User talk:Bearcat

Archives

Archive 1 Archive 2 Archive 3 Archive 4 Archive 5 Archive 6 Archive 7 Archive 8 Archive 9 Archive 10 Archive 11 Archive 12 Archive 13 Archive 14 Archive 15 Archive 16 Archive 17 Archive 18 Archive 19 Archive 20 Archive 21 Archive 22 Archive 23 Archive 24 Archive 25 Archive 26 Archive 27 Archive 28 Archive 29 Archive 30 Archive 31 Archive 32 Archive 33 Archive 34 Archive 35 Archive 36 Archive 37 Archive 38 Archive 39 Archive 40 Archive 41 Archive 42 Archive 43 Archive 44 Archive 45 Archive 46 Archive 47 Archive 48 Archive 49 Archive 50 Archive 51 Archive 52 Archive 53 Archive 54 Archive 55 Archive 56 Archive 57 Archive 58 Archive 59 Archive 60 Archive 61 Archive 62 Archive 63 Archive 64 Archive 65 Archive 66 Archive 67 Archive 68 Archive 69 Archive 70 Archive 71 Archive 72 Archive 73 Archive 74 Archive 75 Archive 76 Archive 77 Archive 78 Archive 79 Archive 80 Archive 81 Archive 82 Archive 83 Archive 84 Archive 85 Archive 86 Archive 87 Archive 88 Archive 89 Archive 90 Archive 91 Archive 92 Archive 93 Archive 94 Archive 95 Archive 96

This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.

Please post new comments at the bottom of this page, not at the top.

I have been adding more current photos I’ve taken of subjects and places in Sheboygan but User:Mrschimpf has reverted several of those edits, falsely claiming I’m some such of competitor in local media in Sheboygan which I don’t own any interests in media publishing in Sheboygan County. In one edit on Shoreline Metro, my photo of a bus in service was removed because he claimed permissions were questionable and the photo was posed. Then there is the challenge of updating the photo on Sheboygan, Wisconsin. Asher Heimermann (talk

• YaSiRu11 (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Ridma Weerawardena (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

• "Has received non-trivial coverage in independent reliable sources of an international concert tour, or a national concert tour in at least one sovereign country [1]

• "Has been a featured subject of a substantial broadcast segment across a national radio or television network" [2][3]

Hi Bearcat,

Looking to get some pages made by Asopa Films put back up and to also save one from being deleted

Aisha and Rahul (2009) - this page has been taken down already, NON WIKI PAGE - https://www.wikiwand.com/en/Aisha_and_Rahul Depth of Pyaar (2019) - this page has been taken down already, NON WIKI PAGE - https://en.everybodywiki.com/Depth_of_Pyaar Zombie Beach (2010) - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zombie_Beach

Would like to discuss why these pages were taken down and how I can get them put back up and also make sure they stay up.

Regards, Winter

Bearcat,

Please link me to this wikipedia elections policy in which you discussed on my talk page.

Thanks!

— WILDSTARTALK is wishing you a Merry Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Don't eat yellow snow!  
  

Spread the holiday cheer by adding {{subst:User:Flaming/MC2008}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

You declined this draft, but I made changes to it that I think solved the initial issue. If you could take another look and give me some feedback I would be appreciative. Thanks for your time. WUH34 (talk) 4:45, 24 March 2022 (UTC)

Since November 16, 2022, a user who is not logged in, just identified by their IP address has been adding information to the San Antonio FC page that has no sources to back it up with. Specifically they are adding a player to the roster when there is no evidence on the internet, either by the club, league, or anywhere else that this transaction has occurred. I have undone the edit multiple times but they keep adding it back. Please assist.

1/13/23 - The vandalism is occurring again. Would you be able to ban the IP addresses that are adding the incorrect information? TYIA

Issue has been taken care of.

The redirect Dil Chahta Hai (sountrack) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 October 2 § Dil Chahta Hai (sountrack) until a consensus is reached. Regards, SONIC678 05:31, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Happy First Edit Day! Hi Bearcat! On behalf of the Birthday Committee, I'd like to wish you a very happy anniversary of the day you made your first edit and became a Wikipedian! The Herald (Benison) (talk) 02:49, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 October 3 § Comedy directors on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 14:01, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I'm posting here what I posted on FormalDude's page. Please forgive me for not being super Wiki-literate yet. I was just looking for some help and noticed that FormalDude isn't an admin so I found your page, Bearcat:

