:00

YouTube, phone conversations, scripting (sorry, I had to), writing, your girlfriend (if you have one), making derogatory statements about your best friends and you so that you all are considered gay even though you've got girlfriends, TV, PhotoShopping (using Adobe photoshop), taking a weekend trip, Wasting a week trying to understand my word choice in my YouTube videos, writing, daydreaming, etc. Yamakiri ^T_C § 03-7-2008 • 23:17:30

You want me to fix that when I get free time this evening? PS [7] [8] LMAO! Yamakiri ^T_C § 03-25-2008 • 11:04:33

If you live in California then why do you use British English? (→My Top 10 Favourite Movies) I use it too, I'm just curious. So they teach people in Hispanic schools British English? Yamakiri ^T_C § 03-25-2008 • 11:07:43

Hablo Español más porque tengo la clase de español. Tengo un *account* de Wikipedia España, pero no editar mucho. Es un poco difícil, pues necesito traduzca para leer, pero Yo no necesito traducir algunas palabras porque acabo de utilizar algunas palabras en... Bien mecanismo de cambios... Acabo de entender algunas cosas sin necesitar para traducir, querer camarero, estar, y ser. Yamakiri ^T_C § 03-28-2008 • 20:10:03

There are backwards accent marks and ones on consonants?!?! NO!!! 2nd year Spanish will be hard! Wahahaha. I also can't read the first sentence of what you wrote. Yamakiri ^T_C § 03-29-2008 • 01:49:07

I don't follow... I'll just assume it was intentional. Yamakiri ^T_C § 03-29-2008 • 20:22:26

Join us! http://testwiki.unixpod.com/wiki/User:Yamakiri It's fun and I'll sysop you. Yamakiri ^T_C § 05-12-2008 • 20:51:05

Yes you do David. Come over to the fun side! Yamakiri ^T_C § 05-12-2008 • 22:54:01

Notice the "The Test Wiki" Icon. And we mostly play games on IRC. ( http://testwiki.unixpod.com/wiki/Special:Mibbit ) We have 3 articles. 1(number), LOL, Lol, OMG (I'm gunna delete it lol) Yamakiri ^T_C § 05-12-2008 • 22:57:28

¿Por qué? It just lets you have fun with tools. Yamakiri ^T_C § 05-12-2008 • 23:43:32

Whatever floats your boat, but in case you change your mind, I made you an account with a VERY GENERIC PASSWORD (password) so at least change it. Yamakiri ^T_C § 05-12-2008 • 23:49:15

Hello, Angel David. You have new messages at Jéské Couriano's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

I was not fond of you editing my post in a way I felt gave an implication I did not desire to make. And I find it even more annoying that you felt the need to repeat your offense once I came by and undid it.

Elohim is but one word in Hebrew for God, just as Allah is but one name for God in Arabic. If you wanted to be specific regarding the name of God in both languages, it would be יְהֹוָה and الله respectively. But as I was speaking in English, and referring to one specific Being, I did not want it to be linked to two separate articles when I was referring clearly to God, the subject of the article.

Please refrain from editing others' comments in the future. May you go in God's care. Peter Deer (talk) 00:24, 13 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dear David,

sorry to bring up an unpleasant issue, but I am finding User:Ilkali high-handed and unpleasant. Even comments that do not include put-downs express a kind of superior attitude. He uses wikilawyering, quoting a few different tangential guidelines and won't take reasonable or sourced replies that show him to be wrong. I'm no expert, but he seems to counter-attack when wrong to mask his rushing to judgement when he doesn't really understand issues or policies.

I've warned him for multiplying tangents, which is time-wasting trolling, and no longer argue with him past one or two replies. I'd be interested to know if you could prove me wrong about all this. I'd like to know he has been a constructive editor and been co-operative in other contexts.

Cheers Alastair Haines (talk) 16:28, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia.
While we appreciate that you enjoy using Wikipedia, please note that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and not a free webhosting service. Wikipedia is not a place to post personal content, host personal websites, or do things that are not directly related to adding to or improving the encyclopedia. Off-topic material may be deleted at any time. This message is not meant to discourage you from editing Wikipedia but rather to remind you that the ultimate goal of this website is to build an encyclopedia. Thank you.