Hi FormalDude. Could you take a look at the NYU Law Review's page? This user "Randykitty" for some reason feels the need to erroneously remove our logo from our page. You reversed him once already last year but he just removed the logo again (for the same reason you'd reversed him) claiming the logo isn't being used by the Law Review. Here is evidence of the Law Review using the logo that's on the Wiki page (that Randykitty will for some reason try to remove again): https://www.instagram.com/nyulawreview/ https://www.linkedin.com/company/nyulr/ https://twitter.com/nyulawreview Nyulrlogo (talk) 22:07, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 October 5 § Women local politicans on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. --MikutoH ^talk! 04:17, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 October 7 § Local politicians by nationality on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. --MikutoH ^talk! 01:16, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please block my account? I don't want to contribute anymore. Thanks. Happyaroundyoubabes (talk) 12:51, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Can we come to a consensus then on restoring the film lists? I just searched for films in 1980 in film. The list has been removed in favour of the country lists. Then I click List of American films of 1980 and not only does it have a bloated release list with excessive cast, but even has 1979 films like Caligula and Stalker, which is a Russian film. Erik thoughts?It's just very few people comment these days at WP:Film. The IP reverted my restoration back to the bloated release table. All I want is a simple A-Z list, consistently by year and country! It is time consuming going back and finding the original text and restoring and even if I do that it seems like nobody is watching these lists and would help revert the ip if he did it again. There also seems to be a tendency on recent years for the big bloated release tables, I argue that even those should be converted to simple A-Z lists.♦ Dr. Blofeld 18:57, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Lists by year have only ever existed at the country level, and no such thing as "List of all 1980 films irrespective of country" has ever existed at all in order to be "removed".

I've already raised the point on more than one occasion that YYYY-by-country lists should be organized by title first rather than by release date, but largely my plaints have fallen on deaf ears. If you're willing to agree with me, that's great, but I'm not the barrier to doing that — I'm the guy who's tried to get the lists organized that way, only to run into a wall of inertia, and you're the first person who's ever responded to agree with me about it.

If films are being added to wrong years or countries, then the way to fix that is by removing them from the lists they don't belong in, not by complaining about it to people who didn't do it.

Turning the categories back into all-inclusives that have to directly include every film from that country even if it's already extensively subcategorized for genre and length and other considerations, and even if that puts the category deeply over the "category is too large and needs some size control measures" bar, is not really the way forward, because that causes more problems than it solves (including the virtual impossibility of properly maintaining the largest ones because their out-of-control size makes it impossible to find all the entries that are missing from the parent and/or the subcategories — we need small and manageable categories for that, not 10,000-film megacategories.) Bearcat (talk) 19:10, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I mean 1980 in film had a general A-Z list which I restored. That's great that you support but if I'm going to restore them again ideally I need some sort of further support at WP:Film and multiple people watching them so if the IP comes back he is spotted that's all. WP Film seems to be much quieter than it used to be for discussions. I'll try bringing it up but doubt I'll get much of a response. ♦ Dr. Blofeld 12:14, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Prix Iris for Best Casting

added a link pointing to Richelieu (film)

Prix Iris for Best Documentary Film

added a link pointing to Joseph Ray

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:53, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ten years ago, you were found precious. That's what you are, always. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:49, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Elementary schools in Greater Sudbury indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:26, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:User max indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:48, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Historic buildings and structures in France has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. RevelationDirect (talk) 18:38, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please take a look at Libertarian Party of New Brunswick? It appears to have been written by someone associated with the party as a promotional device. Wellington Bay (talk) 03:26, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ha, thanks for that. I must have been on autopilot without noticing. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 14:02, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

My instinct to exclude this book from this category comes from my understanding of a phrase like “Māori literature” to align with something like: “But not everything expressed in words—even when organized and written down—is counted as literature. Those writings that are primarily informative—technical, scholarly, journalistic—would be excluded from the rank of literature by most, though not all, critics.” (from britannica) So I wonder whether the category needs a rename, because I suspect there are other non-fiction works previously excluded from it based on similar interpretations. It also currently carries the implication of Māori language literature, when, as far as I can see, all of the articles listed are about English language works, only with Māori cultural subject matter. — HTGS (talk) 04:35, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Wikipedia, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.

You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.

The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .

Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:21, 23 October 2024 (UTC) [reply]

The article Intrepid Records (Canada) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable record label. No coverage with sigcov. A search found only passing mentions.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JoeNMLC (talk) 13:23, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Crean Hill, Ontario has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 October 26 § Crean Hill, Ontario until a consensus is reached. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 21:18, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Disambig-Class Kerala articles of Low-importance indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:42, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

I noticed that you recently reverted my PROD tag on the Brent Blakley article. I wanted to ask if it's possible to create an article that relies on only one reference. As a new contributor, I’m looking to improve my edits and contribute more effectively. Any guidance would be appreciated.

Thank you! Rpgea (talk) 06:23, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please see Wikipedia:Orphan § On set indexes. Mach61 16:27, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Coe Hill has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NATFEAT. "Named natural features are often notable, provided information beyond statistics and coordinates is known to exist. [...] If a Wikipedia article cannot be developed using known sources, information on the feature can instead be included in a more general article on local geography. For example, a river island with no information available except name and location should probably be described in an article on the river". The rather small hill seems to be of little significance, with no hope of expanding it to an encyclopedic article.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]