I'd like to note that 67% of all your edits are going to your userspace. This gives the impression you wish to have a homepage rather than a workspace. While it is okay to use the userspace, you're abusing it. I've been informed you're on the verge of a block if your habits keep up. Please come on the IRC for us to discuss this further. Your old friend, Yamakiri ^T_C § 07-20-2008 • 20:32:16

Hey, just a quick pointer. The "if you mean..." tags are normally only used when there are very few things else that you could possibly be looking for; the Anathema article, for example, has one to Anathema (band) since it's unlikely to be anything other than those two articles. If you look at the disambig for Phineas you'll see 20-odd other pages, any of which a user could be looking for, so the "do you mean...?" thing for a childrens TV character is not really appropriate.

I replied to your message on the Antichrist talk page, by the way. Ironholds 21:42, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The little blue box of text that follows you down the page, about that. The last time I saw something that annoying I held the pillow over its head until the squirming stopped. Could you remove it please? Bright colours in front of comments make said comments impossible to read. Ironholds 12:08, 26 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oh right, been blocked for the mass userpagification? Fair enough. Ironholds 03:12, 27 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Just checking in, and I'm glad you seem to have been doing fine staying out of your userspace ;-) If you want we can catch up on things at my channel on FreeNode :P Yamakiri ^T_C § 01-18-2009 • 03:16:09

Hello Angel David, Celestialwarden11 has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Go on, smile! Cheers, and happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Hello, fellow Christian and Wikipedia! I am so, so happy and honored for this chance for us to talk. If you need anything, or if you simply want to chat, I am right here for you, pal! Also remember, to spread the joy! Wikipedia may not be the most cheerful place to be, but YOU can help make it more cheerful! Have a fantastic day, and God bless! ^_^

P.S. I noticed an Unencylopedia external link on your user page. Please, though I know the site is considered, like, lol funny to lots of people, should it be used a source? (And, come on, its mockery of God Himself is a bit too extreme for me; I mean, seriously, who would spend their time making entire articles laughing at religion?) Do you like Unencylopedia, and, if so, why? Thanks! Celestialwarden11 (talk) 21:01, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 04:47, 20 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article Hadephobia has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No sources, probably a neologism, looks like it was created to push a POV (I do think that too many only claim to follow their own religion out of fear of a bad afterlife, it is still just an opinion)

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ian.thomson (talk) 21:46, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Angel David. You have new messages at Ian.thomson's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Hello, Angel David. You have new messages at Ian.thomson's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Hello, Angel David. You have new messages at Ian.thomson's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

I have nominated Hadephobia, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hadephobia. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Ian.thomson (talk) 15:24, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated User:Angel David/Secret Page for deletion at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Chubbennaitor/HAHA/Barnstar. Cunard (talk) 08:49, 6 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Most Holy Family Monastery, please cite a reliable source for the content of your edit. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. Take a look at Wikipedia:Citing sources for information about how to cite sources and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Binksternet (talk) 21:16, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Angel David. You have new messages at Indian Chronicles's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

	The Admin's Barnstar
	whats up some one message me babygirl (talk) 14:01, 30 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Kuzimu. Since you had some involvement with the Kuzimu redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 02:35, 5 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:31, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Democratic Party (United States. Since you had some involvement with the Democratic Party (United States redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - CHAMPION ^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)} 09:57, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Democratic Party (United States and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 27#Democratic Party (United States until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Steel1943 (talk) 19:57, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I wonder, are you still active on Wikipedia? Leave a message on my talk page if you are, just curious. Ballads2110 (talk) 00:23, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article Paradise and Hell has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Failed verification (one source of dubious reliability); see Talk:Paradise and Hell#Merge with The Haywain Triptych, where a merge is not the preferred option as the target isn't plausible.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Klbrain (talk) 15:08, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Paradise and Hell is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paradise and Hell until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Klbrain (talk) 20:52, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]